On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Define status epilepticus (SE) using the two-timepoint framework: Timepoint 1 (t1) is 5 minutes of continuous activity, indicating the seizure is unlikely to self-terminate; Timepoint 2 (t2) is 30 minutes, indicating a high risk of long-term neuronal injury.
- •Recognize the receptor trafficking hypothesis, which explains why SE becomes pharmacoresistant: prolonged seizures cause the internalization (endocytosis) of synaptic GABA-A receptors and the increased surface expression of excitatory NMDA and AMPA receptors.
- •Distinguish between the two physiological stages of SE: Stage 1 (Compensated) involves massive autonomic discharge with , tachycardia, and hyperglycemia; Stage 2 (Uncompensated) involves hemodynamic collapse, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and metabolic (lactic) acidosis.
- •Identify common etiologies including medication non-compliance, acute structural brain injury (stroke, hemorrhage, trauma), metabolic derangements, and .
- •Understand the concept of (NORSE), a clinical construct describing a previously healthy patient presenting with refractory SE without an obvious acute cause, often requiring an aggressive workup for autoimmune or paraneoplastic triggers.
Evaluation
- •Suspect SE in any patient presenting with rhythmic motor activity, fluctuating mental status, or persistent coma following a witnessed seizure.
- •Obtain a fingerstick glucose immediately upon arrival to rule out hypoglycemia, which is a rapidly reversible cause of status-like activity.
- •Time the seizure activity from the moment of onset or arrival; clinical protocols for first-line therapy must be activated at the 5-minute mark.
- •Examine the patient for signs of "subtle" status epilepticus, such as nystagmus, rhythmic eye blinking, or small-amplitude twitching of the face or extremities, which may persist after overt convulsions cease.
- •Order emergent laboratory studies including a comprehensive metabolic panel (to check for hyponatremia or hypocalcemia), toxicology screen, and serum levels of known antiseizure medications (ASMs).
- •Perform a pregnancy test in all women of reproductive age to guide ASM selection and screen for , which requires different management (magnesium sulfate).
- •Obtain a non-contrast CT as soon as the patient is stabilized to rule out intracranial hemorrhage, large masses, or acute hydrocephalus.
- •Order an emergent (EEG) within 30–60 minutes if the patient does not regain consciousness after motor seizures stop to rule out nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).
- •Utilize point-of-care EEG (pocEEG) in the emergency department for rapid screening if full continuous EEG (cEEG) is not immediately available.
- •Consider a lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis if there is clinical suspicion of meningitis, encephalitis, or if the patient has a fever of unknown origin.
- •Calculate the STESS (Status Epilepticus Severity Score) or EMSE (Etiology, Age, Comorbidities, EEG) score to assist in prognostic stratification and mortality risk assessment.
- •Look for specific MRI findings such as Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis (CCD)—reversible hyperintensity in the contralateral cerebellum—which indicates high metabolic demand from a supratentorial seizure focus.
Management
- •Administer first-line benzodiazepines immediately at the 5-minute mark: IV Lorazepam 4 mg (may repeat once) or IM Midazolam 10 mg for patients weighing >40 kg.
- •Initiate second-line non-sedating intravenous ASMs if seizures persist after the first benzodiazepine dose: IV Levetiracetam 60 mg/kg (maximum 4500 mg) is often preferred for its safety profile.
- •Consider alternative second-line agents: IV Fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg (maximum 1500 mg PE) or IV Valproate 40 mg/kg (maximum 3000 mg).
- •Avoid IV Valproate in pregnant patients due to high teratogenic risk unless all other options have failed.
- •Escalate to Refractory Status Epilepticus (RSE) management if seizures continue despite one benzodiazepine and one appropriately dosed second-line ASM.
- •Induce anesthesia for RSE using IV Midazolam: 0.2 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr.
- •Utilize IV Propofol as an alternative anesthetic: 1–2 mg/kg bolus followed by 20–100 μg/kg/min; monitor closely for Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome (PRIS) characterized by metabolic acidosis and bradycardia.
- •Incorporate NMDA antagonism for super-refractory cases: IV Ketamine 1–2 mg/kg bolus followed by 1–5 mg/kg/hr infusion.
- •Maintain continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring to guide anesthetic titration; the goal is typically the cessation of electrographic seizures or a burst-suppression pattern.
- •Administer Magnesium Sulfate 4–6 g IV loading dose followed by 1–2 g/hr infusion if the patient is pregnant and eclampsia is suspected.
- •Monitor for systemic complications including , acute kidney injury, and neurogenic pulmonary edema.
- •Avoid underdosing in elderly patients; while they are more sensitive to side effects, subtherapeutic dosing is a primary cause of treatment failure.
- •Consult neurocritical care early for patients requiring anesthetic infusions or those with suspected NORSE.
- •Initiate gradual weaning of anesthetics only after at least 24 hours of electrographic seizure control to prevent rebound status epilepticus.
- •Consider adjunctive Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) in cases of refractory SE with a suspected autoimmune or neuroinflammatory component.
- •Refer for surgical evaluation or (VNS) in cases of super-refractory SE that fail all pharmacological interventions.
Board Review — High Yield
- •GABA-A Internalization — The primary molecular mechanism for benzodiazepine resistance in prolonged SE.
- •T1 vs T2 — T1 (5 min) is when to start treatment; T2 (30 min) is when permanent damage begins.
- •Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis — A reversible MRI finding in SE showing contralateral cerebellar hyperintensity.
- •Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome (PRIS) — Metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and cardiac failure during high-dose propofol use.
- •Eclampsia Treatment — Magnesium sulfate is the drug of choice, not standard antiseizure medications.
- •Subtle Status — The transition from convulsive SE to electrographic SE with minimal motor movements.
- •Ketamine Mechanism — Non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist used for refractory SE when GABAergic drugs fail.
- •NORSE — New-onset refractory status epilepticus in a healthy person, often autoimmune.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury
- ▸The transition to self-sustaining SE is driven by the internalization of GABA-A receptors and the synaptic recruitment of NMDA/AMPA receptors.
- ▸Neuronal injury is primarily mediated by excitotoxicity, where massive calcium influx leads to mitochondrial failure and oxidative stress.
- ▸Inverse neurovascular coupling and spreading depolarization can cause localized ischemia even in the presence of high metabolic demand.
The pathophysiology of (SE) represents a failure of normal seizure termination mechanisms and the subsequent transition into a self-sustaining state of hyper-excitability [3]D[11]D. This transition occurs rapidly, typically within 5 minutes of continuous seizure activity, and is driven by a complex interplay of receptor trafficking, ionic imbalances, and metabolic exhaustion [3]D[5]D. As the duration of SE increases, the brain undergoes profound molecular changes that render standard treatments, such as benzodiazepines, increasingly ineffective [4]D[9]D.
The Receptor Trafficking Hypothesis
The hallmark of SE pathophysiology is the maladaptive trafficking of synaptic receptors, which shifts the balance of the brain toward excitation [3]D[9]D. Under normal conditions, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) provides the primary inhibitory tone. However, during SE, there is a progressive internalization (endocytosis) of synaptic GABA-A receptors into the intracellular compartment [3]D[5]D[11]D. This reduction in surface inhibitory receptors explains why the brain becomes pharmacoresistant to GABAergic agents like benzodiazepines as the seizure persists [4]D[5]D.
Simultaneously, there is an increased recruitment and surface expression of excitatory glutamatergic receptors, specifically N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors [3]D[5]D[17]D. Research indicates a specific increase in the NR1 subunit and GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors at the synaptic membrane [12]D[17]D. This "double hit"—the loss of inhibition and the gain of excitation—creates a feed-forward loop that sustains the seizure activity [3]D[9]D.
Molecular Cascade of Neuronal Injury
Neuronal death in SE is not merely a result of physical exhaustion but is a programmed consequence of biochemical cascades [2]D[11]D. The mechanism follows a predictable sequence:
- Step 1: Excessive Glutamate Release: Sustained depolarization leads to massive release of glutamate into the synaptic cleft [3]D[11]D.
- Step 2: Calcium Overload: Activation of NMDA receptors causes a massive influx of calcium ($Ca^{2+}$) into the neuron [3]D.
- Step 3: Mitochondrial Dysfunction: The intracellular $Ca^{2+}$ levels overwhelm mitochondrial buffering capacity, leading to irreversible mitochondrial membrane depolarization and the release of pro-apoptotic factors [3]D.
