On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Understand that aortic dissection involves the longitudinal separation of the aortic wall layers, typically initiated by an intimal tear or primary medial hemorrhage that creates a false lumen separate from the true lumen.
- •Classify the condition using the Stanford system: Type A involves the ascending aorta (regardless of the tear site) and requires emergent surgery, while Type B is distal to the left subclavian artery and is primarily managed medically unless complications arise.
- •Recognize the temporal phases of the disease: Hyperacute (within 24 hours), Acute (1–14 days), Subacute (15–90 days), and Chronic (beyond 90 days), noting that the acute phase carries the highest risk of spontaneous rupture.
- •Identify key risk factors, most notably chronic (associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk), bicuspid aortic valve, and genetic connective tissue disorders such as or Loeys-Dietz syndrome.
- •Be aware of the "AAS spectrum" which includes classic dissection, (IMH)—bleeding within the wall without a visible tear—and (PAU), which can progress to full dissection.
- •Note the emerging association with pharmacological triggers, specifically fluoroquinolones, which may induce collagen degradation and increase the risk of aortic events within 30 days of exposure.
Evaluation
- •Suspect aortic dissection in any patient presenting with sudden-onset, "tearing," "ripping," or "stabbing" chest or back pain that is maximal at its inception.
- •Ask about pain migration, as the movement of pain from the chest to the back or abdomen often tracks the distal propagation of the dissection flap.
- •Measure blood pressure in both arms simultaneously; a systolic blood pressure differential >20 mmHg is a classic sign of brachiocephalic or subclavian artery involvement.
- •Perform a thorough four-limb pulse exam to identify pulse deficits, which occur when the false lumen compresses the true lumen or the flap occludes branch vessels.
- •Auscultate for a new diastolic decrescendo murmur at the right sternal border, indicating acute due to aortic root dilation or leaflet prolapse.
- •Screen for neurological deficits, including hemiparesis or altered mental status (carotid involvement) and paraplegia (spinal cord ischemia from intercostal artery involvement).
- •Utilize the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) to categorize patients into low, intermediate, or high clinical suspicion based on predisposing factors and exam findings.
- •Order a D-dimer test for patients with low clinical suspicion (ADD-RS ≤ 1); a value <500 ng/mL has a high negative predictive value and can effectively rule out the diagnosis.
- •Obtain a 12-lead ECG to rule out primary , but remain vigilant as 10-20% of Type A dissections involve the coronary ostia (usually the RCA), causing ST-elevation.
- •Order (CTA) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis as the gold standard diagnostic test, providing nearly 99% sensitivity and specificity.
- •Perform bedside Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) in unstable patients to rapidly screen for pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, or severe aortic root dilation.
- •Consider Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) in the operating room or for patients with contraindications to CT contrast to visualize the intimal flap and valve function.
Management
- •Initiate "anti-impulse therapy" immediately upon suspicion to reduce the rate of ventricular contraction (dP/dt) and systemic wall stress.
- •Administer intravenous beta-blockers as first-line therapy; use Esmolol (500 mcg/kg bolus, then 50–200 mcg/kg/min) or Labetalol (20 mg IV bolus every 10 minutes) to achieve a target heart rate of ≤60 bpm.
- •Ensure heart rate is controlled before adding vasodilators to prevent reflex tachycardia, which can accelerate dissection propagation.
- •Target a systolic blood pressure between 100 and 120 mmHg; if BP remains elevated after beta-blockade, add Nitroprusside (0.25–10 mcg/kg/min) or Nicardipine (5–15 mg/hr).
- •Consult Cardiac Surgery emergently for all Stanford Type A dissections; these are surgical emergencies requiring replacement of the ascending aorta to prevent tamponade or rupture.
- •Transfer patients with Type A dissection to high-volume aortic centers, ideally using a "Direct-to-OR" protocol to bypass emergency department delays.
- •Manage uncomplicated Stanford Type B dissections in an ICU setting with aggressive medical therapy (BP and HR control) and serial imaging.
- •Perform (TEVAR) for "complicated" Type B dissections, defined by malperfusion, rupture, refractory pain, or rapid aortic expansion.
- •Prioritize endovascular reperfusion (stenting) in stable patients with malperfusion syndrome (e.g., mesenteric ischemia) before proceeding to open aortic repair.
- •Avoid the administration of thrombolytics or anticoagulants until dissection is definitively ruled out, as these agents can be fatal if a dissection is present.
- •Monitor for acute kidney injury (AKI) and maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP) to ensure spinal cord and visceral perfusion.
- •Implement long-term blood pressure control with a target of <120/80 mmHg using beta-blockers as the backbone of therapy to reduce the risk of late aneurysmal expansion.
- •Refer patients under age 60 for genetic counseling and screening of first-degree relatives to identify familial thoracic aortic aneurysm syndromes.
- •Advise patients to avoid heavy isometric lifting (e.g., weightlifting) and fluoroquinolone antibiotics, which may increase the risk of future aortic events.
Board Review — High Yield
- •Tearing/Ripping Pain — The classic description of pain that is maximal at onset, unlike the crescendo pain of MI.
- •BP Differential — A difference of >20 mmHg between arms suggests the dissection involves the aortic arch/subclavian artery.
- •Stanford Type A — Involves the ascending aorta; always a surgical emergency regardless of the entry tear location.
- •Fluoroquinolones — Black box warning: avoid in patients with aortic disease due to increased risk of dissection/rupture.
- •Cystic Medial Necrosis — The classic histopathological finding in the aortic media, especially in Marfan syndrome.
- •D-dimer — Useful only for its high negative predictive value (NPV) to rule out dissection in low-risk patients.
- •Beta-blockers before Vasodilators — Essential sequence to prevent reflex tachycardia and increased aortic wall shear stress.
- •1% to 2% per hour — The mortality rate of untreated acute Type A aortic dissection in the first 24-48 hours.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
Definition, Synonyms, and Classification
- ▸Aortic dissection is defined by the creation of a false lumen within the aortic media following an intimal tear.
- ▸The Stanford classification (Type A vs. B) is the primary driver for determining immediate surgical vs. medical management.
- ▸The acute phase is defined as the first 14 days, during which the risk of mortality is highest.
Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency defined by a tear in the aortic intima that allows blood to surge into the medial layer, creating a "false lumen" separate from the "true lumen" [6]D[12]D. This process results in the longitudinal separation of the aortic wall layers, which can lead to vessel rupture, organ malperfusion, or aortic valve insufficiency [12]D[25]D. Aortic dissection is the most prevalent manifestation of (AAS), a spectrum of conditions characterized by acute disruption of the aortic wall [6]D[22]D[28].
Synonyms and Related Terms
- Also Called: AD, dissecting hematoma, or dissecting aneurysm (though the latter is technically a misnomer as the vessel is not always aneurysmal).
- Related Conditions: (IMH) and (PAU) are closely related entities within the AAS spectrum [6]D[9]D.
Temporal Phases of Aortic Dissection
The classification of AD by duration is critical because the risk of complications and the mechanical properties of the aortic wall change over time [14]C[17]D.
- Hyperacute: Within the first 24 hours of symptom onset.
- Acute: From 1 to 14 days. This phase carries the highest risk of spontaneous rupture and mortality [14]C[28].
- Subacute: From 15 to 90 days. The aortic wall begins to thicken and fibrose during this period.
- Chronic: Beyond 90 days. Dissections in this phase are often characterized by stable false lumens but carry a long-term risk of aneurysmal expansion [23]D.
Anatomical Classification Systems
Clinicians use several systems to categorize AD based on the extent of involvement and the location of the primary entry tear. These systems are essential for determining whether a patient requires immediate surgical intervention or medical [7]D[8]D.
Stanford Classification
The Stanford system is the most widely used in clinical practice because it simplifies the decision-making process for surgical versus medical therapy [7]D[12]D.
- Type A: Involves the ascending aorta, regardless of the site of the primary tear. These cases are surgical emergencies due to the risk of aortic root involvement, coronary artery occlusion, or cardiac tamponade [7]D[13][19]D.
- Type B: Involves only the descending aorta, distal to the left subclavian artery. These are typically managed medically unless complications like malperfusion or rupture occur [8]D[13].
DeBakey Classification
The DeBakey system provides more anatomical detail regarding the extent of the dissection [8]D[16]D.
- Type I: Originates in the ascending aorta and propagates distally to include the arch and descending aorta [16]D[30].
- Type II: Confined strictly to the ascending aorta [16]D.
- Type III: Originates in the descending aorta and extends distally (IIIa is confined to the thoracic aorta; IIIb extends below the diaphragm) [8]D.
SVS/STS Classification
Introduced in 2020 by the Society for Vascular Surgery and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, this system focuses on the location of the Primary Intimomedial Tear (PIT) and the proximal and distal extent of the dissection [6]D[15]D. It addresses limitations in the Stanford system, such as "retrograde" Type A dissections where the tear is actually in the descending aorta but blood has tracked back into the ascending aorta (classified as SVS/STS Type B0) [15]D[19]D.
Advanced Scoring and Variants
Newer systems like the TEM Classification (Type, Entry, Malperfusion) have been proposed to improve risk stratification by incorporating the presence of malperfusion syndromes, which significantly impact mortality [12]D[29]. Additionally, the 301 Classification is used specifically for Type B dissections to predict the risk of aortic expansion after (TEVAR) based on the configuration of the true and false lumens [23]D.
| System | Category | Anatomical Involvement | Clinical Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | Type A | Ascending aorta involved | Immediate surgical repair [7]D[13] |
| Type B | Descending aorta only | Medical management or TEVAR [8]D[13] | |
| DeBakey | Type I | Ascending, arch, and descending | Extensive surgical/hybrid repair [16]D |
| Type II | Ascending aorta only | Surgical repair [16]D | |
| Type III | Descending aorta only | Medical or endovascular [8]D | |
| SVS/STS | Type A | PIT in ascending aorta | Surgical repair [15]D[19]D |
| Type B | PIT in descending aorta | Medical/TEVAR [15]D[19]D | |
| Type B0 | PIT in arch/descending with retrograde ascending involvement | Complex surgical decision [15]D[19]D |
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| T (Type) | Based on Stanford A or B [12]D |
| E (Entry) | Location of the primary entry tear (e.g., ascending, arch, descending) [12]D |
| M (Malperfusion) | Presence and site of organ ischemia (e.g., M0: none, M1: coronary, M2: CNS, M3: visceral) [12]D[29] |
Etiology and Triggering Factors
- ▸Hypertension is the leading etiological factor, increasing the risk of thoracic aortic dissection by 2.51-fold.
- ▸Fluoroquinolone use is associated with an increased risk of aortic events within 30 days of exposure due to collagen degradation.
- ▸Environmental thermal stress (cold exposure) acts as an acute trigger for Type A aortic dissection by increasing systemic vascular resistance.
The primary mechanism of aortic dissection involves an initial tear in the aortic intima or a primary medial hemorrhage that allows blood to propagate through the media, creating a false lumen [44]D. This process is driven by a complex interplay between chronic degenerative changes in the aortic wall and acute hemodynamic stressors that exceed the structural integrity of the vessel [42]C.
Hemodynamic and Cardiovascular Factors
Hypertension remains the most significant modifiable risk factor for (TAD), associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.51 [32]. Chronic elevation in blood pressure leads to increased wall tension and accelerated medial degeneration. The use of antihypertensives, particularly beta-blockers (HR 0.55) and ACE inhibitors or ARBs (HR 0.67), significantly reduces the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in these patients [32].
Beyond blood pressure, structural markers of vascular aging contribute to risk. Aortic and iliac calcifications serve as independent predictors of aortic events, including dissection and aneurysm rupture [38]. Furthermore, the atherosclerotic index of plasma (AIP) and the presence of atherosclerotic disease are linked to long-term adverse outcomes, particularly in patients with chronic dissection [46]D[47]D. Electrocardiographic markers, such as a P-wave duration >140 ms or the presence of flat T-waves, have also been identified as predictors of cardiovascular events, including aortic dissection, in high-risk populations [56]D[57]D.
Pharmacological Triggers
Recent epidemiological evidence has highlighted a significant association between the use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) and the development of aortic dissection or aneurysm [33][36].
- Mechanism: FQs are thought to induce collagen degradation within the aortic media by upregulating matrix metalloproteinases, thereby weakening the structural framework of the aorta [36].
- Risk Window: The risk of de novo aortic events is significantly elevated within 30 days of FQ exposure [36].
- Clinical Significance: Clinicians are advised to avoid FQs in patients with known aortic dilation or high-risk profiles unless no alternative therapy is available [33].
Metabolic and Endocrine Factors
Insulin resistance has emerged as a novel metabolic driver of aortic pathology. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, a surrogate marker for insulin resistance, is positively correlated with the incidence of aortic dissection and aneurysm [39]. Chronic hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia may promote vascular inflammation and oxidative stress, further compromising the aortic wall. Additionally, sex-based differences play a role; while men are more frequently affected, women presenting with acute aortic dissection (AAD) tend to be older and often present with more advanced disease or different clinical profiles [48]D[52]D.
Iatrogenic and Procedural Causes
Iatrogenic injury is a rare but critical cause of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).
- TAVI/TAVR: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) carries an ATAAD incidence of approximately 0.15% [55]D. These events typically occur periprocedurally due to mechanical trauma from catheters, wires, or the valve prosthesis itself [55]D.
- TEVAR Complications: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B dissection can lead to retrograde aortic dissection or intramural hematoma, particularly when revascularization of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is required [35].
- Residual Dissection: Patients who have undergone previous surgical repair for TAAD remain at risk for residual distal dissection, which may require subsequent open or endovascular reintervention [34].
Histopathological and Genetic Markers
Mucoid Extracellular Matrix Accumulation (MEMA) is a key histopathological marker of aortic fragility [42]C. MEMA involves the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans in the media, which disrupts the lamellar architecture and predisposes the aorta to spontaneous tearing, even in individuals without classic syndromic features like [42]C. Furthermore, an aortic diameter ≥4.0 cm is a critical threshold for increased surveillance, as the risk of dissection or rupture rises significantly as the diameter increases [50]D[52]D[59]D.
Environmental Triggers
Environmental factors, specifically cold exposure and thermal stress, have been identified as acute triggers for ATAAD [60]D.
- Mechanism: Exposure to cold temperatures and wind effects increases systemic vascular resistance and sympathetic tone, leading to acute spikes in blood pressure that may trigger an intimal tear in a vulnerable aorta [60]D.
- Temporal Association: Studies using distributed lag non-linear models show a short-term association between thermal stress and symptom onset within the preceding 2 weeks [60]D.
