On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Pulmonary embolism (PE), obstruction of the pulmonary arteries by thrombus, usually from lower-extremity deep veins, is the third most frequent cardiovascular emergency worldwide and a leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world, with an estimated 60,000-100,000 deaths annually in the United States alone.
- •The paradigm for acute PE management shifted from a one-size-fits-all approach (heparin → warfarin) to a risk-stratified model driven by the 2014 ESC algorithm and the 2016 CHEST guideline, which established DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran) as first-line over vitamin K antagonists, a change supported by the landmark EINSTEIN-PE, Hokusai-VTE, and AMPLIFY trials, which collectively showed comparable efficacy with 40-50% less major bleeding.
- •The central pathophysiology is acute right ventricular (RV) pressure overload from mechanical obstruction and neurohumoral vasoconstriction (thromboxane A₂, serotonin). A thin-walled RV poorly adapted to sudden afterload dilates, becomes ischemic, and fails, the hallmark of high-risk (massive) PE. In a subset of patients, failure of clot lysis leads to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), driven by plasmin-resistant fibrin and a macrophage-driven inflammatory milieu.
- •PE is classified by clinical severity: high-risk (sustained hypotension SBP <90 mmHg for ≥15 min or requiring vasopressors), intermediate-risk (normotensive but with RV dysfunction on imaging or elevated cardiac biomarkers), and low-risk (no RV strain, normal biomarkers). The 30-day mortality ranges from <1% in low-risk patients managed as outpatients to 30-50% in high-risk PE with shock.
Evaluation
- •Suspect PE in any patient with acute dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, hemoptysis, or syncope, especially when accompanied by risk factors such as recent surgery, immobilization, cancer, pregnancy, or prior VTE.
- •Assess pre-test probability using a validated tool, the simplified single-question approach ('Is PE the most likely diagnosis?') is as effective as the or and allows a higher D-dimer threshold of 1000 ng/mL when PE is not the most likely diagnosis.
- •Order a high-sensitivity assay in patients with low or moderate pre-test probability. Use age-adjusted thresholds: for age ≥50 years, the upper limit of normal is age × 10 ng/mL (e.g., 700 ng/mL at 70 years). A negative D-dimer rules out PE with a 3-month failure rate <0.5%.
- •If D-dimer is positive or pre-test probability is high, proceed to (CTPA), the gold standard. CTPA identifies PE in ~20% of suspected patients, and a negative CTPA rules out PE with a 3-month VTE risk of 0.0% (level 1 evidence).
- •Use as an alternative when CTPA is contraindicated (severe contrast allergy, renal impairment, pregnancy) or in young women to reduce breast radiation. Planar V/Q has a negative predictive value >99% when interpreted as normal or low probability.
- •In pregnancy, apply the pregnancy-adapted : evaluate three clinical criteria (clinical signs of DVT, hemoptysis, PE as most likely diagnosis). If 0 criteria, use D-dimer threshold of 1000 ng/mL; if ≥1 criteria, use 500 ng/mL. This approach avoided CTPA in 39% of pregnant women (65% in the first trimester) with a 0.21% 3-month VTE failure rate.
- •Perform point-of-care ultrasound as a supplementary tool: a normal anterior lung profile plus evidence of DVT on compression ultrasound has 99% specificity for PE, but sensitivity is low (81%). A negative ultrasound does not rule out PE.
- •Once PE is confirmed, immediately stratify risk using the . Score 1 point each for age >80 years, cancer, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, heart rate ≥110 bpm, SBP <100 mmHg, and SpO₂ <90%. A score of 0 identifies low-risk patients with ~1% 30-day mortality.
- •Order cardiac biomarkers: high-sensitivity troponin (elevated in ~50% of PE patients) and NT-proBNP or BNP. Elevated BNP increases the odds of a complicated in-hospital course 6.8-fold (95% CI 4.4-10) and 30-day mortality 7.6-fold (95% CI 3.4-17). Use age-adjusted hsTnT: ≥14 pg/mL for age <75 years, ≥45 pg/mL for age ≥75 years.
- •Obtain echocardiography or CT to assess RV function. RV dilation on CT (RV/LV ratio >1.0) increases 30-day mortality 2.08-fold (95% CI 1.63-2.66) and PE-related death 7.35-fold (95% CI 3.59-15.09). Echocardiographic signs of RV dysfunction (e.g., TAPSE <16 mm, McConnell's sign) further refine risk.
- •Use the to select low-risk patients for outpatient management. The 11-item checklist includes hemodynamic instability, need for oxygen, active bleeding, severe renal impairment, and other comorbidities. If all criteria are negative, direct discharge is safe (30-day adverse outcome rate 1.1% in a randomized trial).
Management
- •Initiate anticoagulation immediately once PE is confirmed and no contraindications exist. For most patients, start a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) without a parenteral lead-in.
- •First-line: 10 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, then 5 mg twice daily for at least 3 months. In the COBRRA trial, apixaban caused significantly less clinically relevant bleeding than rivaroxaban (3.3% vs 7.1%; RR 0.46; NNT=27).
- •Alternative: 15 mg orally twice daily for 21 days, then 20 mg once daily. Acceptable for patients who prefer once-daily dosing, but bleeding risk is higher than with apixaban.
- •Alternative: 60 mg once daily after 5 days of parenteral anticoagulation (LMWH or UFH). Reduce to 30 mg once daily if CrCl 15-50 mL/min or body weight ≤60 kg.
- •For patients with cancer-associated VTE, apixaban and edoxaban are preferred over LMWH. Apixaban is noninferior to dalteparin (HR 0.63 for recurrence) with similar major bleeding (3.8% vs 4.0%). After 6 months of full-dose therapy, consider reduced-dose apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for extended secondary prevention (noninferior to 5 mg twice daily with fewer bleeding events).
- •For high-risk (massive) PE with sustained hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg for ≥15 min or requiring vasopressors), administer immediate systemic fibrinolysis: as a single weight-based IV bolus (30-50 mg). This reduces death or hemodynamic decompensation from 5.6% to 2.6% (NNT=34) but increases major bleeding from 1.2% to 6.3% (NNH=20).
- •For intermediate-risk PE (normotensive with RV dysfunction and elevated troponin) who develop cardiorespiratory distress (SBP ≤110 mmHg, heart rate ≥100 bpm, respiratory rate >20), consider ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed fibrinolysis (UF-CDT) with alteplase. This reduces the composite of PE-related death, decompensation, or recurrence from 10.3% to 4.0% (RR 0.39; NNT=16) without excess intracranial hemorrhage.
- •Provide supplemental oxygen to maintain SpO₂ ≥90% (≥92% in chronic lung disease). Do not give routine oxygen to normoxemic intermediate-risk patients, it does not improve RV recovery and may mask clinical deterioration.
- •For hypotension, administer cautious fluid resuscitation (250-500 mL crystalloid boluses). If shock persists, start norepinephrine. Avoid excessive fluids that worsen RV distension.
- •Monitor for bleeding: check hemoglobin, platelet count, and renal function at baseline and periodically. Anticoagulate for at least 3 months. For unprovoked PE with high recurrence risk (age >65, residual pulmonary vascular obstruction ≥5%, antiphospholipid antibodies), extend anticoagulation indefinitely.
- •In patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, use warfarin (INR 2-3) rather than DOACs due to higher recurrence rates with DOACs.
- •Refer patients with persistent dyspnea or exercise limitation after PE for structured rehabilitation, an 8-week program improves incremental shuttle walk test by 53 m (95% CI 17.7-88.3) and quality of life.
- •Screen for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in patients with persistent dyspnea 3-6 months after PE: perform echocardiography and V/Q scan. If CTEPH is confirmed, refer to a pulmonary hypertension center for consideration of pulmonary endarterectomy.
- •What NOT to do: Do not use systemic fibrinolysis in all intermediate-risk patients, the bleeding risk (6.3% major bleeding, 2.4% stroke) outweighs the benefit. Do not place inferior vena cava filters routinely, they increase DVT risk without improving survival. Do not discharge a patient with intermediate-risk PE to home without a plan for close follow-up.
Board Review — High Yield
- •Single-question rule-out, Asking 'Is PE the most likely diagnosis?' simplifies pre-test probability and allows a D-dimer threshold of 1000 ng/mL when the answer is 'no', reducing chest imaging by 18%.
- •Apixaban vs rivaroxaban bleeding, COBRRA trial: apixaban causes 46% less clinically relevant bleeding than rivaroxaban (3.3% vs 7.1%; NNT=27), making apixaban the preferred DOAC for acute VTE.
- •CTEPH incidence, Pooled incidence of CTEPH after acute PE is 0.56% in all-comers but rises to 3.2% in survivors; unprovoked PE (OR 4.1) and recurrent VTE (OR 3.2) are strong predictors.
- •Hestia criteria for outpatient management, A randomized trial showed that patients negative for all 11 Hestia criteria can be discharged directly with a 30-day adverse event rate of only 1.1%.
- •Age-adjusted troponin cut-off, In patients ≥75 years, use hsTnT ≥45 pg/mL (not 14 pg/mL) for risk stratification; this improves the C-index to 0.77 and identifies 16.6% as higher risk.
- •Pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm, Using 0 criteria + D-dimer <1000 ng/mL avoids CTPA in 39% of pregnant women (65% in first trimester) with a 0.21% 3-month VTE failure rate.
- •Thrombolysis in intermediate-risk PE, PEITHO trial: tenecteplase reduces death or decompensation from 5.6% to 2.6% (NNT=34) but increases major bleeding from 1.2% to 6.3% (NNH=20) and stroke from 0.2% to 2.4%, reserved for deterioration.
- •Reduced-dose apixaban for cancer, After 6 months of full-dose anticoagulation, apixaban 2.5 mg BID is noninferior to 5 mg BID for preventing recurrent VTE (2.1% vs 2.8%) and reduces clinically relevant bleeding (12.1% vs 15.6%; NNT=28).
- •RV dilation on CT, RV/LV ratio >1.0 on CT is the strongest predictor of PE-related death (OR 7.35), outperforming clinical scores alone.
- •Post-PE rehabilitation, An 8-week exercise program improves incremental shuttle walk test by 53 m and quality of life in patients with persistent dyspnea after PE.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature
- ▸PE is a common cardiovascular emergency and a leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world [1].
- ▸Risk stratification into high-risk, intermediate-risk (with ESC subclassification), and low-risk categories is essential for guiding the urgency and type of therapy [11,14].
- ▸Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a distinct late complication of acute PE, driven by chronic inflammation and vascular remodeling [13].

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an obstruction of the pulmonary arteries by thrombus, most commonly originating from the deep veins of the lower extremities. It is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world and a frequent cardiovascular emergency [1]A1c.
Also Called / Synonyms
- Pulmonary thromboembolism, the preferred pathophysiologic term
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE), the umbrella term encompassing both PE and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Massive PE, historical term for high-risk PE with sustained hypotension
- Submassive PE, historical term for intermediate-risk PE with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction but preserved blood pressure
- Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary (CTEPH), a late sequela of acute PE in which the embolus remodels into a chronic scar in the pulmonary arteries, causing vascular obstruction and pulmonary hypertension [13]D5
Key Terms Used in This Article
- Acute PE, symptomatic obstruction within days to weeks of embolization; the focus of the acute management sections
- High-risk (massive) PE, acute PE with sustained hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg for ≥15 min or requiring vasopressors); the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) algorithm places these patients in the highest risk category [11]B2b
- Intermediate-risk (submassive) PE, normotensive acute PE with evidence of RV dysfunction on echocardiography (e.g., increased RV/LV ratio, abnormal tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE]) or elevated cardiac biomarkers (e.g., high-sensitivity troponin T, NT-proBNP) [11]B2b[14]B2a. The ESC algorithm further subdivides into intermediate-high (both RV dysfunction and elevated biomarkers) and intermediate-low (one or neither)
- Low-risk PE, normotensive, no RV dysfunction, normal biomarkers; can be considered for early discharge or outpatient management
- Subsegmental PE, embolism confined to subsegmental pulmonary arteries; the 2016 CHEST guideline suggests clinical surveillance over anticoagulation when the risk of recurrent VTE is low [4]A1c
- Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), echocardiographic finding that predicts increased risk of death in acute PE; risk ratio for death in all-comers was 1.49 (95% CI 1.24-1.79) [14]B2a
Classification of PE
| Category | Key Feature | Defining Criteria | Supporting Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-risk (massive) | Hemodynamic instability | Sustained hypotension or shock | [11]B2b (ESC algorithm) |
| Intermediate-high risk | RV dysfunction + elevated biomarkers | Both present on echocardiography and lab testing | [11]B2b (adverse outcome in 5.6%) |
| Intermediate-low risk | Either RV dysfunction or elevated biomarkers | One present, not both | [11]B2b |
| Low-risk | No RV dysfunction, normal biomarkers | None of the above | [11]B2b |
| CTEPH (chronic) | Chronic pulmonary hypertension after PE | Pulmonary artery pressure >25 mm Hg at rest >6 months after acute PE [13]D5 | [13]D5 |
Clinical Significance
PE is a common cardiovascular emergency with a case-fatality rate that remains substantial if untreated. It is a leading cause of maternal death [1]A1c and, in patients with , occurs more frequently than in seasonal influenza [12]B3b. For patients who survive an acute PE, up to 4% may develop CTEPH, a progressive condition characterized by chronic inflammation, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and pulmonary vascular remodeling [13]D5. In cardiac arrest suspected to be due to PE, thrombolytic therapy may be considered [18]A1c.
The sections that follow cover the pathophysiology and mechanisms that drive the clinical presentation and risk stratification outlined above.
Pearl: The single most critical decision in acute PE is the initial hemodynamic assessment: a patient with sustained hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg) is high-risk and warrants immediate reperfusion, while every normotensive patient requires systematic risk stratification using RV imaging and cardiac biomarkers to guide the intensity of management.
2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism
- ▸Acute PE causes RV overload through mechanical obstruction and neurohumoral vasoconstriction; the RV's inability to tolerate sudden afterload dictates hemodynamic severity [37].
- ▸Incomplete clot resolution with fibrin resistance to plasmin-mediated lysis and chronic inflammation (macrophages, T cells, SMC-to-myofibroblast transition) underlies CTEPH [13][33].
- ▸Single-cell analysis identifies PAR1 as a therapeutic target linking thrombosis to chronic vascular remodeling in CTEPH [13].
From the classification of acute and chronic thromboembolic disease, the pathophysiologic cascade begins with embolic occlusion of the pulmonary arteries. The hemodynamic consequence depends on the degree of obstruction and the interplay of mechanical and neurohumoral factors [37]D5.
Acute Pulmonary Embolism
An embolus lodged in the pulmonary vasculature produces two immediate effects: mechanical obstruction of the arterial lumen and neurohumorally mediated pulmonary vasoconstriction triggered by local release of thromboxane A₂ and serotonin from activated platelets [37]D5. The combined obstruction and vasoconstriction increase pulmonary vascular resistance, abrupt right ventricular (RV) afterload, and widen the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. Increased physiological dead space proportion (VD/VT) correlates with the extent of unmatched perfusion defects on V/Q scans [31]B3b.
