On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Recognize acute appendicitis as a progressive inflammatory process that begins with luminal obstruction, leading to mucus accumulation, bacterial overgrowth, and a rapid rise in intraluminal pressure. This mechanical distension triggers visceral afferent fibers in the T10 distribution, explaining the initial periumbilical pain.
- •Identify common triggers for obstruction, including fecaliths, lymphoid hyperplasia (often following viral infections), and rare causes such as Appendico-Ileal Knotting (AIK)—also known as appendiceal tourniquet syndrome—where the appendix encircles the ileum.
- •Consider genetic and systemic predispositions, such as , where thick viscid mucus increases the risk of impaction, or , which can involve the appendix through transmural inflammation.
- •Understand the molecular progression where ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) serves as a marker for tissue necrosis; as intraluminal pressure exceeds venous pressure, venous and lymphatic drainage are impaired, eventually leading to arterial compromise and gangrene.
- •Differentiate between simple (uncomplicated) appendicitis and complicated variants, which include perforation, phlegmon, or abscess formation, often seen in patients with delayed presentation or those at extremes of age.
Evaluation
- •Suspect acute appendicitis in any patient presenting with new-onset abdominal pain, particularly if it follows the classic migratory pattern from the periumbilical area to the right lower quadrant (RLQ) over 12 to 48 hours.
- •Ask about associated symptoms such as anorexia (the 'hamburger sign'), nausea, and vomiting, which typically occur after the onset of pain; the absence of anorexia should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses.
- •Examine the abdomen for localized tenderness at McBurney’s point (one-third the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus) and assess for peritoneal signs like involuntary guarding and rebound tenderness.
- •Perform specific maneuvers to localize the appendix: Rovsing’s sign (RLQ pain upon LLQ palpation), the Psoas sign (pain on hip extension suggesting a retrocecal appendix), and the Obturator sign (pain on internal rotation of the flexed hip suggesting a pelvic appendix).
- •Utilize clinical risk stratification tools such as the or the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score to guide the necessity of imaging; patients with an Alvarado score < 4 are generally low risk.
- •Order laboratory tests including a complete blood count (WBC count) and C-reactive protein (CRP); while non-specific, the combination of normal WBC and CRP has a high negative predictive value for appendicitis.
- •Obtain a contrast-enhanced (CT) as the primary imaging modality in non-pregnant adults, as it provides superior visualization of the appendix and can identify alternative pathologies.
- •Prioritize Ultrasound (US) as the first-line imaging modality in children and pregnant patients to avoid ionizing radiation; if US is inconclusive in these groups, proceed to MRI without gadolinium.
- •Rule out mimics such as ectopic pregnancy (obtain a beta-hCG in all females of childbearing age), mesenteric adenitis, Meckel's diverticulitis, and which can involve the appendix and cause cyclical pain.
- •Maintain a high index of suspicion for atypical presentations in the elderly (aged ≥65), who may present with vague symptoms and a 'quiet' abdomen despite advanced pathology or perforation.
Management
- •Administer intravenous fluid resuscitation and keep the patient NPO (nothing by mouth) once the diagnosis is suspected or confirmed to prepare for potential surgical intervention.
- •Perform laparoscopic appendectomy as the definitive gold standard treatment for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, as it is associated with lower infection rates and faster recovery compared to open surgery.
- •Initiate preoperative antibiotics to cover gram-negative and anaerobic organisms; for community-acquired mild-to-moderate cases, use Cefoxitin 2 g IV every 6 hours or Ertapenem 1 g IV daily.
- •Utilize pediatric-specific antibiotic protocols for complicated cases: Ceftriaxone 50–80 mg/kg/day plus Metronidazole 30 mg/kg/day; if fever >38.5°C persists beyond 72 hours post-op, escalate to Piperacillin/Tazobactam 100 mg/kg every 8 hours.
- •Consider non-operative management (NOM) with antibiotics alone for highly selected patients with uncomplicated appendicitis who wish to avoid surgery, but counsel them on the ~20-30% risk of recurrence within one year.
- •Avoid NOM in patients with an appendicolith (calcified fecalith) visible on imaging, as this is associated with a high rate of antibiotic failure and rapid progression to perforation.
- •Manage complicated appendicitis with a stable phlegmon or abscess (>3 cm) using initial NOM: administer IV antibiotics and arrange for percutaneous image-guided drainage rather than immediate surgery.
- •Monitor for 'treatment-related fluctuation' or failure in NOM; if clinical status worsens or inflammatory markers rise despite antibiotics, proceed to urgent surgical intervention.
- •Limit postoperative antibiotics to less than 24 hours for uncomplicated cases; for complicated cases with adequate source control, continue antibiotics for 4 to 7 days.
- •Refer pregnant patients for immediate surgical consultation, as the risk of fetal loss and preterm labor increases significantly if the appendix perforates.
- •Discharge patients when they are afebrile, tolerating a soft diet, and have adequate pain control with oral medications; routine post-discharge oral antibiotics are generally not required for uncomplicated cases.
Board Review — High Yield
- •McBurney's Point — Located 1/3 the distance from the ASIS to the umbilicus; the site of maximal tenderness in classic appendicitis.
- •Psoas Sign — Pain on passive extension of the right hip; indicates an inflamed appendix in the retrocecal position.
- •Rovsing's Sign — Pain in the right lower quadrant elicited by palpation of the left lower quadrant; indicates peritoneal irritation.
- •Appendicolith — A calcified fecalith seen on imaging; a strong predictor of failure for non-operative (antibiotic) management.
- •Hamburger Sign — A clinical pearl where the patient's desire to eat their favorite food (e.g., a hamburger) makes appendicitis less likely (anorexia is highly sensitive).