Protocol for Etiological Risk Assessment
Step 1 → Screen for Hemodynamic Stressors: Evaluate for chronic and acute triggers such as extreme physical exertion or recent cold exposure [32][60]D. Step 2 → Review Medication History: Specifically check for recent (within 30 days) use of fluoroquinolones [33][36]. Step 3 → Assess Structural Vulnerability: Review prior imaging for aortic diameter ≥4.0 cm, calcifications, or evidence of atherosclerosis [38][50]D. Step 4 → Evaluate Metabolic Profile: Calculate the TyG index to assess for underlying insulin resistance [39]. Step 5 → Identify Procedural Risks: Note any history of recent cardiac interventions such as TAVI or TEVAR [35][55]D.
| Cause | Category | Frequency/Risk | Associated Subtype | Key Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | Hemodynamic | HR 2.51 | Type A & B | [32] |
| Fluoroquinolones | Pharmacological | Elevated within 30 days | Type A & B | [33][36] |
| TAVI/TAVR | Iatrogenic | 0.15% incidence | Type A | [55]D |
| Cold Exposure | Environmental | Seasonal/Acute | Type A | [60]D |
| Insulin Resistance (TyG Index) | Metabolic | Variable | Type A & B | [39] |
| Aortic Calcification | Degenerative | Predictive of events | Type A & B | [38] |
| MEMA | Histopathological | Marker of fragility | Type A & B | [42]C |
| Aortic Diameter ≥4.0 cm | Structural | Threshold for risk | Type A & B | [50]D[52]D[59]D |
Pathophysiology
- ▸The rate of ventricular contraction (dP/dt) is the primary hemodynamic force driving the propagation of the dissection flap.
- ▸Macrophage-mediated inflammation and CMKLR-1 expression in smooth muscle cells are central to the molecular degradation of the aortic media.
- ▸Aortic growth of ≥5 mm/year is a critical threshold associated with high wall shear stress and increased risk of rupture.
The pathophysiology of aortic dissection (AD) involves a complex interplay between mechanical hemodynamic forces, structural wall degeneration, and a robust inflammatory response. The process is classically initiated by an intimal tear that allows pulsatile blood to penetrate the medial layer of the aortic wall, creating a false lumen (FL) [70]D[82]D. This separation of the aortic trilaminar wall can propagate longitudinally, leading to catastrophic complications such as rupture or end-organ malperfusion [70]D[74]D.
The Initial Insult and Hemodynamic Drivers
The primary driver of AD initiation and propagation is the rate of ventricular contraction (dP/dt), which represents the steepness of the systolic pressure surge [61]. Chronic is the most significant clinical risk factor, associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.51 for developing (TAD) [32]. and morning blood pressure surges further exacerbate wall stress, increasing the risk of acute events [78]D[80]D.
Step-by-Step Mechanism of Dissection Propagation:
- Triggering Event: Chronic hypertension [32] or genetic conditions like (BAV) [73]D cause cystic medial necrosis and weaken the aortic media.
- Intimal Disruption: An intimal tear occurs, often at sites of high wall shear stress (WSS) or near penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAU) [75]D[81]D.
- False Lumen Formation: Blood enters the media, creating a high-pressure FL that compresses the true lumen (TL) [82]D.
- Propagation: The dP/dt force drives the dissection flap distally or retrogradely [61][63].
- Secondary Complications: The FL may involve side branches, leading to nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) or coronary malperfusion [49]D[74]D[88]D.
Cellular and Molecular Pathogenesis
Emerging evidence highlights the role of cellular heterogeneity and immune activation in AD. The aortic wall consists of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), endothelial cells, immune cells, and fibroblasts, all of which contribute to disease progression [65]D.
- Macrophage Activation: Macrophage-mediated inflammation is critical for the initiation and progression of AD [70]D. These cells infiltrate the media, releasing proteolytic enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix.
- Smooth Muscle Cell (SMC) Remodeling: SMCs in the media layer express Chemokine-like receptor 1 (CMKLR-1), the binding site for chemerin [86]D. CMKLR-1 expression is linked to vascular remodeling and inflammation-induced wall weakening [86]D.
- Gut Microbiota Influence: Recent studies suggest a "gut-aorta axis," where a reduction in beneficial bacteria (e.g., Bifidobacterium) and an increase in harmful metabolites may predispose individuals to AD by modulating systemic inflammation [77]D.
Biomechanics and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Advanced imaging and CFD modeling have identified specific hemodynamic profiles that predict AD progression. High WSS and the oscillatory shear index (OSI) are associated with rapid aortic growth (defined as ≥5 mm/year) [83]D. In patients who have undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), CFD can predict complications like distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) by analyzing wall pressure and flow velocity [79]D[83]D.
Susceptibility and Genetic Factors
Susceptibility to AD is not uniform. Patients with BAV are at significantly higher risk due to inherent aortopathy, even when aortic diameters are below traditional surgical thresholds [73]D. Immunogenetic factors and epigenetic modifications also induce cellular heterogeneity, making some patients more prone to medial degeneration than others [65]D.
| Mediator/Factor | Mechanism of Action | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| dP/dt | Rate of systolic pressure rise | Primary driver of flap propagation [61] |
| Hypertension | Chronic mechanical wall stress | HR 2.51 for TAD development [32] |
| Macrophages | Proteolytic matrix degradation | Critical for disease initiation and progression [70]D |
| CMKLR-1 | Chemerin-binding G-protein receptor | Expressed in SMCs; linked to vascular remodeling [86]D |
| Wall Shear Stress | Frictional force of blood flow | Predicts rapid aortic growth (≥5 mm/year) [83]D |
| Bifidobacterium | Gut microbiota metabolite regulation | Reduction linked to increased AD susceptibility [77]D |
Clinical Features
- ▸Aortic dissection pain is typically maximal at onset and may migrate as the dissection propagates distally.
- ▸A systolic blood pressure differential >20 mmHg between arms or pulse deficits are high-yield physical exam findings for branch vessel involvement.
- ▸Intramural hematoma (IMH) is a distinct variant often seen in older, female patients with a lower incidence of aortic insufficiency compared to classic dissection.
The clinical presentation of (AD) is notoriously heterogeneous, often earning it the moniker of the "great masquerader." A high index of clinical suspicion is required, as delayed diagnosis is a significant contributor to the high early mortality rate associated with acute aortic syndromes [92]. The presentation typically reflects the anatomical extent of the dissection, the involvement of branch vessels (malperfusion), and the presence of secondary complications such as or cardiac tamponade.
Presenting Symptoms
The hallmark of acute aortic dissection is the sudden onset of severe pain, often described as "tearing," "ripping," or "sharp." Unlike the crescendo pain of , AD pain is typically maximal at its inception [92].
- Pain Location: The site of pain often correlates with the segment of the aorta involved. Anterior chest pain is more common in Stanford Type A (ascending) dissections, while back or abdominal pain suggests Stanford Type B (descending) involvement.
- Pain Migration: As the dissection flap propagates distally, patients may report the pain "moving" from the chest to the back or abdomen.
- Associated Risk Factors: is the most significant predisposing factor, associated with a hazard ratio of 2.51 for developing [32]. Clinicians should specifically screen for a history of [78]D, morning hypertension surges [80]D, or high peak nocturnal blood pressure [103]D, all of which are linked to increased cardiovascular event rates. Additionally, a high (BMI) is associated with increased perioperative mortality in acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) [91], [101]D.
Physical Examination Protocol
A systematic physical examination is essential for identifying signs of malperfusion and hemodynamic instability. The following protocol should be implemented for any patient with suspected AD:
- Bilateral Blood Pressure Measurement: Obtain blood pressure in both arms. A systolic blood pressure (SBP) differential >20 mmHg between arms is a classic sign of subclavian artery involvement by the dissection flap.
- Four-Limb Pulse Palpation: Assess the radial, femoral, and dorsalis pedis pulses. Pulse deficits (absent or diminished pulses) occur when the false lumen compresses the true lumen or the dissection flap directly occludes a branch vessel [82]D.
- Cardiac Auscultation: Listen for a new diastolic decrescendo murmur at the right sternal border, indicating acute (AI). AI occurs in approximately 25% of classic ATAAD cases due to aortic root dilation or leaflet prolapse [107]D.
- Neurological Screening: Perform a rapid assessment for focal deficits. Acute occurs in approximately 8.3% of ATAAD patients due to carotid artery involvement [107]D.
- Assessment for Tamponade: Evaluate for Beck’s triad (hypotension, jugular venous distension, and muffled heart sounds), which indicates rupture into the pericardial sac.
Neurological Examination Findings
Neurological symptoms in AD result from malperfusion of the central or peripheral nervous system. These findings are often dynamic as the dissection flap fluctuates.
- Cerebral: Hemiparesis or altered mental status may indicate carotid artery dissection. Intraoperative monitoring using cerebral oximetry has shown that maintaining adequate cerebral perfusion is critical to preventing postoperative delirium [62].
- Spinal: Paraplegia or sensory levels may occur if the dissection involves the intercostal or lumbar arteries, leading to spinal cord ischemia.
- Peripheral: Ischemic neuropathy may present as sudden limb pain, weakness, or paresthesia in the setting of a cold, pulseless extremity.
Phenotypic Variants
Not all aortic dissections present with a classic intimal flap. The clinical features may vary based on the specific subtype of acute aortic syndrome.
| Variant | Key Features | Frequency/Demographics |
|---|---|---|
| Classic Aortic Dissection | Presence of a true and false lumen separated by an intimal flap; high risk of AI (25%) [107]D. | Most common; associated with severe hypertension [32]. |
| Intramural Hematoma (IMH) | Hemorrhage within the aortic wall without a visible intimal tear; patients are often older (65 vs 59 years) and more likely female (45% vs 32%) [107]D. | ~10-20% of acute aortic syndromes; lower incidence of malperfusion (8.5%) [107]D. |
| Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer (PAU) | Ulceration of an atherosclerotic plaque through the internal elastic lamina; high risk of progression to dissection or rupture [81]D. | Typically occurs in elderly patients with extensive atherosclerosis. |
Red Flags
Certain findings necessitate immediate surgical consultation and intensive care stabilization:
- Hemodynamic Instability: Hypotension in the setting of AD suggests cardiac tamponade, aortic rupture, or severe AI.
- Neurological Deficits: New-onset stroke or paraplegia indicates critical branch vessel occlusion.
- Visceral Malperfusion: Severe abdominal pain out of proportion to the exam may indicate mesenteric ischemia.
- Refractory Pain: Persistent pain despite aggressive blood pressure and heart rate control suggests ongoing dissection propagation [90].
Atypical Presentations
Clinicians must remain vigilant for atypical features that lead to diagnostic delay [92]:
- Sex-Specific Differences: Women often present later and may experience ATAAD at smaller aortic diameters than men, potentially falling below traditional guideline thresholds for prophylactic repair [96]D.
- Painless Dissection: A small percentage of patients present without pain, instead manifesting with secondary complications like syncope, heart failure, or stroke.
- Isolated Abdominal Pain: Stanford Type B dissections may mimic renal colic or acute abdomen if the dissection involves the renal or mesenteric arteries.
| Feature | Classic ATAAD | Intramural Hematoma (IMH) |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Age | 59 years | 65 years |
| Female Gender | 32% | 45% |
| Aortic Insufficiency | 25% | 5% |
| Malperfusion Syndrome | 19% | 8.5% |
| Acute Stroke | 8.3% | 2.8% |
| Acute Renal Failure | 13% | 5.7% |
Clinical Features and Variants
- ▸Aortic Dissection can present atypically as a seizure or myocardial infarction, leading to dangerous delays in diagnosis [116, 127].
- ▸The Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) combined with D-dimer testing is a validated strategy to risk-stratify patients and reduce unnecessary imaging in low-risk cases [117, 123].
- ▸Intramural Hematoma (IMH) and Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer (PAU) are dynamic variants that frequently progress to classic dissection or rupture [109, 120].
Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS) represents a spectrum of life-threatening conditions characterized by the disruption of the aortic wall layers. This spectrum includes classic Aortic Dissection (AD), (IMH), and (PAU) [108][109]. Understanding the clinical nuances of these variants is critical, as their presentation often overlaps with more common conditions like myocardial infarction or stroke, leading to fatal diagnostic delays [127]D.
Presenting Symptoms
The hallmark of acute aortic dissection is the sudden onset of intense thoracic pain, frequently described by patients as "tearing," "ripping," or "stabbing" [116]C. Unlike the gradual crescendo of anginal pain, AAS pain is typically maximal at its inception. The location of the pain often correlates with the site of the initial tear: anterior chest pain suggests involvement of the ascending aorta (Stanford Type A), while interscapular or back pain is more common in descending aortic involvement (Stanford Type B) [116]C[120]D.
A key diagnostic clue is the migratory nature of the pain, which follows the path of the dissection as it propagates distally along the vessel [116]C. However, clinicians must remain vigilant for "painless" presentations, particularly in PAU or IMH, where symptoms may be more subtle or entirely absent until a complication like rupture occurs [109].
Neurological Examination Findings
Neurological deficits occur when the dissection flap or hematoma occludes the ostia of major supra-aortic branches, leading to malperfusion [118]D[124]D. A thorough neurological exam is mandatory for any patient with suspected AAS.
- Cerebral Malperfusion: Patients may present with symptoms, such as hemiparesis or aphasia, if the brachiocephalic or left common carotid arteries are involved [116]C[124]D.
- Altered Consciousness: Syncope or sudden loss of consciousness may result from carotid occlusion, profound hypotension, or cardiac tamponade [116]C[121]D.
- Seizures: In rare cases, AAS can present as new-onset tonic-clonic seizures, which may mask the underlying aortic pathology and lead to inappropriate neurological workups [116]C.
- Spinal Cord Ischemia: Propagation into the intercostal or lumbar arteries can cause paraplegia due to spinal cord malperfusion [35].
Phenotypic Variants
The clinical behavior of AAS depends heavily on the specific pathological variant. While they share a common risk of rupture, their mechanisms of wall disruption differ.
| Variant | Pathophysiological Mechanism | Key Clinical Features | Frequency (Approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic Aortic Dissection (AD) | Tear in the tunica intima leading to a false lumen within the media [108]. | Sudden tearing pain; pulse deficits; migratory symptoms [116]C. | 70–80% of AAS |
| Intramural Hematoma (IMH) | Hemorrhage within the media without a visible intimal tear, often from vasa vasorum rupture [120]D. | Similar to AD but often in older, more hypertensive patients; high risk of progression to AD [120]D[132]D. | 10–25% of AAS |
| Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer (PAU) | Ulceration through the internal elastic lamina into the media [109]. | Often asymptomatic; localized back pain; associated with extensive atherosclerosis [109][81]D. | 2–7% of AAS |
| Iatrogenic Dissection | Dissection caused by catheters or wires during hemodynamic procedures [68]C. | Occurs during or immediately after intervention; different entry flap angles compared to spontaneous AD [68]C. | Increasing incidence |
Red Flags
Certain clinical findings indicate an immediate threat to life and necessitate rapid surgical or endovascular consultation [121]D.