- Step 4: Oxidative Stress and Proteasome Inhibition: Increased metabolic demand generates reactive oxygen species (ROS). Furthermore, SE causes inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), preventing the degradation of misfolded or damaged proteins, which further compromises cellular survival [3]D[14]D.
- Step 5: Programmed Cell Death: Activation of pathways involving the p53 tumor suppressor and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK 1/2) can either attempt neuroprotection or, if the insult is severe, trigger apoptosis [6]D[19]D.
Neurovascular Coupling and Spreading Depolarization
In the early stages of SE, the brain attempts to compensate for the massive metabolic demand by increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF) and glucose metabolism [2]D[11]D. However, as SE progresses, a phenomenon known as inverse neurovascular coupling may occur [1]C. This is often associated with spreading depolarization (SD)—a wave of sustained neuronal and glial depolarization that causes abrupt ion translocation and cytotoxic edema [1]C. During SD, instead of increasing blood flow to meet demand, the microvasculature may constrict, leading to severe hypoperfusion and secondary ischemic injury despite the ongoing electrical activity [1]C.
Systemic Pathophysiological Changes
SE is a multisystemic emergency. The physiological response is traditionally divided into two stages [2]D:
- Stage 1 (Compensated): Characterized by a massive autonomic discharge. Patients exhibit , tachycardia, hyperglycemia, and hyperthermia. Cerebral autoregulation is intact, and CBF is increased to meet the high metabolic demand [2]D.
- Stage 2 (Uncompensated): Occurs as the body's compensatory mechanisms fail. This stage is marked by hypotension, hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, and metabolic (lactic) acidosis [2]D[11]D. Hemodynamic collapse and systemic organ failure (including and acute kidney injury) significantly increase mortality [2]D.
Susceptibility and Anatomical Vulnerability
Certain brain regions are more susceptible to SE-induced damage, particularly the hippocampus, which may undergo significant atrophy and reorganization [10]D[16]D. Genetic factors also play a role; for instance, patients with Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies (DEEs) have a lower threshold for SE and are more prone to progressive cognitive decline following episodes [8]D. Additionally, unusual manifestations like crossed cerebellar diaschisis—where a cerebral seizure focus causes a reversible hyperintensity in the contralateral cerebellum—demonstrate the wide-reaching network effects of SE [7]C.
| Component | Change in SE | Pathophysiological Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| GABA-A Receptors | Internalization (Endocytosis) | Loss of inhibitory tone; Benzodiazepine resistance [3]D[5]D |
| NMDA/AMPA Receptors | Increased Surface Expression | Excessive excitation; Calcium-mediated excitotoxicity [3]D[17]D |
| Intracellular Calcium | Massive Influx | Mitochondrial depolarization and activation of apoptotic pathways [3]D |
| P2X7 Receptors | Up-regulation | Increased pro-inflammatory signaling and seizure maintenance [18]D |
| UPS Function | Inhibition | Accumulation of misfolded proteins and cellular stress [14]D |
| Nav1.6 Channels | Increased Activity | Enhanced neuronal firing and seizure severity [15]D |
| Feature | Stage 1 (Compensated) | Stage 2 (Uncompensated) |
|---|---|---|
| Blood Pressure | Hypertension | Hypotension / Hemodynamic collapse [2]D |
| Glucose | Hyperglycemia | Hypoglycemia [2]D |
| Cerebral Blood Flow | Increased (Matched to demand) | Decreased (Inverse coupling) [1]C[2]D |
| Acid-Base Status | Mild compensation | Severe Lactic Acidosis [2]D[11]D |
| Temperature | Hyperthermia | Potential failure of thermoregulation [2]D |
Etiology and Triggering Factors
- ▸Identifying the underlying etiology is the most critical predictor of mortality (approx. 27.8% in NORSE) and functional recovery [32].
- ▸Autoimmune triggers, including AQP4 and Anti-Hu antibodies, often present as highly refractory focal SE or EPC [27, 28].
- ▸Mitochondrial disorders (MELAS, POLG) must be considered in refractory cases, as they present with distinct EEG patterns and metabolic failure mechanisms [31].
Status epilepticus (SE) arises from a fundamental failure of endogenous seizure-termination mechanisms or the activation of pathways that promote abnormally prolonged, self-sustaining electrical activity [2]D. The transition from a self-terminating seizure to SE is characterized by a critical physiological shift, often involving the internalization of GABA-A receptors and the synaptic recruitment of NMDA receptors, which creates a cycle of refractory hyperexcitability [34]D. Identifying the specific etiology is the most significant predictor of both short-term mortality and long-term functional recovery [24][32]D.
Infectious and Post-Infectious Triggers
Infectious etiologies remain a primary cause of SE, particularly in the context of (NORSE). Viral encephalitis is identified in approximately 25% of adult NORSE cases [32]D. The mechanism typically involves direct viral invasion of the parenchyma or a secondary inflammatory cascade that disrupts the blood-brain barrier and lowers the seizure threshold. In pediatric populations, the relationship between baseline clinical features and infectious triggers is a key focus for prioritizing diagnostic testing [24].
Autoimmune and Paraneoplastic Etiologies
Autoimmune mechanisms are increasingly recognized as major drivers of refractory SE. These conditions often involve molecular mimicry, where the immune system targets neuronal or glial proteins [27]C[28]C.
- Anti-Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) Autoimmunity: Associated with (NMOSD), AQP4 antibodies target astrocytes, leading to secondary neuronal hyperexcitability. This can manifest as (EPC) [27]C.
- Anti-Hu Encephalitis: Often paraneoplastic, specifically associated with underlying malignancies such as mediastinal seminoma [28]C. The mechanism involves T-cell mediated neuronophagia, which can mimic the pathology of [28]C.
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): SE in SLE (SE-SLE) is generally attributed to fulminant neuropsychiatric disease activity. Convulsive phenotypes are associated with a high burden of cortical and subcortical brain lesions [25].
- (AE): AE is a frequent cause of NORSE. The DAME score (Duration of SE, MRI abnormalities, CSF findings, Etiology) is utilized to predict the development of persistent autoimmune-associated epilepsy following the acute episode [33]D.
Vascular and Structural Causes
Cerebrovascular accidents are potent triggers for SE, particularly in pediatric cohorts. Arterial Ischemic Stroke (AIS) in neonates and children carries a significant risk for acute SE and the subsequent development of post-stroke epilepsy within 3 years [22]. The risk is influenced by the size and location of the stroke, which creates a nidus of cortical irritability through excitotoxicity and structural remodeling [22]. Radiological phenomena such as Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis (CCD)—the functional deactivation of the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere—are frequently observed in supratentorial SE, reflecting the metabolic and hemodynamic coupling between ictal zones and distant connected regions [26].
Genetic and Mitochondrial Disorders
Genetic factors are major contributors to the pediatric SE landscape, though they are increasingly identified in adults via Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing (rWGS) [29]C[30]D.
- Mitochondrial Diseases: SE is a hallmark of disorders such as MELAS ( , , and Stroke-like episodes), POLG (Polymerase Gamma), MERRF, COQ8A, and MT-ND1 variants [31]D. The mechanism involves impaired oxidative phosphorylation and ATP depletion, preventing the maintenance of neuronal membrane potentials [31]D. Specific EEG patterns, such as Type 2 Lateralized Periodic Discharges (LPDs-plus), are highly suggestive of mitochondrial SE [31]D.
- Metabolic Crises: In adults with developmental delay, rWGS can identify previously undiagnosed genetic syndromes or metabolic crises that present as nonconvulsive SE [29]C.
Cryptogenic and Emerging Factors
Despite exhaustive workup, a significant proportion of SE cases remain cryptogenic. In adult NORSE, 54% to 62% of cases are classified as cryptogenic (c-NORSE) [32]D[35]D. The c-NORSE score is a clinical tool used to predict cryptogenic etiology after testing for antineuronal antibodies [37]D. Emerging research suggests a role for the gut-brain axis, as patients with SE and NORSE display drastically altered fecal microbiomes and associated cytokine shifts compared to patients with chronic epilepsy [36]D.