The right ventricle, a thin-walled chamber poorly adapted to acute pressure overload, responds with dilation, increased wall stress, and subendocardial ischemia. If the afterload is sufficiently high, RV failure ensues and cardiac output falls, the hallmark of high-risk (massive) PE [37]D5.
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary (CTEPH)
In a subset of patients, the acute embolus does not resolve completely. Fibrin from patients who develop CTEPH is resistant to plasmin-mediated lysis, with significantly slower cleavage of all three polypeptide chains (p < 0.05) [33]B3b. The release of N-terminal fragments from the beta-chain, which promote cell signaling, migration, and angiogenesis, is also retarded (p < 0.01), suggesting that persistent fibrin structural motifs may drive the transition from acute thromboemboli to chronic obstructive vascular scars [33]B3b. The exact mechanism transforming red clots into fibrotic remnants remains unknown [34]A1c.
Single-cell RNA sequencing of CTEPH thrombus removed at pulmonary endarterectomy has identified a complex cellular ecosystem: macrophages (with a predominant subcluster upregulating inflammatory signaling), CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, and heterogeneous smooth muscle cells (SMCs) [13]D5. A subset of SMCs transitions into myofibroblasts expressing fibrosis markers, and cultured cells from CTEPH tissue show abnormal angiogenic potential, proliferation, and apoptosis compared with control cells [13]D5. PAR1 (protease-activated receptor 1) emerged as a potential therapeutic target: PAR1 inhibition decreased SMC and myofibroblast proliferation and migration, linking thrombosis directly to chronic vascular remodeling [13]D5. This model parallels atherosclerosis, with chronic inflammation driving SMC modulation and fibrotic occlusion [13]D5.
In addition to proximal arterial obstruction, a secondary microvasculopathy of vessels <500 µm develops, further increasing pulmonary vascular resistance and contributing to progressive right heart failure [34]A1c.
Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism (NTPE) encompasses embolization of diverse materials, adipocytes, amniotic fluid, trophoblasts, tumour cells, bacteria, fungi, or foreign bodies, and triggers a severe inflammatory reaction in the pulmonary circulation, often presenting with atypical clinical and radiographic features such as tree-in-bud opacities or micronodules [35]D5.
Pearl: In acute PE, the degree of RV overload is the central determinant of hemodynamic instability; in chronic PE, the transition from a lytic-resistant fibrin scaffold to a macrophage-driven inflammatory milieu marks the pathobiological shift toward CTEPH, and PAR1 inhibition may offer a future pharmacologic target to interrupt this cascade [13]D5[33]B3b.
3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors
- ▸PE incidence and prognosis vary widely: 30-day mortality 1.7% in cancer outpatients to 10.3% in intermediate-risk patients; CTEPH develops in 0.6% of all-comers but 3.2% of survivors.
- ▸Major risk factors include cancer, unprovoked PE, recurrent VTE, fracture, surgery, pregnancy, and elevated biomarkers (BNP, NT-proBNP, GDF-15) or right ventricular dilation on CT.
- ▸Biomarker and imaging risk stratification outperforms clinical assessment alone; elevated BNP confers an OR of 7.6 for 30-day mortality, and RV dilation on CT an OR of 7.35 for PE-related death.
The pathophysiologic triad of venous stasis, endothelial injury, and hypercoagulability translates into a measurable disease burden that varies sharply across populations, clinical contexts, and biomarker profiles.
Incidence and Prognosis
Among all-comers with acute pulmonary embolism, the pooled incidence of subsequent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary (CTEPH) is 0.56% (95% CI 0.1-1.0%); in survivors of the acute event, it rises to 3.2% (95% CI 2.0-4.4%) [47]A1a. The short-term risk of adverse outcomes depends on hemodynamic stability and biomarker status. In normotensive patients, a complicated 30-day course (death, hemodynamic collapse, or recurrent PE) occurred in 7.4% of a derivation cohort and 4.5% of a validation cohort [44]B2b. Among patients with intermediate-risk PE (right ventricular strain plus elevated troponin), the composite of PE-related death, cardiorespiratory decompensation, or symptomatic recurrence within 7 days was 10.3% with anticoagulation alone and 4.0% with catheter-directed fibrinolysis [52]A1b. In cancer-associated PE managed as outpatients, 30-day all-cause mortality was 1.74% (95% CI 0.99-3.03%) [39]A1a.
Risk Factors
Risk factors for PE and its complications span clinical, biomarker, and imaging domains. The table below summarizes the strongest predictors identified in meta-analyses and prospective cohorts.
| Risk Factor | Odds Ratio or Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Evidence Level | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elevated BNP/NT-proBNP for complicated in-hospital course | OR 6.8 (4.4-10) | High (meta-analysis) | [42]A1a |
| Elevated BNP/NT-proBNP for 30-day mortality | OR 7.6 (3.4-17) | High (meta-analysis) | [42]A1a |
| Right ventricular dilation on CT for 30-day mortality | OR 2.08 (1.63-2.66) | High (meta-analysis) | [46]A1a |
| Right ventricular dilation on CT for PE-related death | OR 7.35 (3.59-15.09) | High (meta-analysis) | [46]A1a |
| Unprovoked PE for subsequent CTEPH | OR 4.1 (2.1-8.2) | Moderate (meta-analysis) | [47]A1a |
| Recurrent VTE for subsequent CTEPH | OR 3.2 (1.7-5.9) | Moderate (meta-analysis) | [47]A1a |
| Active cancer (ambulatory high-risk) | HR 0.40-0.66 for VTE with prophylaxis | High (RCT) | [54]A1b |
| Lower-limb fracture (operative) | PE incidence 1.49% | High (RCT) | [53]A1b |
| Nonmajor orthopedic surgery | Major VTE 1.1% with | High (RCT) | [55]A1b |
Elevated growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) independently predicts 30-day complications, with a c-statistic of 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.90), outperforming troponin T (0.72) and NT-proBNP (0.65) [43]B2b.
Special Populations
Pregnancy: PE is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world, and the diagnostic algorithm must balance accuracy with minimizing cumulative radiation exposure [1]A1c.
Cancer: Active malignancy confers a persistent thrombotic risk. In high-risk ambulatory patients (Khorana score ≥2), 10 mg daily reduced VTE during the intervention period (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.20-0.80) [54]A1b. Extended reduced-dose (2.5 mg twice daily) was noninferior to full-dose for preventing recurrent VTE and reduced clinically relevant bleeding (12.1% vs 15.6%) [50]A1b.
Testosterone therapy: In men with hypogonadism and preexisting cardiovascular disease, testosterone-replacement therapy was associated with a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism [51]A1b.
ICU patients: Low-molecular-weight reduces DVT risk compared with control (OR 0.59; 95% CrI 0.33-0.90) and is probably more effective than unfractionated heparin (OR 0.72; 95% CrI 0.46-0.98) [41]A1a.
Pearl: The risk of PE-related death is most strongly predicted by right ventricular dysfunction (OR 7.35) and elevated BNP (OR 7.6), these biomarkers are essential for refining risk stratification beyond clinical factors alone.
4. Clinical Presentation
- ▸Clinical presentation of PE spans from asymptomatic (incidental) to obstructive shock, with dyspnea and pleuritic chest pain as the cardinal symptoms.
- ▸Key bedside signs of high-risk PE include hypotension (SBP <100 mmHg), tachycardia (HR ≥110), hypoxia (SpO2 <90%), and clinical evidence of RV strain.
- ▸In patients with COPD exacerbation or cancer, PE may present atypically, one in four hospitalized COPD exacerbations is associated with PE [64].
From the risk factors discussed above, the clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism emerges as a syndrome of acute cardiorespiratory compromise, driven by sudden obstruction of pulmonary arteries and the resulting right ventricular (RV) pressure overload. The spectrum ranges from asymptomatic incidental findings to fulminant obstructive shock, with the severity determined by clot burden, cardiopulmonary reserve, and the host's inflammatory response.
Presenting Symptoms
- Dyspnea - the most common symptom, often acute and pleuritic; persistent dyspnea after PE is frequent and may be the chief complaint in survivors [57]A1b.
- Pleuritic chest pain - sharp, localized pain that worsens with inspiration, indicating pleural irritation from distal emboli.
- Cough and hemoptysis - less common; hemoptysis is a YEARS criterion (clinical signs of deep-vein thrombosis, hemoptysis, and pulmonary embolism as the most likely diagnosis) [30]B2b.
- Syncope or presyncope - a red flag for hemodynamic compromise, often associated with large central emboli.
- Signs of deep-vein thrombosis - unilateral leg swelling, warmth, or cord-like veins.
Neurological Examination Findings
- Tachypnea (respiratory rate >20 breaths/min) is nearly universal.
- Tachycardia (heart rate ≥110 beats/min) is a predictor of adverse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.31-2.69) [58]B2b.
- Hypotension - systolic blood pressure (SBP) 90-100 mmHg carries an aOR of 2.45 (95% CI 1.50-3.99) for PE-related complications; SBP <100 mmHg is a mortality predictor in cancer patients [58]B2b[61]B2b.
- Hypoxia - basal oxygen saturation <90% is associated with increased 30-day mortality in cancer-associated PE [61]B2b.
- RV strain signs - elevated jugular venous pressure, a right ventricular heave, a loud P2 component of the second heart sound, and tricuspid regurgitation murmur.
Phenotypic Variants
| Variant | Key Features | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamically stable (low-risk) | Normotension, normal RV function, no tachycardia | ~60% of diagnosed PE |
| Intermediate-risk (submassive) | SBP ≥90 mmHg but RV dysfunction on imaging or elevated troponin; heart rate ≥110 may be present | ~30% |
| High-risk (massive) | SBP <90 mmHg for ≥15 min, or need for vasopressors; syncope may be present | ~5-10% |
Red Flags
- Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or a drop of ≥40 mmHg for >15 min.
- Heart rate ≥110 beats/min with evidence of RV strain.
- Oxygen saturation <90% on room air.
- Syncope - suggests large central embolus with transient hypotension.
Atypical Presentations
- In exacerbation: PE may present with worsening dyspnea without classic pleuritic pain or hemoptysis; prevalence of PE in hospitalized COPD exacerbations is 24.7% (95% CI 17.9-31.4%) [64]B2a.
- In cancer patients: unsuspected PE (UPE) is often asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic; the 30-day mortality for truly asymptomatic UPE is 3% versus 20-21% for symptomatic PE [61]B2b.
- In children: symptoms are similar to adults (dyspnea, chest pain) but the PERC-Peds rule can safely rule out PE when negative [68]B2b.
The clinical suspicion raised by these features then guides the selection of diagnostic tests, detailed in the next section.
Pearl: A normotensive patient with PE and heart rate ≥110 bpm, SBP 90-100 mmHg, or oxygen saturation <90% is at intermediate risk and warrants urgent risk stratification [58]B2b[61]B2b.
| Sign | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Systolic blood pressure 90-100 mmHg | 2.45 (1.50-3.99) | Bova et al. [58]B2b |
| Heart rate ≥110 beats/min | 1.87 (1.31-2.69) | Bova et al. [58]B2b |
| Elevated cardiac troponin | 2.49 (1.71-3.69) | Bova et al. [58]B2b |
| Right ventricular dysfunction (echocardiography) | 2.28 (1.58-3.29) | Bova et al. [58]B2b |
| Basal oxygen saturation <90% | Not reported as OR; associated with 30-day mortality (p<0.0001) | Font et al. [61]B2b |
5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored)
- ▸Clinical probability assessment (single question or validated score) determines the D-dimer threshold: 1000 ng/mL for low probability, 500 ng/mL for moderate probability.
- ▸CTPA is the reference standard for PE diagnosis; V/Q scan (planar or SPECT) is an alternative when contrast is contraindicated.
- ▸Point-of-care ultrasound signs (e.g., normal anterior lung profile + DVT) have high specificity for PE and can supplement the workup, but a negative ultrasound does not rule out PE.
The clinical suspicion raised by , , or enters a stepwise diagnostic algorithm that begins with assessing pre-test probability and ends with imaging. The goal is to avoid unnecessary radiation and contrast while identifying the ~20% of patients who truly have PE [21]A1b.
Step 1: Clinical Probability Assessment
Formal scoring systems ( , revised ) or a single clinical question, "Is PE the most likely diagnosis?", stratify patients into low, moderate, or high pre-test probability [75]B2b. The single-question approach has been prospectively validated and simplifies the decision tree: when PE is not the most likely diagnosis, a higher threshold of 1000 ng/mL can safely rule out the disease [75]B2b.
Step 2: D-Dimer Testing
D-dimer is a sensitive but non-specific fibrin degradation product. Its utility depends on the threshold chosen:
- Low pre-test probability: D-dimer < 1000 ng/mL rules out PE without further testing (diagnostic failure rate 0.00%, 95% CI 0.00-0.34) [75]B2b.
- Moderate pre-test probability: a threshold of 500 ng/mL is used; if negative, PE is ruled out [82]B2b.
- High pre-test probability: D-dimer is not routinely recommended because a negative result does not safely exclude PE; proceed directly to imaging.
The PEGeD strategy (low C-PTP + D-dimer < 1000 ng/mL, moderate C-PTP + D-dimer < 500 ng/mL) resulted in a 3-month VTE event rate of 0.00% (95% CI 0.00-0.29) and avoided chest imaging in 65.7% of patients [82]B2b. The simplified single-question strategy reduced chest imaging from 50% to 32% [75]B2b.
Step 3: Imaging (Gold-Standard Test)
(CTPA) is the reference standard for PE diagnosis. In the randomized trial comparing strategies, CTPA identified PE in 20.7% of patients, and the 3-month VTE risk in patients with a negative CTPA was 0.0%) [21]A1b.
Alternative imaging modalities:
- (V/Q): Planar V/Q had a PE diagnosis rate of 16.0% and a 3-month VTE risk of 0.8% after negative workup [21]A1b.
- : Although SPECT V/Q is widely used, the randomized trial did not demonstrate non-inferiority to CTPA/planar V/Q (p for non-inferiority = 0.75). However, the 3-month VTE risk after a negative SPECT V/Q was only 0.5% (1/221), suggesting it is a safe alternative in practice [21]A1b.
When to use V/Q over CTPA: Patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast (e.g., severe allergy, renal impairment) or young women (to reduce breast radiation) are candidates for V/Q imaging.
Step 4: Point-of-Care Ultrasound (Supplementary)
In patients with suspected PE, point-of-care ultrasound can rapidly identify those with high specificity who may not require immediate radiation imaging [66]B2a. The following signs have been prospectively evaluated:
| Test | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilateral compression of femoral and popliteal veins (DVT) | 43.7% (36.3-51.4) | 96.7% (95.4-97.6) | not reported | not reported | [66]B2a |
| Hypoechoic pleural-based lesion (lung ultrasound) | 81.4% (73.2-87.5) | 87.4% (80.9-91.9) | not reported | not reported | [66]B2a |
| (RV free wall hypokinesis sparing apex) | 29.1% (20.0-40.1) | 98.6% (96.7-99.4) | not reported | not reported | [66]B2a |
| Normal anterior lung profile + DVT (BLUE protocol) | 81% (not reported) | 99% (not reported) | not reported | not reported | [67]B2b |
Interpretation: A normal anterior lung profile with evidence of DVT on compression ultrasound has a specificity of 99% for PE [67]B2b. However, sensitivity is low; a negative ultrasound does not rule out PE.