- Hemodynamic Instability: Hypotension or shock may indicate cardiac tamponade, severe , or aortic rupture [121]D.
- Pulse Deficits: Absence or weakening of the radial, carotid, or femoral pulses suggests branch vessel occlusion and impending organ malperfusion [117]D.
- Respiratory Compromise: May occur due to compression of the tracheobronchial tree by a massive aneurysm or pleural effusion from a leaking aorta [108].
- Perioperative Cardiac Arrest: AAS is a significant cause of sudden cardiac arrest in emergency surgical settings, carrying a very high mortality rate [111].
Atypical Presentations
AAS is frequently misdiagnosed because it can mimic other emergencies.
- The Myocardial Infarction Mimic: Up to 20% of AAS cases may show ischemic ECG changes (ST-segment elevation or depression) if the dissection involves the coronary ostia (most commonly the right coronary artery) [127]D. This often leads to the administration of anticoagulants or thrombolytics, which can be fatal in the setting of a dissection [127]D.
- Asymptomatic PAU: Many penetrating ulcers are discovered incidentally on imaging for unrelated conditions. Despite the lack of symptoms, these require close surveillance as they can progress to rupture or IMH [109][132]D.
Protocol for Clinical Risk Stratification
To avoid missing the diagnosis, clinicians should follow a structured assessment protocol using the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) [110][117]D.
- Step 1: Identify High-Risk Conditions: Assess for , family history of aortic disease, known aortic aneurysm, or recent aortic manipulation [117]D.
- Step 2: Assess Pain Features: Determine if the pain was sudden in onset, severe in intensity, or tearing/ripping in quality [116]C.
- Step 3: Physical Examination: Check for bilateral blood pressure differentials (>20 mmHg), pulse deficits, or a new murmur of aortic insufficiency [117]D[123]D.
- Step 4: Integrate Biomarkers: In patients with a low-to-intermediate clinical suspicion (ADD-RS ≤ 1), a D-dimer < 500 ng/mL has a high negative predictive value and may be used to rule out AAS without immediate (CTA) [117]D[123]D.
Differential Diagnosis
- ▸Aortic dissection is frequently misdiagnosed as ACS when ischemic ECG changes or elevated troponins are present due to coronary malperfusion.
- ▸Sudden-onset, migrating pain is the hallmark of AD, whereas ACS pain is typically static and pressure-like.
- ▸CTA remains the diagnostic gold standard, but IVUS is a critical adjunctive tool when coronary angiography shows non-obstructive but 'hazy' lesions.
The differential diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (AD) is broad, as it frequently mimics more common conditions such as Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), Pulmonary Embolism (PE), and musculoskeletal disorders [139]C[154]D. Because AD is a time-sensitive emergency with high mortality, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion, particularly when patients present with the "chest pain triad" [154]D[155]D. Differentiation is complicated by the fact that AD can cause secondary complications, such as myocardial infarction (MI) via coronary malperfusion, which may lead to a missed diagnosis of the underlying dissection [127]D[145]D.
Diagnostic Criteria for Differentiation
Distinguishing AD from its mimics requires evaluating the quality, onset, and radiation of pain. While ACS typically presents with pressure-like substernal pain, AD is characterized by sudden-onset, "tearing" or "ripping" pain that may migrate as the dissection progresses [139]C.
- Stanford Type A: Often mimics ACS due to involvement of the ascending aorta and potential coronary ostial compromise [145]D[150]D.
- Stanford Type B: More likely to mimic renal colic or musculoskeletal back pain due to descending aortic involvement [139]C.
- Pulmonary Embolism: Suggested by sudden dyspnea and hypoxia, though AD can present similarly if a pseudoaneurysm compresses the pulmonary artery [143]C.
Laboratory Tests in the Differential
Laboratory evaluation is used primarily to rule in or out competing diagnoses, though specific biomarkers for AD are emerging.
- Troponin (I or T): Elevated in ACS, but also elevated in 10.8% of Type A AD cases due to coronary malperfusion [145]D. A positive troponin in the presence of tearing chest pain should not rule out AD [127]D.
- D-dimer: Highly sensitive for both PE and AD. A low D-dimer (<500 ng/mL) has high negative predictive value for AD, but its specificity is low [155]D.
- Peripheral Leukocyte mRNA: Recent studies have identified differentially expressed mRNAs in peripheral leukocytes that may distinguish Stanford Type A AD from ACS and healthy controls with high accuracy [151]D.
- ANCA Titers: In patients with systemic symptoms and rapidly progressive vascular lesions, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing may reveal underlying vasculitis, which can predispose to or mimic AD [140]C.
Imaging Modalities
Imaging is the definitive method for differentiating AD from other acute thoracic syndromes.
- Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA): The gold standard for AD, providing a sensitivity and specificity near 99%. It can simultaneously evaluate for PE and some features of ACS [154]D.
- CT-FFR: Fractional flow reserve derived from CT (CT-FFR) is an emerging tool to predict myocardial ischemia in Type A AD patients, helping to determine if coronary involvement is functionally significant [147]D.
- Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS): Crucial when coronary angiography is "hazy" or inconclusive. IVUS can identify a widened hypoechoic space in the aortic root, confirming dissection that was missed on initial angiography [142]C.
- Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE): Useful for rapid bedside screening for pericardial effusion or aortic root dilation, though it lacks the sensitivity of CTA for the descending aorta [135].
Electrodiagnostic Studies
ECG interpretation is a common source of diagnostic error in AD.
- Ischemic Changes: Up to 24.3% of Type A AD patients may show ECG evidence of ischemia [147]D. ST-segment elevation is particularly dangerous as it may lead to the administration of thrombolytics or anticoagulants, which are contraindicated in AD [127]D[152]D.
- Flat T-waves: Defined as amplitude <0.1 mV in leads I, II, aVL, or V4-V6, flat T-waves are associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events, including AD [57]D.
- Normal ECG: A completely normal ECG in a patient with severe, refractory chest pain should increase the suspicion for AD over ACS [146]D.
Diagnostic Algorithm for Acute Chest Pain
To minimize misdiagnosis, clinicians should follow a structured approach to differentiate AD from ACS and PE:
- Step 1: Clinical Risk Assessment: Evaluate for sudden-onset tearing pain, pulse deficits, or new aortic insufficiency murmurs. Note seasonality; AD admissions peak in winter [144]D.
- Step 2: Immediate ECG and Biomarkers: Obtain a 12-lead ECG and troponin. If ST-elevation is present, consider AD if the pain is atypical or if there is a history of [141]C.
- Step 3: D-dimer Screening: If clinical suspicion is low-to-moderate, a negative D-dimer may help rule out AD and PE [155]D.
- Step 4: Definitive Imaging: If suspicion remains or biomarkers are inconclusive, proceed to CTA of the chest and abdomen. If the patient is unstable, consider transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) [135][154]D.
- Step 5: Specialized Evaluation: In cases of suspected coronary malperfusion, use IVUS or CT-FFR to assess the extent of ostial involvement before surgical repair [142]C[147]D.
| Feature | Aortic Dissection (AD) | Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) | Pulmonary Embolism (PE) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain Quality | Sudden, tearing, ripping, migrating [139]C | Gradual or sudden, pressure, heaviness [152]D | Pleuritic, sudden onset [143]C |
| ECG Findings | Normal (common) or ischemic changes [127]D | ST-elevation or T-wave inversion [146]D | Non-specific ST-T changes or S1Q3T3 |
| Biomarkers | Elevated D-dimer; Troponin (+) in 10% [145]D | Elevated Troponin I/T [152]D | Elevated D-dimer; Elevated BNP [135] |
| Imaging Choice | CTA Chest/Abdomen [154]D | Coronary Angiography [138] | CT Pulmonary Angiography [143]C |
| Key Risk Factor | Hypertension, Marfan syndrome [80]D[141]C | Hyperlipidemia, Smoking [140]C | Immobilization, Malignancy [144]D |
Management of Aortic Dissection
- ▸Anti-impulse therapy must target a heart rate of **≤60 bpm** and SBP of **100-120 mmHg** to prevent dissection propagation [61].
- ▸Stanford Type A dissection requires emergent surgical repair, ideally facilitated by a Direct Bypass Protocol to minimize delays [121].
- ▸TEVAR is the primary intervention for complicated Type B dissection, with LSA preservation techniques significantly reducing stroke risk [165].
The of acute aortic dissection (AD) is a clinical exigency requiring simultaneous stabilization and definitive intervention. The primary goal is to limit the propagation of the dissection by reducing the shear stress on the aortic wall, followed by anatomical repair based on the Stanford classification [61][121]D.
Step 1: Initial Assessment and Severity Classification
Immediate management begins with rapid classification into Stanford Type A (involving the ascending aorta) or Type B (involving only the descending aorta).
- Stanford Type A (ATAAD): This is a surgical emergency with a high mortality rate [61]. Patients should be transferred immediately to a high-volume aortic center. Implementation of a Direct Bypass Protocol (DBP), which allows patients to bypass the emergency department and proceed directly to the operating suite, has been shown to significantly improve surgical outcomes for referred patients [121]D.
- Stanford Type B (TBAD): These patients are typically managed in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or Intermediate Care (IMC) setting [64]. While uncomplicated TBAD may be managed medically, complicated cases (e.g., malperfusion, rupture, or refractory pain) require urgent (TEVAR) [166]D[175]D.
Step 2: Anti-Impulse Therapy
The cornerstone of preoperative and medical management is anti-impulse therapy. The physiological objective is to reduce the rate of ventricular contraction (dP/dt), heart rate (HR), and systemic blood pressure (BP) to minimize aortic wall stress [61].
- Heart Rate Control: Administer intravenous beta-blockers (e.g., Esmolol 500 mcg/kg bolus, then 50-200 mcg/kg/min) to achieve a target HR of ≤60 bpm [61]. Beta-blockade must precede any vasodilatory therapy to prevent reflex tachycardia, which increases dP/dt and risks dissection extension.
- Blood Pressure Control: Once HR is controlled, target a systolic blood pressure (SBP) between 100 and 120 mmHg. If SBP remains elevated, add intravenous vasodilators such as Nitroprusside (0.25–10 mcg/kg/min) [64].
Step 3: Definitive Surgical Intervention (Type A)
For ATAAD, the gold standard is emergent open surgical repair. This typically involves replacement of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch.
- Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET): For dissections involving the arch, the FET technique (e.g., using the Evita Neo EDE hybrid device) allows for total arch replacement and provides a stable landing zone for future distal repairs [177]C[178]C. FET promotes true lumen expansion and aortic remodeling but carries a risk of postoperative false lumen (FL) thrombosis, which may acutely obstruct branch vessels like the superior mesenteric artery [179]C.
- Hybrid Approaches: In high-risk patients or secondary dissections after prior TEVAR, the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS) can be used as an adjunctive technology to facilitate favorable remodeling [176]C.
Step 4: Endovascular Management (Type B and Residual Dissection)
TEVAR is the preferred treatment for complicated TBAD and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAU) [109][166]D.
- Landing Zone Selection: The quality of the proximal landing zone is critical; placing the endograft within a healthy aorta (Zone 0-2) is associated with better long-term outcomes than landing in a diseased segment [168]D.
- Branch Management: Preservation of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is often required to maintain vertebrobasilar perfusion. Techniques include the use of dedicated single-branch platforms (e.g., Castor/Cratos or Gore TAG TBE) or chimney stenting [159][163]D[164]D. Reconstructing the LSA with a Castor stent has been shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction compared to partial LSA coverage [165]D.
Step 5: Monitoring and Management of Complications
Post-procedural care focuses on monitoring for treatment failure and promoting aortic remodeling.
- False Lumen Management: In chronic AD with retrograde FL perfusion, techniques like the Modified Candy Plug or the Knickerbocker technique (selective FL disruption) are used to induce FL thrombosis and prevent rupture [162]D[173]D.
- Distal Aortic Expansion (DAE): Patients must be monitored for DAE after TEVAR. Risk factors for expansion include a larger initial aortic diameter and persistent FL patency [133].
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): In cases of postcardiotomy following ATAAD repair, veno-arterial ECMO may be used, though it is associated with a high in-hospital mortality rate of 72.4% [158].
| Drug | Initial Dose | Route | Mechanism | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esmolol | 500 mcg/kg bolus | IV | Ultra-short acting β1-blocker; reduces dP/dt | 2b [61] |
| Labetalol | 20 mg bolus every 10 min | IV | Combined α/β-blocker; reduces HR and SBP | 2b [64] |
| Nitroprusside | 0.25–10 mcg/kg/min | IV | Vasodilator; use ONLY after HR is controlled | 2b [64] |
| Nicardipine | 5 mg/hr (titrate to 15) | IV | Calcium channel blocker; alternative for BP | 2b [64] |
Supportive Care and Complication Management
- ▸In stable ATAAD with malperfusion, an endovascular-first reperfusion strategy followed by delayed open repair may improve survival by stabilizing organ function before major surgery.
- ▸Intraoperative hypotension during cardiopulmonary bypass is a significant risk factor for postoperative lung injury and must be aggressively avoided.
- ▸The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (aPRP) is an effective blood conservation strategy that reduces allogeneic transfusion requirements in complex aortic repairs.
The of acute aortic syndromes, particularly (ATAAD) and (TBAD), extends far beyond the initial surgical or endovascular repair. Postoperative care is characterized by a high incidence of multi-organ dysfunction, including malperfusion syndromes (MPS), acute kidney injury (AKI), and respiratory failure [158][45][189]D. Effective supportive care requires a multidisciplinary approach focused on hemodynamic stability, organ preservation, and the mitigation of systemic inflammatory responses triggered by both the dissection and the subsequent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [181].
Step 1: Management of Malperfusion Syndrome (MPS)
Malperfusion occurs in approximately 15.6% of ATAAD cases and is associated with a significantly higher hospital mortality rate of 37.2% compared to those without MPS [184]D.
- Assess Hemodynamic Stability: Determine if the patient is stable or exhibits signs of aortic rupture or tamponade.