Protocol: Etiological Investigation of Refractory SE
Step 1 → Immediate Screening: Perform a comprehensive metabolic panel, toxicology screen, and basic CSF analysis to exclude common triggers [35]D. Step 2 → Advanced Diagnostics: Initiate neuroimaging (MRI) to look for structural lesions or CCD and send serum/CSF for autoimmune and paraneoplastic panels (e.g., AQP4, Anti-Hu) [27]C[28]C[37]D. Step 3 → Genetic and Metabolic Testing: In cases of unexplained or refractory SE, especially with developmental delay or mitochondrial features, perform rWGS and specific metabolic testing (e.g., POLG, MELAS) [29]C[31]D.
| Cause | Category | Frequency/Context | Key Mechanism | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viral Encephalitis | Infectious | 25% of NORSE | Direct invasion/Inflammation | [32]D |
| Autoimmune Encephalitis | Autoimmune | Common in NORSE | Molecular mimicry/Antibodies | [33]D[37]D |
| Arterial Ischemic Stroke | Vascular | High in Pediatrics | Excitotoxicity/Structural injury | [22] |
| Mitochondrial (MELAS/POLG) | Genetic | Rare but severe | ATP depletion/Energy crisis | [31]D |
| SLE | Autoimmune | Neuropsychiatric lupus | Fulminant disease activity | [25] |
| NMOSD (AQP4) | Autoimmune | Rare (manifests as EPC) | Astrocyte targeting | [27]C |
| Anti-Hu (Seminoma) | Paraneoplastic | Rare (manifests as EPC) | T-cell neuronophagia | [28]C |
| Cryptogenic (c-NORSE) | Unknown | 54-62% of NORSE | Unidentified inflammation | [32]D[35]D |
Recognition and Triage
- ▸The operational threshold for status epilepticus is 5 minutes of continuous seizure activity, necessitating immediate pharmacological intervention.
- ▸Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) requires EEG for diagnosis and should be suspected in any patient with unexplained altered mental status or failure to wake after a convulsive seizure.
- ▸Point-of-care EEG (pocEEG) and rapid EEG (rEEG) are essential triage tools that decrease time to diagnosis in the emergency department and ICU settings.
Status epilepticus (SE) is a critical neurologic emergency requiring rapid identification to mitigate the high risk of mortality and permanent neurological damage [40][43]C. The modern approach to SE recognition utilizes a patient-specific framework organized into four axes: semiology, etiology, electroencephalogram (EEG) correlate, and age [43]C. Clinical recognition is often straightforward in convulsive status epilepticus (CSE), but nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) presents a significant diagnostic challenge, frequently requiring specialized monitoring to distinguish it from other forms of encephalopathy [45]D[52]D.
Clinical Recognition of Convulsive Status Epilepticus
CSE is characterized by prominent, rhythmic motor activity and an ongoing impairment of consciousness. The operational definition for initiating emergency treatment is 5 minutes of continuous seizure activity or two or more discrete seizures without a return to baseline consciousness between events [43]C. Early recognition in the pre-hospital setting is vital, as seizures of longer duration become increasingly difficult to terminate, leading to a self-sustaining cycle of benzodiazepine-refractory SE [34]D.
Pre-hospital triage relies on standardized emergency medical services (EMS) protocols and screening tools to ensure appropriate dosing of first-line therapies [47]D. Clinicians must remain vigilant for the transition from overt CSE to "subtle" SE, where motor movements may diminish to small-amplitude twitching of the face or extremities while the brain remains in a state of continuous electrical seizure [45]D.
Identifying Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus (NCSE)
NCSE is defined by altered mental status without prominent motor manifestations [45]D. It is increasingly recognized in the intensive care unit (ICU), particularly following cardiac arrest, where it occurs in 1% to 20% of comatose survivors [51]D.
Clinical Features and Mimics
Unlike sleep or some metabolic comas, patients in NCSE often have their eyes open [45]D. A key diagnostic differentiator is EEG reactivity. In metabolic or toxic encephalopathy, external auditory or somatosensory stimuli often induce changes in the EEG background (reactivity). In contrast, ictal activity in NCSE is typically self-perpetuating and does not cease or significantly alter in response to external stimulation [48]D.
Clinicians must avoid the "false syllogism" of diagnosing NCSE based solely on a positive response to benzodiazepines. For example, in (CJD), periodic sharp wave complexes (PSWCs) may be suppressed by intravenous benzodiazepines, but this represents a transient electrographic change without clinical improvement, leading to frequent misdiagnosis [46]D.
Diagnostic Triage and EEG Modalities
Because clinical examination alone is insufficient to diagnose NCSE, rapid access to EEG is the gold standard for triage [41][50]D.
- Point-of-Care EEG (pocEEG): These devices use simplified electrode montages and can be applied rapidly by non-specialists in the emergency department or ICU [41][50]D. pocEEG serves as an effective screening tool to identify nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and NCSE, potentially reducing the time to definitive treatment and improving hospital resource allocation [49]D.
- Continuous EEG (cEEG): In critically ill patients at risk for NCSE, 24-72 hours of Tele-cEEG monitoring provides a significantly higher seizure detection rate compared to a standard 30-minute routine EEG [42].
- Rapid Response EEG (rEEG): Advances in machine learning and reduced montage systems allow for expedited medical decision-making in cases of unexplained altered mental status or suspected post-convulsive NCSE [50]D.
Prognostic Scoring Systems
Triage also involves assessing the severity and predicted outcome of the SE episode. Several scoring systems have been validated to assist in clinical decision-making and family counseling [44].
| Score | Components | Primary Utility |
|---|---|---|
| STESS | Age, seizure type, consciousness, history of seizures | High sensitivity for predicting mortality in the ED [44] |
| EMSE-EACE | Etiology, Age, Comorbidities, EEG | Comprehensive assessment of mortality risk [44] |
| END-IT | Encephalitis, NCSE, Diazepam resistance, Image abnormalities, Tracheal intubation | Predicts functional outcomes at 3 months [23][44] |
| Modified END-IT | Individualized nomogram for CSE | Enhanced prediction of functional recovery in convulsive cases [23] |
Triage Protocol for Suspected Status Epilepticus
- Step 1: Immediate Stabilization. Assess airway, breathing, and circulation. Check fingerstick glucose to rule out hypoglycemia [43]C.
- Step 2: Time-Stamp and First-Line Therapy. If seizure activity exceeds 5 minutes, administer a full dose of benzodiazepines (e.g., IM Midazolam 10 mg for >40kg, or IV Lorazepam 4 mg) [43]C[47]D.
- Step 3: Emergent EEG. If the patient does not regain consciousness within 10-20 minutes after motor seizures stop, or if NCSE is suspected initially, obtain a pocEEG or rEEG immediately [41][50]D.
- Step 4: Etiological Screening. Simultaneously initiate workup for underlying causes (e.g., metabolic derangement, acute brain injury, or drug toxicity) [43]C[52]D.
Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management
- ▸Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) requires immediate ICU admission and escalation to continuous anesthetic infusions like midazolam or propofol.
- ▸Ketamine is a critical adjunctive therapy that targets NMDA receptor upregulation, which occurs as GABAergic medications lose efficacy during prolonged seizures.
- ▸Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is defined by seizure persistence 24 hours after anesthetic initiation and may require immunomodulatory therapy or NMDA-receptor weaning strategies.
Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is defined as seizure activity that persists despite the administration of a first-line and at least one appropriately dosed second-line non-sedating intravenous (IV) antiseizure medication (ASM) [60][66]D. Approximately 10% to 40% of pediatric status epilepticus cases progress to RSE [54]. Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) occurs when seizures continue or recur 24 hours or more after the initiation of anesthetic therapy, including instances where seizures return during the weaning of anesthetic infusions [55][63]D[71]C. requires rapid escalation to continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) to prevent neuronal injury and systemic complications [64]D[66]D.
Step 1: Initial Assessment and Severity Classification
Upon failure of second-line ASMs (e.g., , , or ), the patient must be classified as having RSE and immediately transitioned to an intensive care unit (ICU) for continuous hemodynamic and electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring [60][66]D. Clinicians must decide between adding a second non-sedating IV ASM or proceeding directly to anesthetic induction. While equipoise exists, rapid sedation is often preferred in convulsive RSE to halt systemic metabolic exhaustion [58]C. For non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), the FAST trial suggests comparing high-dose IV ASMs against rapid ICU sedation to determine if the risks of intubation outweigh the benefits of immediate seizure suppression [57].