Diagnostic Algorithm (Simplified Single-Question Strategy)
Step-by-step:
- Assess clinical probability. Use either the single question or a validated score. [75]B2b
- If PE is NOT the most likely diagnosis: perform D-dimer. If < 1000 ng/mL, stop, PE is ruled out. If ≥ 1000 ng/mL, proceed to age-adjusted D-dimer (or fixed 500 ng/mL) and then to imaging if positive. [75]B2b
- If PE IS the most likely diagnosis: go directly to age-adjusted D-dimer (or fixed 500 ng/mL). If the result is below the threshold, PE is ruled out; otherwise, obtain CTPA or V/Q. [75]B2b
- Imaging: CTPA is the reference standard. V/Q (planar or SPECT) is an alternative when contrast is contraindicated. [21]A1b
Special Populations: Pregnancy
In pregnant women with suspected PE, the pregnancy-adapted is validated: apply the three YEARS criteria (clinical signs of DVT, hemoptysis, PE as most likely diagnosis). If 0 criteria, use D-dimer threshold of 1000 ng/mL; if ≥1 criteria, use 500 ng/mL. All patients with a positive D-dimer undergo CTPA. This algorithm avoided CTPA in 39% of patients overall (65% in the first trimester) with a 3-month VTE failure rate of 0.21% (95% CI 0.04-1.2) [30]B2b.
Pearl: The single question "Is PE the most likely diagnosis?" can replace complex scoring systems and safely allow a 1000 ng/mL D-dimer threshold, reducing chest imaging by nearly 20 percentage points [75]B2b.
6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification
- ▸Risk stratification integrates hemodynamic status, clinical scores (PESI/sPESI, Hestia), biomarkers (BNP/NT-proBNP, troponin, copeptin), and imaging (CTPA RV/LV ratio, echocardiography) to guide triage.
- ▸The sPESI score of 0 or negative Hestia criteria identify low-risk patients suitable for outpatient management with 30-day adverse event rates below 2%.
- ▸Multimarker models (Bova, PREP, PROTECT) improve intermediate-risk classification, with negative predictive values exceeding 99% for a complicated course.
Once the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism is confirmed by computed-tomographic (CTPA) or ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, the next imperative is to stratify the patient's risk of early death or adverse outcome. This classification drives the triage decision, home, ward, or intensive care, and the intensity of initial therapy.
Clinical Risk Scores: and
The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and its simplified version (sPESI) are the most extensively validated clinical prediction rules for 30-day mortality. The sPESI assigns one point each for age >80 years, cancer, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, heart rate ≥110 beats/min, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <100 mmHg, and arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation <90%. A score of 0 identifies low-risk patients with a 30-day mortality of approximately 1% [85]D5. Use of sPESI to select patients for outpatient treatment has been associated with a low risk of adverse events [40]A1b. In a randomized trial, patients without any Hestia criteria (a 11-item checklist that includes hemodynamic instability, hypoxia, bleeding risk, and comorbidity) had a 30-day adverse outcome rate of 1.1% (95% CI 0.2-3.2%) and could be safely discharged directly [40]A1b.
Biomarkers for Risk Stratification
Biomarkers of myocardial stretch and injury refine risk assessment. Brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) are markers of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In a meta-analysis of 13 studies, elevated BNP was associated with a 6.8-fold increased odds of a complicated in-hospital course (95% CI 4.4-10) and a 7.6-fold increase in 30-day mortality (95% CI 3.4-17). Patients with high NT-proBNP had a 10% risk of dying and a 23% risk of adverse clinical outcome [42]A1a. Cardiac troponin elevation indicates myocardial injury and independently predicts adverse outcome (adjusted OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.71-3.69) [58]B2b. Copeptin, the C-terminal fragment of vasopressin released during stress, adds prognostic value: a threshold of ≥24 pmol/L conferred a 5.4-fold increased risk of adverse outcome (95% CI 1.68-17.58) and further stratified normotensive patients with elevated hsTnT and NT-proBNP into intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk groups [86]B2b.
Imaging for Right Ventricular Dysfunction
RV dilation on CTPA (right-to-left ventricle diameter ratio) is a strong predictor of mortality. In a meta-analysis, CT-detected RV dilation was associated with increased 30-day mortality in all-comers (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.63-2.66) and in hemodynamically stable patients (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.52), and with a 7.35-fold increase in PE-related death (95% CI 3.59-15.09) [46]A1a. Echocardiographic RV dysfunction, together with right-to-left ventricle diameter ratio, also independently predicts 30-day adverse events (adjusted OR per 0.1 increase 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4) [83]B2b.
Multimarker Models and Integrated Algorithms
The combination of clinical scores, biomarkers, and imaging improves classification. The Bova score integrates SBP 90-100 mmHg, heart rate ≥110 bpm, elevated troponin, and RV dysfunction into a 7-point index identifying three stages with 30-day PE-related complication rates of 4.2%, 10.8%, and 29.2% [58]B2b. The PREP model combines altered mental state, shock on admission, cancer, BNP, and right-to-left ventricle ratio, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.90) [83]B2b. A multimarker model from the PROTECT study incorporating sPESI, cardiac troponin I, BNP, and lower limb ultrasound showed a negative predictive value for a complicated course of 99.1% in derivation and 100% in validation cohorts [44]B2b.
Special Populations: Cancer-Associated PE
Patients with active cancer require careful risk assessment. A systematic review of 19 studies (1675 patients) found that selected cancer patients managed as outpatients had a 30-day all-cause mortality of 1.74% (95% CI 0.99-3.03%), major bleeding rate of 2.71% (95% CI 1.51-4.83%), and recurrent VTE rate of 1.26% (95% CI 0.53-3.00%) [39]A1a. These rates suggest that low-risk cancer patients can be considered for outpatient management, though dedicated prospective validation is needed.
Outpatient Management Criteria
Validated selection tools for early discharge include the Hestia criteria and sPESI = 0. In a randomized noninferiority trial, 550 patients without Hestia criteria were randomized to direct discharge or additional NT-proBNP testing; the primary endpoint (PE- or bleeding-related mortality, CPR, or ICU admission) occurred in no patient in the NT-proBNP group and in 1.1% in the direct discharge group (P=0.25) [40]A1b. The Hestia criteria alone appear sufficient for safe outpatient triage. Adding NT-proBNP to a negative Hestia assessment may not further reduce adverse events, but the low event rate precludes definitive conclusions [40]A1b.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role of NT-proBNP in Hestia-negative patients | Unnecessary - Hestia alone suffices [40]A1b | May identify occult high-risk patients [85]D5 | Low evidence | Current practice: Hestia alone for low-risk selection |
| Optimal biomarker algorithm for intermediate-risk | ESC 2014 algorithm: troponin + NT-proBNP + echo [86]B2b | Copeptin-based algorithm may reclassify more patients as low-risk (52.8% vs 17.5%) [86]B2b | Moderate | Either approach acceptable; copeptin not yet widely adopted |
Pearl: The single most important decision is distinguishing normotensive patients with RV dysfunction from those without; this separates intermediate-risk from low-risk PE and determines whether escalation to reperfusion therapy may be warranted.
| Tool | Components | Risk Categories | 30-day Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| sPESI | Age >80, cancer, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, HR ≥110, SBP <100, O2 sat <90% | 0 = low-risk; ≥1 = higher risk | Low-risk mortality ~1% [85]D5 |
| Hestia criteria | 11 items: hemodynamic instability, hypoxia, bleeding risk, comorbidity, etc. | Negative = low-risk | Adverse outcome 1.1% (0.2-3.2%) [40]A1b |
| Bova score | SBP 90-100 (2 pts), HR ≥110 (1 pt), elevated troponin (2 pts), RV dysfunction (2 pts) | Stage I (0-2): 4.2%; Stage II (3-4): 10.8%; Stage III (>4): 29.2% [58]B2b | PE-related death, collapse, or recurrent PE |
| PREP model | Altered mental state, shock, cancer, BNP, RV/LV ratio | Continuous score; AUC 0.84 (0.78-0.90) [83]B2b | 30-day adverse events |
| PROTECT multimarker | sPESI + troponin I + BNP + lower limb ultrasound | NPV 99.1-100% for complicated course [44]B2b | All-cause mortality, collapse, recurrent PE |
7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue
- ▸Risk stratification (high/low/intermediate) drives the acute management pathway: immediate anticoagulation for all, fibrinolysis or catheter-directed therapy for high-risk and selected intermediate-risk patients.
- ▸Apixaban is associated with a 54% lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding compared with rivaroxaban for acute VTE (COBRRA trial, NNT=26).
- ▸Ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed fibrinolysis reduces the composite outcome of PE-related death/decompensation/recurrence from 10.3% to 4.0% in intermediate-risk patients with cardiorespiratory distress (HI-PEITHO, NNT=16).
Risk stratification, completed in the previous section, directly drives the first therapeutic decision. The clinician must decide within minutes whether the patient is high-risk (persistent hypotension or shock), intermediate-risk (normotensive with right ventricular [RV] dysfunction and elevated cardiac biomarkers), or low-risk (normotensive, no RV strain, normal biomarkers), each category warrants a distinct management pathway.
Step 1: Triage and Disposition
For low-risk patients, outpatient or early discharge is safe. The Hestia clinical decision rule identifies candidates: if none of the 11 criteria (e.g., hemodynamic instability, need for oxygen, active bleeding, severe renal impairment) are present, direct discharge is feasible. In a randomized trial, 550 patients selected by Hestia criteria alone had a 30-day adverse event rate of 1.1% (95% CI, 0.2-3.2%) in the direct-discharge group, and no patient with an elevated NT-proBNP (>500 ng/L) who was treated in hospital experienced the primary endpoint (0%; 95% CI, 0-10.2%) [40]A1b. A structured prognostic assessment and management pathway further reduces length of stay: median 4.0 days (IQR 3.7-4.2) vs. 6.1 days (IQR 5.7-6.5) with usual care, without increasing 30-day mortality (2.4% vs. 2.0%) or readmission (4.0% vs. 4.8%) [88]A1b. All intermediate- and high-risk patients require in-hospital management, at least initially in an intensive care unit for high-risk patients.
Step 2: Anticoagulation, Initiation
Anticoagulation should be started immediately once the diagnosis is confirmed, unless a contraindication exists. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the agents of choice for most patients because of their fixed dosing, no routine monitoring, and superior safety profile.
| Drug | Acute dose | Maintenance dose | Renal adjustment | Key trial | Efficacy vs. /LMWH | Bleeding vs. comparator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg PO BID × 7 days | 5 mg PO BID | Avoid if CrCl <15 mL/min; CrCl 15-29: limited data | Caravaggio [94]A1b | Noninferior to dalteparin in cancer (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37-1.07) | Major bleeding 3.8% vs. 4.0% (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.40-1.69) | |
| 15 mg PO BID × 21 days | 20 mg PO daily | Avoid if CrCl <15 mL/min; 15 mg daily if CrCl 15-49 | EINSTEIN-PE [96]A1b | Noninferior to /VKA (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.75-1.68) | Major bleeding 1.1% vs. 2.2% (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.79) | |
| lead-in × 5 days | 60 mg PO daily; 30 mg if CrCl 30-50 or body weight ≤60 kg | Avoid if CrCl <30 or >95 mL/min | Hokusai-VTE [95]A1b | Noninferior to warfarin (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.70-1.13) | Clinically relevant bleeding 8.5% vs. 10.3% (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.94) |
Among DOACs, apixaban carries a lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding than rivaroxaban. In the COBRRA trial (N=2760), the primary outcome (major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) occurred in 3.3% of apixaban-treated patients vs. 7.1% of rivaroxaban-treated patients (relative risk 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.65; P<0.001) [92]A1b. NNT = 26 to prevent one clinically relevant bleed with apixaban. For patients with cancer-associated VTE, apixaban is noninferior to dalteparin and does not increase major bleeding (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.40-1.69) [94]A1b. Rivaroxaban is also an option (cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE 6.4% vs. 10.1% with dalteparin; SHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.21-2.66) [91]A1b, though the trial was underpowered for noninferiority.
Step 3: Escalation for High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Patients
High-risk (massive) PE: Immediate systemic fibrinolysis is indicated unless contraindicated. Tenecteplase, given as a single weight-based bolus, is the most studied agent. In the PEITHO trial, normotensive patients with intermediate-risk PE (RV dysfunction plus elevated troponin) who received tenecteplase plus heparin had a lower rate of death or hemodynamic decompensation within 7 days than those receiving placebo plus heparin (2.6% vs. 5.6%; odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.87; P=0.02) [93]A1b. However, major extracranial bleeding increased (6.3% vs. 1.2%; P<0.001) and stroke occurred in 2.4% (hemorrhagic in 10 of 12) vs. 0.2% (P=0.003). NNT = 33 to prevent death or decompensation, NNH = 20 for major bleeding. Therefore, systemic fibrinolysis is reserved for high-risk PE or intermediate-risk patients who deteriorate.
Intermediate-risk PE with indicators of cardiorespiratory distress: Ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed fibrinolysis (UF-CDT) with alteplase plus anticoagulation reduces the composite of PE-related death, cardiorespiratory decompensation, or symptomatic recurrence within 7 days compared with anticoagulation alone (4.0% vs. 10.3%; relative risk 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.77; P=0.005) [52]A1b. Major bleeding within 7 days was 4.1% vs. 2.2% (P=0.32), and no intracranial hemorrhage occurred. NNT = 16 to prevent a primary outcome event. This approach is an option for intermediate-risk patients with systolic BP ≤110 mm Hg, heart rate ≥100 bpm, or respiratory rate >20 breaths/min.
Step 4: Supportive Care
Oxygen therapy: Supplemental oxygen should be administered to achieve a target SpO₂ ≥90% (or ≥92% in patients with pre-existing lung disease). For nonhypoxemic patients with intermediate-risk PE, routine oxygen does not significantly improve RV recovery. In a pilot trial, normalization of RV size at 48 hours occurred in 42.4% of patients receiving oxygen. 21.6% receiving ambient air [90]A1b. Do not give supplemental oxygen to normoxemic patients solely for intermediate-risk status.
Hemodynamic support: For high-risk patients with hypotension, cautious fluid resuscitation (250-500 mL crystalloid boluses) is appropriate, followed by vasopressors (e.g., norepinephrine) if shock persists. Avoid excessive fluid administration that could worsen RV distension.
Step 5: Monitoring and Transition to Long-Term Therapy
All patients should be monitored for bleeding (especially gastrointestinal and intracranial) and for signs of recurrent PE or hemodynamic deterioration. For patients receiving anticoagulation, check hemoglobin, platelet count, and renal function at baseline and periodically. The decision to transition to long-term anticoagulation (beyond 3 months) is guided by the presence of provoking factors, cancer, and risk of recurrence (see Section 8). In patients with active cancer who have completed ≥6 months of anticoagulation, extended therapy with reduced-dose apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily is noninferior to full-dose (5 mg twice daily) for preventing recurrent VTE (cumulative incidence 2.1% vs. 2.8%; adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.41-1.41; P=0.001 for noninferiority) and reduces clinically relevant bleeding (12.1% vs. 15.6%; adjusted subhazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; P=0.03) [50]A1b. NNT = 28 to prevent one clinically relevant bleed.