- Prioritize Reperfusion in Stable Patients: In hemodynamically stable patients with MPS, perform endovascular reperfusion (aortic or mesenteric branch stenting) first, followed by delayed open aortic repair [184]D. This "reperfusion-first" strategy aims to resolve organ ischemia before the physiological stress of major cardiac surgery, potentially reducing mortality associated with organ failure [184]D.
- Neurological Evaluation: For cerebral malperfusion, evaluate the lateral ventricular volume ratio (LVR) on preoperative CT. An LVR > 1.0 (asymmetry) is a predictor of poor postoperative neurological outcomes, reflecting significant cerebral edema or infarction [185]D.
Step 2: Spinal Cord and Neurological Protection
Neurological complications, including stroke and spinal cord ischemia (SCI), are primary concerns during both open and endovascular repairs [35][171]D.
- Left Subclavian Artery (LSA) Revascularization: During thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for TBAD, coverage of the LSA increases the risk of stroke and paraplegia. Utilize in situ laser fenestration for LSA revascularization to maintain posterior cerebral and spinal cord perfusion [35]. Multicenter data indicates this is a safe and effective method for preserving LSA flow in both urgent and elective settings [35].
- Blood Pressure Management: Maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP) to ensure spinal cord perfusion. Avoid intraoperative arterial hypotension during CPB, as it is strongly associated with postoperative lung injury and potentially reduced collateral flow to the cord [181].
Step 3: Postoperative Respiratory Management and ARDS Prevention
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and prolonged mechanical ventilation are common due to systemic inflammation and surgical trauma [45][51]D.
- Hemodynamic Optimization: Maintain stable pressures during CPB. Intraoperative hypotension is a known risk factor for postoperative lung injury (PLI) [181].
- Weaning Protocol: ATAAD patients face unique weaning challenges. Predictors of weaning success include younger age, lower BMI, and shorter CPB times [45]. Implement a structured weaning protocol that accounts for the high risk of weaning failure in this population [45].
- ARDS Prediction: Utilize predictive models based on the 2023 global definition to identify patients at high risk for ARDS early in the postoperative course [51]D.
Step 4: Renal Protection and Fluid Management
Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a major driver of mortality, particularly in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [158][189]D.
- Early Identification: AKI is a frequent complication after total aortic arch replacement (TAAR). Preoperative serum Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning may offer a novel method for early identification of patients at risk for AKI [189]D.
- Fluid Balance: Use balanced crystalloids to maintain euvolemia while avoiding hyperchloremic acidosis. In patients with postcardiotomy , veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) may be required, though it is associated with a high in-hospital mortality of 72.4% and a high rate of AKI requiring CRRT [158].
Step 5: Blood Conservation and Coagulopathy Management
Extensive aortic surgery often leads to profound coagulopathy due to hypothermia, long CPB times, and consumption of clotting factors [180].
- Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (aPRP): Administer intraoperative aPRP to improve blood conservation. Meta-analysis of 2,150 patients suggests that aPRP reduces the volume of allogeneic blood product transfusions and may decrease the need for reoperation due to bleeding [180].
- Cannulation Strategy: Consider central aortic cannulation as a primary strategy. Compared to axillary cannulation, central cannulation is associated with shorter total operative times (280.14 min vs 321 min) and may reduce the complexity of the procedure [187]D.
| Intervention | Indication | Key Outcome/Benefit | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| aPRP | Intraoperative coagulopathy | Reduced allogeneic transfusion volume [180] | 2a |
| In situ Laser Fenestration | LSA coverage during TEVAR | Preservation of LSA flow; reduced MAE [35] | 2b |
| VA-ECMO | Postcardiotomy shock | Weaning rate 48.3%; high mortality (72.4%) [158] | 2a |
| Central Cannulation | ATAAD surgical access | Shorter operative time (280 vs 321 min) [187]D | 5 |
| Delayed Open Repair | Stable ATAAD with MPS | Reperfusion of ischemic organs first [184]D | 5 |
Landmark Trials and Key Evidence
- ▸The IRAD registry has demonstrated that over 50% of Type A dissections occur at aortic diameters below the traditional 5.5 cm surgical threshold.
- ▸Women with acute aortic dissection present later, are older, and face 40% higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to men.
- ▸Management of Type B dissection has shifted toward TEVAR, which now accounts for nearly 40% of cases in contemporary registry data.
The evidence base for the of acute aortic dissection (AAD) has been fundamentally shaped by large-scale multicenter registries, most notably the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Established in 1996, IRAD has provided longitudinal data on over 11,000 patients across 63 centers in 15 countries, shifting the clinical paradigm from anecdotal case reports to evidence-based protocols [198]D[202]D. This section details the landmark findings that have defined contemporary diagnostic thresholds, surgical techniques, and prognostic models.
The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)
As the primary evidence backbone for AAD, IRAD has demonstrated that while the clinical presentation of AAD remains relatively stable, management strategies have evolved significantly over 25 years [198]D.
- Design: Prospective/Retrospective multicenter observational registry.
- Population: Patients with confirmed acute Stanford Type A (TAAAD) or Type B (TBAAD) aortic dissection.
- Key Result: In-hospital mortality for TAAAD has decreased over time due to improved surgical techniques and faster diagnosis, though it remains high at approximately 16.1% to 19.7% [209]D[213]D. For TBAAD, there has been a significant shift toward endovascular management [205]D.
- Clinical Impact: IRAD data established that the classic "1% to 2% mortality per hour" for TAAAD remains a relevant clinical concern, emphasizing the need for rapid surgical referral [209]D.
Temporal Trends in Type B Management
Evidence from IRAD quartiles (1996–2022) reveals a dramatic shift in the management of TBAAD. The use of (TEVAR) increased from 19.1% to 37.2%, while isolated medical therapy decreased from 65.7% to 54.0% [205]D. This transition is driven by evidence that TEVAR improves outcomes in complicated TBAAD, with overall in-hospital mortality for TBAAD decreasing from 10.7% to 6.1% over the study period [205]D. However, TEVAR is not without risk; registry data indicates a periprocedural neurological event rate (stroke or spinal cord ischemia) of approximately 9.4% in TBAAD patients [212]D.
The Aortic Diameter Paradox
Clinical guidelines historically utilized a 5.5 cm maximal aortic diameter (MAD) as the threshold for elective surgical intervention. However, IRAD data has challenged this "5.5 cm rule."
- Evidence: Analysis of 667 TAAAD patients found that >50% of dissections occurred at a MAD of <5.5 cm [211]D.
- Mechanism: Root dilation appears more "malignant" than supracoronary ascending aortic dilation, with root-involved dissections occurring at smaller diameters [215]D.
- Clinical Reasoning: Clinicians must recognize that a "normal" or only mildly dilated aorta does not rule out the risk of acute dissection, particularly in patients with or genetic predispositions [211]D.
Sex and Age-Related Disparities
Registry data has identified significant disparities in presentation and outcomes based on sex and age.
- Sex Disparities: Women represent approximately one-third of AAD cases but are typically older at presentation (median age 65.4 vs 58.6 years) [48]D[217]D. Women often present with more advanced symptoms and have 40% higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to men [201]D. They are also more likely to present with or complete false lumen thrombosis [217]D.
- Age Considerations: In patients aged >70 years, surgical mortality for TAAAD is higher than in younger cohorts but remains significantly lower than medical management (15.8% vs 55.2% for septuagenarians) [213]D. Even in octogenarians, surgery offers a survival benefit over medical therapy, although the benefit-to-risk ratio must be carefully weighed [213]D.
Malperfusion Syndromes and Complications
Malperfusion (coronary, mesenteric, renal, or cerebral) is a critical determinant of mortality.
- Mesenteric Malperfusion: This remains the most lethal complication, with systematic reviews showing high in-hospital mortality regardless of whether surgical or endovascular revascularization is pursued [194].
- Cardiac Tamponade: Preoperative occurs in approximately 18.7% of TAAAD cases and is a major predictor of mortality [197]D.
- Acute Kidney Injury (AKI): Postoperative AKI occurs in 23% of TAAAD surgical patients and is associated with significantly worse long-term survival [206]D. Similarly, AKI is common after TEVAR for TBAAD, often related to contrast load and baseline renal function [203]D.
Surgical Logistics and Scoring Systems
Recent evidence emphasizes the "systems of care" approach to AAD. The implementation of Direct-to-Operating Room (DOR) transfer programs has been shown to reduce the time from hospital arrival to skin incision by an average of 82 minutes, significantly improving the chances of survival for TAAAD patients [204]D.
To assist in risk stratification, several mortality scores have been developed. A multicenter validation study of 1,895 patients compared four scores, finding that the German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (GERAADA) score provided reliable discrimination for 30-day mortality following TAAAD repair [200]D.
Cannulation and Operative Strategy
The choice of arterial cannulation site during TAAAD repair (axillary vs. femoral) remains a point of clinical debate. IRAD interventional cohort data (n=2,145) compared these strategies:
- Axillary Cannulation: Used in 52% of cases; preferred for facilitating antegrade cerebral perfusion [106]D.
- Femoral Cannulation: Used in 48% of cases; often faster in hemodynamically unstable patients [106]D.
- Outcome: While both are viable, axillary cannulation is increasingly favored in specialized centers to mitigate the risk of retrograde embolization and stroke [106]D.
| Study/Registry | N | Key Findings | Clinical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRAD (25-Year Trend) [198]D | 11,000+ | Mortality for TAAAD decreased (25% to 18%); TBAAD management shifted to TEVAR. | Established global standards for AAD epidemiology and outcomes. |
| IRAD Diameter Study [211]D | 667 | 59% of TAAAD patients had a maximal diameter <5.5 cm; 40% were <5.0 cm. | Challenged the reliance on size alone for dissection risk assessment. |
| DOR Transfer Program [204]D | 126 | Reduced transfer-to-OR time by 82 minutes (1.93h vs 3.30h). | Demonstrated that logistical protocols directly reduce time-to-intervention. |
| GERAADA Validation [200]D | 1,895 | Validated the GERAADA score for predicting 30-day mortality in TAAAD. | Provided a reliable tool for preoperative risk counseling and stratification. |
| IRAD Sex Analysis [48]D[217]D | 11,586 | Women present later with more vague symptoms and higher mortality. | Highlighted the need for increased clinical suspicion in female patients. |
Special Populations
- ▸Pregnancy-related aortic dissection risk peaks in the third trimester and postpartum period, with a maternal mortality rate of approximately 10.4%.
- ▸In Turner Syndrome, an Aortic Size Index (ASI) >2.5 cm/m² is an absolute contraindication for pregnancy due to the high risk of rupture.
- ▸Pediatric aortic risk is best assessed via Z-scores (≥4.5) rather than absolute diameters, as systemic features do not reliably predict cardiac severity.
Aortic dissection (AD) requires significant modification in specific cohorts where physiological stressors, genetic predispositions, or anatomical variations alter the risk-benefit ratio of standard interventions. High-risk groups include pregnant individuals, pediatric patients with heritable thoracic aortic diseases (HTAD), and the elderly, who exhibit distinct vascular aging patterns [226]D[235]D[239]D.
Pregnancy and Postpartum
Pregnancy-related acute AD is a lethal complication that typically occurs in the third trimester (50%–60%) or the postpartum period (30%–50%) [229]C. The physiological demands of pregnancy, including increased cardiac output and hormonal remodeling, exacerbate underlying vascular vulnerabilities. (HDP) are strongly associated with adverse maternal cardiac remodeling and significant changes in aortic root size [221]. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for aortic events is significantly higher during the vulnerable perinatal period compared to non-pregnant controls (IRR 2.83) [245]D.
Management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetric team [231]C. For Stanford Type A AD, immediate surgical intervention is generally required regardless of gestational age to prevent maternal mortality, which remains approximately 10.4% in this population [224].
Protocol: Management of Acute Type A AD in Pregnancy
- Multidisciplinary Activation: Immediate involvement of cardiac surgery, obstetrics, neonatology, and anesthesiology [229]C[231]C.
- Gestational Assessment: If the fetus is viable (typically >28 weeks), a single-stage "deliver-then-repair" strategy via Cesarean section followed by aortic repair (e.g., Bentall procedure) is often preferred [224][229]C.
- In Utero Protection: If the fetus is pre-viable (<28 weeks), emergency aortic surgery with in utero protection may be attempted, though fetal risk is high [229]C.
- Hemodynamic Control: Use of remifentanil for anesthetic stability during delivery to minimize blood pressure fluctuations [231]C.
- Postpartum Surveillance: Continued monitoring is essential; cabergoline may be used to suppress lactation in patients with to reduce metabolic and hemodynamic stress [228].
Pediatrics and Young Adults
In pediatric and young adult populations (ages 1–40), (TAD) is a rare but significant cause of (SCD), with an incidence of 0.32 per 1,000,000 [235]D. Presentation in this group is almost exclusively linked to syndromic HTAD, such as Marfan syndrome (MFS), , or Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome (SGS) [240]D[246]D.
Diagnostic considerations in children focus on aortic root Z-scores rather than absolute diameters. A Z-score ≥4.5 is a primary indicator of a severe cardiac phenotype [222]. Interestingly, extracardiac manifestations (e.g., skeletal or skin features) do not reliably predict the severity of the aortic phenotype, necessitating regular echocardiographic surveillance regardless of systemic involvement [222]. Late diagnosis (age ≥21 years) is associated with a higher risk of unplanned surgery and cardiovascular death [248]D.
Elderly and Sex-Specific Considerations
Elderly patients and post-menopausal women face unique risks driven by vascular aging and arterial stiffening [226]D. Women often experience acute aortic syndromes at smaller aortic diameters than men and suffer from higher out-of-hospital mortality and delays in diagnosis [226]D. In the elderly, the use of the aortic height index (aortic diameter divided by patient height) may be more predictive of dissection risk than absolute diameter alone [232]D.
Biological aging in HTAD is accelerated; for instance, adults with MFS exhibit significantly shorter leukocyte telomere length compared to age-matched controls, suggesting that chronic inflammation and oxidative stress drive premature vascular senescence [234]D.
Heritable Thoracic Aortic Disease (HTAD)
Specific genetic syndromes require modified intervention thresholds and surgical strategies:
- (TS): Characterized by a 3-fold increase in standardized mortality, primarily due to AD [233]D. Pregnancy is an absolute contraindication if the aortic size index (ASI) is >2.5 cm/m² (or ≥2.0 cm/m² with additional risk factors like ) [227]D.
- Marfan Syndrome (MFS): Prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta is recommended at 5.0 cm [248]D. However, elective root replacement with noncompliant Dacron grafts may increase the risk of subsequent Type B dissection due to altered hemodynamics in the distal aorta [247]D.