Step 2: Induction of Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs (CIVADs)
Administer Midazolam 0.2 mg/kg IV bolus, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr [61]. Midazolam is often the preferred initial CIVAD due to its rapid onset and familiar safety profile [64]D. In pediatric populations, a dose threshold of 0.8 mg/kg/hr has been identified; exceeding this dose may be associated with diminishing returns in seizure cessation and increased risk of treatment failure [61]. Alternatively, Propofol 1–2 mg/kg IV bolus followed by 20–100 μg/kg/min may be used [60]. A multicenter study found no significant difference in efficacy between midazolam and propofol for RSE control, though propofol requires caution regarding propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) during prolonged use [60].
Step 3: Integration of NMDA Antagonism (Ketamine)
Administer Ketamine 1–2 mg/kg IV bolus, followed by an infusion of 1–5 mg/kg/hr [54][67]D. As status epilepticus persists, GABA-A receptors are internalized and become less responsive to benzodiazepines and barbiturates, while N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are upregulated [64]D[67]D. Ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, targets this mechanism and is increasingly used as an advanced second-line or early third-line agent [67]D[75]C. Unlike other anesthetics, ketamine does not significantly suppress respiratory drive, potentially allowing for seizure management without endotracheal intubation in select cases of NCSE [73]C[74]C. Prehospital administration of ketamine for benzodiazepine-refractory SE has also shown promise in terminating seizures before ICU arrival [65]D[72]C.
Step 4: Monitoring and Titration
Continuous EEG (cEEG) is mandatory to guide titration, especially as clinical convulsions may cease while electrographic seizures persist (electromechanical dissociation) [66]D. The therapeutic goal is typically the cessation of all electrographic seizures or the achievement of a burst-suppression pattern [66]D. When using ketamine, EEG monitoring may reveal increased beta-frequency activity, which has been suggested as a potential marker for treatment response [70]. Clinicians should monitor for drug-specific adverse effects, such as hypotension with midazolam or propofol, and metabolic acidosis or bradycardia with propofol [60].
Step 5: Resolution, Weaning, and Transition
Anesthetic weaning should only be attempted after at least 24 hours of electrographic seizure control [63]D. Weaning must be gradual to prevent rebound SE. For patients who fail repeated weaning attempts (SRSE), adjunctive therapies may be required. Memantine 20 mg/day (oral NMDA antagonist) has been used off-label to facilitate weaning from ketamine infusions in refractory cases [71]C. In cases with suspected neuroinflammatory components, Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV (max 800 mg) may be considered; a randomized trial indicated that adding tocilizumab to standard anesthetic regimens may improve outcomes in RSE by modulating inflammatory cytokines [59].
| Drug | Initial Bolus | Maintenance Dose | Key Considerations | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midazolam | 0.2 mg/kg | 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr | Preferred for rapid onset; threshold of 0.8 mg/kg/hr in peds | 2b [60][61] |
| Propofol | 1–2 mg/kg | 20–100 μg/kg/min | Risk of PRIS; avoid in prolonged pediatric infusions | 2b [60] |
| Ketamine | 1–2 mg/kg | 1–5 mg/kg/hr | NMDA antagonist; minimal respiratory suppression | 2a [54][55] |
| Pentobarbital | 5–15 mg/kg | 0.5–5.0 mg/kg/hr | High risk of hypotension and immunosuppression | 2a [56] |
| Tocilizumab | 8 mg/kg | Single dose (adjunct) | Used for neuroinflammatory RSE/SRSE | 1b [59] |
Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup
- ▸Status epilepticus is defined by the t1 (failure to terminate) and t2 (risk of neuronal injury) timepoints, with 5 minutes being the threshold for generalized convulsive SE.
- ▸EEG is mandatory for the diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), as clinical signs are often subtle or absent in critically ill patients.
- ▸A seizure burden exceeding 12 minutes per hour on continuous EEG is a critical threshold for defining status epilepticus in the ICU setting.
The diagnosis of status epilepticus (SE) is a time-sensitive neuro-emergency that requires a parallel approach: stabilizing the patient while simultaneously identifying the seizure type and underlying etiology [83]D[84]D. Because prolonged seizure activity leads to progressive changes in neurotransmission—specifically the internalization of GABA receptors and the mobilization of NMDA receptors—prompt recognition is vital to prevent the transition to refractory states [84]D. The diagnostic process is guided by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) framework, which classifies SE across four axes: semiology, EEG correlates, etiology, and age [89]D.
Diagnostic Criteria
Formal diagnosis relies on the ILAE two-timepoint definition. Timepoint 1 (t1) represents the duration beyond which a seizure is unlikely to self-terminate (typically 5 minutes for generalized tonic-clonic SE), while Timepoint 2 (t2) represents the duration beyond which there is a significant risk of long-term consequences, including neuronal injury and death [84]D[89]D.
- Required Features: Continuous seizure activity or recurrent seizures without a return to clinical baseline between episodes [84]D[88]D.
- Supportive Features: For nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), supportive features include fluctuating mental status, subtle motor twitches (e.g., nystagmus, perioral twitching), or a response to antiseizure medications (ASMs) accompanied by EEG improvement [83]D[90]D.
- Exclusion Criteria: Clinicians must exclude mimics such as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), syncope, or movement disorders. Notably, in patients with (CJD), periodic sharp wave complexes (PSWCs) may respond to benzodiazepines without clinical improvement; this should not be misdiagnosed as NCSE [46]D.
Laboratory Tests
Laboratory evaluation should be initiated immediately to identify reversible metabolic triggers and systemic complications of prolonged muscle activity.
- Fingerstick Glucose: Must be performed immediately in all patients to rule out hypoglycemia as a reversible cause [88]D.
- Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: To assess for hyponatremia, , and renal or hepatic failure which may lower the seizure threshold [88]D.
- Toxicology Screen: Essential for identifying sympathomimetic toxicity or withdrawal states (e.g., alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal) [88]D.
- Pregnancy Test: Mandatory for all women of reproductive age to guide ASM selection and screen for eclampsia [88]D.
- Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Analysis: Indicated if there is clinical suspicion of meningitis, encephalitis, or autoimmune epilepsy, particularly after the acute phase is stabilized [89]D.
Imaging
Neuroimaging is used to identify acute structural brain injuries that may be the primary cause of SE, such as hemorrhage, tumor, or stroke [78]D.
- Non-contrast CT : The emergent modality of choice to rule out large intracranial hemorrhages or masses [78]D.
- MRI Brain: Superior for detecting subtle cortical dysplasia, encephalitis, or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Specific findings in SE include Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis (CCD), a phenomenon where supratentorial seizure activity causes functional deafferentation and metabolic depression in the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere [26].
- Special Considerations: In patients receiving amyloid-targeting therapies (e.g., aducanumab), clinicians should look for Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), which can trigger fatal super-refractory SE [87]C.
Electrodiagnostic Studies
Electroencephalography (EEG) is the gold standard for diagnosing NCSE and monitoring treatment response in refractory SE [90]D.
- Continuous EEG (cEEG): Recommended in the ICU for patients with unexplained altered mental status or those who do not wake up within 10–20 minutes of seizure cessation [78]D[83]D. A seizure burden of >12 minutes per hour (20%) is often used to define SE in the critical care setting [78]D.
- Point-of-Care EEG (pocEEG): Utilizes simplified montages for rapid bedside assessment in the emergency department. It is highly feasible in pediatric populations for the early detection of NCSE [41].
- AI-Integrated EEG: Emerging AI platforms offer a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 83% for detecting nonconvulsive seizures, potentially reducing unnecessary ASM administration [86].
- EEG-EMG Monitoring: Combined monitoring is useful in the ICU to differentiate between epileptic myoclonus and non-epileptic movement disorders like postanoxic myoclonus or tremors [82]D.
Diagnostic Algorithm
- Step 1: Clinical Suspicion: Identify prolonged motor activity (>5 min) or persistent altered mental status without recovery [84]D[88]D.
- Step 2: Immediate Metabolic Screen: Check fingerstick glucose and electrolytes [88]D.
- Step 3: Emergent EEG: Order EEG (pocEEG or routine) within 30–60 minutes if the patient remains encephalopathic to rule out NCSE [41][83]D.
- Step 4: Neuroimaging: Perform CT head once the patient is stabilized; follow with MRI if the etiology remains unknown [26][78]D.