- •Subhepatic Appendicitis — A variant due to maldescent of the cecum; presents with RUQ pain mimicking cholecystitis.
- •IMA (Ischemia-Modified Albumin) — A biochemical marker that rises during the ischemic phase of appendicitis before perforation occurs.
- •Situs Inversus — A rare condition that can lead to left-sided appendicitis presentation.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
Pathophysiology
- ▸Luminal obstruction leads to a closed-loop system where intraluminal pressure exceeds venous and eventually arterial pressure, causing transmural ischemia.
- ▸Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) serves as a novel molecular biomarker that reflects the degree of oxidative stress and helps differentiate between simple and perforated appendicitis.
- ▸Genetic factors, such as CFTR mutations in Cystic Fibrosis, increase susceptibility by altering mucus viscosity and promoting luminal impaction.
The pathophysiology of acute appendicitis follows a predictable progression from luminal obstruction to transmural necrosis, though the inciting triggers and molecular responses vary across patient populations. The process is primarily characterized by a closed-loop obstruction that initiates a cascade of mechanical, vascular, and inflammatory events [10][11].
The Obstructive Hypothesis and Luminal Dynamics
The classic mechanism begins with the obstruction of the appendiceal lumen. Common causes include fecaliths, lymphoid hyperplasia, or more rarely, Appendico-Ileal Knotting (AIK), also known as appendiceal tourniquet syndrome [10]. In AIK, the appendix encircles the ileum, creating a closed-loop obstruction that rapidly progresses to ischemia and gangrene [10]. In patients with Cystic Fibrosis , variants in the CFTR gene lead to the production of abnormally thick, viscid mucus, which significantly increases the risk of luminal impaction and subsequent inflammation [6]D.
Once the lumen is obstructed, the appendiceal mucosa continues to secrete mucus, and resident bacteria proliferate. This leads to a rapid rise in intraluminal pressure. Research suggests that appendix length may influence this progression; shorter appendices may experience a more rapid increase in intraluminal pressure compared to longer ones, potentially leading to a higher frequency of early perforation [11].
Vascular Compromise and Ischemic Signaling
As intraluminal pressure exceeds venous pressure, venous and lymphatic drainage are impaired, resulting in mucosal edema and further pressure elevation. This stage marks the transition from simple inflammation to ischemic injury.
Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) has emerged as a critical molecular marker during this phase [1][5]. IMA is produced when serum albumin contacts ischemic tissues, leading to a reduction in its cobalt-binding capacity due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress [1].
- Step 1: Antigen/Trigger Exposure: Luminal obstruction (fecalith, AIK, or thick mucus) occurs [6]D[10].
- Step 2: Mechanical Distension: Intraluminal pressure rises, stimulating visceral afferent fibers (T10 distribution) [11].
- Step 3: Venous Congestion: Edema develops as venous outflow is restricted.
- Step 4: Molecular Mimicry/Ischemic Response: Ischemia triggers the production of IMA and other oxidative stress markers [5].
- Step 5: Arterial Compromise: High pressure eventually halts arterial inflow, leading to infarction.
- Step 6: Bacterial Translocation: The mucosal barrier fails, allowing bacterial invasion into the appendiceal wall [13]D.
Molecular Mediators and Oxidative Stress
The progression from acute to perforated appendicitis is driven by an escalation in oxidative stress. Patients with perforated appendicitis exhibit significantly higher levels of IMA and other biochemical markers compared to those with uncomplicated acute appendicitis [5]. This suggests that the degree of albumin modification is proportional to the severity of the ischemic insult and the extent of tissue necrosis [1]. In cases of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia—such as those induced by cocaine use—severe splanchnic vasoconstriction can mimic the clinical presentation of appendicitis by causing localized cecal or appendiceal gangrene without mechanical luminal obstruction [19]C.
Susceptibility and Immunogenetic Factors
Susceptibility to complicated appendicitis (perforation or abscess) is influenced by age and underlying genetic conditions. In the elderly, a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis is often attributed to delayed diagnosis and physiological changes in the appendiceal vasculature, which may predispose them to more rapid ischemia [12]D[16]D. Furthermore, the presence of Crohn's disease in the ileocecal region can predispose individuals to appendiceal involvement through transmural inflammation, often discovered incidentally during surgery for suspected acute appendicitis [4]. In the context of systemic viral infections like , segmental bowel wall thickening and mesenteric ischemia have been observed, which may further complicate the inflammatory landscape of the right lower quadrant [3].
| Stage | Pathophysiological Event | Key Mediators/Markers |
|---|---|---|
| Early | Luminal obstruction & distension | CFTR dysfunction [6]D, Mucus accumulation |
| Intermediate | Venous congestion & mucosal edema | Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) [1] |
| Late | Arterial compromise & gangrene | Oxidative stress markers, IMA [5] |
| Perforation | Transmural necrosis & translocation | Elevated CRP, IMA, Bacterial toxins [5][13]D |
Clinical Features and Variants
- ▸The classic migration of pain from the periumbilical region to the RLQ occurs over 12-48 hours, but anatomical variants like subhepatic or left-sided appendicitis can shift the pain to the RUQ or LLQ.
- ▸Geriatric and pediatric populations frequently present with atypical, non-specific symptoms, leading to higher rates of perforation and complications.
- ▸Chronic appendicitis is a distinct clinical entity characterized by symptoms persisting for weeks, which may be managed via endoscopic or surgical approaches.
The clinical presentation of varies significantly based on the patient's age, the anatomical position of the appendix, and the presence of underlying systemic conditions. While the classic presentation involves migratory pain, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for atypical variants that often lead to diagnostic delays and increased morbidity [24]D[27]D.