Treatment Failure Protocol
If a patient deteriorates (new hypotension, worsening hypoxia, or cardiopulmonary arrest) despite adequate anticoagulation:
- High-risk: Consider immediate systemic fibrinolysis (tenecteplase bolus) if not already given; if contraindicated, proceed to catheter-directed therapy or surgical embolectomy.
- Intermediate-risk: If cardiorespiratory distress develops, escalate to UF-CDT or, if not available, systemic fibrinolysis (with careful bleeding risk assessment).
- Suspected recurrence: Reimage (CT ) and switch anticoagulant class (e.g., from apixaban to edoxaban, or to LMWH).
What NOT to Do
- Do not use routine oxygen in normoxemic intermediate-risk patients; it does not improve RV function and may mask clinical deterioration [90]A1b.
- Do not give systemic fibrinolysis to all intermediate-risk patients; the bleeding risk (6.3% major bleeding, 2.4% stroke) outweighs the benefit in most [93]A1b.
- Do not discharge a patient with intermediate-risk PE to home without a clear plan for close follow-up and anticoagulation adherence.
Figure 1: Acute management algorithm for pulmonary embolism, stratified by risk.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength of disagreement | Implication for practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role of systemic fibrinolysis in intermediate-risk PE | PEITHO trial, reduces decompensation but increases major bleeding and stroke; reserve for deterioration [93]A1b | HI-PEITHO trial, catheter-directed fibrinolysis reduces composite outcome without excess intracranial hemorrhage, offering an alternative [52]A1b | Moderate (different risk-benefit thresholds for different interventions) | UF-CDT is an emerging option for selected intermediate-risk patients; systemic fibrinolysis remains mainly for high-risk cases |
| Outpatient vs. inpatient management of low-risk PE | Hestia criteria, safe for direct discharge (0% adverse events in those with elevated NT-proBNP managed as inpatient) [40]A1b | Prognostic pathway, early discharge after 4 days reduces costs without increasing mortality [88]A1b | Mild (both support outpatient management, differ in selection method) | Hestia is simple; the pathway adds NT-proBNP testing; either approach is acceptable |
Pearl: For acute PE, choose a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) for most patients; apixaban causes less bleeding (NNT=26 vs. rivaroxaban [92]A1b); reserve fibrinolysis for high-risk or selected intermediate-risk patients, and consider catheter-directed therapy for those with cardiorespiratory distress (NNT=16 [52]A1b).
| Drug | Acute dose | Maintenance dose | Renal adjustment | Key trial | Efficacy vs. comparator | Bleeding vs. comparator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apixaban | 10 mg PO BID × 7 days | 5 mg PO BID | Avoid if CrCl <15 mL/min | Caravaggio [94]A1b | Noninferior to dalteparin (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37-1.07) | Major bleeding 3.8% vs. 4.0% (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.40-1.69) |
| Rivaroxaban | 15 mg PO BID × 21 days | 20 mg PO daily | Avoid if CrCl <15 mL/min; 15 mg daily if CrCl 15-49 | EINSTEIN-PE [96]A1b | Noninferior to enoxaparin/VKA (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.75-1.68) | Major bleeding 1.1% vs. 2.2% (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.79) |
| Edoxaban | Heparin lead-in × 5 days | 60 mg PO daily; 30 mg if CrCl 30-50 or weight ≤60 kg | Avoid if CrCl <30 or >95 mL/min | Hokusai-VTE [95]A1b | Noninferior to warfarin (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.70-1.13) | Clinically relevant bleeding 8.5% vs. 10.3% (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.94) |
8. Long-term and Definitive Management
- ▸Anticoagulation duration is guided by recurrence risk factors: age >65, PVOI ≥5% at 6 months, and antiphospholipid antibodies (PADIS-PE trial).
- ▸Apixaban has a lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding than rivaroxaban in the first 3 months of acute VTE treatment (COBRRA trial: RR 0.46, NNT 27).
- ▸Extended therapy with reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg BID) is noninferior to full-dose (5 mg BID) for preventing recurrent VTE and reduces bleeding in patients with active cancer (API-CAT trial).
After initial stabilization, the focus shifts to preventing recurrent thromboembolism and managing the chronic sequelae of pulmonary embolism. The CHEST 2016 guideline and trial evidence provide a structured framework for anticoagulant duration, agent selection, and follow-up.
Step 1: Risk Stratification for Recurrence
Before deciding on anticoagulation duration, stratify the patient’s risk of recurrent VTE. The PADIS-PE trial identified independent predictors of recurrence after a first unprovoked PE: age >65 years (HR 4.70, 95% CI 1.78-12.40), pulmonary vascular obstruction index (PVOI) ≥5% at 6 months (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.14-3.72), and antiphospholipid antibodies (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.15-4.89) [22]A1b. PVOI ≥40% at diagnosis also conferred a twofold increased risk. These factors guide the decision for extended therapy.
Step 2: Anticoagulation Duration and Agent Selection
For acute VTE (first 3-6 months):
- Non-cancer patients: The CHEST 2016 guideline suggests (Grade 2B), (Grade 2B), (Grade 2B), or (Grade 2B) over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy, and suggests VKA over low-molecular-weight (LMWH) (Grade 2C) [4]A1c.
- Cancer patients: The guideline suggests LMWH over VKA (Grade 2B), and also suggests dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban (each Grade 2C) [4]A1c. The Hokusai VTE Cancer study confirmed that clinical outcomes are similar for incidental and symptomatic VTE, supporting the same treatment approach [87]B2b.
Choice of DOAC - apixaban vs rivaroxaban: The COBRRA trial randomized 2760 patients with acute VTE to apixaban (10 mg BID ×7d, then 5 mg BID) or rivaroxaban (15 mg BID ×21d, then 20 mg daily) for 3 months. The primary outcome (clinically relevant bleeding) occurred in 3.3% with apixaban vs 7.1% with rivaroxaban (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.65; P<0.001); NNT = 27 to prevent one clinically relevant bleed [92]A1b. Death from any cause was 0.1% vs 0.3% (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03-2.26). This suggests apixaban has a lower bleeding risk in the acute treatment phase.
Extended therapy (beyond 3-6 months): For patients with unprovoked PE and high recurrence risk (e.g., age >65, PVOI ≥5%, antiphospholipid antibodies), extended anticoagulation is recommended. The CHEST guideline suggests extended therapy without a scheduled stop date for unprovoked VTE [4]A1c.
Extended therapy in cancer patients: The API-CAT trial tested reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg BID) vs full-dose (5 mg BID) for 12 months in patients with active cancer who had completed at least 6 months of anticoagulation. Recurrent VTE occurred in 2.1% vs 2.8% (adjusted sub-HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.41-1.41; P=0.001 for noninferiority). Clinically relevant bleeding was lower with reduced dose: 12.1% vs 15.6% (adjusted sub-HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; P=0.03); NNT = 28 to prevent one clinically relevant bleed [50]A1b. Thus, reduced-dose apixaban is an option for extended secondary prevention in cancer-associated VTE.
Dosing Table
| Drug | Starting dose (acute phase) | Target/maintenance dose | Renal adjustment | Hepatic adjustment | Key monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apixaban | 10 mg BID ×7 days | 5 mg BID | CrCl <25 mL/min: avoid; CrCl 25-30: 2.5 mg BID | C: avoid | CBC, renal function, bleeding signs |
| Rivaroxaban | 15 mg BID ×21 days | 20 mg daily | CrCl <30 mL/min: avoid | Child-Pugh B/C: avoid | CBC, renal function, bleeding signs |
| Edoxaban | LMWH ×5d then 60 mg daily | 60 mg daily; reduce to 30 mg if CrCl 15-50 or weight ≤60 kg | CrCl 15-50: 30 mg daily | Child-Pugh B/C: avoid | CBC, renal function, weight |
| Dabigatran | LMWH ×5d then 150 mg BID | 150 mg BID; reduce to 110 mg BID if age ≥80 or CrCl 30-50 | CrCl <30: avoid | Child-Pugh B/C: avoid | CBC, renal function, bleeding signs |
| Dalteparin (LMWH) | 200 IU/kg SC daily ×1 month, then 150 IU/kg daily | 150 IU/kg SC daily | Adjust per anti-Xa (peak 0.5-1.0 IU/mL) | Caution in severe hepatic impairment | Anti-Xa, platelet count (HIT monitoring) |
Doses are from the CHEST 2016 guideline and pivotal trials; refer to full prescribing information for complete dose modifications.
Step 3: Monitoring and Follow-Up
After discharge, patients should be followed at 1, 3, and 6 months, then annually while on anticoagulation. Assess for bleeding, recurrent symptoms, and adherence. The Hestia criteria can identify low-risk patients suitable for outpatient management: in the trial, the primary endpoint (30-day adverse outcome) occurred in 0% (95% CI 0-1.3%) of patients managed with Hestia criteria alone [40]A1b. A prognostic assessment pathway reduced hospital stay from 6.1 to 4.0 days (P<0.001) without increasing 30-day mortality (2.4% vs 2.0%) [88]A1b.
Step 4: Management of Chronic Sequelae
Persistent dyspnea and functional limitation: A randomized trial of exercise-based rehabilitation (8 weeks, 2 sessions/week) in patients with persistent dyspnea after PE (6-72 months prior) showed a mean improvement in the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test of 53.0 m (95% CI 17.7-88.3) vs usual care, and a small improvement in PE-specific quality of life (mean difference -4%, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.00) [57]A1b. No adverse events occurred. Rehabilitation should be considered in patients with persistent dyspnea.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary (CTEPH): Patients with persistent dyspnea, exercise intolerance, or signs of right heart failure 3-6 months after PE should undergo echocardiography and ventilation-perfusion scanning. If CTEPH is confirmed, surgical pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice, with medical therapy (riociguat, bosentan) for inoperable cases. This is beyond the scope of this section but is a key long-term consideration.
Step 5: Special Populations
Cancer-associated VTE: As above, DOACs (edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban) or LMWH are options. The Planquette trial comparing rivaroxaban vs dalteparin in 158 patients with cancer-associated VTE found a primary outcome (recurrent VTE at 3 months) of 6.4% vs 10.1% (SHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.21-2.66), but the trial was underpowered for noninferiority [91]A1b. An updated meta-analysis within that paper supports DOACs as effective alternatives.
Antiphospholipid syndrome: The CHEST 2016 guideline suggests VKA therapy (INR 2-3) rather than DOACs for VTE in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients, as DOACs have shown higher recurrence rates in this setting. The PADIS-PE trial identified antiphospholipid antibodies as a strong predictor of recurrence (HR 2.38) [22]A1b.
Pregnancy: Anticoagulation with LMWH is preferred; VKAs and DOACs are contraindicated.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength of disagreement | Implication for practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOAC vs VKA for first-line in non-cancer VTE | CHEST 2016 suggests DOACs (Grade 2B) [4]A1c | ACCP 9th edition (this is the same guideline) - no separate alternative | Mild (wording differences) | Practice is now DOAC-first; VKA reserved for specific indications (e.g., antiphospholipid syndrome, severe renal impairment) |
| Apixaban vs rivaroxaban in acute VTE | COBRRA trial (2026) shows lower bleeding with apixaban (RR 0.46) [92]A1b | Other guidelines do not differentiate between DOACs for bleeding risk | Moderate (new trial evidence may shift practice) | Consider apixaban as first-line DOAC for lower bleeding risk; rivaroxaban remains an option |
| Extended therapy in cancer: reduced vs full dose | API-CAT trial (2025) shows noninferiority of reduced-dose apixaban with lower bleeding [50]A1b | CHEST 2016 and many guidelines recommend full-dose anticoagulation for extended therapy | Moderate (new evidence supports reduced-dose option) | Reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg BID) is a reasonable option for extended secondary prevention in cancer patients after initial 6 months of full-dose therapy |
No major guideline disagreements identified for the core anticoagulation duration recommendations beyond the above.
Pearl: For long-term management after PE, risk-stratify using age, pulmonary vascular obstruction index, and antiphospholipid antibodies (PADIS-PE) to guide extended anticoagulation; apixaban appears to have a lower bleeding risk than rivaroxaban in the acute phase (COBRRA), and reduced-dose apixaban is a noninferior option for extended therapy in cancer-associated VTE (API-CAT).
History and Evolution of Treatment
- ▸The shift from vitamin K antagonists to DOACs as first-line therapy for acute VTE, beginning with the 2016 CHEST guideline update.
- ▸Risk stratification using tools like the Hestia criteria and prognostic pathways has enabled safe outpatient management, reducing length of stay without increasing adverse events.
- ▸Head-to-head comparisons such as COBRRA (2026) have refined DOAC selection, showing significantly lower clinically relevant bleeding with apixaban versus rivaroxaban.
Building on the principles of long-term anticoagulation, the treatment of pulmonary embolism has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past three decades, shifting from a one-size-fits-all approach of parenteral followed by vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to a risk-stratified paradigm dominated by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and outpatient management.
The Era of Heparin and Vitamin K Antagonists
For decades, the standard of care for acute PE was initial parenteral anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), overlapped with a VKA such as . The 9th edition of the CHEST guidelines (2012) codified this approach, recommending initial parenteral anticoagulant therapy (Grade 1B) and suggesting LMWH or fondaparinux over IV UFH (Grade 2C) [5]A1c. Thrombolytic therapy was reserved for PE with hypotension (Grade 2C) [5]A1c. For cancer-associated VTE, LMWH was preferred over VKAs (Grade 2B) [5]A1c. However, the guidelines still suggested VKAs or LMWH over or (Grade 2B) [5]A1c, reflecting the nascent evidence for DOACs.
The DOAC Revolution
The 2016 CHEST update marked a watershed: for VTE and no cancer, the panel suggested dabigatran, rivaroxaban, , or over VKA therapy (all Grade 2B) [4]A1c. For cancer-associated VTE, LMWH remained the preferred agent, but DOACs were listed as alternatives (Grade 2C) [4]A1c. The 2021 second update further solidified DOACs, generating 29 guidance statements, 13 of which were strong recommendations [3]A1c[7]A1c. The COBRRA trial (2026) provided head-to-head bleeding data: clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 3.3% of patients on apixaban versus 7.1% on rivaroxaban (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.65; P<0.001; NNT = 26 to prevent one bleeding event) [92]A1b. This trial has refined DOAC selection, favoring apixaban for its lower bleeding risk.
Risk Stratification and Outpatient Management
Parallel to pharmacologic advances, risk stratification enabled safe outpatient treatment. The Hestia criteria, validated in a 2016 randomized trial, selected patients for direct discharge; the primary endpoint occurred in 0% (95% CI 0-1.3%) of those with NT-proBNP testing vs 1.1% (95% CI 0.2-3.2%) in the direct discharge group (P=0.25) [40]A1b. A 2022 trial showed that a prognostic assessment and management pathway reduced median length of stay from 6.1 days to 4.0 days (P<0.001) without increasing 30-day mortality or readmission [88]A1b. These data support the widespread adoption of risk-stratified outpatient management.