- Step 5: Etiological Workup: Conduct targeted testing (CSF, toxicology, or autoimmune panels) based on clinical context [89]D.
| Test | Finding | Timing | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fingerstick Glucose | Hypoglycemia | Immediate (<5 min) | High for metabolic SE | N/A |
| pocEEG | Ictal discharges | <30 min | High for NCSE | Moderate |
| AI-EEG | Seizure detection | Continuous | 95% [86] | 83% [86] |
| CT Head | Hemorrhage/Mass | Emergent | High for acute bleed | Low for subtle lesions |
| MRI (DWI/FLAIR) | Cortical edema/CCD | Subacute | High for focal SE [26] | High |
| CSF Analysis | Pleocytosis/Protein | Post-stabilization | High for infection | Variable |
Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly
- ▸The elderly have the highest incidence of SE (89.6/100,000) and a fourfold higher mortality rate compared to younger adults [97].
- ▸In pregnancy, differentiating SE from eclampsia is critical, as eclampsia requires Magnesium sulfate rather than standard ASMs [88].
- ▸Continuous EEG monitoring for at least 36.8 hours is recommended in SE to reduce the risk of missed seizure recurrence below 5% [106].
of (SE) requires significant modification when encountered in specific patient cohorts. Physiological variations, altered pharmacokinetics, and distinct etiologic profiles necessitate a departure from standard adult protocols to optimize outcomes and minimize iatrogenic harm [88]D[97]D.
Pediatrics
In the pediatric population, SE is a common neurological emergency where rapid intervention is critical to prevent long-term developmental and cognitive sequelae [99]D. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) included patients as young as 2 years old, demonstrating that second-line management with Levetiracetam (60 mg/kg, max 4500 mg), Fosphenytoin (20 mg PE/kg, max 1500 mg PE), or Valproic acid (40 mg/kg, max 3000 mg) shows comparable efficacy in benzodiazepine-refractory convulsive SE [91].
Diagnostic considerations in children must prioritize metabolic disturbances and infection. In cases of (NORSE), which can occur in previously healthy children, the prognosis is often guarded, and clinicians must aggressively investigate for autoimmune or paraneoplastic etiologies [21][32]D. For pediatric patients with super-refractory SE (SRSE), adjunctive therapies such as (VNS) have emerged as safe options, with some evidence suggesting they may assist in SE resolution when anesthetic weaning fails [93][94].
Pediatric Monitoring Protocol:
- Step 1: Immediate stabilization and administration of weight-based benzodiazepines (e.g., Midazolam 0.2 mg/kg IM or Lorazepam 0.1 mg/kg IV).
- Step 2: If seizures persist at 5–10 minutes, initiate a second-line ASM (Levetiracetam, Fosphenytoin, or Valproate) [91].
- Step 3: Early transition to continuous EEG (cEEG). In pediatric SE, monitoring should ideally persist for 36.8 hours after the last seizure to ensure the risk of recurrence is reduced below 5% [106]D.
Pregnancy
SE in pregnancy represents a dual-emergency involving both the mother and the fetus. The primary clinical challenge is differentiating SE from , as the treatments differ fundamentally [88]D. While SE is managed with standard ASMs, eclampsia requires Magnesium sulfate (4–6 g IV loading dose followed by 1–2 g/h infusion).
Physiological changes in pregnancy, such as increased glomerular filtration and volume of distribution, often lead to subtherapeutic ASM levels. Furthermore, the risk of fetal hypoxia during prolonged maternal seizures is high, necessitating continuous fetal heart rate monitoring if the fetus is viable (typically >24 weeks gestation) [88]D.
Management of SE in Pregnancy:
- Teratogenicity: While Valproate is highly effective, it is generally avoided in pregnancy due to significant teratogenic risks (neural tube defects). Levetiracetam (60 mg/kg) or Fosphenytoin (20 mg PE/kg) are preferred second-line agents [91].
- Delivery Planning: SE is not an absolute indication for immediate Cesarean section unless there is evidence of fetal distress that does not resolve with maternal seizure control.
- : Most ASMs are compatible with breastfeeding, though infants should be monitored for sedation if the mother is receiving high-dose benzodiazepines or phenobarbital.
Elderly
Patients aged ≥60 years represent the demographic with the highest incidence of SE, reaching 89.6 per 100,000 person-years in women [97]D. Mortality in this group increases nearly fourfold compared to younger adults, often due to the underlying etiology such as , intracranial hemorrhage, or neuro-oncological complications [97]D[105]D.
Pharmacokinetic changes in the elderly, including reduced hepatic metabolism and renal clearance, increase the risk of drug-induced toxicity. Clinicians must be vigilant against underdosing, which is a frequent cause of treatment failure in the emergency department [98]. However, the use of highly protein-bound drugs (e.g., Phenytoin) is complicated by age-related hypoalbuminemia, which increases the free (active) fraction of the drug, potentially leading to toxicity even with "normal" total serum levels [97]D.
Elderly Prognostic Stratification: Prognostic scores like the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and qSOFA are utilized to predict mortality, though their performance in the elderly can be limited by the complexity of comorbidities [95]. Structured EEG reporting is increasingly recognized as a vital tool for predicting length of stay and mortality in this population [101]D. Biomarkers such as Neurofilament light-chain (Nf-L) in the CSF or serum may also serve as indicators of neuroaxonal injury following SE [102]D.
Immunocompromised Patients
In immunocompromised individuals (e.g., HIV/AIDS, post-transplant, or those on chemotherapy), SE is frequently the result of opportunistic CNS infections or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy [88]D. These patients are at higher risk for (NCSE), which may present subtly as altered mental status or "brain fog" rather than overt motor activity.
Management must include a low threshold for lumbar puncture and broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage while awaiting culture results. Clinicians must also account for significant drug-drug interactions between ASMs (especially enzyme-inducers like Carbamazepine or Phenytoin) and immunosuppressant medications (e.g., calcineurin inhibitors), which can lead to graft rejection or increased ASM toxicity.
| Medication | Pediatric Dose (≥2 years) | Maximum Dose | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levetiracetam | 60 mg/kg IV | 4500 mg | 1b [91] |
| Fosphenytoin | 20 mg PE/kg IV | 1500 mg PE | 1b [91] |
| Valproic Acid | 40 mg/kg IV | 3000 mg | 1b [91] |
| Factor | Change in Elderly | Clinical Impact on SE Management |
|---|---|---|
| Albumin Levels | Decreased | Increases free fraction of protein-bound drugs (e.g., Phenytoin) [97]D |
| Renal Clearance | Decreased | Requires dose adjustment for Levetiracetam and Lacosamide [96][97]D |
| Comorbidities | Increased | Higher risk of multi-organ failure and STESS score elevation [95][97]D |
| Etiology | Shift to Vascular | Stroke and neoplasm are the most common triggers [97]D[105]D |
Guidelines and Resources
- ▸The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) 2012 guidelines establish a three-tiered pharmacological framework: Emergent (Benzodiazepines), Urgent (AEDs), and Refractory (Anesthetic infusions).
- ▸Continuous EEG (cEEG) is recommended by the NCS within 60 minutes of seizure onset to rule out non-convulsive status epilepticus in patients who do not regain consciousness.
- ▸According to AAN/AES guidelines, women with epilepsy on AEDs do not have a substantially increased risk (>2x) of cesarean delivery or late pregnancy bleeding.
Clinical practice guidelines for (SE) emphasize a time-sensitive, tiered approach to . Because SE is a neurological emergency with high morbidity, standardized protocols are essential to reduce institutional variability and improve patient outcomes [107]. The primary objectives of all major guidelines are the rapid termination of clinical and electrographic seizure activity and the prevention of seizure recurrence.
Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) 2012 Guidelines
The 2012 NCS guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for the evaluation and management of SE in critically ill patients [107]. These guidelines utilize the GRADE system to categorize recommendations based on the quality of evidence and the balance between benefits and risks. A central tenet of the NCS approach is the categorization of treatment into three distinct phases: Emergent, Urgent, and Refractory.
Emergent Initial Therapy (0–5 Minutes)
The goal of the emergent phase is the immediate cessation of seizure activity. are the established first-line agents due to their rapid onset of action. The NCS recommends the following protocols:
- Step 1: Stabilization — Assess airway, breathing, and circulation (ABCs). Initiate cardiac monitoring and . Perform a rapid finger-stick glucose check to rule out hypoglycemia.