Presenting Symptoms
The hallmark of acute appendicitis is the progression of abdominal pain. In the classic sequence, visceral pain begins in the periumbilical region due to appendiceal distension, subsequently migrating to the right lower quadrant (RLQ) as the overlying parietal peritoneum becomes inflamed [24]D. This progression typically occurs over 12 to 48 hours.
In contrast, chronic appendicitis presents with a more indolent timeline, where symptoms may persist or recur over days to weeks [21]. Patients with chronic variants often report recurrent bouts of RLQ pain that may be less severe than acute episodes but significantly impact quality of life [21]. In pediatric populations, especially those under 5 years of age, the presentation is frequently non-specific, often involving fever, vomiting, and generalized irritability rather than localized pain [31]C.
Physical Examination Findings
A systematic physical examination is essential for localizing the inflammation and assessing for complications such as perforation.
- Abdominal Examination: The most reliable finding is localized tenderness at McBurney’s point (one-third the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus). Clinicians should assess for peritoneal signs, including rebound tenderness and involuntary guarding. Specific maneuvers include Rovsing’s sign (pain in the RLQ upon palpation of the left lower quadrant) and the psoas sign (pain on hip extension), which suggests a retrocecal appendix.
- Systemic Assessment: Low-grade fever is common, but high-grade fever (>38.5°C) may indicate perforation or abscess formation [31]C. In geriatric patients, these systemic responses are often blunted due to frailty and multisystem comorbidities, leading to a deceptively "quiet" abdomen despite advanced pathology [27]D[28]D.
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS): In pediatric cases, POCUS can identify specific etiologies, such as motile Enterobius vermicularis (pinworms) within a dilated appendix, which may present with acute intermittent pain rather than constant inflammation [32]C.
Phenotypic Variants
The anatomical position of the appendix, which varies in length (averaging 10.31 cm in some cohorts [30]D), dictates the site of maximal tenderness.
| Variant | Key Features | Frequency/Context |
|---|---|---|
| Subhepatic Appendicitis (SHA) | Mimics hepatobiliary disease (cholecystitis); pain localized to the right upper quadrant [25]. | Rare; due to failed cecal descent |
| Left-Sided Appendicitis | Pain in the left lower quadrant; associated with situs inversus or midgut malrotation [33]C. | Very rare; requires high suspicion |
| Chronic/Recurrent | Symptoms lasting >48 hours or recurring over weeks; may be managed by organ-preserving endoscopic therapy [21]. | Increasing recognition |
| Geriatric Appendicitis | Atypical presentation with vague pain and higher rates of perforation [27]D[28]D. | Patients ≥ 65 years |
| Pregnancy-Associated | Appendix displaced superiorly by the gravid uterus; pain may be in the mid-to-upper right abdomen [34]C. | Most common non-obstetric emergency |
Red Flags
Certain clinical findings necessitate urgent surgical consultation or advanced imaging to prevent life-threatening complications:
- Signs of Peritonitis: Diffuse abdominal rigidity and high-grade fever suggest perforation.
- Markedly Elevated Inflammatory Markers: A significantly high WBC count or CRP level in a child with vague symptoms may indicate a secondary complication, such as a hepatic abscess following a missed perforation [31]C.
- Third Trimester Pregnancy: Physiological changes can obscure symptoms, and a delay in diagnosis increases the risk of fetal loss and maternal sepsis [34]C.
- Geriatric Frailty: In patients ≥ 65 years, the absence of classic RLQ pain does not rule out appendicitis; these patients have a higher mortality rate and require lower thresholds for CT imaging [28]D.
Atypical Presentations and Mimics
Clinicians must differentiate appendicitis from rare conditions that present with similar features. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis can mimic appendicitis with RLQ pain and vomiting before the characteristic purpuric rash appears [35]C. In women of reproductive age, can involve the appendix, causing chronic or cyclical pain that mimics chronic appendicitis; visual inspection during laparoscopy often fails to detect these histopathologic abnormalities [22].
Rarely, appendiceal masses such as neurofibromas (associated with ) can present as a palpable RLQ mass and fever [23]. Additionally, appendiceal hemorrhage is an extremely rare cause of lower bleeding that may present without typical inflammatory symptoms, often requiring advanced endoscopic visualization for diagnosis [26]C.
| Variant | Clinical Presentation | Diagnostic Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Subhepatic | Right upper quadrant pain, positive Murphy-like sign [25] | Often misdiagnosed as cholecystitis |
| Left-Sided | Left lower quadrant pain, omental torsion [33]C | Requires recognition of midgut malrotation |
| Chronic | Recurrent RLQ pain, symptoms >48 hours [21] | May be missed on initial acute evaluation |
| Pediatric (<5 yrs) | Fever, vomiting, generalized abdominal pain [31]C | High risk of missed perforation and abscess |
| Geriatric (≥65 yrs) | Vague pain, blunted febrile response [27]D[28]D | Higher morbidity and mortality due to delay |
Special Populations
- ▸Ultrasound is the first-line imaging for pediatrics, but MRI is preferred in pregnancy to avoid ionizing radiation.
- ▸Elderly patients (≥65 years) have a significantly higher risk of perforation and mortality, necessitating prompt surgical intervention.
- ▸Pediatric complicated appendicitis is typically managed with Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole, with escalation to Piperacillin/Tazobactam if fever persists beyond 72 hours.
The of acute appendicitis requires significant adaptation based on patient age, physiological state, and immune status. While the condition remains the most common abdominal surgical emergency worldwide, substantial variability in presentation and outcomes persists across different demographics [36]. Clinicians must balance the risks of diagnostic radiation, surgical intervention, and the potential for rapid disease progression in vulnerable groups.