Special Populations: Cancer and Pregnancy
For cancer-associated VTE, the Hokusai VTE Cancer study (2020) confirmed that patients with incidental VTE have similar adverse outcomes to those with symptomatic VTE, primary outcome 12.7% vs 13.8%, supporting equal treatment [87]B2b. In pregnancy, the ATS/STR guideline (2011) recommended chest radiography as the first radiation-associated procedure, lung scintigraphy if the CXR is normal, and CTPA over digital subtraction angiography for nondiagnostic V/Q results [1]A1c. For heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), argatroban, lepirudin, or danaparoid are suggested (Grade 2C) [8]A1c.
Recent Evolution and Future Directions
The 2021 CHEST update added four new guidance statements and substantially modified eight from the 2016 update, reflecting ongoing uncertainty in limited disease and special populations [3]A1c[7]A1c. The PADIS-PE trial (2018) identified age >65 years (HR 4.70), pulmonary vascular obstruction index ≥5% at 6 months (HR 2.06), and antiphospholipid antibodies (HR 2.38) as independent predictors of recurrence after unprovoked PE [22]A1b. Rehabilitation has emerged as a treatment for persistent dyspnea: a 2023 trial showed a 53.0 m improvement in Incremental Shuttle Walk Test [57]A1b. Supplemental oxygen in nonhypoxemic intermediate-risk PE did not significantly increase RV normalization (42.4% vs 21.6%) in a pilot trial [90]A1b.
Pearl: The 2016 CHEST guideline's recommendation of DOACs over VKAs for non-cancer VTE marked a paradigm shift; the 2026 COBRRA trial further refined DOAC selection by demonstrating apixaban's lower bleeding risk (NNT = 26), reinforcing the need to individualize anticoagulant choice based on bleeding risk profile.
| Era / Milestone | Key Change | Supporting Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 CHEST 9th ed. | Heparin → VKA standard; LMWH preferred for cancer | [5]A1c Grade 1B for initial parenteral therapy; Grade 2B for LMWH over VKA in cancer |
| 2016 CHEST Update | DOACs preferred over VKAs for non-cancer VTE | [4]A1c Grade 2B for DOACs; LMWH still first-line for cancer |
| 2016 Hestia Trial | Outpatient treatment safe with Hestia criteria | [40]A1b Primary endpoint 0-1.1% in selected patients |
| 2021 CHEST 2nd Update | 29 statements, 13 strong; new guidance on limited disease | [3]A1c[7]A1c Substantial modifications from 2016 |
| 2026 COBRRA Trial | Apixaban lower bleeding risk vs rivaroxaban | [92]A1b RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33-0.65 |
9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive)
- ▸Mechanical thrombectomy is feasible and safe in lung transplant recipients with acute massive PE, even with concurrent atrial septal defect.
- ▸Cryoextraction via flexible bronchoscopy effectively restores airway patency in PE-related tracheobronchial obstruction without complications.
- ▸Pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH achieves excellent long-term outcomes when immediate postoperative PVR is <590 dynes·s·cm⁻⁵.
The evolution of endovascular and surgical techniques has expanded the procedural options for pulmonary embolism beyond anticoagulation and thrombolysis, creating a distinct interventional pulmonology toolkit that includes mechanical thrombectomy, bronchoscopic cryoextraction, bronchial artery embolization, and pulmonary endarterectomy. These procedures are particularly relevant in lung transplant recipients, who carry a high thromboembolic burden.
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Massive PE
In lung transplant recipients with acute massive PE, endovascular mechanical thrombectomy can be life-saving. A case report describes a patient with a single left lung transplant and atrial septal defect who underwent successful endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with immediate improvement in oxygen saturation and hemodynamic status despite persistent instability after systemic thrombolysis; the procedure was performed without adverse outcomes or paradoxical embolization [118]C4. This supports the use of mechanical thrombectomy even in anatomically complex post-transplant patients.
Bronchoscopic Interventions for Airway Obstruction
Cryoextraction via flexible bronchoscopy can restore airway patency when PE-related thrombi cause tracheobronchial obstruction. In a pediatric series of 11 critically ill children (including those with pulmonary embolism), cryoextraction resulted in partial (n = 5) or complete (n = 6) restoration of airway patency with no procedure-related complications; 5 patients were decannulated from ECMO [110]C4. The technique is effective for blood clots, mucus plugs, and casts [110]C4.
Bronchial Artery Embolization for Hemoptysis
Hemoptysis from pulmonary infarction or PE can be managed with bronchial artery embolization (BAE). The Chinese expert consensus identifies BAE as "a pivotal interventional technique for managing hemoptysis due to its minimally invasive nature and robust hemostatic efficacy" [111]D5. Preoperative bronchial artery CT angiography is recommended to identify culprit vessels, and super-selective embolization using coaxial microcatheters is advised to avoid non-target embolization [111]D5.
ECMO and Invasive Procedures
Patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for massive PE often need concurrent invasive procedures. A systematic review of 46 studies found that airway and bronchoscopic procedures generally showed high procedural success, though registry-level data reported hemorrhagic complications in 26.0% and surgical-site bleeding in 13.0% [105]B2a. Lung transplantation studies on ECMO reported that , transfusion, and thromboembolism remain central safety issues [105]B2a.
Lung Transplantation and PE
Thromboembolic complications develop in 8.6% of lung transplant recipients (4-24 months post-transplant), often associated with elevated fibrinogen, factor VIII/IX/XI, and antiphospholipid antibodies [99]B3b. DVT after lung transplantation is common (incidence 53.6%) and linked to higher postoperative mortality (33.17% vs. 12.9%) and a fourfold increase in PE (22.4% vs. 5.4%) [113]B3b. Lower extremity DVT (OR 2.14) and elevated preoperative platelet count predict PE, while lung transplantation for pulmonary artery is protective (OR 0.36) [113]B3b.
IVC filters
Retrievable inferior vena cava filters are placed in lung transplant recipients for VTE with high success. In a cohort of 95 patients, 63 filters (66.3%) were retrieved after a median dwell time of 7.7 months; only one complication (filter migration, successfully removed) occurred [112]C4.
Donor lungs with PE
Lungs from donors with acute bilateral PE and chronic thromboembolic disease can be salvaged by backtable pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Two recipients of such grafts had graft dysfunction scores of 0 at 48 and 72 hours and remained free of rejection at follow-up, demonstrating utility in expanding the donor pool [117]C4.
Biomarker surveillance
Serum Aspergillus galactomannan antigen (AGA) positivity, detected in 24% of lung transplant recipients, is associated with a higher rate of pulmonary embolism (23.9% vs. 12.6%) and may serve as an early biomarker for thrombotic risk [114]B3b.
Pulmonary Endarterectomy for CTEPH
Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the definitive surgical treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Immediate postoperative pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is the only predictor of long-term survival/freedom from lung transplantation [104]B2b. Patients with an immediate postoperative PVR <590 dynes·s·cm⁻⁵ have significantly better long-term outcomes than those with PVR ≥590 dynes·s·cm⁻⁵ [104]B2b.
| Procedure | Indication | Key Evidence | Clinical Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical thrombectomy | Acute massive PE in lung transplant recipients | [118]C4 | Immediate hemodynamic improvement; safe despite ASD |
| Cryoextraction | Airway obstruction from PE thrombi | [110]C4 | Partial/complete patency restoration; no complications |
| Bronchial artery embolization | Hemoptysis from PE | [111]D5 | Effective hemostasis; minimally invasive |
| Pulmonary endarterectomy | CTEPH | [104]B2b | PVR normalization; excellent survival if PVR <590 dynes·s·cm⁻⁵ |
| IVC filter placement | VTE in lung transplant recipients | [112]C4 | High retrieval rate (66.3%); low complication rate (1.1%) |
Pearl: In lung transplant recipients, a high index of suspicion for PE is warranted given the 8.6% incidence and associated hypercoagulable abnormalities; mechanical thrombectomy and IVC filters can be safely employed in this population, and donor lungs with PE can be used after backtable thromboendarterectomy.
10. Complications
- ▸Acute complications include right ventricular failure, major bleeding (2.71% at 30 days in cancer-PE), recurrent VTE (1.26% at 30 days), and HIT (1.2-1.5% with heparin).
- ▸Chronic complications: CTEPH occurs in 0.56% of all-comers and 3.2% of survivors; residual obstruction and exercise pulmonary hypertension affect 25-40% of symptomatic patients.
- ▸Supportive care must address respiratory monitoring, haemodynamic instability, and hospital-acquired complications; high PEEP strategies during surgery increase hypotension and arrhythmias.
The preceding section detailed advanced respiratory support and interventional options; even with optimal management, PE carries a substantial burden of acute and chronic sequelae that require structured surveillance and supportive care.
Acute Complications
Right ventricular failure and haemodynamic collapse remain the most immediate life-threatening complications. The Bova score identifies intermediate-risk patients using systolic blood pressure 90-100 mmHg (aOR 2.45), heart rate ≥110 bpm (aOR 1.87), elevated cardiac troponin (aOR 2.49), and right ventricular dysfunction (aOR 2.28); the 30-day PE-related complication rate rises from 4.2% (stage I) to 29.2% (stage III) [58]B2b. Right ventricular adaptation to pressure overload determines short- and long-term outcomes, yet validated RV-targeted therapies remain an unmet need [2]D5.
Bleeding complications are the most common treatment-related adverse events. In selected cancer-associated PE patients managed as outpatients, the 30-day major bleeding rate is 2.71% (95% CI 1.51-4.83%) [39]A1a. In medically ill patients, extended 2.5 mg twice daily for 30 days caused more major bleeding than short-course (0.47% vs 0.19%; RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.02-7.24) [124]A1b. Among patients with active cancer completing ≥6 months of anticoagulation, extended reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) reduced clinically relevant bleeding compared with full-dose apixaban (5.0 mg twice daily) (12.1% vs 15.6%; adjusted subhazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97) while maintaining noninferior efficacy for recurrent VTE [50]A1b.
Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurs in 1.26% (95% CI 0.53-3.00%) within 30 days in cancer-PE outpatients [39]A1a and in 2.1% over 12 months with reduced-dose apixaban versus 2.8% with full dose (adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.41-1.41) [50]A1b.
-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is infrequent but consequential. In a meta-analysis of 13 studies (5275 patients), thrombocytopenia rates did not differ between low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UH) (1.2% vs 1.5%; p = 0.246), and confirmed HIT or HITT was too rare for adequate comparison [119]A1a. For patients receiving heparin in whom the risk of HIT is >1%, guideline recommends platelet count monitoring every 2-3 days from day 4 to day 14 (Grade 2C) [8]A1c.
Chronic Complications
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary (CTEPH) is the most feared long-term complication. A meta-analysis of 16 studies (4047 patients) reported a pooled incidence of 0.56% (95% CI 0.1-1.0%) in all-comers, 3.2% (95% CI 2.0-4.4%) in survivors, and 2.8% (95% CI 1.5-4.1%) in survivors without major comorbidities. Both unprovoked PE (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-8.2) and recurrent VTE (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.7-5.9) were significantly associated with CTEPH [47]A1a.
Residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO) occurs in 28.4% and 25.3% of patients in two prospective cohorts, and fibrinogen Bβ-chain monosialylation independently predicts its development [125]B2b. Among symptomatic patients with chronic thrombi and absent or mild resting pulmonary hypertension, 40.2% develop exercise pulmonary hypertension on right heart catheterisation, identified by a multiparametric score incorporating peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity and TAPSE/PASP ratio [126]B2b.
Supportive Care and Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Complications
Respiratory monitoring is essential: acute respiratory failure occurs more frequently in PE patients with than with seasonal influenza [12]B3b; , arterial blood gases, and clinical assessment guide escalation to noninvasive or invasive ventilation. Intraoperative management of PE patients requiring surgery demands caution: in the PROTHOR trial, a higher PEEP strategy (10 cm H₂O) during one-lung ventilation increased intraoperative hypotension (37.3% vs 14.3%) and new arrhythmias (9.9% vs 3.9%) compared with lower PEEP (5 cm H₂O) [24]A1b.
Autonomic complications such as haemodynamic instability and arrhythmias are common. The same trial reported that hypotension and arrhythmias were the most frequent intraoperative complications with aggressive lung expansion [24]A1b. Ileus and urinary retention are not specifically reported in the reviewed evidence but are recognised in critically ill patients.
Pain management of pleuritic chest pain typically requires nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opiates; no specific dosing data from the reviewed sources.
Rehabilitation should begin after hospital discharge. A structured follow-up pathway for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, which includes assessment for breathlessness, oxygen requirement, and rehabilitation, can serve as a model for post-PE care [127]D5.
Hospital-acquired complications (pneumonia, pressure injury, urinary tract infection) are not quantified in the reviewed evidence but are general risks of prolonged hospitalisation. Prevention bundles include early mobilisation, oral care, and catheter avoidance.
Complication Frequency Table
| Complication | Frequency | Prevention | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major bleeding (anticoagulation) | 2.71% at 30 days (cancer-PE) [39]A1a; 0.47% with apixaban vs 0.19% with enoxaparin [124]A1b | Risk stratification; reduced-dose apixaban in cancer (2.5 mg twice daily) [50]A1b | Anticoagulant reversal, transfusion, supportive care |
| Recurrent VTE | 1.26% at 30 days [39]A1a; 2.1% (reduced-dose apixaban) over 12 months [50]A1b | Adequate-duration anticoagulation; extended treatment in active cancer | Reassess anticoagulation, consider catheter-directed therapy |
| CTEPH | 0.56% (all-comers); 3.2% (survivors) [47]A1a | Early detection of residual obstruction | Pulmonary endarterectomy, medical therapy (riociguat) |
| RPVO | 28.4%-25.3% [125]B2b | Not established | Surveillance, consider long-term anticoagulation |
| HIT | 1.2% (LMWH) vs 1.5% (UH) [119]A1a | Platelet count monitoring if risk >1% [8]A1c | Argatroban, lepirudin, or danaparoid (Grade 2C) [8]A1c |
| Exercise PH (chronic thromboembolic disease) | 40.2% [126]B2b | Not established | Exercise rehabilitation, pulmonary vasodilators if indicated |
| Intraoperative hypotension | 37.3% (high PEEP) vs 14.3% (low PEEP) [24]A1b | Avoid excessive PEEP and recruitment manoeuvres | Fluid resuscitation, vasopressors |
| New arrhythmias (intraoperative) | 9.9% (high PEEP) vs 3.9% (low PEEP) [24]A1b | Minimise PEEP, maintain haemodynamic stability | Treat underlying cause, antiarrhythmics |
Pearl: The 0.56% CTEPH incidence in all-comers after PE is lower than often quoted, but the 3.2% incidence in survivors highlights the need for structured follow-up in patients with persistent dyspnea, especially after unprovoked or recurrent PE [47]A1a.
11. Prognosis and Natural History
- ▸Short-term mortality in normotensive PE is 2-4% with modern risk stratification, but high-risk groups (Bova stage III) have a 29.2% complication rate.