- Loeys-Dietz and SGS: These patients may require earlier intervention. While SGS shares skeletal features with MFS, its cardiovascular progression can differ, though (44.8%) and aortic aneurysms (37.9%) remain prevalent [240]D.
| Population | Threshold/Indicator | Clinical Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Turner Syndrome | ASI >2.5 cm/m² | Absolute contraindication for pregnancy [227]D |
| Pediatrics (HTAD) | Z-score ≥4.5 | Defines severe cardiac phenotype [222] |
| Marfan Syndrome | Diameter ≥5.0 cm | Threshold for prophylactic root replacement [248]D |
| General (Elderly) | Aortic Height Index | More predictive than absolute diameter in varying body sizes [232]D |
| Gestational Age | Primary Strategy | Neonatal Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| <28 Weeks | Emergency Aortic Surgery | In utero protection; high fetal risk [229]C |
| >28 Weeks | Deliver then Repair | Single-stage Cesarean followed by Bentall [224][229]C |
| Postpartum | Surgical Repair + Cabergoline | Cabergoline used to reduce metabolic/hemodynamic stress [228] |
Guidelines and Resources
- ▸The 2022 ACC/AHA guidelines emphasize the role of multidisciplinary 'Aortic Teams' and lower the threshold for genetic testing to all patients under age 60 with thoracic aortic disease.
- ▸Contrast-enhanced CT remains the gold standard for diagnosis, with a critical focus on identifying malperfusion and false lumen status to guide urgent surgical or endovascular intervention.
- ▸Surgical intervention thresholds for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have been clarified to 5.5 cm for most, or 5.0 cm in high-risk cases or specialized centers.
Clinical of and related acute aortic syndromes (AAS) is governed by evidence-based guidelines that emphasize rapid diagnosis, multidisciplinary care, and longitudinal surveillance. The 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease represents the most comprehensive update, consolidating recommendations for both thoracic and abdominal pathologies into a single framework [251][252]. These guidelines advocate for the formation of multidisciplinary "Aortic Teams" to optimize outcomes in complex cases, particularly when determining the timing of surgical intervention for asymptomatic aneurysms or chronic dissections [253].
Diagnostic Imaging Standards
According to the ACR Appropriateness Criteria, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the first-line imaging modality for suspected AAS due to its high sensitivity, specificity, and near-ubiquitous availability [255][266]. CT allows for the rapid evaluation of the entire aorta in a single-step examination, which is critical given that untreated ascending aortic dissection carries a mortality rate of 1% to 2% per hour after symptom onset [255][266].
For treatment planning and follow-up, the 2024 ACR Update emphasizes that imaging must characterize the extent of the dissection, the involvement of branch vessels (malperfusion), and the status of the false lumen (patent, partially thrombosed, or completely thrombosed) [108]. In patients with (CKD), the KDIGO controversies conference notes that while contrast-induced nephropathy is a concern, the life-threatening nature of suspected dissection often necessitates contrast-enhanced studies regardless of renal function, though non-contrast MR angiography or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may be considered in stable patients [262].
Surgical Thresholds and Guideline Disagreements
A significant area of clinical focus involves the threshold for surgical intervention in patients with (BAV) and associated aortopathy. The 2022 ACC/AHA update and subsequent clarifications have sought to harmonize previously conflicting recommendations [258][261].
- Standard Threshold: Elective replacement of the ascending aorta is generally recommended at a diameter of 5.5 cm in most patients [251][266].
- Lower Thresholds: Surgery may be considered at 5.0 cm in patients with BAV if they have additional risk factors (e.g., family history of dissection, rapid growth ≥0.5 cm/year) or if the surgery is performed by a high-volume aortic team [258][264].
- Coarctation Influence: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) historically advised lower surgical thresholds for patients with concomitant , though recent retrospective data suggests the risk of events may not be significantly higher than in BAV patients without coarctation [270]D.
Management of Type B Aortic Dissection
The SVS/STS Reporting Standards (2020) introduced a refined classification for Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) that includes the aortic arch (Zones 0-4) [254]. This classification helps clinicians distinguish between "complicated" and "uncomplicated" TBAD, which dictates the urgency of intervention.
Protocol: Management Stratification for Type B Dissection
- Step 1: Assess for Complications. Identify signs of rupture, malperfusion (renal, mesenteric, or limb ischemia), or refractory pain/ [254].
- Step 2: Urgent Intervention. For complicated TBAD, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the preferred treatment to stabilize the aorta and restore branch vessel flow [254][256].
- Step 3: Medical Therapy and Surveillance. For uncomplicated TBAD, aggressive blood pressure control (target <120/80 mmHg) is initiated. The ESVS 2026 Guidelines recommend close surveillance, as a subset of "uncomplicated" patients with high-risk features (e.g., entry tear >10 mm) may benefit from early TEVAR to promote aortic remodeling [256].
Special Populations and Genetic Screening
Genetic evaluation is a cornerstone of modern aortic care. The 2022 ACC/AHA guidelines recommend genetic counseling and testing for all patients under age 60 with thoracic aortic disease or those with a positive family history [251].
- Pregnancy: Women with or face a significantly elevated risk of dissection during pregnancy. In Turner syndrome, the risk of dissection or rupture may exceed 2%, with a 100-fold increase in maternal mortality compared to the general population [263][267].
- Family Screening: First-degree relatives of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections should undergo screening with echocardiography or CT/MRI to identify asymptomatic dilations [251][257].
Clinical Prediction and Tools
Clinicians utilize several tools to estimate risk and guide therapy:
- Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS): Used in the emergency department to risk-stratify patients based on predisposing conditions, pain characteristics, and physical exam findings.
- RCS Analysis for BAV: Recent studies use restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis to identify inflection points in diameter (e.g., 46.5 mm for the aortic root) where the risk of Type A dissection increases significantly [268].
| Organization | Year | Key Recommendations/Focus |
|---|---|---|
| ACC/AHA [251] | 2022 | Comprehensive management; Aortic Teams; Genetic screening for age <60; BAV thresholds. |
| SVS/STS [254] | 2020 | Standardized reporting for Type B; Zone-based classification; Definitions of chronicity. |
| ESVS [256] | 2026 | Management of descending thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aorta; TEVAR for complicated TBAD. |
| ACR [108][255] | 2024/25 | Appropriateness of imaging; CT as first-line for AAS; Surveillance protocols. |
| ESC [266] | 2014 | European standards for diagnosis; Open surgery for Type A; Medical management for Type B. |
References
- [1]
Bin L, Fei J, Zhao L et al.. “Comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft technique with stented elephant trunk implantation in treating Stanford type A aortic dissection: A trial sequential meta-analysis.” Journal of cardiac surgery (2022). PMID: 36352782 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [2]
Yamashita Y, Sicouri S, Dokollari A et al.. “Double arterial vs. single axillary cannulation in acute type A aortic dissections: a meta-analysis.” Future cardiology (2024). PMID: 38963122 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [3]
Yamashita Y, Sicouri S, Kjelstrom S et al.. “Direct aortic cannulation versus femoral arterial cannulation for early outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection: A study-level meta-analysis.” Perfusion (2025). PMID: 38537032 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [4]
Yamashita Y, Sicouri S, Dokollari A et al.. “Aortic versus axillary cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A meta-analysis.” Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals (2024). PMID: 38343086 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [5]
Guglielmi V, Groeneveld NS, Posthuma L et al.. “Aortic dissection masquerading as a code stroke: A single-centre cohort study.” European stroke journal (2020). PMID: 32232170 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [6]
Modares M, Hanneman K, Ouzounian M et al.. “Computed Tomography Angiography Assessment of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Classification, Differentiating Imaging Features, and Imaging Interpretation Pitfalls.” Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes (2022). PMID: 33874779 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [7]
Zhu Y, Lingala B, Baiocchi M et al.. “Type A Aortic Dissection-Experience Over 5 Decades: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2020). PMID: 33004136 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [8]
Saremi F, Hassani C, Lin LM et al.. “Image Predictors of Treatment Outcome after Thoracic Aortic Dissection Repair.” Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc (2018). PMID: 30312138 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [9]
Gutschow SE, Walker CM, Martínez-Jiménez S et al.. “Emerging Concepts in Intramural Hematoma Imaging.” Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc (2016). PMID: 27163587 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [10]
Li S, Liu X, Yang J et al.. “Clinical features and survival analysis of non-hypertensive aortic dissection patients post-thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a 10-year retrospective study.” Journal of thoracic disease (2024). PMID: 39678834 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [11]
Uriu Y, Kuriyama A. “Malperfusion-associated transient monoplegia as an initial manifestation of aortic dissection.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2021). PMID: 33036846 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [12]
Ramesh P, Al-Zubaidi FI, Abdelghaffar M et al.. “TEM Classification of Aortic Dissection-The Evolving Scoring System: A Literature Review.” Heart, lung & circulation (2024). PMID: 38143192 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [13]
Gao Y, Li D, Cao Y et al.. “Prognostic value of serum albumin for patients with acute aortic dissection: A retrospective cohort study.” Medicine (2019). PMID: 30732220 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [14]
Abarca Rozas BA, Schwarze Fieldhouse MW, Contreras Bertolo RI et al.. “Atypical presentation and late diagnosis of acute aortic dissection without timely surgical treatment: case report and literature review.” Medwave (2018). PMID: 30240389 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [15]
Wu Z, Yuan Y, Chai C et al.. “Impact of the society for vascular surgery/society of thoracic surgeons classification on prognosis and therapeutic strategies in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41953671 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [16]
Shirakura K, Ushioda R, Kunioka S et al.. “Association of Stanford, DeBakey classification and false-lumen blood flow with age of onset in acute aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41859548 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [17]
Xu Y, Huang C, Huang C et al.. “Analysis of epidemiological characteristics and prognosis based on 1,343 cases of aortic dissection from a regional single center.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41725939 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [18]
Canalejo-Codina F, López-Lluva MT, Rumoroso JR et al.. “Epidemiology, treatment, and data management trends in aortic dissection and related syndromes: Insights and limitations from the RAE-CMBD in Spain (2016-2021).” Progress in cardiovascular diseases (2025). PMID: 41448445 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [19]
Ikeno Y, Tanaka A, Troncone MJ et al.. “Impact of new classification from the Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons on acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40692091 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [20]
Zhang J, Han L, Liu H et al.. “Metabolomic analysis reveals the metabolic disturbance in aortic dissection: Subtype difference and accurate diagnosis.” Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD (2023). PMID: 37263915 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [21]
Huang LT, Tsai YS, Liou CF et al.. “Automated Stanford classification of aortic dissection using a 2-step hierarchical neural network at computed tomography angiography.” European radiology (2022). PMID: 34854930 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [22]
Xu W, Mani K, Khashram M. “Ethnic differences in incidence and outcomes of acute aortic syndromes in the Midland region of New Zealand.” Journal of vascular surgery (2022). PMID: 34506891 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [23]
Ge YY, Rong D, Ge XH et al.. “The 301 Classification: A Proposed Modification to the Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Classification for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Prognostication.” Mayo Clinic proceedings (2020). PMID: 32622443 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [24]
Pan E, Gudbjartsson T, Ahlsson A et al.. “Low rate of reoperations after acute type A aortic dissection repair from The Nordic Consortium Registry.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2018). PMID: 29753501 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [25]
Platon A, Bernard S, Perrin N et al.. “Type A aortic dissection: Are there CT signs suggestive of valvular involvement?” European journal of radiology (2016). PMID: 27776642 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [26]
Xue J, Ni Y, He J et al.. “A case of twin pregnancy with "precious fetuses" complicated by DeBakey type I aortic dissection.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41126334 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [27]
Varela-Jaramillo S, Taub-Krivoy A, Gómez-Gutiérrez MA et al.. “Neurological Manifestations of Aortic Dissection: A Scoping Review.” Journal of acute medicine (2024). PMID: 39624147 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [28]
Gao ZC, Wang Y, Li GS et al.. “[Risk factors for adverse prognosis in acute aortic syndrome: a single-center retrospective cohort study].” Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi (2025). PMID: 39965848 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [29]
Nakajima T, Shibata T, Mukawa K et al.. “Treatment Strategies for Acute Aortic Dissection With Malperfusion: A Retrospective Study.” Cureus (2024). PMID: 39219975 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [30]
MacKerricher W, Klein RR, Winston DC. “Association of Antemortem Central Nervous System Symptoms and Location of Aortic Dissections; A Retrospective Study from 2001-2014.” Academic forensic pathology (2016). PMID: 31239925 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Definition, Synonyms, and Classification - [31]
Han Z, Li B, Liu J. “Predictive value of machine learning for mortality risk in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” International journal of medical informatics (2026). PMID: 41539126 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [32]
Sharma S, Seth J, Rabkin SW. “Hypertension in Thoracic Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis-Based Consideration in the Choice of Antihypertensive Agents.” American journal of hypertension (2026). PMID: 41206434 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [33]
Chen Q, Jiang Y, Shen Y et al.. “Risk of aortic aneurysm/aortic dissection associated with fluoroquinolones use: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.” Vascular (2026). PMID: 41678806 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [34]
Squizzato F, Bilato MJ, Menegolo M et al.. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Outcomes of Distal Aortic Interventions for Residual Aortic Dissection.” Annals of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41106673 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [35]
Peng Z, Liang S, Zhang R et al.. “Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization With In Situ Laser Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Acute Complicated or High-Risk Type B Aortic Dissection: Results of the LLTEVAR Trial.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 41368828 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Clinical Features and Variants, Differential Diagnosis, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [36]
Wu ZY, Yang Y, Li ZL et al.. “Effects of Fluoroquinolones on Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection Processes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Reviews in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41923717 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [37]
Kaewboonlert N, Pongsuwan N, Chatkaewpaisal C et al.. “Survival outcomes of hybrid versus total arch replacement in type A aortic dissection: A meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data.” Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals (2026). PMID: 41236863 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [38]
Petersen CS, Karon Z, Obel LM et al.. “Aortic and Iliac Calcifications as Predictors of Aortic Dissection, Aneurysm Rupture, and Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study from the DANCAVAS Trials.” Circulation (2026). PMID: 41766556 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [39]
Shao Z, Lu Z, Duan W et al.. “Insulin resistance indicators in aortic disease: A large cohort study.” Clinical and translational medicine (2026). PMID: 41499559 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [40]
Bashir M, Jubouri M, Surkhi AO et al.. “From Equipoise to Evidence: Pre-Trial Setup of the European Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Repair Clinical Trial.” Annals of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41421577 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [41]
Yan M, Wang K, Liu S et al.. “Factors associated with device-associated health care-associated infections after cardiac surgery: a matched cohort study.” PeerJ (2026). PMID: 41978887 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [42]
Imbriani M, Marchesini D, Piras GN et al.. “Mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation as a histopathological marker of aortic fragility: Two autopsy cases and a literature review.” Legal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) (2026). PMID: 41525745 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [43]
Pruna-Guillen R, Rojanathagoon T, Oo A et al.. “Impact of an On-Call Specialist Aortic Rota Implementation in Acute Type a Aortic Dissection on Outcomes and Repair Complexity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41148058 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [44]
Li C, Liu C. “Multimodal imaging of acquired aortic diseases: clinical efficacy, comparative analysis, and future perspectives.” The international journal of cardiovascular imaging (2026). PMID: 41549183 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Clinical Features and Variants - [45]
Pan C, Ning S, Zhou Y et al.. “Influencing Factors of Postoperative Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Outcomes in Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.” British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005) (2025). PMID: 41134180 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [46]
Ram E, Lau C, Gregg A et al.. “Comparative Analysis of Risk Profile and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Chronic Dissection Versus Degenerative Disease.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41904662 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [47]
Li S, Li W, Zhang J et al.. “Association between atherosclerotic index of plasma and long-term aortic-related adverse events in type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair.” Cardiovascular diabetology (2026). PMID: 41787449 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Management - [48]