Pediatrics
Pediatric appendicitis presents unique diagnostic challenges due to the overlap of symptoms with common childhood illnesses and the risks associated with ionizing radiation. Ultrasound (US) is the established first-line imaging modality to avoid radiation exposure, though its efficacy is operator-dependent [39]. A prospective study of 1,174 children found that false-negative US results are more likely in the presence of specific clinical and inflammatory predictors, necessitating close observation or secondary imaging when clinical suspicion remains high [39]. Recent advancements include the use of interpretable AI models that utilize routine hematological parameters, such as neutrophil and eosinophil percentages, to facilitate rapid emergency diagnosis [53]D.
Management strategies for children are evolving toward a choice between traditional appendectomy and non-operative management (NOM) for uncomplicated cases [41]. While NOM is increasingly common, clinicians must consider the theoretical risk of missing an incidental appendiceal neoplasm, although the incidence in children meeting NOM criteria is extremely low [56]D. For surgical cases, Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a viable alternative to conventional laparoscopy, offering similar complication rates and hospital stays [64].
Pediatric Antibiotic Protocol (Complicated Appendicitis):
- Initial Therapy: Administer IV Ceftriaxone (50–80 mg/kg/day) plus Metronidazole (30 mg/kg/day) [57]D, [58]D.
- Monitoring: Evaluate for persistent fever (>38.5°C) beyond 72 hours postoperatively [57]D.
- Escalation: If fever persists, switch to Piperacillin/Tazobactam (100 mg/kg every 8 hours) to cover resistant organisms [57]D.
- Discharge: The use of post-discharge oral home remains controversial; meta-analyses suggest they may not significantly reduce readmission rates compared to no antibiotics [37].
Pregnancy
Appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric surgical emergency during pregnancy [36]. Diagnosis is complicated by the anatomical displacement of the appendix by the gravid uterus and the physiological leukocytosis of pregnancy. To avoid fetal radiation, MRI is the preferred advanced imaging modality when ultrasound is inconclusive [36]. Specifically, T2-weighted imaging with deep-learning reconstruction has shown high utility in diagnosing acute abdominal conditions in emergency settings [50]D. Surgical intervention remains the gold standard, as perforation significantly increases the risk of fetal loss and [36].
Elderly (Aged ≥65 Years)
Older adults experience disproportionately higher morbidity and mortality compared to younger populations [43]. This is often due to delayed presentation, atypical symptoms, and a higher baseline prevalence of comorbidities. For instance, rare anatomical variations like a subhepatic cecum (found in 0.3–0.5% of individuals) can lead to right upper quadrant pain, mimicking cholecystitis [63]C.
Elderly patients have a significantly higher risk of perforation (up to 46.9% in some cohorts) [38]. While some data suggest that short in-hospital delays (<12–24 hours) may be safe, the consensus emphasizes prompt surgical intervention to prevent sepsis [59]D. Furthermore, the elderly are more susceptible to rare pathogens; for example, Eggerthella lenta bacteremia has been reported in older patients with abdominal infections, leading to septic shock and requiring escalation to Meropenem [45]C.
Immunocompromised Patients
Patients with compromised immune systems, including those on anti-CD20 therapies like Ocrelizumab (IV 600 mg every 6 months) for multiple sclerosis, may present with attenuated inflammatory responses [44]C. In these individuals, classic signs such as rebound tenderness or high fever may be absent, leading to a "silent" progression to perforation [36]. A high index of clinical suspicion and early use of cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) is mandatory. Management should be aggressive, as these patients have lower physiological reserves to tolerate intra-abdominal sepsis [36].
| Population | Primary Diagnostic Tool | Key Management Modification | Primary Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pediatrics | Ultrasound [39] | Consider NOM for uncomplicated cases [41] | Missed neoplasm (rare) [56]D |
| Pregnancy | MRI (T2-weighted) [50]D | Prompt surgery to protect fetus [36] | Fetal loss/Preterm labor [36] |
| Elderly | CT Scan [36] | Early surgery due to perforation risk [59]D | High mortality/Sepsis [43] |
| Immunocompromised | CT or MRI [36] | Aggressive IV antibiotics and surgery [36] | Attenuated symptoms/Silent perforation [44]C |
Guidelines and Resources
- ▸Contrast-enhanced CT is the gold standard for adult diagnosis, reducing negative appendectomy rates to 1-3%.
- ▸Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred surgical approach across all populations, including pregnant and obese patients.
- ▸Nonoperative management is a conditional alternative for uncomplicated appendicitis but carries a risk of recurrence and is less effective if an appendicolith is present.
Clinical practice guidelines for acute appendicitis have evolved significantly, shifting from a purely clinical diagnosis to an imaging-first strategy to minimize negative appendectomy rates (NAR). Current guidelines from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) [36], the Society of American and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) [66], and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) [71] emphasize risk stratification and the use of cross-sectional imaging in nearly all adult populations.
Diagnostic Imaging Protocols
Modern diagnostic pathways prioritize high-sensitivity imaging to reduce the NAR from historical levels of 25% to current benchmarks of 1% to 3% [77][81]. The choice of modality is dictated by the patient's age, pregnancy status, and clinical risk score.
Step 1: Clinical Risk Stratification Initial assessment should utilize validated scoring systems such as the or the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score [36][72]. Patients with a low clinical probability (e.g., Alvarado score <4) may often be safely discharged with follow-up instructions, while intermediate and high-risk patients require further evaluation [84].
Step 2: Imaging Selection
- Adults (Non-pregnant): Contrast-enhanced (CT) is the primary and most appropriate imaging modality [77][81]. The IDSA 2024 update recommends CT with IV contrast over non-contrast CT due to superior visualization of the appendix and alternative pathologies [71].