- ▸Elevated BNP/NT-proBNP increases the odds of 30-day mortality sevenfold (OR 7.6) and identifies patients needing closer monitoring.
- ▸Fibrinolytic therapy prevents hemodynamic decompensation in intermediate-risk PE (NNT 34) but at the cost of major bleeding (NNH 20) and stroke (NNH 46).
Having reviewed the complications of pulmonary embolism, the prognosis now warrants attention, short-term mortality is highly variable, driven by hemodynamic status, right ventricular strain, and underlying comorbidities. The untreated trajectory of acute PE carries a historically high mortality, but with modern risk-stratified management, outcomes have improved substantially.
Short-term Mortality and Adverse Outcomes
In contemporary cohorts, 30-day all-cause mortality in normotensive patients with acute symptomatic PE is approximately 1.9% (95% CI 0.79-4.6%) in low-risk patients managed as outpatients [129]A1a, and 7.4% (95% CI 5.5-9.8%) in unselected normotensive patients [83]B2b. The 30-day complicated course (death, hemodynamic collapse, or recurrent PE) occurs in 7.4% of normotensive patients in the derivation cohort and 4.5% in the validation cohort [44]B2b. Among patients with intermediate-risk PE (right ventricular dysfunction plus myocardial injury), the placebo group in the PEITHO trial had a 5.6% rate of death or hemodynamic decompensation within 7 days [93]A1b. For high-risk PE requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, overall mortality reaches 42.8% with strategies other than mechanical reperfusion, versus 22.6% with mechanical reperfusion (surgical embolectomy in most) [49]A1a.
Risk Stratification Models
Several validated tools stratify normotensive patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups:
- Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index ( ): Combined with BNP testing, it yields a negative predictive value of 99.1% (derivation) and 100% (validation) for a 30-day complicated course [44]B2b.
- Bova score: A seven-point index incorporating SBP 90-100 mmHg (aOR 2.45), heart rate ≥110 bpm (aOR 1.87), elevated troponin (aOR 2.49), and right ventricular dysfunction (aOR 2.28). The 30-day PE-related complication rate is 4.2% for stage I, 10.8% for stage II, and 29.2% for stage III [58]B2b.
- Hestia criteria: Patients selected for outpatient treatment using Hestia criteria alone have a 30-day adverse outcome rate of 1.1% (95% CI 0.2-3.2%) [40]A1b.
Prognostic Biomarkers
Elevated BNP or NT-proBNP levels are strongly associated with adverse outcomes. In a meta-analysis of 13 studies, 51% of patients had elevated levels; high NT-proBNP conferred a 10% risk of 30-day mortality (68/671; 95% CI 8.0-13%) and a 23% risk of adverse clinical outcome (209/909; 95% CI 20-26%) [42]A1a. The odds ratio for 30-day mortality with elevated BNP/NT-proBNP was 7.6 (95% CI 3.4-17) [42]A1a. Cardiac troponin elevation independently predicts complications (aOR 2.49) [58]B2b.
Treatment Effect on Prognosis
Effective anticoagulation dramatically reduces the risk of fatal recurrent PE. Among patients with acute VTE, shows a lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding than (3.3% vs 7.1%; RR 0.46; NNT = 27 to prevent one clinically relevant bleeding event over 3 months) [92]A1b. For intermediate-risk PE, fibrinolytic therapy (tenecteplase) reduces the risk of death or hemodynamic decompensation from 5.6% to 2.6% (OR 0.44; NNT = 34) but increases major bleeding from 1.2% to 6.3% (NNH = 20) and stroke from 0.2% to 2.4% (NNH = 46) [93]A1b. Ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed fibrinolysis reduces the composite of PE-related death, cardiorespiratory decompensation, or symptomatic recurrence within 7 days from 10.3% to 4.0% (RR 0.39; NNT = 16) [52]A1b. In patients with cancer-associated PE, outpatient management yields a 30-day mortality of 1.74% (95% CI 0.99-3.03%) and major bleeding of 2.71% [39]A1a. Extended reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) is noninferior to full-dose for preventing recurrent VTE (2.1% vs 2.8%; adjusted subhazard ratio 0.76) and reduces clinically relevant bleeding (12.1% vs 15.6%; NNT = 29) [50]A1b.
Long-term Outcomes
Late complications include chronic thromboembolic pulmonary (CTEPH) and post-PE functional impairment. In the API-CAT trial, mortality at approximately 12 months was 17.7% in the reduced-dose apixaban group and 19.6% in the full-dose group among patients with active cancer [50]A1b. The risk of long-term adverse outcomes is influenced by the adequacy of initial anticoagulation, presence of residual thrombus, and underlying cardiopulmonary reserve.
Pearl: The 30-day mortality in normotensive PE is low (≈2-4%) with appropriate risk stratification, but intermediate-risk patients (Bova stage III) have a 29.2% complication rate, these patients may benefit from escalation of therapy beyond anticoagulation alone [58]B2b.
Controversies and Guideline Disagreement
| Question | Position A | Position B | Strength | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role of thrombolysis in intermediate-risk PE | CHEST guideline (2021) recommends against routine use, citing bleeding risk [3]A1c | PEITHO trial supports selective use to prevent hemodynamic decompensation (NNT 34) [93]A1b | Moderate | Shared decision-making; consider if cardiorespiratory reserve is poor |
| Outpatient management of cancer-associated PE | Some guidelines recommend inpatient treatment due to higher bleeding risk | Meta-analysis shows 30-day mortality 1.74% and major bleeding 2.71% in selected outpatients [39]A1a | Low | Selection criteria (Hestia, sPESI, no hypoxia) are critical |
| Score | Components | Risk Categories | 30-Day Complication Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| sPESI + BNP | Age >80, cancer, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, HR ≥110, SBP <100, O2 sat <90%; BNP >500 ng/L | Low vs high | NPV 99.1-100% for complicated course [44]B2b |
| Bova | SBP 90-100 mmHg, HR ≥110, elevated troponin, RVD | Stage I (0-2), II (3-4), III (5-7) | 4.2%, 10.8%, 29.2% [58]B2b |
| Hestia | 11 clinical criteria (hemodynamic instability, hypoxia, bleeding risk, etc.) | Low risk (none met) | 1.1% (95% CI 0.2-3.2%) [40]A1b |
12. Special Populations & Pregnancy
- ▸The pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm (D-dimer <1000 ng/mL if no criteria, <500 ng/mL if ≥1 criterion) avoids CTPA in 39% of pregnant women, with no missed PE in a prospective study.
- ▸In elderly patients (≥75 years), the standard hsTnT cut-off of 14 pg/mL fails to predict adverse outcome; an age-adjusted cut-off of 45 pg/mL improves risk stratification.
- ▸LMWH is preferred over UFH in pregnancy due to fewer adverse effects and fewer fetal losses, though evidence certainty is very low.
Having outlined the natural history across unselected cohorts, the following sections address how pregnancy, comorbidities, and age modify the presentation, diagnosis, and management of pulmonary embolism.
Pregnancy
PE is a leading cause of maternal death in the developed world [1]A1c. The pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm safely reduces imaging: pulmonary embolism is ruled out if none of three criteria (clinical signs of deep-vein thrombosis, hemoptysis, PE as most likely diagnosis) are present and the D‑dimer level is <1000 ng/mL, or if ≥1 criterion is met and the D‑dimer level is <500 ng/mL [30]B2b. In a prospective study of 510 women, computed tomographic (CTPA) was avoided in 39% (95% CI 35-44), with the highest efficiency in the first trimester (65% avoided) and lowest in the third (32%) [30]B2b. No patient had PE during follow-up; one popliteal deep‑vein thrombosis occurred (0.21%; 95% CI 0.04-1.2) [30]B2b.
When imaging is required, the American Thoracic Society recommends chest radiography as the first radiation‑associated procedure; if the result is normal, lung scintigraphy (V/Q) is preferred over CTPA because of lower maternal‑fetal radiation exposure [1]A1c. Low‑dose perfusion scintigraphy (LDQ) has a negative predictive value of 100% compared with 97.5% for CTPA, with fewer nondiagnostic results [133]B2b. If V/Q is nondiagnostic, CTPA is recommended over digital subtraction angiography [1]A1c.
Cesarean section carries a fourfold higher risk of VTE than vaginal delivery (OR 3.7; 95% CI 3.0-4.6), with an absolute incidence of 2.6 per 1000 cesarean sections (95% CI 1.7-3.5) that rises to 4.3 per 1000 with longer follow‑up [130]A1a. Emergency cesarean section confers greater risk than elective [130]A1a. Women with sickle cell disease are at particularly high risk: pulmonary thromboembolism risk is 7.7‑fold higher (RR 7.74; 95% CI 4.65-12.89) than in women without SCD, and the prevalence of acute chest syndrome is 6.46% (95% CI 4.66%-8.25%) [128]A1a. Prophylactic blood transfusion in SCD pregnancies reduces pain crisis (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.12-0.67) but does not clearly alter the risk of PE or acute chest syndrome [142]A1a.
For treatment, low‑molecular‑weight (LMWH) is preferred over unfractionated heparin (UFH) during pregnancy. LMWH is associated with fewer adverse effects sufficient to stop treatment (RR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01-0.54) and fewer fetal losses (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.95) compared with UFH [143]A1a. However, the overall certainty of evidence for thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy is very low [136]A1a[143]A1a. Direct oral anticoagulants are not recommended during lactation; passes into breast milk in small amounts, and its safety is undetermined [134]C4.
Pediatrics
The retrieved evidence does not provide pediatric‑specific data. Clinical practice therefore extrapolates from adult guidelines, using weight‑based dosing of anticoagulants and accounting for developmental hemostasis. The need for dedicated pediatric trials remains.
Elderly
Age alters the performance of risk‑stratification biomarkers. The established high‑sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) cut‑off of 14 pg/mL retains its prognostic value in younger patients but fails to predict adverse outcome in those aged ≥75 years [135]B2b. An age‑optimised cut‑off of 45 pg/mL is superior in this group, and an age‑adjusted strategy (≥14 pg/mL for age <75 years, ≥45 pg/mL for age ≥75 years) provides additive independent prognostic information beyond the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index and echocardiography (OR 4.56; 95% CI 1.30-16.01; C‑index 0.77) [135]B2b. A three‑step approach using , age‑adjusted hsTnT, and echocardiography identifies 16.6% of normotensive patients as higher risk, of whom 12.4% have an adverse 30‑day outcome [135]B2b.
Immunocompromised (Cancer)
Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer is the best‑studied scenario. Meta‑analyses comparing LMWH with UFH show no conclusive difference in mortality, pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, or minor bleeding [138]A1a[140]A1a[141]A1a. LMWH is associated with a lower incidence of wound hematoma (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.92) [138]A1a. For acutely ill medical patients (a population that includes many immunocompromised individuals), extended‑duration anticoagulation reduces symptomatic VTE (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.46-0.78; NNTB 204) but increases major bleeding (RR 2.05; 95% CI 1.51-2.79; NNTH 314), with little effect on all‑cause mortality [137]A1a.
Pearl: In pregnancy, the YEARS algorithm with a D‑dimer threshold of 1000 ng/mL (when no YEARS criteria are present) safely avoids CTPA in up to two‑thirds of women in the first trimester; in patients aged ≥75 years, use a hsTnT cut‑off of 45 pg/mL rather than 14 pg/mL for risk stratification.
13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
- ▸Primary prevention after major orthopedic surgery requires at least 10-14 days of pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis, with extension up to 35 days (Grade 2B).
- ▸Statins have a minimal and uncertain role in primary prevention of VTE; only rosuvastatin showed a small reduction in VTE but not in pulmonary embolism (low-certainty evidence).
- ▸SARS-CoV-2 infection itself substantially increases the risk of pulmonary embolism, strongly favoring vaccination despite rare vaccine-associated thrombotic events.
Prevention of venous thromboembolism is a three-tiered strategy: primary prophylaxis in at-risk populations, secondary prevention of recurrence after an index event, and surveillance of patients who have recovered.
Primary Prevention
Thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery is the best-studied primary prevention strategy. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) 2012 guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight (LMWH), fondaparinux, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, low-dose unfractionated heparin, adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist, or (all Grade 1B) or an intermittent pneumatic compression device (Grade 1C) for a minimum of 10 to 14 days, with extension up to 35 days (Grade 2B) [6]A1c. They recommend against Doppler screening before discharge (Grade 1B) [6]A1c.
In trauma patients, VTE is common despite early chemoprophylaxis. Among 133 patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures, 24.1% developed VTE (12.8% pulmonary embolism alone) despite a median chemoprophylaxis start on hospital day 1 [159]B2b. After degenerative spine surgery, 61% of all VTE events occurred within the first four postoperative months, peaking in month 2 [157]B2b.
have been investigated for primary prevention of VTE. A 2024 Cochrane meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials (122,601 participants) found that statins may slightly reduce VTE incidence (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98; low-certainty evidence), but no significant reduction in pulmonary embolism (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.52) [149]A1a. Only showed a signal, but the effect was very small and the evidence limited [148]A1a[149]A1a.
Drug-induced thromboembolic risk warrants awareness. Olanzapine use significantly increased the risk of VTE and pulmonary embolism (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.37-3.14) [156]A1a.
Vaccine considerations: The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is not associated with elevated risk of most adverse events, while SARS-CoV-2 infection itself substantially increases the risk of pulmonary embolism [155]B2b. Rare cases of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia with pulmonary embolism have been reported 5 to 16 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination [151]C4. The benefit-risk balance strongly favors vaccination given the higher thrombotic risk from itself.
Secondary Prevention (Preventing Recurrence)
CHEST 2016 guidelines provide a framework. For VTE without cancer, suggest , , , or over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy (Grade 2B), and VKA over LMWH (Grade 2C) [4]A1c. For VTE with cancer, suggest LMWH over VKA (Grade 2B) [4]A1c. Anticoagulation should be continued for at least 3 months, with extended therapy considered based on risk-benefit [4]A1c.
If recurrence occurs on a non-LMWH anticoagulant, switch to LMWH (Grade 2C); if on LMWH, increase the dose (Grade 2C) [4]A1c. For subsegmental pulmonary embolism without proximal DVT, clinical surveillance is suggested over anticoagulation when the risk of recurrence is low, and anticoagulation when risk is high (Grade 2C) [4]A1c. The guidelines recommend against inferior vena cava filter placement (Grade 1B) [4]A1c.
Screening and Surveillance
Surveillance for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary (CTEPH) after COVID-19-associated PE is of low yield. A UK national study found that 1.2% of confirmed CTEPH cases were potentially associated with COVID-19 PE; simple risk scoring using symptoms, ECG, and NT-proBNP is a potentially effective screening approach [145]B2b.
In patients with permanent IVC filters who are anticoagulated, annual ultrasound surveillance of the filter and lower extremity veins is reasonable; filter clot was detected in 30% of patients over follow-up, and symptomatic PE occurred in 5% [146]B2b.
Patient Education
Patients should be counseled to recognize symptoms of DVT (unilateral leg swelling, pain, warmth) and PE (sudden dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, hemoptysis) and to seek urgent medical attention. Adherence to prescribed anticoagulation, avoidance of missed doses, and awareness of bleeding symptoms are essential. For those on extended prophylaxis, instruction on proper injection technique (for LMWH) and the importance of completing the prescribed duration should be reinforced.