Jackson E, Carbone A, Shalhub S et al.. “Sex-Related Differences in Clinical Profile, Management, and Outcomes of Patients With Type A and B Acute Aortic Dissection: Observations From IRAD.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 41744110 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Management, Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [49]
Dell'Aquila AM, Georgevici AI, Wisniewski K et al.. “Risk Profile and Outcomes of Patients Requiring Coronary Revascularization as Concomitant Procedure to Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41563923 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Pathophysiology - [50]
Gomez A, Carroway W, Tu S et al.. “Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms in a Veterans Affairs Health System: Longitudinal Outcomes and Risk Factors.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 41532501 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [51]
Tang C, Wang T, Diao H et al.. “Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with type A aortic dissection based on the 2023 updated definition.” Respiratory research (2025). PMID: 41388298 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [52]
Abusafia M, Jadam S, Kalahasti V et al.. “Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Ascending Aortic Dilation.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 41334743 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [53]
Maznyczka A, Gill C, Norman S et al.. “Outcomes of Non-Anesthetist Led Conscious Sedation for 2000 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantations.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2026). PMID: 41332125 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [54]
Gober LM, Telma K, Richmond E et al.. “Protocolized management of acute type B aortic dissections reduces disease progression and need for surgery.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41317972 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Clinical Features and Variants - [55]
Frumkin D, Nersesian G, Spethmann S et al.. “Acute type A aortic dissection following TAVI.” International journal of cardiology (2026). PMID: 41276188 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [56]
Yokota A, Kabutoya T, Hoshide S et al.. “Digital electrocardiogram-measured P-wave duration and hypertensive heart disease are associated with cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular risks.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2026). PMID: 41272126 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [57]
Kabutoya T, Hoshide S, Kario K. “Digital ECG detection of flat T waves predicts cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: the Coupling Study.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2026). PMID: 41272124 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Differential Diagnosis - [58]
Chamseddine H, Halabi M, Hamdan H et al.. “The impact of intervention timing, etiology, and revascularization strategy on acute mesenteric ischemia outcomes.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41242625 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [59]
Nadel J, Suinesiaputra A, Paratz ED et al.. “Site-Specific Analysis of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Cardiovascular Mortality: Insights From the National Echo Database Australia.” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography (2026). PMID: 41242620 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [60]
Kletzer J, van Kampen A, Peterss S et al.. “Weathering the Aorta: The Impact of Environmental Factors on Acute Aortic Dissection.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2025). PMID: 41223150 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [61]
Liu G, Wang D, Yang Y et al.. “Efficacy and Safety of preoperative Controlling Heart Rate in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ESCORT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.” BMJ open (2026). PMID: 41962972 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Management - [62]
Chen X, Xie W, Li W et al.. “Cerebral Oximetry Index-Guided Blood Pressure Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Reduces Postoperative Delirium in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2025). PMID: 39855957 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [63]
Naito N, Takagi H. “Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for retrograde type a intramural hematoma or aortic dissection with intimal disruption in the descending aorta: Systematic review and meta-analysis.” Perfusion (2025). PMID: 39977541 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology - [64]
Hochberg CH, Yan L, Card ME et al.. “Outcomes of patients with hypertensive emergency managed in intensive vs intermediate care settings: a multihospital retrospective cohort study.” Annals of the American Thoracic Society (2026). PMID: 41915559 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Management - [65]
Song T, Han Y, Xie L et al.. “Cellular Heterogeneity in Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.” Circulation research (2026). PMID: 41886549 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [66]
Hu M, Chen B, Luo Y. “Computational fluid dynamics modelling of hemodynamics in aortic aneurysm and dissection: a review.” Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology (2025). PMID: 40190707 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [67]
Jia Q, Bian Y, Wang X et al.. “Case Report: Diagnostic pitfalls in localized aortic root dissection: two cases and a literature review.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41953663 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [68]
Cosco V, Grenci G, Fiorentino A et al.. “Limited Iatrogenic Dissection of the Aortic Root: To Treat or Not to Treat?” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2025). PMID: 41078216 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Variants - [69]
Kelly JJ, Brown CR, Eisenga JB et al.. “Repair of Arch Aneurysm With Frozen Elephant Trunk for DeBakey Type I Dissection Previously Treated With a Hybrid Arch Bare-Metal Stent.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40609665 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [70]
Cui P, Sun HH, Luo Y et al.. “Aortic dissection: the role of macrophages in disease pathogenesis and their potential as a treatment target.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41765885 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [71]
Bissell MM, Garg P. “Clinical 4D flow MRI assessment in aortopathy-what the clinician needs to know.” Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy (2025). PMID: 41509618 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [72]
Clothier JS, Kobsa S. “Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” Cardiology clinics (2025). PMID: 40268355 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [73]
Ahmad HM, Iskandar Z, Lang CC et al.. “Emerging imaging and circulating biomarkers in relation to underlying mechanisms in Bicuspid Aortic Valve aortopathy.” International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature (2025). PMID: 40130209 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [74]
Murtada A, Jubouri M, Refaie M et al.. “Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia in Aortic Surgery: What You Need to Know.” Annals of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39863280 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [75]
Al-Rawi M, Lim ETA, Khashram M et al.. “Utility of Computational Modeling in Reassessing the Threshold for Intervention and Progression into Type A Aortic Dissection.” Biomedicines (2026). PMID: 41898340 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [76]
Li B, Zhu Y, Wang K et al.. “Strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction analysis of TEVAR with double-branched endograft for non-A non-B aortic dissection: a patient-specific case study.” Journal of biomechanics (2026). PMID: 41391440 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [77]
Liu W, Lin Q, Zhong H et al.. “Microbiomics and metabolomics explored the characteristics of gut microbiota and metabolites in patients with aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology (2025). PMID: 41132489 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [78]
Kario K, Okawara Y, Kanegae H et al.. “Relationship Between Home Blood Pressure Monitoring-Confirmed Resistant Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prognosis.” Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) (2025). PMID: 41127912 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [79]
Osswald A, Tsagakis K, Thielmann M et al.. “Can computational fluid dynamics simulations predict a distal stent graft-induced new entry after frozen elephant trunk operation?” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 41112231 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [80]
Kario K, Nishiyama A, Shibata S et al.. “The JSH Morning Hypertension Eradication Program Project.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2025). PMID: 40858749 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Differential Diagnosis - [81]
Wu T, Zhu H, Zhuo H et al.. “Fluid-structure interaction study of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers: Assessing progression and rupture risks.” Computer methods and programs in biomedicine (2025). PMID: 40706491 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination, Clinical Features and Variants - [82]
Zhang L, Yang S, Guo X et al.. “Changes in True and False Lumen Pressures During Closure of the Primary Tear in Aortic Dissection.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2025). PMID: 40665556 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [83]
Chen Y, Guo J, Wang S et al.. “Identifying Hemodynamic Predictors of Aortic Growth After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2025). PMID: 40650600 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [84]
Larsen KSR, Tang M, Budtz-Lilly JW et al.. “Evaluation of a Rehabilitation Program With Blood Pressure-Guided Exercise Intensity Restrictions for Patients With Thoracic Aortic Dissection or Aneurysm.” Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention (Unknown). PMID: 40627738 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [85]
Chen N, Downing JV, Epstein J et al.. “Emergency Department Blood Pressure Management in Type B Aortic Dissection: An Analysis with Machine Learning.” The western journal of emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 40561988 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology, History and Physical Examination - [86]
Öster H, Chen T, Mennander A et al.. “CMKLR-1 Expression in Human Aorta Is Dominated by Smooth Muscle Cell Positivity.” The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society (2025). PMID: 40552467 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [87]
Chen X, Xie L, Wu Q et al.. “Development and validation of a novel prognostic score to improve prognostic prediction in patients with type B aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40541619 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [88]
Balasubramanya A, Gheysen L, Wagenhäuser MU et al.. “Hemodynamics in aortic dissections: A fluid-solid interaction study in an idealized dissection model with a false lumen side branch.” Journal of biomechanics (2025). PMID: 40449253 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [89]
Wang X, Song F, Jiang L et al.. “Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Combined With Mild Hypertension.” American journal of hypertension (2024). PMID: 38564196 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [90]
Zhu YL, Wang S, Gu Y et al.. “Efficacy of predictive pain intervention in patients with aortic dissection.” Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine (2024). PMID: 38943408 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [91]
Song W, Liu J, Tu G et al.. “Impact of body mass index on perioperative mortality of acute stanford type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” BMC cardiovascular disorders (2023). PMID: 37907847 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: History and Physical Examination - [92]
Xiao Y, Huang S, Zheng D et al.. “Delayed Diagnosis of Aortic Dissection: A Scoping Review.” Reviews in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 40630449 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: History and Physical Examination - [93]
Oztas DM, Ozdemir E, Bauernschmitt R et al.. “Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for pure aortic insufficiency in a patient following David-type aortic valve-sparing root replacement after aortic dissection-A successful off-label procedure.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2024). PMID: 38577923 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [94]
Gillinov LA, Kapoor SR, Sperry AE et al.. “Fate of the Aortic Root After Reconstruction With Felt Neomedia for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41557464 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [95]
Zhao R, Liu Y, Zhang B et al.. “Concomitant Aortic Root Replacement in Total Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk for Type A Aortic Dissection: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41410509 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [96]
Wagner CM, Marway PS, Ferrel MN et al.. “Sex differences in ascending aortic diameter at the time of acute type A aortic dissection.” Heart (British Cardiac Society) (2026). PMID: 41083213 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [97]
Ikeno Y, Tanaka A, Estrera GA et al.. “Aortic Root Reconstruction With Pledgeted Sutures in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 40681029 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [98]
Norton EL, Arora A, Cangut B et al.. “Association of intraoperative transfusion of blood products with postoperative outcomes and midterm survival in acute type A aortic dissection repair.” JTCVS open (2025). PMID: 40061521 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [99]
Ho CH, Lin CP, Chang FC et al.. “Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Management in Patients After Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40057152 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [100]
Jiang B, Ren P, He C et al.. “Short-term disruption of TGF-β signaling in adult mice renders the aorta vulnerable to hypertension-induced dissection.” JCI insight (2025). PMID: 39932797 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [101]
Chen D, Fang K, Luo M et al.. “Aortic Dissection Incidence and Risk Factor Analysis: Findings from the China Kadoorie Biobank.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2025). PMID: 39643204 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [102]
Leshnower BG, Farrington WJ, Huckaby LV et al.. “Long-term Results of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 39293750 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [103]
Kario K, Okawara Y, Kanegae H et al.. “Peak nocturnal home blood pressure as an early and strong novel risk factor for stroke: the practitioner-based nationwide J-HOP Nocturnal BP study.” Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (2025). PMID: 39242824 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [104]
Zhang K, Zhou C, Gao S et al.. “The optimal degree of core temperature for hypothermic circulatory arrest in complex aortic arch surgery: results from 1310 patients.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2024). PMID: 39137134 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [105]
Kario K, Kanegae H, Okawara Y et al.. “Home Blood Pressure Variability Risk Prediction Score for Cardiovascular Disease Using Data From the J-HOP Study.” Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) (2024). PMID: 39136129 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [106]
Elbatarny M, Trimarchi S, Korach A et al.. “Axillary vs Femoral Arterial Cannulation in Acute Type A Dissection: International Multicenter Data.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2024). PMID: 38458510 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination, Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [107]
Ahmad RA, Orelaru F, Arora A et al.. “Acute type A intramural hematoma: The less-deadly acute aortic syndrome?” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 38280668 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [108]
Ripley B, Scheidt MJ, Aghayev A et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection-Treatment Planning and Follow-Up: 2024 Update.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2025). PMID: 40409894 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Guidelines and Resources - [109]
Esfahanian F, Madani MH. “Clinical and Imaging Features of Aortic Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41682880 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Management - [110]
Goodacre S, Pandor A, Thokala P et al.. “Diagnostic strategies for suspected acute aortic syndrome: systematic review, meta-analysis, decision-analytic modelling and value of information analysis.” Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) (2025). PMID: 40944621 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [111]
Anezaki H, Aoki Y, Kato H et al.. “Perioperative cardiac arrest requiring admission to intensive care units in Japan: epidemiological differences between emergency and elective surgery from a multicentre cohort study.” British journal of anaesthesia (2025). PMID: 40713194 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [112]
Yao YT, Xie CM, Wang HB et al.. “Acute type A aortic dissection patients undergoing surgical repair during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Medicine (2025). PMID: 40295228 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [113]
Yang KJ, Chi NH, Yu HY et al.. “Endovascular vs. open surgical repair in retrograde type a dissection & intramural hematoma: A study-level meta-analysis.” Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40991360 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [114]
Ayhan C, Mekhaeil M, Channawi R et al.. “Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.” Journal of clinical medicine (2025). PMID: 41375721 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [115]
Kamel S, Chastant R, Alric P et al.. “Single- and Double-Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent Grafts for Emergent Aortic Arch Lesions.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2025). PMID: 41200840 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [116]
Chochoł P, Witt-Majchrzak A, Mycko MP. “Dissected Thoracic Aorta Masked as Seizures: A Case Report.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41682827 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [117]
Pignataro G, Scafetta A, De Luca D et al.. “The Role of Biomarkers and Clinical Prediction Tools in the Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes: A Literature-Based Review.” Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2025). PMID: 41010942 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [118]
Rahman I, Ali J, De Silva R. “Cannulation Strategies for Aortic Arch Surgery.” Journal of cardiovascular development and disease (2025). PMID: 41002639 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [119]
Garg I, Grist TM, Nagpal P. “MR Angiography for Aortic Diseases.” Cardiology clinics (2025). PMID: 40268353 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [120]
Sica G, Rea G, Lieto R et al.. “CT diagnosis and destiny of acute aortic intramural hematoma.” Frontiers in radiology (2025). PMID: 40134989 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [121]
Cai Z, Yan T, Wang H et al.. “Impact of an emergency department bypass referral pathway for surgically managed Type A aortic dissection diagnosed at non-aortic centers.” Frontiers in public health (2025). PMID: 41924021 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Management - [122]
Apostolidis G, Nana P, Panuccio G et al.. “A Retrospective Analysis of Barb-mediated Active Fixation Impact on Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Outcomes.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41857800 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Management - [123]
Bhat S, Bhat S, Schreve F et al.. “d-Dimer With the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score May Improve Patient Selection for Acute Aortic Syndrome Diagnostic Imaging.” Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA (2026). PMID: 41582603 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [124]