- Children: Ultrasound (US) is the recommended initial modality to avoid ionizing radiation [72][84]. If US is inconclusive, MRI (without contrast) or low-dose CT is preferred [71][72].
- Pregnant Patients: US is the first-line modality [80][81]. If US is non-diagnostic, MRI without gadolinium is the preferred second-line study [77][85]. CT should be reserved for cases where MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, as the risk of missed diagnosis often outweighs the risk of fetal radiation exposure [80].
Guidelines and Controversies
While laparoscopic appendectomy remains the gold standard, nonoperative management (NOM) has emerged as a viable alternative in highly selected cases of uncomplicated appendicitis.
Operative vs. Nonoperative Management SAGES 2024 guidelines provide a conditional recommendation for NOM in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis who prioritize avoiding surgery and accept a higher risk of recurrence [66]. However, the WSES 2025 Jerusalem guidelines emphasize that surgery remains the definitive treatment, particularly in patients with an appendicolith, which is associated with a higher failure rate of antibiotic therapy [36]. For complicated appendicitis (e.g., abscess or phlegmon), initial NOM with and percutaneous drainage (if >3 cm) is generally preferred over immediate surgery [36][82].
Surgical Technique Laparoscopic appendectomy is strongly recommended over open surgery for nearly all populations, including patients with obesity (BMI ≥30), the elderly (age ≥65), and pregnant patients [36][68][76]. In pregnancy, the laparoscopic approach is associated with lower rates of wound infection and faster recovery without increased risk of fetal loss compared to open surgery [68][76].
Special Populations
- Elderly Patients: Guidelines emphasize a lower threshold for imaging due to atypical presentations and a higher risk of perforation (up to 70% in some series) [74][75]. Early CT is mandatory to rule out malignancy, as the incidence of appendiceal neoplasms increases with age [75].
- Immunocompromised Patients: These patients often lack classic signs like fever or leukocytosis. WSES guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach and early cross-sectional imaging to avoid delays in treatment [79].
- Remote/Low-Resource Areas: In settings with limited access to CT or laparoscopy, clinical scores and US are prioritized, and open appendectomy remains an acceptable standard [83].
Antimicrobial Recommendations
For complicated intra-abdominal infections, the IDSA and SIS recommend specific regimens based on the severity of the infection [67][90].
- Community-acquired (Mild-to-Moderate): Cefoxitin 2 g IV every 6 hours or Ertapenem 1 g IV daily [67].
- Duration: For uncomplicated appendicitis, antibiotics should be discontinued within 24 hours postoperatively. For complicated cases with adequate source control, a duration of 4 to 7 days is typically sufficient [67][90].
| Guideline | Organization | Year | Key Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jerusalem Guidelines [36] | WSES | 2025 | Comprehensive update; favors laparoscopy; risk-stratified imaging; NOM for selected uncomplicated cases. |
| SAGES Appendicitis [66] | SAGES | 2024 | Conditional recommendation for NOM in uncomplicated cases; strongly favors laparoscopy. |
| IDSA Imaging Update [71] | IDSA | 2024 | Recommends CT with IV contrast for adults; US then MRI/CT for children and pregnancy. |
| ACR Appropriateness Criteria [81] | ACR | 2022 | CT with contrast is most appropriate for RLQ pain; US/MRI for pregnancy. |
| EAES Pregnancy [76] | EAES | 2022 | Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and preferred over open surgery in all trimesters. |
| Swedish National Guidelines [73] | Swedish Surgical Society | 2025 | Evidence-based national standards for uniform management in adults and children. |
| EAST Practice Management [82] | EAST | 2019 | Recommends against routine interval appendectomy after successful NOM of abscess. |
References
- [1]
Singh A, Pogorelić Z, Agrawal A et al.. “Utility of Ischemia-Modified Albumin as a Biomarker for Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of clinical medicine (2023). PMID: 37685553 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology - [2]
Reinisch A, Liese J, Padberg W et al.. “Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.” Journal of robotic surgery (2023). PMID: 35727485 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology - [3]
Singh P, Singh SP, Verma AK et al.. “A Systematic Review of Abdominal Imaging Findings in COVID-19 Patients.” Visceral medicine (2021). PMID: 34580634 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology - [4]
Quaresma AB, Miranda EF, Kotze PG. “MANAGEMENT OF ILEOCECAL CROHN'S DISEASE DURING SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.” Arquivos de gastroenterologia (2021). PMID: 34909865 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology - [5]
Caliskan O, Ozkan BN, Unlu MT et al.. “Ischemia-Modified Albumin and Oxidative Stress Marker in Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Study.” The Journal of surgical research (2025). PMID: 40381390 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [6]
Ley D, Turck D. “Digestive outcomes in Cystic fibrosis.” Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology (2022). PMID: 35331400 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [7]
Kärkkäinen JM. “Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Challenge for the Acute Care Surgeon.” Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society (2021). PMID: 33866891 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology - [8]
Lin J, Liu X, Li Y et al.. “Testicular torsion after laparoscopic appendectomy: salvage by spermatic cord heparin flush and testicular decompression - a case report and literature review.” BMC pediatrics (2025). PMID: 40604587 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [9]
Harada T, Watari T, Watanuki S et al.. “Preventable diagnostic errors of lower gastrointestinal perforation: a secondary analysis of a large-scale multicenter retrospective study.” International journal of emergency medicine (2024). PMID: 39702011 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [10]
Bhargav P, Tiwari AK, Nargesh SS et al.. “Appendico-Ileal Knotting (Appendiceal Tourniquet Syndrome): A Systematic Review and Clinicopathological Classification.” Cureus (2026). PMID: 41777962 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology - [11]
Dibekoğlu C. “Does the length matter in acute appendicitis for the perforation risk?: A retrospective cohort study.” Medicine (2022). PMID: 36482564 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [12]
Coutureau J, Millet I, Taourel P. “CT of acute abdomen in the elderly.” Insights into imaging (2025). PMID: 40335795 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [13]
Coccolini F, Brogi E, Ceresoli M et al.. “Epidemiological analysis of intra-abdominal infections in Italy from the Italian register of complicated intra-abdominal infections-the IRIS study: a prospective observational nationwide study.” World journal of emergency surgery : WJES (2025). PMID: 40097999 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [14]