Pearl: The most impactful prevention strategy is appropriate thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized surgical and medical patients, guided by validated risk scores; the CHEST guidelines recommend against routine Doppler screening before discharge after orthopedic surgery, emphasizing that pharmacologic prophylaxis, not surveillance, is the cornerstone of prevention.
| Population | Recommended Prophylaxis | Duration | Grade | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major orthopedic surgery | LMWH, fondaparinux, DOACs, LDUH, VKA, aspirin, or IPCD | Minimum 10-14 days, extend to 35 days | 1B (pharmacologic), 1C (IPCD) | CHEST 2012 [6]A1c |
| Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures | Early chemoprophylaxis (initiate hospital day 1) | Ongoing during hospitalization | , | Observational [159]B2b |
| Degenerative spine surgery | Maintain thromboembolic vigilance for up to 4 months | Extended beyond typical perioperative window | , | Observational [157]B2b |
| General medical patients with no prior VTE | Statins not recommended for primary PE prevention | , | Low-certainty evidence | Cochrane 2024 [149]A1a |
| Patients on olanzapine | Enhanced clinical surveillance | , | , | Meta-analysis [156]A1a |
References
- [1]
Leung AN, Bull TM, Jaeschke R et al.. “An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2011). PMID: 22086989 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism, 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Prognosis and Natural History, 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [2]
Lahm T, Douglas IS, Archer SL et al.. “Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in the Research Setting: Knowledge Gaps and Pathways Forward. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2018). PMID: 30109950 ↗
L5GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, 10. Complications - [3]
Stevens SM, Woller SC, Kreuziger LB et al.. “Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Second Update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.” Chest (2021). PMID: 34352278 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [4]
Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J et al.. “Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.” Chest (2016). PMID: 26867832 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [5]
Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ et al.. “Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Chest (2012). PMID: 22315268 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, History and Evolution of Treatment - [6]
Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA et al.. “Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Chest (2012). PMID: 22315265 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, History and Evolution of Treatment, 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [7]
Stevens SM, Woller SC, Baumann Kreuziger L et al.. “Executive Summary: Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Second Update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.” Chest (2021). PMID: 34352279 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [8]
Linkins LA, Dans AL, Moores LK et al.. “Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.” Chest (2012). PMID: 22315270 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, History and Evolution of Treatment, 10. Complications - [9]
Moores LK, Tritschler T, Brosnahan S et al.. “Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of VTE in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.” Chest (2020). PMID: 32502594 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [10]
Eikelboom JW, Karthikeyan G, Fagel N et al.. “American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons and American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for venous thromboembolism prevention in hip and knee arthroplasty differ: what are the implications for clinicians and patients?” Chest (2009). PMID: 19201714 ↗
L5GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [11]
Hellenkamp K, Pruszczyk P, Jiménez D et al.. “Prognostic impact of copeptin in pulmonary embolism: a multicentre validation study.” The European respiratory journal (2018). PMID: 29599188 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [12]
Piroth L, Cottenet J, Mariet AS et al.. “Comparison of the characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2020). PMID: 33341155 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored), 10. Complications - [13]
Viswanathan G, Kirshner HF, Nazo N et al.. “Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Distinct Immune and Smooth Muscle Cell Populations that Contribute to Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2023). PMID: 36803741 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [14]
Cimini LA, Candeloro M, Pływaczewska M et al.. “Prognostic role of different findings at echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism: a critical review and meta-analysis.” ERJ open research (2023). PMID: 37009027 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [15]
O'Connor D, Johnston RV, Brignardello-Petersen R et al.. “Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease (osteoarthritis including degenerative meniscal tears).” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2022). PMID: 35238404 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [16]
Lloyd TD, Geneen LJ, Bernhardt K et al.. “Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2023). PMID: 37681564 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature, 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [17]
Junqueira DR, Zorzela LM, Perini E. “Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparins for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017). PMID: 28431186 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [18]
Kim TY, Ahn GJ, Cha KC et al.. “2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 5. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances.” Clinical and experimental emergency medicine (2026). PMID: 42297408 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [19]
Dorfman SR, Chan SS, Amanullah S et al.. “ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chest Pain-Child.” Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR (2026). PMID: 41729147 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [20]
Huie TJ, Olson AL, Cosgrove GP et al.. “A detailed evaluation of acute respiratory decline in patients with fibrotic lung disease: aetiology and outcomes.” Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) (2010). PMID: 20546190 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 1. Definition, Classification and Nomenclature - [21]
Le Pennec R, Le Roux PY, Robin P et al.. “Comparison of Three Diagnostic Strategies for Suspicion of Pulmonary Embolism: Planar Ventilation-Perfusion Scan (V/Q), Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA), and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Ventilation-Perfusion Scan (SPECT V/Q): a multicenter, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.” The European respiratory journal (2026). PMID: 41927066 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored), History and Evolution of Treatment - [22]
Tromeur C, Sanchez O, Presles E et al.. “Risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism after unprovoked pulmonary embolism: the PADIS-PE randomised trial.” The European respiratory journal (2018). PMID: 29301920 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment - [23]
Lee LA, Bailes Z, Barnes N et al.. “Efficacy and safety of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (CAPTAIN): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3A trial.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2020). PMID: 32918892 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism, 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 4. Clinical Presentation, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment - [24]
. “Effects of intraoperative higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery on postoperative pulmonary complications (PROTHOR): a multicentre, international, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2025). PMID: 41240959 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, 10. Complications, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [25]
Harris B, Bailey D, Miles S et al.. “Objective analysis of tomographic ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in pulmonary embolism.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2007). PMID: 17363770 ↗
L3PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [26]
Scagliotti GV, Gaafar R, Nowak AK et al.. “Nintedanib in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (LUME-Meso): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2019). PMID: 31103412 ↗
L1RCT_PHASE2Cited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [27]
Hemnes AR, Newman AL, Rosenbaum B et al.. “Bedside end-tidal CO2 tension as a screening tool to exclude pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2009). PMID: 19717480 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [28]
Le Duc-Pennec A, Le Roux PY, Cornily JC et al.. “Diagnostic accuracy of single-photon emission tomography ventilation/perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.” Chest (2011). PMID: 21852295 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [29]
Salaun PY, Couturaud F, Le Duc-Pennec A et al.. “Noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.” Chest (2010). PMID: 20724733 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [30]
van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM et al.. “Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.” The New England journal of medicine (2019). PMID: 30893534 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism, 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored), 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [31]
Fernandes TM, Alotaibi M, Strozza DM et al.. “Dyspnea Postpulmonary Embolism From Physiological Dead Space Proportion and Stroke Volume Defects During Exercise.” Chest (2019). PMID: 31759962 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [32]
Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P et al.. “A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.” Chest (2009). PMID: 19525358 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [33]
Morris TA, Marsh JJ, Chiles PG et al.. “Fibrin derived from patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is resistant to lysis.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2006). PMID: 16514114 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [34]
Delcroix M, Torbicki A, Gopalan D et al.. “ERS statement on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.” The European respiratory journal (2021). PMID: 33334946 ↗
L1NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [35]
Jorens PG, Van Marck E, Snoeckx A et al.. “Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2009). PMID: 19648522 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [36]
Kim NH, Delcroix M, Jais X et al.. “Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.” The European respiratory journal (2019). PMID: 30545969 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [37]
Agnelli G, Becattini C. “Anticoagulant treatment for acute pulmonary embolism: a pathophysiology-based clinical approach.” The European respiratory journal (2015). PMID: 25700388 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [38]
Mercier O, Fadel E. “Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: animal models.” The European respiratory journal (2013). PMID: 23314897 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 2. Pathophysiology and Mechanism - [39]
Delluc A, Pradier M, Siegal DM et al.. “Outpatient management of cancer-associated pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” The European respiratory journal (2025). PMID: 39603673 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 10. Complications, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [40]
den Exter PL, Zondag W, Klok FA et al.. “Efficacy and Safety of Outpatient Treatment Based on the Hestia Clinical Decision Rule with or without N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. A Randomized Clinical Trial.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2016). PMID: 27030891 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [41]
Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W et al.. “VTE Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.” Chest (2021). PMID: 34419428 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors - [42]
Klok FA, Mos IC, Huisman MV. “Brain-type natriuretic peptide levels in the prediction of adverse outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2008). PMID: 18556626 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [43]
Lankeit M, Kempf T, Dellas C et al.. “Growth differentiation factor-15 for prognostic assessment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2008). PMID: 18263797 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, 10. Complications - [44]
Jiménez D, Kopecna D, Tapson V et al.. “Derivation and validation of multimarker prognostication for normotensive patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2014). PMID: 24471575 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [45]
Walsh SLF, Mackintosh JA, Calandriello L et al.. “Deep Learning-based Outcome Prediction in Progressive Fibrotic Lung Disease Using High-Resolution Computed Tomography.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2022). PMID: 35696341 ↗
L3PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored), 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [46]
Becattini C, Agnelli G, Germini F et al.. “Computed tomography to assess risk of death in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.” The European respiratory journal (2014). PMID: 24603813 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification - [47]
Ende-Verhaar YM, Cannegieter SC, Vonk Noordegraaf A et al.. “Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary view of the published literature.” The European respiratory journal (2017). PMID: 28232411 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored), 10. Complications - [48]
Squizzato A, Galli M, Dentali F et al.. “Outpatient treatment and early discharge of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.” The European respiratory journal (2009). PMID: 19407049 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [49]
Chopard R, Nielsen P, Ius F et al.. “Optimal reperfusion strategy in acute high-risk pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” The European respiratory journal (2022). PMID: 35487534 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 4. Clinical Presentation, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [50]
Mahé I, Carrier M, Mayeur D et al.. “Extended Reduced-Dose Apixaban for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.” The New England journal of medicine (2025). PMID: 40162636 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, 10. Complications, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [51]
Lincoff AM, Bhasin S, Flevaris P et al.. “Cardiovascular Safety of Testosterone-Replacement Therapy.” The New England journal of medicine (2023). PMID: 37326322 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 4. Clinical Presentation, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management - [52]
Rosenfield K, Klok FA, Piazza G et al.. “Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Fibrinolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.” The New England journal of medicine (2026). PMID: 41910345 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [53]
O'Toole RV, Stein DM, O'Hara NN et al.. “Aspirin or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis after a Fracture.” The New England journal of medicine (2023). PMID: 36652352 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 10. Complications, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [54]
Khorana AA, Soff GA, Kakkar AK et al.. “Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer.” The New England journal of medicine (2019). PMID: 30786186 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification - [55]
Samama CM, Laporte S, Rosencher N et al.. “Rivaroxaban or Enoxaparin in Nonmajor Orthopedic Surgery.” The New England journal of medicine (2020). PMID: 32223113 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 3. Epidemiology, Etiology and Risk Factors - [56]
Eikelboom JW, Jolly SS, Belley-Cote EP et al.. “Colchicine and the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (ACT): an open-label, factorial, randomised, controlled trial.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2022). PMID: 36228641 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Prognosis and Natural History, 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [57]
Jervan Ø, Haukeland-Parker S, Gleditsch J et al.. “The Effects of Exercise Training in Patients With Persistent Dyspnea Following Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Chest (2023). PMID: 37149257 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment - [58]
Bova C, Sanchez O, Prandoni P et al.. “Identification of intermediate-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2014). PMID: 24696111 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 10. Complications, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [59]
Decousus H, Prandoni P, Mismetti P et al.. “Fondaparinux for the treatment of superficial-vein thrombosis in the legs.” The New England journal of medicine (2010). PMID: 20860504 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [60]
Farmakis IT, Valerio L, Barco S et al.. “Cardiopulmonary exercise testing during follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2023). PMID: 36958742 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification - [61]
Font C, Carmona-Bayonas A, Beato C et al.. “Clinical features and short-term outcomes of cancer patients with suspected and unsuspected pulmonary embolism: the EPIPHANY study.” The European respiratory journal (2017). PMID: 28052954 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [62]
Kline JA, Hogg MM, Courtney DM et al.. “D-dimer and exhaled CO2/O2 to detect segmental pulmonary embolism in moderate-risk patients.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2010). PMID: 20448094 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [63]
Henzler T, Roeger S, Meyer M et al.. “Pulmonary embolism: CT signs and cardiac biomarkers for predicting right ventricular dysfunction.” The European respiratory journal (2011). PMID: 21965223 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [64]
Rizkallah J, Man SFP, Sin DD. “Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in acute exacerbations of COPD: a systematic review and metaanalysis.” Chest (2008). PMID: 18812453 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [65]
Arzt M, Luigart R, Schum C et al.. “Sleep-disordered breathing in deep vein thrombosis and acute pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2012). PMID: 22362853 ↗
L3CASE_CONTROLCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [66]
Falster C, Jacobsen N, Coman KE et al.. “Diagnostic accuracy of focused deep venous, lung, cardiac and multiorgan ultrasound in suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Thorax (2021). PMID: 34497138 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [67]
Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. “Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol.” Chest (2008). PMID: 18403664 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation, 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [68]
Ellison AM, Kuppermann N, Shihabuddin BS et al.. “PERC-Peds rule for bedside exclusion of pulmonary embolism without radiation in children in the USA (BEEPER): a multicentre, prospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2026). PMID: 42398511 ↗
L2CASE_SERIESCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [69]
Celli BR, Fabbri LM, Aaron SD et al.. “Differential Diagnosis of Suspected Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations in the Acute Care Setting: Best Practice.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2023). PMID: 36701677 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [70]
Rali PM, Criner GJ. “Submassive Pulmonary Embolism.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2018). PMID: 29672125 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 4. Clinical Presentation - [71]
Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Díaz G et al.. “Prognostic significance of deep vein thrombosis in patients presenting with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2010). PMID: 20110556 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [72]
Jiménez D, Bikdeli B, Barrios D et al.. “Management appropriateness and outcomes of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2018). PMID: 29724918 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [73]
Nijkeuter M, Hovens MM, Davidson BL et al.. “Resolution of thromboemboli in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.” Chest (2006). PMID: 16424432 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [74]
Aleva FE, Voets LWLM, Simons SO et al.. “Prevalence and Localization of Pulmonary Embolism in Unexplained Acute Exacerbations of COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Chest (2016). PMID: 27522956 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [75]
Roussel M, Bannelier H, Lebal S et al.. “D-Dimer thresholds for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism based on a single question: is it the most likely diagnosis? A prospective, multicentre, open-label, single-arm interventional study.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2025). PMID: 41135553 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [76]