- Step 2: Pharmacological Intervention — Administer a rapid-acting benzodiazepine.
- Lorazepam: 0.1 mg/kg IV (up to 4 mg per dose), may repeat once.
- Midazolam: 10 mg IM (for patients without IV access) or 0.2 mg/kg IV.
- Diazepam: 0.15 mg/kg IV (up to 10 mg per dose).
Urgent Control Therapy (5–20 Minutes)
If seizures persist after the initial benzodiazepine dose, the patient enters the urgent control phase. The goal is to achieve long-term seizure control using non-sedating antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The NCS highlights that the choice of agent often depends on the patient's comorbidities and the side-effect profile of the drug [107].
- Fosphenytoin: 20 mg PE/kg IV (max 1500 mg/dose) at a rate of 150 mg PE/min.
- Valproate Sodium: 20–40 mg/kg IV at a rate of 3–6 mg/kg/min.
- Levetiracetam: 1000–3000 mg IV over 15 minutes.
Refractory Status Epilepticus (RSE)
Refractory SE is defined as continued seizures despite the administration of an emergent and an urgent agent. The NCS recommends moving to continuous intravenous infusions (cIVIs) with anesthetic agents. This stage requires intensive care monitoring and often endotracheal intubation [107].
- Midazolam Infusion: Loading dose of 0.2 mg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.05–2.0 mg/kg/hr.
- Propofol: Loading dose of 1–2 mg/kg followed by 20–200 mcg/kg/min.
- Pentobarbital: Loading dose of 5–15 mg/kg followed by 0.5–5.0 mg/kg/hr.
Management in Special Populations: Pregnancy
The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the American Epilepsy Society (AES) provided a practice parameter update regarding women with epilepsy (WWE) and pregnancy [108][109]. While SE during pregnancy is a life-threatening event for both the mother and the fetus, the guidelines offer reassurance regarding general obstetrical risks for WWE.
Key findings from the AAN/AES update include:
- Obstetrical Complications: For WWE taking AEDs, there is probably no substantially increased risk (defined as > 2 times the expected rate) of cesarean delivery or [108].
- Labor and Delivery: There is probably no moderately increased risk (defined as > 1.5 times the expected rate) of premature contractions or premature labor and delivery [109].
- Seizure Frequency: While the risk of SE remains a concern, many women remain seizure-free throughout pregnancy. Monitoring AED serum levels is recommended to maintain therapeutic thresholds as physiological changes in pregnancy can alter drug metabolism.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The NCS guidelines emphasize the role of (EEG) in the management of SE, particularly for identifying non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) [107]. Continuous EEG (cEEG) should be initiated within 1 hour of SE onset if seizures continue or if the patient does not return to clinical baseline. This is critical because clinical cessation of motor activity does not always correlate with the cessation of electrographic seizure activity, a phenomenon known as electromechanical dissociation.
| Guideline | Organization | Year | Key Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of SE | Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) | 2012 | Tiered pharmacological approach (Emergent, Urgent, Refractory); emphasis on rapid benzodiazepine use; use of cEEG for monitoring [107]. |
| Practice Parameter Update: Management Issues for WWE | AAN / American Epilepsy Society (AES) | 2009 | SE risk in pregnancy is low; no substantial increase in C-section or late bleeding for WWE on AEDs; no moderate increase in premature labor [108][109]. |
References
- [1]
Winkler MK, Chassidim Y, Lublinsky S et al.. “Impaired neurovascular coupling to ictal epileptic activity and spreading depolarization in a patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage: possible link to blood-brain barrier dysfunction.” Epilepsia (2012). PMID: 23134492 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [2]
Iglesias AH, Balabanov A, Raedy A. “Systemic Complications of Status Epilepticus.” Current neurology and neuroscience reports (2025). PMID: 41068542 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury, Etiology and Triggering Factors - [3]
Alshehri RS, Alrawaili MS, Zawawi BMH et al.. “Pathophysiology of Status Epilepticus Revisited.” International journal of molecular sciences (2025). PMID: 40806628 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [4]
Magro G, Laterza V. “Status epilepticus: Is there a Stage 1 plus?” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38507275 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [5]
Wasterlain CG, Chen JW. “Mechanistic and pharmacologic aspects of status epilepticus and its treatment with new antiepileptic drugs.” Epilepsia (2008). PMID: 19087119 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [6]
Walker M. “Neuroprotection in epilepsy.” Epilepsia (2007). PMID: 18330004 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [7]
Ohe Y, Hayashi T, Deguchi I et al.. “A case of nonconvulsive status epilepticus with a reversible contralateral cerebellar lesion: temporal changes in magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography finding.” Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association (2013). PMID: 23910513 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [8]
Specchio N, Auvin S. “To what extent does status epilepticus contribute to brain damage in the developmental and epileptic Encephalopathies.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2025). PMID: 39883989 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [9]
Niquet J, Lumley L, Baldwin R et al.. “Early polytherapy for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2019). PMID: 31636007 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [10]
Scott RC. “What are the effects of prolonged seizures in the brain?” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2014). PMID: 25323416 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [11]
Engrand N, Crespel A. “[Pathophysiologic basis of status epilepticus].” Revue neurologique (2009). PMID: 19243800 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [12]
De Luca P, Mele M, Tanqueiro S et al.. “Synaptic accumulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors mediates the effects of BDNF-TrkB signalling on synaptic plasticity and in hyperexcitability during status epilepticus.” Journal of biomedical science (2025). PMID: 40890771 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [13]
Abbasova K, Kubová H, Mareš P. “Does status epilepticus modify the effect of ifenprodil on cortical epileptic afterdischarges in immature rats?” Pharmacological reports : PR (2018). PMID: 29355816 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [14]
Engel T, Martinez-Villarreal J, Henke C et al.. “Spatiotemporal progression of ubiquitin-proteasome system inhibition after status epilepticus suggests protective adaptation against hippocampal injury.” Molecular neurodegeneration (2017). PMID: 28235423 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [15]
Shao H, Yang Y, Qi AP et al.. “Gastrodin Reduces the Severity of Status Epilepticus in the Rat Pilocarpine Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy by Inhibiting Nav1.6 Sodium Currents.” Neurochemical research (2017). PMID: 27743286 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [16]
Hocker S, Nagarajan E, Rabinstein AA et al.. “Progressive Brain Atrophy in Super-refractory Status Epilepticus.” JAMA neurology (2016). PMID: 27533350 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [17]
Wasterlain CG, Naylor DE, Liu H et al.. “Trafficking of NMDA receptors during status epilepticus: therapeutic implications.” Epilepsia (2013). PMID: 24001081 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [18]
Engel T, Gomez-Villafuertes R, Tanaka K et al.. “Seizure suppression and neuroprotection by targeting the purinergic P2X7 receptor during status epilepticus in mice.” FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (2012). PMID: 22198387 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [19]
Engel T, Tanaka K, Jimenez-Mateos EM et al.. “Loss of p53 results in protracted electrographic seizures and development of an aggravated epileptic phenotype following status epilepticus.” Cell death & disease (2010). PMID: 21368852 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [20]
Avchalumov Y, Kirschstein T, Köhling R. “Altered physiology and pharmacology in the corticostriatal system in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy.” Epilepsia (2011). PMID: 21070218 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Neuronal Injury - [21]
Peng W, Lu L, Yin J et al.. “Factors associated with long-term outcomes in people with new onset refractory epilepticus: A single-center cohort study.” Epilepsia (2026). PMID: 41277767 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [22]
Lopez-Espejo M, Skorin I, Mesa T et al.. “Three-year incidence and acute setting predictors of epilepsy after neonatal and childhood arterial ischaemic stroke: a disease-based cohort study.” European journal of pediatrics (2024). PMID: 38170290 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [23]
Wang X, Wang YY, Gao Q et al.. “Development and validation of a nomogram to provide individualized predictions of functional outcomes in patients with convulsive status epilepticus at 3 months: The modified END-IT tool.” CNS neuroscience & therapeutics (2023). PMID: 37334755 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Recognition and Triage - [24]
Lee S, Kim SH, Kim HD et al.. “Identification of etiologies according to baseline clinical features of pediatric new-onset refractory status epilepticus in single center retrospective study.” Seizure (2024). PMID: 38908141 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [25]
Mikdashi J, Krumholz A. “Long-term outcome of status epilepticus-related to systemic lupus erythematosus: An observational study and a systematic review.” Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism (2023). PMID: 37595509 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [26]
Tabaee Damavandi P, Bosque-Varela P, Santos HBH et al.. “Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in status epilepticus: A systematic review of the literature.” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2026). PMID: 41483388 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [27]
Romozzi M, Vollono C, Calabresi P et al.. “Epilepsia Partialis Continua as a manifestation of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity.” Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) (2024). PMID: 39077880 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [28]