Sermonesi G, Tian BWCA, Vallicelli C et al.. “Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.” World journal of emergency surgery : WJES (2023). PMID: 38066631 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [15]
O'Meara L, Zhang A, Baum JN et al.. “Anticoagulation in emergency general surgery: Who bleeds more? The EAST multicenter trials ACES study.” The journal of trauma and acute care surgery (2023). PMID: 37349868 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [16]
Guttman MP, Tillmann BW, Nathens AB et al.. “Long-term survival in high-risk older adults following emergency general surgery admission.” The journal of trauma and acute care surgery (2021). PMID: 34252059 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [17]
Koninckx CR, Donat E, Benninga MA et al.. “The Use of Fecal Calprotectin Testing in Paediatric Disorders: A Position Paper of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Gastroenterology Committee.” Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (2021). PMID: 33716293 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [18]
Guttman MP, Tillmann BW, Nathens AB et al.. “Alive and at home: Five-year outcomes in older adults following emergency general surgery.” The journal of trauma and acute care surgery (2021). PMID: 33502146 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology - [19]
Elaskri H, Ben Abid S, Oueslati A et al.. “Cocaine-associated non-occlusive ischemic colitis mimicking appendicitis in a young woman: a case report.” Future science OA (2025). PMID: 41071079 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [20]
Horibe A, Funasaka J, Hiroshima K et al.. “Epiploic appendagitis on the vermiform appendix is often misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis.” Emergency radiology (2025). PMID: 39661268 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology - [21]
Chen L, Feng Y, Liu Y et al.. “Digital cholangioscope-assisted endoscopic direct-vision appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy for chronic appendicitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.” Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology (2026). PMID: 41732326 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [22]
Nezhat C, Najmi Z, Mirzaie M et al.. “Selective Appendectomy in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometriosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” Journal of clinical medicine (2025). PMID: 41156147 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [23]
Jiang YF, Li XZ, Wang PA et al.. “Case Report: Appendiceal neurofibroma associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: a rare case and systematic review of the literature.” Frontiers in surgery (2026). PMID: 41971055 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [24]
Akbulut S, Kucukakcali Z, Colak C. “Artificial intelligence in acute appendicitis: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning applications.” World journal of gastroenterology (2025). PMID: 41358178 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [25]
Shivalingam Vanaraj NA, G V V, Vijayakumar K et al.. “Subhepatic Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Challenges, and Surgical Management.” Cureus (2025). PMID: 41466917 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [26]
Zheng J, Sun Y, Xu B. “Endoscopic diagnosis of appendiceal hemorrhage with a disposable imaging catheter (EyeMax): a case report.” Frontiers in medicine (2026). PMID: 41788716 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [27]
Li D. “Emergency surgical conditions in geriatric patients: current research landscape.” International journal of emergency medicine (2025). PMID: 41462071 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [28]
Aslan F, Binici S, Beger B et al.. “Acute appendicitis in geriatric population: a clinical and prognostic comparison of surgical intervention and conservative management.” BMC geriatrics (2026). PMID: 41987071 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [29]
Calışkan YK, Başak F, Erdem O. “Can AI safely choose antibiotics over the knife? A STROBE-guided benchmark of GPT-4, GPT-5, and Gemini for non-operative acute appendicitis management.” International journal of medical informatics (2026). PMID: 41831386 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [30]
Sahin E, Tuncer A, Kayaalp C et al.. “Small Intestine and Vermiform Appendix Lengths in Healthy Adults: Intraoperative Morphometric Data from a Living Donor Cohort.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41827164 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [31]
Li X, Lin L, Yu C et al.. “Case Report: Diagnostic challenges in pediatric appendicitis: a case of perforated appendicitis with secondary hepatic abscess.” Frontiers in pediatrics (2026). PMID: 41798284 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [32]
Vorel ES. “Point-of-Care Ultrasound Identification of Motile Enterobius vermicularis in the Appendix of a Toddler: The Youngest Reported Case and Successful Nonoperative Management of Early Appendicitis.” Pediatric emergency care (2026). PMID: 41622431 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [33]
Yao H, Ma P, Gao R et al.. “Case Report: Midgut malrotation presenting as left-sided appendicitis with secondary omental torsion: a diagnostic challenge in a child.” Frontiers in pediatrics (2025). PMID: 41602878 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [34]
Didžiokaitė G, Kuznecovaitė A, Šileikis A et al.. “Delayed Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: Diagnostic Pitfalls, Multisurgical Management, and a Prolonged Postoperative Course-A Multidisciplinary Case Report.” Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2025). PMID: 41153265 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [35]
Hayajneh R, Ghazal K, Nakib G. “Atypical presentation of immunoglobulin A vasculitis mimicking acute appendicitis in a pediatric patient: a case report.” Future science OA (2025). PMID: 40961422 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Clinical Features and Variants - [36]
Podda M, Ceresoli M, De Simone B et al.. “Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis: 2025 Edition of the World Society of Emergency Surgery Jerusalem Guidelines.” JAMA surgery (2026). PMID: 41604201 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Special Populations, Guidelines and Resources - [37]
Arredondo Montero J, Rico-Jiménez M. “Post-discharge oral home antibiotic use in complicated pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” World journal of pediatrics : WJP (2026). PMID: 41591702 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations - [38]
Tustumi F, Sposito Ribeiro Baltazar LF, Correa LH et al.. “Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” The Journal of surgical research (2025). PMID: 41317594 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations - [39]
Zouari M, Belhajmansour M, Hbaieb M et al.. “Clinical and Inflammatory Predictors of False-Negative Ultrasound in Children With Suspected Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.” World journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 41731339 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [40]