Meinert ÉFRC, Kremer J, Farag M et al.. “Outcomes of total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk in acute aortic syndrome.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 41552679 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [125]
Yang J, Zhang X, Lou D et al.. “First in Human Evaluation of an Innovative Stent Graft for Endovascular Repair of Acute Ascending Aortic Syndromes.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2025). PMID: 41391565 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Differential Diagnosis - [126]
Keyoumu R, Wang Y, Liu R et al.. “Three Dimensional Printing Assisted Multi-fenestrated Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch: A Multicentre Study.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2025). PMID: 41380763 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [127]
Schönbeck H, Björkelund A, Møller ES et al.. “A missed diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome is associated with ischaemic ECG changes and an initial suspicion of myocardial infarction: a retrospective observational study.” BMC emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 41315990 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Differential Diagnosis - [128]
Xu W, Haran C, Lim E et al.. “Nationwide outcomes of early thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41177275 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [129]
Besola L, Biasci L, Mangifesta C et al.. “Warming up the frozen elephant trunk for aortic arch pathology.” Annals of cardiothoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41098994 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [130]
Voetsch A, Gottardi R, Winkler A et al.. “Frozen Elephant Trunk in Acute Aortic Syndrome: Retrospective Results from a Low-Volume Center.” Journal of clinical medicine (2025). PMID: 41095777 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [131]
Ullery BW, Alie-Cusson F, Magee GA et al.. “Laser in situ fenestrated endograft (LIFE) repair of complex aortic arch pathology: Early outcomes from the multicenter LIFE registry.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41075877 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [132]
Francesco Squizzato, D'Oria M, Antonello M et al.. “Editor's Choice - International Expert Consensus on the Management of Acute Aortic Type B Intramural Haematoma and Penetrating Ulcer.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41038380 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [133]
Cui D, Li X, Chen Y et al.. “Risk Factor Analysis of Post-TEVAR Distal Aortic Expansion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41833301 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis, Management - [134]
Kushnir Y, Barrera N, Arias-Sanchez P et al.. “Intensified blood pressure control during hospital admission and on discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41725942 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [135]
Benabbas R, Zehtabchi S, Wakai A et al.. “Cardiac Biomarkers, Echocardiography, and Outpatient Cardiac Monitoring for Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Direct Evidence for SAEM GRACE.” Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (2026). PMID: 41201260 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [136]
Qazi SU, Zaide DB, Fatima U et al.. “Long term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair versus optimal medical therapy for uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Future cardiology (2025). PMID: 40923587 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [137]
Nouri A, Awashra A, Hamdan D et al.. “Cardiovascular toxicity of Fruquintinib in patients with colorectal and other cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Cardio-oncology (London, England) (2025). PMID: 40993794 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [138]
Fukano K, Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H et al.. “Preoperative coronary angiography and outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion: A retrospective cohort study.” Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions (2025). PMID: 41125468 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [139]
Li XD, Chen ZJ. “Aortic dissection disguised as musculoskeletal condition: a case report and review of literature.” BMC musculoskeletal disorders (2025). PMID: 41023648 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [140]
Lu G, Wang X, Wang X et al.. “Case Report: Rapid progression of inflammation-driven coronary artery lesions in a normolipidemic patient with ANCA-associated vasculitis complicated by Stanford type A aortic dissection.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 41909680 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [141]
Qiu F, Luo L, Huang J et al.. “Case Report: Improved axillary artery cannulation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridging therapy for cardiogenic shock caused by Marfan syndrome combined with aortic dissection.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41908050 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [142]
Ji B, Lai Y, Liu XB et al.. “Aortic Root Dissection Masquerading as Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Critical Role of Intravascular Ultrasound.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2026). PMID: 41264798 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [143]
Wang H, Bello J, Gala D et al.. “Aortic Dissection With Pseudoaneurysm Formation Masquerading as Pulmonary Embolism After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.” Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2025). PMID: 40908904 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [144]
Leinweber ME, Hofmann AG. “Seasonality of Selected Cardiovascular Disorders in Austria: A Retrospective Observational Study Between 2009 and 2023.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2026). PMID: 41988963 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [145]
Patel S, Desai ND, Brinster DR et al.. “Type A acute aortic dissection complicated by preoperative myocardial infarction: Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” JTCVS open (2026). PMID: 41960051 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis, Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [146]
Luo Y, Peng J, Peng W et al.. “Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based electrocardiogram prediction model for emergency chest pain patients.” Frontiers in medicine (2026). PMID: 41884147 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [147]
Zhou F, Zhou X, Yang L et al.. “Evaluation of CT-FFR for Predicting Myocardial Ischaemia in Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection.” European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging (2026). PMID: 41748322 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [148]
Kwinta A, Bielański P, Szkudlarek O et al.. “Feasibility and outcomes of anaesthesiology- and intensive care-led ECPR in a hospital without cardiac surgery: a 2.5-year prospective registry.” BMC anesthesiology (2026). PMID: 41699484 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [149]
Wan Z, Jama K, Hasemaki N et al.. “Outcomes after Endovascular Arch Repair in Patients with a Native Ascending Aorta Diameter Greater than 38 mm: An Observational Study in Two High Volume Centres.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41554372 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [150]
Fujiyoshi T, Kumamaru H, Ogino H et al.. “Surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion in Japan: Nationwide database analysis.” JTCVS open (2025). PMID: 41473077 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [151]
Zhou Y, Chen C, Li J et al.. “Identification and Validation of Differentially Expressed mRNAs From Peripheral Leukocytes for Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 41378480 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [152]
Hoppe JM, Schramm MC, Diegruber K et al.. “Identification of diagnostic markers for MINOCA in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2025). PMID: 41341294 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [153]
Szeto WY, Fukuhara S, Fleischman F et al.. “One-Year Results of Novel Aortic Arch Hybrid Prosthesis for Repair of Acute DeBakey Type I Dissection With Malperfusion: PERSEVERE Study.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41238072 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [154]
Tang J, Chen F, Wu D. “Early auxiliary diagnosis model for chest pain triad based on artificial intelligence multimodal fusion.” JAMIA open (2025). PMID: 41041626 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [155]
Haimovich JS, Kolossváry M, Alam R et al.. “Risk stratification of chest pain in the emergency department using artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms.” Open heart (2025). PMID: 40889954 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [156]
Guo W, Sun G, Zhang H et al.. “The G-branch off-the-shelf mixed branch endograft for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study.” International journal of surgery (London, England) (2025). PMID: 40865966 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [157]
Irshad S, Adrejiya P, Abubaker M et al.. “Kommerell's Diverticulum Masquerading in a Right Aortic Arch: A Vascular Surprise.” Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal (2025). PMID: 40860769 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Differential Diagnosis - [158]
Papakonstantinou NA, Antonopoulos CN. “Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) (2026). PMID: 41736226 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [159]
Amvrazi AV, Antonopoulos CN, Spath P et al.. “Outcomes of Custom Made and Off the Shelf Endografts for Preservation of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41905582 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Management - [160]
Donndorf P, Angles T, Schafmayer C et al.. “Urgent and Emergent Endovascular Treatment of the Downstream Aorta Soon After Open Surgical Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Analyzing Indications and Outcomes of an Institutional Case Series.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41682617 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [161]
Gu JJ, Zhao TY, Tian XC et al.. “Mixed Reality-Assisted Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety.” Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc (2026). PMID: 41913345 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [162]
Peng HH, Fang QB, Wang L et al.. “Modified Candy Plug for False Lumen Embolization in Chronic Aortic Dissection: Technical Aspects and Initial Experience.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41978486 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [163]
Marzano A, Gagliardo di Carpinello G, Giordano A et al.. “Dedicated Single-Branch Platforms for Totally Endovascular Zone 2 TEVAR with LSA Revascularization: A Comparison of Castor/Cratos and Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41976960 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Management - [164]
Fang J, Cao Z, Zhang Y et al.. “Outcomes of Zone 1 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair with Single Branched Stent Graft and Left Common Carotid Artery Chimney Stenting for Zone 2 Aortic Arch Pathologies.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41936860 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [165]
Li N, Ge S, Hu J et al.. “Castor stent reconstruction of left subclavian artery reduces the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction of type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing area: a propensity score matched analysis.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41908054 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [166]
Deng L, Li H, Yu W et al.. “Mid-and Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular with branch artery revascularization in the Aortic Repair for Non-A Non-B Aortic Dissection.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41903628 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [167]
Atash A, Mees BME, Cramer MJ et al.. “MYH11 variants in thoracic aortic aneurysm pathophysiology: From bench to bedside.” European journal of clinical investigation (2026). PMID: 41891259 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Management - [168]
Keschenau PR, Bandzius N, Weiß B et al.. “Effect of the Proximal Landing Zone Quality on TEVAR Outcomes-11-Year Real-World Experience with the Relay Stent Graft Family in Aortic Dissections.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41872993 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [169]
D'Onofrio A, Caraffa R, Cibin G et al.. “Suitability Analysis of 2 Devices for Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Following Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41803625 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [170]
Zhao Y, Qian J, He H et al.. “A Novel Method Improving Estimation of Distal Landing Zone and Remodeling in Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41728920 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [171]
Tinelli G, Sica S, Tsilimparis N et al.. “Open surgery versus branched endovascular repair of the aortic arch in residual dissections after type A surgical repair.” The British journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 41701205 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [172]
Jiang X, Fu W, Lu W et al.. “Intimo-Intimal Intussusception during Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41679455 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [173]
Dean A, Feng K, Hassan S et al.. “Midterm Outcomes of the Knickerbocker Technique following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic Post-dissection Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: A Single Centre Experience.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41672344 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [174]
Wang F, Li H, Wang Y et al.. “Endovascular treatment of retrograde type A aortic dissection: a decade of experience in a single-center.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41623614 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management - [175]
Jiang X, Zou L, Liu H et al.. “Endovascular Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection Accompanied by Retrograde Intramural Haematoma.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41619797 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Management, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [176]
Boshkoski G, Natour D, Jankulovski A et al.. “First Reported Use of the AMDS Hybrid Prosthesis for Secondary Type A Aortic Dissection After Prior TEVAR.” Journal of cardiovascular development and disease (2026). PMID: 41892729 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [177]
Pitts L, Kofler M, Montagner M et al.. “Total Arch Replacement with a New Hybrid Device to Manage the Left Subclavian Artery in the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique.” Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41808447 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [178]
Asta L, Mancini V, Mantini C et al.. “Aortic dissection in a Jehovah's witness: Frozen Elephant Trunk and subsequent 4D flow MRI analysis, a case report.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41715223 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [179]
Zhao HY, Gan LX, Guo HW. “Fatal delayed superior mesenteric artery thrombosis after frozen elephant trunk repair in acute type a aortic dissection with false lumen perfusion: a case report.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2026). PMID: 41689049 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Management - [180]
Santos K, Oya K, Umibe T et al.. “Does Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Improve Blood Conservation and Postoperative Outcomes in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2026). PMID: 41107167 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [181]
Agard G, Tonon D, Collart F et al.. “Arterial Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Postoperative Lung Injury in Patients Undergoing Urgent Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Propensity Score-matched Retrospective Cohort Study.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (2026). PMID: 41193309 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [182]
Bohatch Júnior MS, de Melo Silva B, Soares EAG et al.. “Endovascular Repair in High-Risk Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2026). PMID: 41578935 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [183]
Matsumoto R, Watanabe T, Kinoshita R et al.. “Sex-Based Differences in Dissection Patterns and Surgical Strategies in Tear-Oriented Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.” Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia (2026). PMID: 41565270 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [184]
Ye M, Xue C, Wang D et al.. “Endovascular reperfusion followed by delayed open aortic repair in stable acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome: a single-center experience.” Frontiers in medicine (2025). PMID: 41755990 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [185]
Takauchi T, Hirao S, Yaegashi K et al.. “Lateral Ventricular Symmetry as a Predictor of Postoperative Neurological Outcomes in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With Cerebral Malperfusion.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41656890 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [186]
Ma WG, Chen Y, Chen SW et al.. “Frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection: long-term outcomes over two decades.” European heart journal (2026). PMID: 41614598 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [187]
Sohn B, Lee JH, Lee H et al.. “Central Aortic Cannulation as a Primary Strategy in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41570093 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [188]
Giuffrè G, Pennetta FF, Palmier M et al.. “Impact of false lumen occluders on aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of chronic type B dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41512935 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [189]
Mei X, Ji S, Jiang Y et al.. “Preoperative serum Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for predicting postoperative acute kidney injury after acute type A aortic dissection.” Renal failure (2025). PMID: 41503972 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [190]
Yalzadeh D, Tabibian K, Sakowitz S et al.. “Surgical repair of type A aortic dissection at safety-net hospitals across the United States.” Surgery (2026). PMID: 41500074 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [191]
Yang S, Zhang X, Wu X et al.. “Three-branched in situ laser fenestration for the endovascular repair of total aortic arch disease: A retrospective analysis of 5-year outcomes.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 41423026 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [192]
Sato H, Iba Y, Mikami T et al.. “Comparison of 3 Surgical Procedures for DeBakey Type I Acute Aortic Dissection: When Is Frozen Elephant Trunk Recommended?” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2025). PMID: 41247077 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [193]
Rebello KR, Green SY, Weldon SA et al.. “Early outcomes for women and men after open extent III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.” Journal of vascular surgery (2026). PMID: 41197838 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [194]
Chandra VM, Norton EL, Khaja MS et al.. “Surgical and endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A systematic review of in-hospital mortality.” JTCVS open (2022). PMID: 36590716 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [195]
Yip A, Libhaber E, Nam P et al.. “A Systematic Review of Acute Thoracic Aortic Dissections in Africa-The Need for a Registry.” Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) (2022). PMID: 36539145 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [196]
Harris KM, Parikh NB, Nienaber CA et al.. “Iatrogenic aortic dissection: Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40414525 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [197]
Gilon D, Korach A, Carbone A et al.. “Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From 25 Years of Registry Research.” JACC. Advances (2025). PMID: 39999651 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [198]