Cabreira V, Ferreira D, Melo C et al.. “Child Neurology: Anti-Hu Encephalitis in an Adolescent With a Mediastinal Seminoma.” Neurology (2023). PMID: 37527936 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [29]
Gaillard JR, Whitt Z, Selwa LM et al.. “Pearls & Oy-sters: Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Neurologic Patient Leads to Diagnosis With Treatment Implications.” Neurology (2023). PMID: 37460236 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [30]
Marini C, Rosati A, Fusco L et al.. “Genetic Etiologies of Epilepsies With Status Epilepticus: Insights From the Italian Pediatric Status Epilepticus Group Cohort.” Neurology (2026). PMID: 41915870 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [31]
Damiano M, Lambrecq V, Nguyen-Michel VH et al.. “EEG, clinical, and MRI features of status epilepticus associated with mitochondrial diseases.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41729327 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [32]
Jayalakshmi S, Pachipala S, Patil A et al.. “Clinical characteristics, etiology and outcome of new onset refractory status epilepticus in adults.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2026). PMID: 41498863 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [33]
Lattanzi S, Matricardi S, Vogrig A et al.. “Predicting epilepsy after new onset refractory status epilepticus due to autoimmune encephalitis: The DAME score.” Epilepsia (2026). PMID: 41467927 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [34]
Pelletier J, Merriman W, Koyfman A et al.. “Benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus: A narrative review.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2026). PMID: 40974752 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors, Recognition and Triage, Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [35]
Kilmer J, Ransley G, Murphy E et al.. “The Role of Metabolic Testing in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Adult NORSE: A Retrospective, Single-Centre Study.” European journal of neurology (2025). PMID: 40470573 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [36]
Steriade C, Thomas SC, Xu F et al.. “Patients with status epilepticus and new-onset refractory status epilepticus display drastically altered fecal microbiomes compared to chronic epilepsy patients.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40387216 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [37]
Ferreira JHF, Gomes AM, Zetehaku AC et al.. “Performance of cryptogenic new onset refractory status epilepticus score in a Brazilian cohort after testing for antineuronal antibodies with tissue-based and cell-based assays.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40318023 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [38]
Halawani LM, Myers KA. “Comparative analysis of new-onset refractory status epilepticus in adult and pediatric patients: immunotherapy timing and functional outcomes.” Journal of neurology (2025). PMID: 40251332 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [39]
Ferhat L, Soussi R, Masse M et al.. “A peptide-neurotensin conjugate that crosses the blood-brain barrier induces pharmacological hypothermia associated with anticonvulsant, neuroprotective, and anti-inflammatory properties following status epilepticus in mice.” eLife (2025). PMID: 40152901 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Etiology and Triggering Factors - [40]
Vignatelli L, Tontini V, Meletti S et al.. “Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38606469 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Recognition and Triage - [41]
Simma L, Kammerl A, Ramantani G. “Point-of-care EEG in the pediatric emergency department: a systematic review.” European journal of pediatrics (2025). PMID: 40053132 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [42]
Limotai C, Jirasakuldej S, Wongwiangiunt S et al.. “Efficacy of delivery of care with Tele-continuous EEG in critically ill patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Tele-cRCT study) study.” Critical care (London, England) (2025). PMID: 39773282 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [43]
Rubinos C. “Emergent Management of Status Epilepticus.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) (2024). PMID: 38830068 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Recognition and Triage, Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [44]
Shen JY, Saffari SE, Yong L et al.. “Evaluation of prognostic scores for status epilepticus in the neurology ICU: A retrospective study.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2024). PMID: 38490090 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Recognition and Triage - [45]
Gélisse P, Crespel A. “Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in patients under intensive care: Should we view epilepsy as a sleep disorder?” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 39821147 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [46]
Gélisse P, Crespel A. “When patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are misdiagnosed as having nonconvulsive status epilepticus.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 39754446 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage, Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [47]
O'Kula SS, Hill CE. “Improving Quality of Care for Status Epilepticus: Putting Protocols into Practice.” Current neurology and neuroscience reports (2024). PMID: 38995482 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [48]
Gélisse P, Tatum WO, Crespel A et al.. “Stimulus-induced arousal with transient electroencephalographic improvement distinguishes nonictal from ictal generalized periodic discharges.” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38624097 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [49]
Green A, Wegman ME, Ney JP. “Economic review of point-of-care EEG.” Journal of medical economics (2024). PMID: 38014443 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [50]
Davey Z, Gupta PB, Li DR et al.. “Rapid Response EEG: Current State and Future Directions.” Current neurology and neuroscience reports (2022). PMID: 36434488 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [51]
De Stefano P, Kaplan PW, Quintard H et al.. “Nonconvulsive status epilepticus following cardiac arrest: overlooked, untreated and misjudged.” Journal of neurology (2023). PMID: 36076090 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [52]
Alkhachroum A, Appavu B, Egawa S et al.. “Electroencephalogram in the intensive care unit: a focused look at acute brain injury.” Intensive care medicine (2022). PMID: 35997792 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Recognition and Triage - [53]
Rosati A, Bartolotta P, Marini C et al.. “Optimizing pediatric status epilepticus management: The role of early midazolam infusion and adherence to clinical practice guidelines.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40377450 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [54]
Chiriboga N, Spentzas T, Abu-Sawwa R. “A systematic review and meta-analysis of ketamine in pediatric status epilepticus.” Epilepsia (2024). PMID: 38881333 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [55]
Yan M, Sun T, Liu J et al.. “The efficacy and safety of ketamine in the treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review.” Journal of neurology (2024). PMID: 38782798 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [56]
Au YK, Kananeh MF, Rahangdale R et al.. “Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs: A Systematic Review.” JAMA neurology (2024). PMID: 38466294 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [57]
Cornwall CD, Piilgaard H, Engedal TS et al.. “Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial.” Critical care explorations (2025). PMID: 40953286 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [58]
Vossler DG. “First Seizures, Acute Repetitive Seizures, and Status Epilepticus.” Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) (2025). PMID: 39899098 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [59]
El-Haggar SM, Hegazy SK, Mustafa W et al.. “Possible immuno-modulatory effects of tocilizumab in patients with refractory status epilepticus.” European review for medical and pharmacological sciences (2023). PMID: 36876691 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [60]
Chiu WT, Campozano V, Schiefecker A et al.. “Management of Refractory Status Epilepticus: An International Cohort Study (MORSE CODe) Analysis of Patients Managed in the ICU.” Neurology (2022). PMID: 35918156 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [61]
Daniels ZS, Srdanovic N, Rychlik K et al.. “High-Dose Midazolam for Pediatric Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.” Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies (2022). PMID: 35894600 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [62]
Aboul-Fotouh S, Habib MZ, Magdy SM et al.. “Tranexamic acid-associated fatal status epilepticus in a paediatric non-cardiac surgery: A case report and literature review.” British journal of clinical pharmacology (2022). PMID: 35244235 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [63]
Hu Y, Peng X, Wang X. “Therapeutic approaches for super-refractory status epilepticus: an update of the literature.” Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2025). PMID: 40583044 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [64]
Kapur J. “Strategies to innovate emergency care of status epilepticus.” Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics (2025). PMID: 39701892 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [65]
Finney JD, Schuler PD, Rudloff JR et al.. “Evaluation of the Use of Ketamine in Prehospital Seizure Management: A Retrospective Review of the ESO Database.” Prehospital emergency care (2025). PMID: 39058382 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [66]
Rossetti AO, Claassen J, Gaspard N. “Status epilepticus in the ICU.” Intensive care medicine (2024). PMID: 38117319 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [67]
Buratti S, Giacheri E, Palmieri A et al.. “Ketamine as advanced second-line treatment in benzodiazepine-refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children.” Epilepsia (2023). PMID: 36792542 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [68]
Roberti R, Rocca M, Iannone LF et al.. “Status epilepticus in pregnancy: a literature review and a protocol proposal.” Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2022). PMID: 35317697 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [69]
Mastroianni G, Iannone LF, Roberti R et al.. “Management of status epilepticus in patients with liver or kidney disease: a narrative review.” Expert review of neurotherapeutics (2021). PMID: 33297776 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [70]
Machado RA, Patel J, Elsayed MS. “The role of ketamine-induced beta activity in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Is the EEG useful to determine responder's rate? A retrospective study.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2022). PMID: 34974373 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [71]
Chakravartty A, Gilmore EJ, Hirsch LJ et al.. “Clinical Reasoning: A 40-Year-Old Man With Refractory Status Epilepticus After Small Bowel Resection for Volvulus.” Neurology (2025). PMID: 40986431 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [72]
Finney JD, Kowalski M, Wang J et al.. “Prehospital Ketamine Administration in Benzodiazepine Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Case Series Review.” Prehospital emergency care (2026). PMID: 40193549 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [73]
Syed MJ, Zutshi D, Muzammil SM et al.. “Ketamine to Prevent Endotracheal Intubation in Adults with Refractory Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Case Series.” Neurocritical care (2024). PMID: 37783825 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [74]
Kimmons LA, Alzayadneh M, Metter EJ et al.. “Safety and Efficacy of Ketamine Without Intubation in the Management of Refractory Seizures: A Case Series.” Neurocritical care (2024). PMID: 37610640 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [75]
Perlmutter M, Price M, Kothari K et al.. “Prehospital Treatment of Benzodiazepine-Resistant Pediatric Status Epilepticus with Parenteral Ketamine: A Case Series.” Prehospital emergency care (2023). PMID: 37276174 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Management - [76]
Pirgit ML, Beniczky S. “EEG and semiology in the elderly: A systematic review.” Seizure (2025). PMID: 39294074 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [77]
Peña-Ceballos J, Moloney PB, Kinney MO et al.. “How are we doing? The electroclinical diagnosis of status epilepticus in idiopathic generalized epilepsy in a tertiary referral center: A case series and scoping review of 40 years of literature.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2026). PMID: 41807915 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [78]
Hirsch LJ, Gopaul MT. “EEG in the critical care setting.” Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (2026). PMID: 41297117 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [79]
Spagnoli C, Ramantani G, Sharpe C et al.. “Rethinking the definition of neonatal status epilepticus.” European journal of pediatrics (2025). PMID: 40906263 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [80]
De Stefano P. “Reconsidering the management and prognostic implications of myoclonus and status epilepticus post-cardiac arrest.” Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (2026). PMID: 40436658 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [81]
Nagarajan L, Ghosh S. “Status epilepticus in the neonate.” BMJ paediatrics open (2025). PMID: 40121015 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [82]
Lévi-Strauss J, Marois C, Worbe Y et al.. “Utility and Value of Movement Recording with Combined EEG-EMG Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit.” Neurocritical care (2025). PMID: 40032771 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [83]
Haider HA. “Initial Management of Acute Seizures and Status Epilepticus.” The Medical clinics of North America (2025). PMID: 39893025 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [84]
Gettings JV, Mohammad Alizadeh Chafjiri F, Patel AA et al.. “Diagnosis and management of status epilepticus: improving the status quo.” The Lancet. Neurology (2025). PMID: 39637874 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [85]
Chiarello D, Perrone A, Ricci E et al.. “The Role of Electroencephalography in Children with Acute Altered Mental Status of Unknown Etiology: A Prospective Study.” Neuropediatrics (2024). PMID: 39106957 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [86]
Gomutbutra P, Krongsut S, Lott J. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Clinical Impact and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in EEG for the Early Detection of Nonconvulsive Seizures.” The Neurodiagnostic journal (2025). PMID: 40679314 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [87]
Neves Briard J, Duquette A, Cayrol R et al.. “Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Patient With Aducanumab-Induced Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities.” Neurology (2024). PMID: 39121445 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [88]
Siegel CR, Khoujah D. “Status Epilepticus.” Emergency medicine clinics of North America (2026). PMID: 41260851 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup, Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [89]
Leitinger M, Bosque-Varela P, Kuchukhidze G et al.. “Seminars in epileptology: How to diagnose status epilepticus in adults and children.” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2025). PMID: 40528536 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [90]
Ford H, Seneviratne U. “The electroencephalogram in the diagnosis and classification of status epilepticus: a practical guide.” Practical neurology (2025). PMID: 39890455 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Secondary Assessment and Diagnostic Workup - [91]
Zehtabchi S, Beall J, Silbergleit R et al.. “Chronological Sequence of Convulsive Status Epilepticus Treatment Steps in a Real-Life Scenario for Patients Enrolled in a Large Multicenter Trial.” Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (2026). PMID: 41854499 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [92]
Wang P, Lu L, Gao H et al.. “Will Memantine Exacerbate Seizures in People With Epilepsy? A Prospective Cohort Study.” Annals of clinical and translational neurology (2026). PMID: 41288262 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [93]
Pichardo-Rojas D, Camarena-Rubio KJ, Gómez-Oropeza I et al.. “Optimizing vagus nerve stimulation for Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A case series and systematic review.” Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape (2025). PMID: 40539748 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [94]
Yoo JY, Bloomfield J, Eka O et al.. “Vagus nerve stimulation as an adjunctive therapy for super-refractory status epilepticus including NORSE: a retrospective cohort study.” Epilepsy & behavior : E&B (2026). PMID: 41875755 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [95]
Manai H, Kharraz T, Zouari H et al.. “Prognostic performance of STESS and qSOFA scores in pre-hospital status epilepticus: A prospective cohort study.” Seizure (2026). PMID: 41679101 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [96]
Nakamura Y, Aso S, Yasunaga H et al.. “In-hospital outcomes of lacosamide versus levetiracetam for early adjunctive treatment of status epilepticus: A Nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study.” Epilepsia open (2026). PMID: 41222404 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [97]
Woodward MR, Armahizer MJ, Wang TI et al.. “Status epilepticus in older adults: A critical review.” Epilepsia (2025). PMID: 40365943 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [98]
Alghadeer SM, Alsuwayegh A, AlMuqati H et al.. “Underdosing and response to pharmacotherapy in patients with status epilepticus: a retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.” Annals of medicine (2025). PMID: 40317249 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [99]
Al Wahaibi A, Kazazian K, Gopaul M et al.. “The spectrum of cognitive outcomes following admission to hospital for refractory status epilepticus (RSE): A scoping review.” Seizure (2025). PMID: 40972237 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [100]
Spuler K, Kaukas L, Tawfik S et al.. “Fatal Status Epilepticus After Elective Revision Cranioplasty: Case Report and Literature Review.” The American journal of case reports (2026). PMID: 41719224 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [101]
Lanzone J, Bellini A, Cursi M et al.. “Structured EEG report complements the prognostic stratification of status epilepticus.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41986752 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [102]
Schlabitz S, Doerrfuss JI, Hebel JM et al.. “Neurofilament light-chain (Nf-L) as a biomarker in seizures and status epilepticus of varying duration.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41927849 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [103]
Orav K, Bosque-Varela P, Lauth W et al.. “Peri-Ictal MRI Abnormalities and Risk of Unprovoked Seizures After De Novo Status Epilepticus.” Neurology (2026). PMID: 41838966 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [104]
Sala Padró J, Fonseca E, Quintana M et al.. “Impact of Treatment Delays in Epileptic Seizures: Time to Hospital Care and to EEG Increases Risk of Status Epilepticus and ICU Admission in Epileptic Seizures.” European journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41778530 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [105]
De Stefano P, Baumann SM, Fisch U et al.. “Impact of Etiology on Mortality and Recovery in Patients With Status Epilepticus.” Neurology (2026). PMID: 41637681 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [106]
Krishnamurthy PV, Philibert-Rosas S, Rivkin M et al.. “Duration of EEG monitoring needed to ensure a low risk of seizure recurrence in hospitalized patients.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 41507611 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations: Pediatrics, Pregnancy, and Elderly - [107]
Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J et al.. “Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus.” Neurocritical care (2012). PMID: 22528274 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [108]
Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY et al.. “Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy Society.” Neurology (2009). PMID: 19398682 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources - [109]
Harden CL, Hopp J, Ting TY et al.. “Management issues for women with epilepsy-Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): I. Obstetrical complications and change in seizure frequency: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.” Epilepsia (2009). PMID: 19496807 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Guidelines and Resources