Charlier C, Vijayaratnam S, Jeanton-Seybel C et al.. “Specificities of pediatric listeriosis beyond the neonatal period: A national prospective study.” Med (New York, N.Y.) (2026). PMID: 41605203 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [41]
Permyakova NV, Reading IC, Bridget Y et al.. “The clinical and cost effectiveness of a conservative treatment pathway compared to appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis: study protocol for a randomised controlled multi-centre open-label parallel-group non-inferiority trial (CONTRACT 2 trial) in the United Kingdom (UK).” Trials (2025). PMID: 41345705 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Special Populations - [42]
Akkoyun I, Unuvar BS, Sezer HK et al.. “Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping after Open Appendectomy in Children.” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP (2026). PMID: 41792069 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations - [43]
Saqib T. “A Retrospective Study of Acute Appendicitis-Related Mortality Among Older Adults in the United States: Regional and Demographic Patterns From 1999 to 2020.” Australasian journal on ageing (2026). PMID: 41857783 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations - [44]
Höpner LK, Marschall E, Schindler P et al.. “Dermatological and gastrointestinal adverse reactions in ocrelizumab treated patients with multiple sclerosis: a case series.” Frontiers in immunology (2026). PMID: 41878428 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [45]
Chen L, Chen Y, Lian Y et al.. “Eggerthella lenta: A rare cause of septic shock and sepsis after Fournier's gangrene.” International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (2026). PMID: 41352755 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [46]
Karacan E, Kayili HM. “Machine learning-based diagnostic modeling for differentiating lymphoid hyperplasia from acute appendicitis using laboratory biomarkers.” American journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 41855732 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [47]
Andresson G, Kristínardóttir ÁS. “The Time Course of Perforation and Abscess Formation in Appendicitis.” World journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 41831204 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [48]
Özel HP, Ertenlice A, Er S et al.. “Epidemiology and histopathological spectrum of appendiceal pathologies in 40.286 adults: a multicenter study from Turkey (2017-2025).” European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society (2026). PMID: 41770340 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [49]
Gowda T, Aguirre N, Mohamed M et al.. “Incidence and Predictors of Neoplastic Diagnosis in Patients with a Clinically Abnormal Appendix.” Annals of surgical oncology (2026). PMID: 41721166 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [50]
Xu J, Zhu L, Liu W et al.. “Feasibility study of fast T2-weighted imaging with deep-learning reconstruction in volunteers and emergency patients with acute abdomen.” European journal of radiology (2026). PMID: 41616758 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [51]
Carvalho N, Almeida JS, Carolino E et al.. “Characterization of Th2 Serum Immune Response in Acute Appendicitis.” International journal of molecular sciences (2026). PMID: 41596388 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [52]
Cipolletta E, Zverkova Sandström T, Rozza D et al.. “Treat-to-Target Urate-Lowering Treatment and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Gout.” JAMA internal medicine (2026). PMID: 41587055 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [53]
Liao S, Li Y, Tang H et al.. “Lightweight interpretable AI model using multiple blood parameters for emergency diagnosis of acute appendicitis.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2026). PMID: 41570492 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [54]
Foroutani L, Wang JJ, Kiran S et al.. “True Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in Patients Presenting with Complicated Appendicitis: A Call for a Revised Management Algorithm.” Annals of surgical oncology (2026). PMID: 41524877 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [55]
Ingram MC. “Invited commentary on: Family decision-making during access to surgical care for children: A qualitative analysis and conceptual framework.” Journal of pediatric surgery (2026). PMID: 41421547 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [56]
Turpin AG, Asti L, Lutz C et al.. “Is Appendiceal Cancer a Risk of Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Uncomplicated Appendicitis?” The Journal of surgical research (2026). PMID: 41380223 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [57]
Studer E, Flament-Viricel C, Calinescu AM et al.. “Pediatric complicated appendicitis: Results of a standardized antibiotic protocol in a tertiary center.” Journal of pediatric surgery (2026). PMID: 41371438 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [58]
Lin AM, Meckmongkol T, Fall F et al.. “Implementing pediatric appendicitis pathways across multiple hospitals: A quality improvement project.” Journal of pediatric surgery (2026). PMID: 41352416 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [59]
Schrempf MC, Schiele S, Anthuber M et al.. “Safety of In-Hospital Delay of Appendectomy in Elderly Patients-A Retrospective Analysis of 525 Consecutive Patients Aged 65 and Older Undergoing Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis.” World journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 41351214 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [60]
Arda Y, Brackin RB, Nzenwa IC et al.. “Sex-Based Disparities in Acute Appendicitis: A Nationwide Analysis.” The Journal of surgical research (2025). PMID: 41337808 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [61]
Hall B, Rhoads M, Happ M et al.. “Family decision-making during access to surgical care for children: A qualitative analysis and conceptual framework.” Journal of pediatric surgery (2026). PMID: 41317954 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [62]
Ağ O, Kutluer N, Öğüt MZ et al.. “The Importance of Preoperatively Calculated Halp Score in Differentiating Complicated Acute Appendicitis in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.” World journal of surgery (2026). PMID: 41291390 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations - [63]
Clayton J, Krews J, Fouchi G et al.. “An unusual subhepatic cecum identified during cadaveric dissection: relevance for clinical diagnosis and anatomy education.” Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA (2026). PMID: 41649580 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations - [64]
Purnomo E, Pambudi BS, Nabilah AN. “Comparative outcomes of single incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy in paediatric population: a meta analysis.” The Medical journal of Malaysia (2025). PMID: 41451717 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations - [65]
Yi T, Song Z, Zhao H et al.. “Peri-appendiceal inflammation is associated with appendiceal orifice stenosis and appendiceal body thickening in ulcerative colitis: A case-control study.” The Journal of international medical research (2025). PMID: 41397450 ↗