Bossone E, Eagle KA, Nienaber CA et al.. “Acute Aortic Dissection: Observational Lessons Learned From 11 000 Patients.” Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes (2024). PMID: 39145396 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [199]
Ogami T, Arnaoutakis GJ, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Long-term outcomes after recurrent acute thoracic aortic dissection: Insights from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 38678471 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [200]
Pollari F, Nardi P, Mikus E et al.. “Comparison of 4 mortality scores for surgical repair of type A aortic dissection: a multicentre external validation.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2024). PMID: 38212996 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [201]
Filiberto AC, Ramadan OI, Wang GJ et al.. “Sex disparities in patients with acute aortic dissection: A scoping review.” Seminars in vascular surgery (2023). PMID: 38030323 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [202]
Trimarchi S, Mandigers TJ, Bissacco D et al.. “Twenty-five years of observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) and its impact on the cardiovascular scientific community.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2024). PMID: 37453718 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [203]
Ogami T, Arnaoutakis GJ, Patel HJ et al.. “Postoperative acute kidney injury after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissection.” Journal of vascular surgery (2023). PMID: 37327951 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [204]
Mehta CK, Chiu S, Hoel AW et al.. “Implementation of a direct-to-operating room aortic emergency transfer program: Expedited management of type A aortic dissection.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2023). PMID: 37270850 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [205]
Trimarchi S, Gleason TG, Brinster DR et al.. “Editor's Choice - Trends in Management and Outcomes of Type B Aortic Dissection: A Report From the International Registry of Aortic Dissection.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2023). PMID: 37201718 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [206]
Arnaoutakis GJ, Ogami T, Patel HJ et al.. “Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2023). PMID: 36370884 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [207]
Wolfe SB, Sundt TM, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Survival after operative repair of acute type A aortic dissection varies according to the presence and type of preoperative malperfusion.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2024). PMID: 36333247 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [208]
Catalano MA, Mamdouhi T, Pupovac S et al.. “Age, sex, and contemporary outcomes in surgical repair of type A aortic dissection: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.” JTCVS open (2022). PMID: 36172443 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [209]
Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD et al.. “Early Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” JAMA cardiology (2022). PMID: 36001309 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [210]
Slaven J, Evans M, Partyka C et al.. “Characteristics, clinical findings and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: A comparison between an Australian emergency department and the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA (2022). PMID: 35636964 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [211]
Ganapathi AM, Ranney DN, Peterson MD et al.. “Location of Aortic Enlargement and Risk of Type A Dissection at Smaller Diameters.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2022). PMID: 35550685 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [212]
Reutersberg B, Gleason T, Desai N et al.. “Neurological event rates and associated risk factors in acute type B aortic dissections treated by thoracic aortic endovascular repair.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2024). PMID: 35260280 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [213]
Hemli JM, Pupovac SS, Gleason TG et al.. “Management of acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly: an analysis from IRAD.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2022). PMID: 34977934 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [214]
Reutersberg B, Trimarchi S, Gilon D et al.. “Pleural effusion: a potential surrogate marker for higher-risk patients with acute type B aortic dissections.” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2022). PMID: 34966915 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [215]
Kalogerakos PD, Zafar MA, Li Y et al.. “Root Dilatation Is More Malignant Than Ascending Aortic Dilation.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2021). PMID: 34238012 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [216]
Angleitner P, Brinster DR, Gleason TG et al.. “Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Presenting With Cerebrovascular Accident at Advanced Age.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2022). PMID: 34146671 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [217]
Huckaby LV, Sultan I, Trimarchi S et al.. “Sex-Based Aortic Dissection Outcomes From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2022). PMID: 34090668 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [218]
Loor G, Gleason TG, Myrmel T et al.. “Effect of Aortic Valve Type on Patients Who Undergo Type A Aortic Dissection Repair.” Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2022). PMID: 33984483 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [219]
Harky A, Mason S, Othman A et al.. “Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection repair: Daytime versus nighttime.” JTCVS open (2021). PMID: 36003743 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [220]
Lin TW, Tsai MT, Wu HY et al.. “Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection operations performed by early-career cardiovascular surgeons.” JTCVS open (2021). PMID: 36003577 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Landmark Trials and Key Evidence - [221]
Eghan P, Folson AA, Donkor A et al.. “Relationship between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and cardiac remodeling during pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.” European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology (2024). PMID: 38749071 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations - [222]
John S, Young LT, Lacro RV et al.. “Extracardiac Manifestations Fail to Predict the Severity of Cardiac Phenotype in Children and Young Adults with Marfan Syndrome.” Pediatric cardiology (2025). PMID: 38727826 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations - [223]
Thunström S, Thunström E, Naessén S et al.. “All-cause mortality and death by aortic dissection in women with Turner syndrome: A national clinical cohort study.” American heart journal (2025). PMID: 39603484 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [224]
Liu H, Yang L, Chen CY et al.. “Management strategies and outcomes in pregnancy-related acute aortic dissection: a multicentre cohort study in China.” Heart (British Cardiac Society) (2024). PMID: 39266045 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [225]
Thunström S, Wide U, Landin-Wilhelmsen K et al.. “Psychiatric disorders and comorbidity in women with Turner Syndrome: a retrospective national cohort study.” Translational psychiatry (2024). PMID: 39227579 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [226]
Samman B, Deng MX, Chung JCY et al.. “Understanding Thoracic Aortic Disease in Women.” Circulation research (2025). PMID: 40080538 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [227]
. “Maternal cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with pregnancy in individuals with Turner syndrome: a committee opinion.” Fertility and sterility (2024). PMID: 38980250 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [228]
Nariai M, Wada-Hiraike O, Sasabuchi Y et al.. “Aortic dissection during the perinatal period in women with Marfan-related disorders: a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database.” The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians (2026). PMID: 41866242 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [229]
Chan CH, Chow SC, Chang AT et al.. “Emergency Bentall Procedure for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in a Patient With Preterm Twin Pregnancy.” The Annals of thoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 40466851 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [230]
Wang Z, Yu X, Ding S et al.. “Management and outcomes of aortic dissection type B in late pregnancy: A retrospective case series.” BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology (2024). PMID: 39075929 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [231]
Trajkovski AV, Reiner K, Džaja N et al.. “Anesthetic management for cesarean section in two parturient with ascending aortic aneurysm: a case-based discussion.” BMC anesthesiology (2024). PMID: 38711027 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [232]
Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Vouliotis A et al.. “Ascending Aorta Aneurysm: What the Cardiologist Needs to Know.” Angiology (2026). PMID: 41919573 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [233]
de Groote K, Patel SR, Mortensen KH et al.. “Management of Cardiovascular Health Issues in Turner Syndrome: Expert Insights and Expanded Recommendations From the 2024 Guideline Development Team.” American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics (2025). PMID: 40135715 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations - [234]
Tournoy TK, D'hulst S, Demolder A et al.. “Telomere length in patients with Marfan Syndrome.” International journal of cardiology (2026). PMID: 41679654 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [235]
De Gaspari M, Basso C, Dalla Zanna F et al.. “A 4-Decade Population-Based Registry of Thoracic Aortic Dissection Causing Sudden Death in the Young.” JACC. Advances (2026). PMID: 41475307 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [236]
Shrestha M, Kaufeld T, Rudolph L et al.. “Should We Replace the Non-Aneurysmal Aortic Arch During Elective Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Marfan Patients?” European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2026). PMID: 41442164 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [237]
Van Der Zande JA, Grewal J, Franx A et al.. “Cardiovascular outcomes and aortic growth in pregnant women with Turner syndrome: data from the ESC EORP Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC) III.” European journal of preventive cardiology (2025). PMID: 40916742 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [238]
Figueroa AV, Tanenbaum MT, Costa Filho JE et al.. “Landing zones optimization using transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy for endovascular repair of post-dissection aortic aneurysms.” Journal of vascular surgery (2025). PMID: 40780667 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [239]
Peters PNJ, van der Zande JA, De Backer J et al.. “Pregnancy outcomes in women with heritable thoracic aortic disease: data from the EORP ESC registry of pregnancy and cardiac disease (ROPAC) III.” European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes (2025). PMID: 40576452 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [240]
Bouhatous YM, Arnaud P, Jondeau G et al.. “Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome: follow-up of the cardiovascular features in an international cohort of 29 patients with SGS.” Journal of medical genetics (2025). PMID: 40562530 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [241]
Narula N, Schwartz Y, Devereux RB et al.. “Clinical and Phenotypic Correlates of Mitral Valve Prolapse in Marfan Syndrome: The Cornell Aortic Aneurysm Registry.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 40357669 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [242]
Soto ME, Rodríguez-Brito M, Pérez-Torres I et al.. “Analysis of FBN1, TGFβ2, TGFβR1 and TGFβR2 mRNA as Key Molecular Mechanisms in the Damage of Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection in Marfan Syndrome.” International journal of molecular sciences (2025). PMID: 40243722 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [243]
Campello Jorge CA, Marway PS, Tjahjadi NS et al.. “Growth Rate Assessed by Vascular Deformation Mapping Predicts Type B Aortic Dissection in Marfan Syndrome.” Journal of the American Heart Association (2025). PMID: 40008501 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [244]
Zhou X, Xu Q, Hu X et al.. “PP2A Attenuates Thoracic Aneurysm and Dissection in Mouse Models of Marfan Syndrome.” Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) (2025). PMID: 39878024 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [245]
Chen SW, Chang FC, Chen CY et al.. “Pregnancy, aortic events, and neonatal and maternal outcomes.” European heart journal (2025). PMID: 39528388 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [246]
Butnariu LI, Russu G, Luca AC et al.. “Identification of Genetic Variants Associated with Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Diseases (HTADs) Using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.” International journal of molecular sciences (2024). PMID: 39456956 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [247]
Thomas R, Dhanekula AS, Byers P et al.. “Elective root replacement increases the risk of type B dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39326730 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [248]
Claus J, Schoof L, Mir TS et al.. “Late diagnosis of Marfan syndrome is associated with unplanned aortic surgery and cardiovascular death.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2025). PMID: 39306029 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [249]
Valdivia Callejon I, Buccioli L, Bastianen J et al.. “Investigation of Strategies to Block Downstream Effectors of AT1R-Mediated Signalling to Prevent Aneurysm Formation in Marfan Syndrome.” International journal of molecular sciences (2024). PMID: 38732244 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [250]
Cha HJ, Kim JW, Moon SH et al.. “Lobar torsion following open surgical repair for type B aortic dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome.” Journal of cardiothoracic surgery (2025). PMID: 41353160 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [251]
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J et al.. “2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Circulation (2022). PMID: 36322642 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [252]
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black Iii J et al.. “2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2022). PMID: 36334952 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [253]
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J et al.. “2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2023). PMID: 37389507 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [254]
Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ et al.. “Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections.” Journal of vascular surgery (2020). PMID: 32001058 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [255]
Kicska GA, Hurwitz Koweek LM, Ghoshhajra BB et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Acute Aortic Syndrome.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2021). PMID: 34794601 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [256]
Wanhainen A, Gombert A, Antoniou GA et al.. “European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Descending Thoracic and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Diseases - Editor's Choice.” European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (2026). PMID: 41448425 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [257]
Bradley TJ, Alvarez NA, Horne SG. “A Practical Guide to Clinical Management of Thoracic Aortic Disease.” The Canadian journal of cardiology (2016). PMID: 26724515 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [258]
Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Surgery for aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: A statement of clarification from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (2016). PMID: 26995623 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [259]
Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Surgery for Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Statement of Clarification From the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2016). PMID: 26658475 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [260]
Sheeran DP, Tong RT, Khaja MS et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection-Interventional Planning and Follow-Up: Update 2025.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2026). PMID: 41837923 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [261]
Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM et al.. “Surgery for Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Statement of Clarification From the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Circulation (2016). PMID: 26637530 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [262]
Johansen KL, Garimella PS, Hicks CW et al.. “Central and peripheral arterial diseases in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.” Kidney international (2021). PMID: 33961868 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [263]
. “Increased maternal cardiovascular mortality associated with pregnancy in women with Turner syndrome.” Fertility and sterility (2006). PMID: 17055808 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [264]
Verma R, Cohen G, Colbert J et al.. “Bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy: 2022 guideline update.” Current opinion in cardiology (2023). PMID: 36718616 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [265]
Seki Y, Okamoto K, Ikezoe T et al.. “Clinical practice guidelines for management of disseminated intravascular coagulation in Japan 2024. Part 3: solid cancers and vascular abnormalities.” International journal of hematology (2025). PMID: 39792236 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [266]
Eggebrecht H. “[Diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases : new guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology 2014].” Herz (2014). PMID: 25406331 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [267]
Bruyère M, Morau E, Beaumont É et al.. “[Maternal mortality due to cardiovascular disease in France 2013-2015].” Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie (2021). PMID: 33161192 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [268]
Gao H, Liu X, Wang Y et al.. “Aortic root dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: impact on dissection risk and evaluation of guideline-based surgical thresholds - a retrospective cohort study.” International journal of surgery (London, England) (2025). PMID: 40479495 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [269]
Pak KJ, Hu T, Fee C et al.. “Acute hypertension: a systematic review and appraisal of guidelines.” Ochsner journal (2014). PMID: 25598731 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [270]
Duijnhouwer A, van den Hoven A, Merkx R et al.. “Differences in Aortopathy in Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve with or without Aortic Coarctation.” Journal of clinical medicine (2020). PMID: 31972995 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [271]
Seferović PM, Ristić AD, Maksimović R et al.. “Pericardial syndromes: an update after the ESC guidelines 2004.” Heart failure reviews (2013). PMID: 22855353 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [272]
Sprynger M, Rigo F, Moonen M et al.. “Focus on echovascular imaging assessment of arterial disease: complement to the ESC guidelines (PARTIM 1) in collaboration with the Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases.” European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging (2018). PMID: 30239635 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [273]
Mariucci EM, Lovato L, Rosati M et al.. “Dilation of peripheral vessels in Marfan syndrome: importance of thoracoabdominal MR angiography.” International journal of cardiology (2013). PMID: 22954416 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Guidelines and Resources