Zhai Z, Wang D, Lei J et al.. “Trends in risk stratification, in-hospital management and mortality of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an analysis from the China pUlmonary thromboembolism REgistry Study (CURES).” The European respiratory journal (2021). PMID: 33986031 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [77]
Zöller B, Pirouzifard M, Memon AA et al.. “Risk of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis in patients with asthma: a nationwide case-control study from Sweden.” The European respiratory journal (2017). PMID: 28202551 ↗
L3CASE_CONTROLCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [78]
Lega JC, Lacasse Y, Lakhal L et al.. “Natriuretic peptides and troponins in pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.” Thorax (2009). PMID: 19525265 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [79]
Wolf S, Valerio L, Kucher N et al.. “Acute pulmonary embolism in children and adolescents in the USA (2016 and 2019): a nationwide retrospective cohort study.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2025). PMID: 39919780 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [80]
Vanni S, Jiménez D, Nazerian P et al.. “Short-term clinical outcome of normotensive patients with acute PE and high plasma lactate.” Thorax (2015). PMID: 25661114 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [81]
Liao H, Na MJ, Dikensoy O et al.. “Diagnostic value of pleural fluid N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels in patients with cardiovascular diseases.” Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) (2008). PMID: 18197911 ↗
L3RCTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [82]
Kearon C, de Wit K, Parpia S et al.. “Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with d-Dimer Adjusted to Clinical Probability.” The New England journal of medicine (2019). PMID: 31774957 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: 5. Diagnosis and Workup (Pulmonary Function, Bronchoscopy and Imaging Anchored) - [83]
Sanchez O, Trinquart L, Caille V et al.. “Prognostic factors for pulmonary embolism: the prep study, a prospective multicenter cohort study.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2009). PMID: 19910608 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [84]
Ho KM, Rao S, Honeybul S et al.. “A Multicenter Trial of Vena Cava Filters in Severely Injured Patients.” The New England journal of medicine (2019). PMID: 31259488 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification - [85]
Lankeit M, Konstantinides S. “Is it time for home treatment of pulmonary embolism?” The European respiratory journal (2012). PMID: 22496322 ↗
L5PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification - [86]
Hellenkamp K, Schwung J, Rossmann H et al.. “Risk stratification of normotensive pulmonary embolism: prognostic impact of copeptin.” The European respiratory journal (2015). PMID: 26493800 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 6. Severity, Staging and Risk Stratification - [87]
Mulder FI, Di Nisio M, Ay C et al.. “Clinical implications of incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.” The European respiratory journal (2020). PMID: 31727694 ↗
L2RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment - [88]
Jiménez D, Rodríguez C, León F et al.. “Randomised controlled trial of a prognostic assessment and management pathway to reduce the length of hospital stay in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2022). PMID: 34385269 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment - [89]
Ison MG, Papi A, Athan E et al.. “Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the AS01E-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in older adults over three respiratory syncytial virus seasons (AReSVi-006): a multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.” The Lancet. Respiratory medicine (2025). PMID: 40245915 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [90]
Barrios D, Durán D, Rodríguez C et al.. “Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Trial.” Chest (2023). PMID: 37717936 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment - [91]
Planquette B, Bertoletti L, Charles-Nelson A et al.. “Rivaroxaban vs Dalteparin in Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism: A Randomized Trial.” Chest (2021). PMID: 34627853 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management - [92]
Castellucci LA, Chen VM, Kovacs MJ et al.. “Bleeding Risk with Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban in Acute Venous Thromboembolism.” The New England journal of medicine (2026). PMID: 41812192 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [93]
Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T et al.. “Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.” The New England journal of medicine (2014). PMID: 24716681 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue, 8. Long-term and Definitive Management, 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [94]
Agnelli G, Becattini C, Meyer G et al.. “Apixaban for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer.” The New England journal of medicine (2020). PMID: 32223112 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue - [95]
Büller HR, Décousus H, Grosso MA et al.. “Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.” The New England journal of medicine (2013). PMID: 23991658 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue - [96]
Büller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW et al.. “Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism.” The New England journal of medicine (2012). PMID: 22449293 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 7. Acute Management and Exacerbation Rescue - [97]
Rosovsky RP, Grodzin C, Channick R et al.. “Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Position Paper From the National PERT Consortium.” Chest (2020). PMID: 32861692 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: 8. Long-term and Definitive Management - [98]
Girard P, Decousus M, Laporte S et al.. “Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis: specificity of symptoms and perfusion defects at baseline and during anticoagulant therapy.” American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (2001). PMID: 11587992 ↗
L2RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment - [99]
Izbicki G, Bairey O, Shitrit D et al.. “Increased thromboembolic events after lung transplantation.” Chest (2006). PMID: 16478860 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [100]
Chieng H, Saha B, Foulke L et al.. “A 24-Year-Old Man With Dyspnea and a Broken Left Femur.” Chest (2022). PMID: 35396056 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [101]
Egan T, Blackwell J, Birchard K et al.. “Assessment of Lungs for Transplant Recovered from Uncontrolled Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death Donors.” Annals of the American Thoracic Society (2017). PMID: 28945476 ↗
L2NON_RANDOMIZED_TRIALCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [102]
Lankeit M, Dellas C, Panzenböck A et al.. “Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein for risk assessment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.” The European respiratory journal (2008). PMID: 18256058 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [103]
Bax S, Jacob J, Ahmed R et al.. “Right Ventricular to Left Ventricular Ratio at CT Pulmonary Angiogram Predicts Mortality in Interstitial Lung Disease.” Chest (2019). PMID: 31351047 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [104]
Skoro-Sajer N, Marta G, Gerges C et al.. “Surgical specimens, haemodynamics and long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy.” Thorax (2013). PMID: 24052543 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [105]
Neri G, Mazza G, Mastrangelo H et al.. “Safety of Invasive Procedures During Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 42355959 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [106]
Liang G, Peng H, Li Y. “Clinical efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Updates in surgery (2026). PMID: 41729427 ↗
L2SR_COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [107]
Hosokawa K, Masaki K, Hirose M et al.. “Long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a nationwide registry study.” Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH (2026). PMID: 42315026 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [108]
Rangwala HS, Rangwala BS, Alotaibi M et al.. “Clinical Outcomes with High- versus Low-Dose Tranexamic Acid Infusion in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon (2025). PMID: 39842460 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [109]
Madeka I, Noueihed K, Woodroof J et al.. “Lymph Node Dissection and Postoperative Complications After Lung Cancer Resection.” JAMA network open (2026). PMID: 42223938 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [110]
Truitt BA, Kasi AS, Kamat PP et al.. “Cryoextraction via flexible bronchoscopy in children with tracheobronchial obstruction.” Pediatric pulmonology (2023). PMID: 37350368 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [111]
. “[Expert consensus on operational procedures for bronchial artery embolization in the treatment of hemoptysis].” Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases (2025). PMID: 40300866 ↗
L5GUIDELINECited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [112]
Naser-Tavakolian K, Sajan A, Krishnasamy VP et al.. “Outcomes of inferior vena cava filtration in lung transplant recipients.” Frontiers in radiology (2026). PMID: 41947864 ↗
L4RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [113]
Kim NT, Miyashita Y, Kaihou T et al.. “Risk factors and perioperative complications associated with deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after lung transplantation.” Journal of thoracic disease (2025). PMID: 41376962 ↗
L3RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [114]
Kamar A, Miyashita Y, Kaiho T et al.. “Risk factors and clinical outcomes of serum Aspergillus galactomannan antigen (AGA) positivity in lung transplantation.” Journal of thoracic disease (2025). PMID: 41229833 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [115]
Liu J, Bao B, Zhang T et al.. “Comparative analysis of the clinical characteristics of severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia and severe bacterial pneumonia in children.” BMC pediatrics (2025). PMID: 40448048 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [116]
Li H, Li SD, Jiang QC et al.. “Case Report: Early diaphragmatic plication for combined phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after VATS thymectomy.” Frontiers in medicine (2026). PMID: 42454123 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [117]
Williams AM, Kathawate RG, Khosravi R et al.. “Utilizing lung donors with recent massive pulmonary emboli and chronic thromboembolic disease for transplantation.” American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (2024). PMID: 39447751 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [118]
Altun I, Zhao Y, Basnet S et al.. “The Role of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism in a Patient With Unilateral Lung Transplant and Atrial Septal Defect.” Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2023). PMID: 37776207 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 9. Respiratory Support, Procedures & Interventional Pulmonology (Specialty-Distinctive) - [119]
Morris TA, Castrejon S, Devendra G et al.. “No difference in risk for thrombocytopenia during treatment of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis with either low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin: a metaanalysis.” Chest (2007). PMID: 17646239 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 10. Complications - [120]
Shivakumar S, Matino D, Zukor D et al.. “Rivaroxaban Then Aspirin vs. Aspirin Alone after Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.” The New England journal of medicine (2026). PMID: 42437501 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 10. Complications - [121]
Anderson DR, Dunbar M, Murnaghan J et al.. “Aspirin or Rivaroxaban for VTE Prophylaxis after Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.” The New England journal of medicine (2018). PMID: 29466159 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 10. Complications - [122]
Myles PS, Smith JA, Forbes A et al.. “Stopping vs. Continuing Aspirin before Coronary Artery Surgery.” The New England journal of medicine (2016). PMID: 26933848 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 10. Complications, 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [123]
Myles PS, Smith JA, Forbes A et al.. “Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Coronary-Artery Surgery.” The New England journal of medicine (2016). PMID: 27774838 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 10. Complications, 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [124]
Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK et al.. “Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients.” The New England journal of medicine (2011). PMID: 22077144 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 10. Complications - [125]
Planquette B, Sanchez O, Marsh JJ et al.. “Fibrinogen and the prediction of residual obstruction manifested after pulmonary embolism treatment.” The European respiratory journal (2018). PMID: 30337447 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Complications - [126]
Martín de Miguel I, Jiménez López-Guarch C, Segura de La Cal T et al.. “Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With Exercise Pulmonary Hypertension: A Noninvasive Model to Predict Exercise Hemodynamics.” Chest (2025). PMID: 41238055 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 10. Complications - [127]
George PM, Barratt SL, Condliffe R et al.. “Respiratory follow-up of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.” Thorax (2020). PMID: 32839287 ↗
L5SR_COHORTCited in: 10. Complications - [128]
Inparaj S, Buckingham M, Oakley L et al.. “Pulmonary complications for women with sickle cell disease in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.” Thorax (2020). PMID: 32345690 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 10. Complications, 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [129]
Zondag W, Kooiman J, Klok FA et al.. “Outpatient versus inpatient treatment in patients with pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.” The European respiratory journal (2012). PMID: 23100493 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 11. Prognosis and Natural History - [130]
Blondon M, Casini A, Hoppe KK et al.. “Risks of Venous Thromboembolism After Cesarean Sections: A Meta-Analysis.” Chest (2016). PMID: 27262227 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [131]
Davies CW, Wimperis J, Green ES et al.. “Early discharge of patients with pulmonary embolism: a two-phase observational study.” The European respiratory journal (2007). PMID: 17567672 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [132]
Tafelmeier M, Luft L, Zistler E et al.. “Central Sleep Apnea Predicts Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery.” Chest (2020). PMID: 32798522 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [133]
Sheen JJ, Haramati LB, Natenzon A et al.. “Performance of Low-Dose Perfusion Scintigraphy and CT Pulmonary Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy.” Chest (2017). PMID: 28823756 ↗
L2RETROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [134]
Wiesen MH, Blaich C, Müller C et al.. “The Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Rivaroxaban Passes Into Human Breast Milk.” Chest (2016). PMID: 27396794 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [135]
Kaeberich A, Seeber V, Jiménez D et al.. “Age-adjusted high-sensitivity troponin T cut-off value for risk stratification of pulmonary embolism.” The European respiratory journal (2015). PMID: 25614162 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [136]
Middleton P, Shepherd E, Gomersall JC. “Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2021). PMID: 33779986 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [137]
Kolkailah AA, Abdelghaffar B, Elshafeey F et al.. “Standard- versus extended-duration anticoagulation for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024). PMID: 39629741 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [138]
Matar CF, Kahale LA, Hakoum MB et al.. “Anticoagulation for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in people with cancer.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2018). PMID: 29993117 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [139]
Perel P, Ker K, Morales Uribe CH et al.. “Tranexamic acid for reducing mortality in emergency and urgent surgery.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2013). PMID: 23440847 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [140]
Akl EA, Kahale L, Sperati F et al.. “Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2014). PMID: 24966161 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [141]
Akl EA, Labedi N, Terrenato I et al.. “Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2011). PMID: 22071865 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [142]
Okusanya BO, Oladapo OT. “Prophylactic versus selective blood transfusion for sickle cell disease in pregnancy.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2016). PMID: 28005272 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [143]
Bain E, Wilson A, Tooher R et al.. “Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy and the early postnatal period.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2014). PMID: 24519568 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 12. Special Populations & Pregnancy - [144]
Wiener RS, Ouellette DR, Diamond E et al.. “An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: the Choosing Wisely top five list in adult pulmonary medicine.” Chest (2014). PMID: 24889436 ↗
L5GUIDELINECited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [145]
Reddy SA, Newman J, Leavy OC et al.. “Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is an uncommon complication of COVID-19: UK national surveillance and observational screening cohort studies.” The European respiratory journal (2024). PMID: 39060016 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [146]
Hajduk B, Tomkowski WZ, Malek G et al.. “Vena cava filter occlusion and venous thromboembolism risk in persistently anticoagulated patients: a prospective, observational cohort study.” Chest (2009). PMID: 19880907 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [147]
Ghincea A, Ryu C, Herzog EL. “An Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis After BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report.” Chest (2022). PMID: 35131075 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [148]
Li L, Sun T, Zhang P et al.. “Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2011). PMID: 22161421 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [149]
Wang Z, Zhang P, Tian J et al.. “Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024). PMID: 39498835 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [150]
Li L, Zhang P, Tian JH et al.. “Statins for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2014). PMID: 25518837 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [151]
Greinacher A, Thiele T, Warkentin TE et al.. “Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination.” The New England journal of medicine (2021). PMID: 33835769 ↗
L4CASE_SERIESCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [152]
Carlbom DJ, Davidson BL. “Pulmonary embolism in the critically ill.” Chest (2007). PMID: 17625093 ↗
L5NARRATIVE_REVIEWCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [153]
George MG, Schieb LJ, Ayala C et al.. “Pulmonary hypertension surveillance: United States, 2001 to 2010.” Chest (2014). PMID: 24700091 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [154]
Hüneburg R, van Bokhorst QNE, Pellisé M et al.. “Artificial intelligence-assisted detection and optical differentiation of colorectal lesions in Lynch syndrome surveillance (CADLY2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled superiority trial.” The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (2026). PMID: 42462747 ↗
L1RCTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [155]
Barda N, Dagan N, Ben-Shlomo Y et al.. “Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Setting.” The New England journal of medicine (2021). PMID: 34432976 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [156]
Zhang X, Sun S, Fan X et al.. “Thromboembolic events with olanzapine: a systematic review integrating meta-analysis and FAERS database.” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (2026). PMID: 41756513 ↗
L1SR_COHORTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [157]
Kim J, Kim TH. “Extended Postoperative Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Nationwide Cohort Study.” Spine (2026). PMID: 42308362 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [158]
Yang S, Li G, Li Y et al.. “In-hospital deep vein thrombosis after tibial plateau fractures: incidence, laterality/anatomy, and risk factors in a multicenter retrospective cohort of 3366 patients.” Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (2026). PMID: 41886203 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance - [159]
Holstein RA, Meyer CH, Herrmann O et al.. “Incidence and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures.” The Journal of surgical research (2026). PMID: 41650792 ↗
L2PROSPECTIVE_COHORTCited in: 13. Prevention, Screening & Surveillance