L3bCASE_CONTROLCited in: Special Populations - [66]
Kumar SS, Collings AT, Lamm R et al.. “SAGES guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis.” Surgical endoscopy (2024). PMID: 38740595 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [67]
Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS et al.. “Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.” Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2010). PMID: 20034345 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [68]
Kumar SS, Collings AT, Wunker C et al.. “SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopy during pregnancy.” Surgical endoscopy (2024). PMID: 38700549 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [69]
Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA et al.. “Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.” Surgical endoscopy (2016). PMID: 27660247 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [70]
Boyle A, Huo B, Sylla P et al.. “Large language model-generated clinical practice guideline for appendicitis.” Surgical endoscopy (2025). PMID: 40251310 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [71]
Bonomo RA, Tamma PD, Abrahamian FM et al.. “2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.” Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2024). PMID: 38963819 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [72]
Koberlein GC, Trout AT, Rigsby CK et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Appendicitis-Child.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2019). PMID: 31054752 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [73]
Salö M, Tiselius C, Rosemar A et al.. “Swedish national guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults and children.” BJS open (2025). PMID: 40203150 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [74]
Antoniou SA, Mavridis D, Kontouli KM et al.. “EAES rapid guideline: appendicitis in the elderly.” Surgical endoscopy (2021). PMID: 33999255 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [75]
Fugazzola P, Ceresoli M, Agnoletti V et al.. “The SIFIPAC/WSES/SICG/SIMEU guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis in the elderly (2019 edition).” World journal of emergency surgery : WJES (2020). PMID: 32156296 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [76]
Adamina M, Andreou A, Arezzo A et al.. “EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment, and evidence-informed European recommendations on appendicitis in pregnancy.” Surgical endoscopy (2022). PMID: 36307599 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [77]
Garcia EM, Camacho MA, Karolyi DR et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain-Suspected Appendicitis.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2018). PMID: 30392606 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [78]
Kumar SS, Calabrese EC, Slater BJ et al.. “SAGES guidelines update to laparoscopy in the era of COVID-19.” Surgical endoscopy (2025). PMID: 39930124 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [79]
Coccolini F, Improta M, Sartelli M et al.. “Acute abdomen in the immunocompromised patient: WSES, SIS-E, WSIS, AAST, and GAIS guidelines.” World journal of emergency surgery : WJES (2021). PMID: 34372902 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [80]
Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A et al.. “Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation.” Obstetrics and gynecology (2008). PMID: 18669732 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [81]
Kambadakone AR, Santillan CS, Kim DH et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain: 2022 Update.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2022). PMID: 36436969 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [82]
Rushing A, Bugaev N, Jones C et al.. “Management of acute appendicitis in adults: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.” The journal of trauma and acute care surgery (2019). PMID: 30908453 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [83]
Perrone G, Sartelli M, Mario G et al.. “Management of intra-abdominal-infections: 2017 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines summary focused on remote areas and low-income nations.” International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (2020). PMID: 32739433 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [84]
Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW et al.. “Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis.” Annals of emergency medicine (2010). PMID: 20116016 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [85]
Brook OR, Dadour JR, Robbins JB et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group: 2023 Update.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2024). PMID: 38823952 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [86]
Nadler EP, Gaines BA. “The Surgical Infection Society guidelines on antimicrobial therapy for children with appendicitis.” Surgical infections (2008). PMID: 18363471 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [87]
Vettoretto N, Gobbi S, Corradi A et al.. “Consensus conference on laparoscopic appendectomy: development of guidelines.” Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (2011). PMID: 21651696 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [88]
Dietrich CF, Hollerweger A, Dirks K et al.. “EFSUMB Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) Task Force Group: Celiac sprue and other rare gastrointestinal diseases ultrasound features.” Medical ultrasonography (2019). PMID: 31476211 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [89]
Collard MK, Christou N, Lakkis Z et al.. “Adult appendicitis: Clinical practice guidelines from the French Society of Digestive Surgery and the Society of Abdominal and Digestive Imaging.” Journal of visceral surgery (2021). PMID: 33419677 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [90]
Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS et al.. “Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.” Surgical infections (2010). PMID: 20163262 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [91]
Bednarczuk T, Bolanowski M, Zemczak A et al.. “Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine and appendix - management guidelines (recommended by the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours).” Endokrynologia Polska (2017). PMID: 28540974 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [92]
Charvériat A, Fritel X. “[Diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease: Clinical, paraclinical, imaging and laparoscopy criteria. CNGOF and SPILF Pelvic Inflammatory Diseases Guidelines].” Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie (2019). PMID: 30878687 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [93]
Bakker OJ, Go PM, Puylaert JB et al.. “[Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended].” Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde (2010). PMID: 21262032 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [94]
Bakker OJ, Go PM, Puylaert JB et al.. “[Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended].” Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde (2010). PMID: 20482926 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources