Stroke Rehabilitation · Web of Medicine

On this page

Quick Reference

RxDrug of choiceNo pharmacological agent is routinely recommended for motor recovery; aspirin 75-100 mg daily for secondary prevention.

AltAlternativesClopidogrel 75 mg daily (if aspirin intolerant), direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation.

⊘AvoidNon-dihydropyridine CCBs (diltiazem, verapamil) exacerbate heart failure if comorbid; avoid high-intensity mobilization within first 24 hours per AVERT trial concerns.

DxTest of choiceFugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for motor impairment; Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for disability; Berg Balance Scale for balance; 10-Meter Walk Test for gait speed.

ScKey scoreNIHSS (stroke severity, predicts dysphagia); Clinical Frailty Scale (predicts discharge outcome); FIM admission score (predicts home discharge).

→When to referComplex spasticity (botulinum toxin), custom orthotics, vocational rehabilitation, locked-in syndrome (AAC), post-stroke depression, recurrent falls.

Early, high-dose, task-specific rehabilitation (≥45 min/day per discipline, >50 repetitions) initiated within 24-48 hours maximizes neuroplasticity and functional recovery; use ICF framework to set goals at all three levels.

Stroke rehabilitation is a coordinated, multidisciplinary process that maximizes functional recovery after stroke by targeting neuroplasticity through high-intensity, task-specific training. The field is anchored in the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework, which frames outcomes across impairment, activity, and participation. Recovery is most rapid in the first 3 months, and the dose of therapy directly correlates with gains. Core interventions include early mobilization, constraint-induced movement therapy, ankle-foot orthoses, and structured gait training, with a focus on ≥45 minutes of active therapy per discipline daily. Prognosis is guided by frailty, lesion characteristics, and electrophysiologic markers.

Overview and Recommendations

Background

•Stroke rehabilitation is a coordinated, multidisciplinary process that uses assessment, goal-setting, and evidence-based interventions to maximize functional recovery, minimize disability, and optimize participation after stroke. The field is anchored in the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which frames stroke outcomes across three domains: impairment (body functions/structure), activity limitation (task execution), and participation restriction (life involvement).
•Approximately 50% of stroke survivors are left with chronic functional deficits, making stroke the leading cause of complex adult disability worldwide. Recovery potential is greatest in the first 3-6 months post-stroke, the window of maximal neuroplasticity, though intensive training can still produce meaningful gains in the chronic phase.
•The ischemic cascade, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, destroys neurons in the infarct core while creating a salvageable penumbra. Recovery begins with resolution of diaschisis (remote functional depression in connected regions), followed by structural and functional neuroplasticity including interhemispheric balance restoration, cortical remapping, and neurotrophin upregulation.
•Key types of stroke by lesion location: left hemisphere (dominant) → aphasia, right hemiparesis; right hemisphere (non-dominant) → left neglect, anosognosia; lacunar → pure motor/sensory stroke; posterior circulation → ataxia, vertigo, dysphagia. Hemorrhagic strokes carry higher risk of spasticity and longer recovery trajectories.
•The four pillars of effective rehabilitation, repetition, intensity, task specificity, and early start, drive motor learning and cortical reorganization. Dose-response relationships are established: 60 hours of arm therapy over 3 weeks yields a 0.92-point gain on the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement, and high-intensity stepping (≈5777 steps/day) improves gait speed by 0.39 m/s.

Evaluation

•Suspect post-stroke disability in any patient with hemiparesis, sensory loss, aphasia, neglect, or gait impairment after a confirmed stroke. The dominant deficit is contralateral hemiparesis; examine for spasticity (velocity-dependent, Modified Ashworth Scale ≥1), power (MRC scale), and coordination.
•Ask about onset and evolution of symptoms, functional limitations (dressing, walking, communication), falls, dysphagia, bladder/bowel function, and mood. Screen for prestroke frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale) and cognitive status (executive function predicts rehabilitation participation).
•Examine for motor deficits: tone (flaccid → spastic over days to weeks), strength (Fugl-Meyer Assessment for stroke-specific impairment), reflexes (brisk, Babinski), and sensory loss (pinprick, proprioception). Assess for neglect (right hemisphere) and aphasia (left hemisphere).
•Order acute imaging (CT or MRI) to confirm stroke type and location; diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide prognostic biomarkers for motor recovery. Assess NIHSS score within 24-48 hours; NIHSS >9 predicts dysphagia (sensitivity 75%, specificity 62%).
•Perform bedside swallow evaluation within 72 hours; if abnormal, obtain modified barium swallow. Note that 11% of dysphagic patients are missed in acute care, so repeat on rehabilitation admission.
•Administer gold-standard functional assessments within the first week of rehabilitation admission: Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for motor impairment, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for balance, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for disability, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognition.
•Use the 10-Meter Walk Test and 6-Minute Walk Test for gait velocity and endurance. Upper-limb dexterity is assessed with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) or Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Spasticity is graded by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
•Diagnostic criteria for rehabilitation admission: medical stability, ability to participate in ≥3 hours of therapy daily, and potential for functional improvement. Admission FIM motor score <55 predicts longer stay and lower likelihood of home discharge.
•Also consider somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) within the first week to stratify upper limb recovery potential: both normal → good prognosis, both non-responsive → poor. Assess lateropulsion severity (Four-Point Pusher Score) as it independently predicts longer length of stay and reduced home discharge.
•Screen for depression (PHQ-9), cognitive impairment (MoCA), fall risk (Stroke Assessment of Fall Risk), visual perception (Oxford Visual Perception Screen), sleep apnea (Berlin Questionnaire), and nutritional status (NRS-2002) per AHA/ASA and Canadian guidelines.

Management

•Initiate medical stabilization first: maintain systolic BP 120-180 mmHg, control fever, hyperglycemia, hypoxia. Start secondary prevention with antiplatelet agents (aspirin 75-100 mg daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily), high-intensity statin, and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (DOACs preferred).
•Begin very early mobilization (VEM) within 24-48 hours: low-dose, supervised sitting out of bed, standing, or walking. VEM reduces pulmonary infection (RR 0.75), urinary tract infection (RR 0.76), and improves functional independence (Barthel Index SMD 0.61). Use structured protocols like Walk 'n Watch (minimum 30 min walking-related activities per session, heart rate 70-85% max).
•Prevent complications: dysphagia screening before oral intake; use intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding (IOE) over nasogastric tube to reduce pneumonia (NNT 3.2). Provide chlorhexidine oral care. Start DVT prophylaxis with enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily or heparin 5000 U SC BID until ambulating.
•Provide early ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) within 2 weeks for foot drop: improves Berg Balance Scale by +5.1 points and Barthel Index by +1.9 points vs. delayed provision. Alternatively, functional electrical stimulation (FES) of peroneal nerve is noninferior for gait speed and may improve endurance; user preference should guide choice.
•Deliver ≥45 minutes of active therapy per discipline (PT, OT, SLP) daily. For upper extremity, aim for >50 repetitions per session. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) 2-6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 2 weeks (restraint of unaffected arm 90% waking hours) improves arm function (SMD 0.34).
•For gait training, target ≥30 minutes of walking practice per day at 70-85% max heart rate. High-intensity stepping (≈5777 steps/day) produces clinically meaningful gains in gait speed (0.39 vs 0.16 m/s). Electromechanical-assisted gait training (robot/exoskeleton) combined with physiotherapy increases odds of independent walking.
•Add non-invasive brain stimulation: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) 1-2 mA/20 min, or repetitive TMS (1 Hz or 10 Hz/20 min). Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over cerebellum improves Berg Balance Scale by 14.2 points. taVNS is best ranked for motor function (SMD 1.20).
•Use virtual reality (VR) as adjunct: 30-60 min sessions, 5 days/week for 2-4 weeks improves FMA-UE by 3.49 points and Box and Block Test by 6.59 points. Robot-assisted therapy provides small gains (SMD 0.29 vs conventional) but may not meet minimal clinically important difference.
•For cognitive impairment, occupational therapy improves basic and instrumental ADLs. For spatial neglect, start prism adaptation therapy and visuospatial training within 4-7 days post-stroke. Brain-computer interface training improves global cognition (SMD 0.62).
•Set SMART goals anchored to participation. Use weekly team conferences; the strongest predictor of home discharge is admission FIM score (each 1-point increase above 40 raises odds by ~34%). Refer to inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) over skilled nursing facility when patient tolerates ≥3 hours therapy/day and has community discharge potential.
•Monitor with FMA, BBS, 6MWT, and FIM every 1-2 weeks. Escalate therapy intensity if no plateau. Use MCID thresholds: FMA-UE ≥5-10 points, FIM ≥22 points, BBS ≥6.5-12.5 points. Transition to home-based telerehabilitation is feasible with comparable outcomes.
•Avoid low-intensity, low-repetition therapy (<30 min/day per discipline). Do not immobilize the patient. Avoid Bobath as sole approach, task-specific training outperforms it. Do not use integrated care pathways that slow recovery. Do not routinely prescribe levodopa/carbidopa for fatigue or motor recovery (DARS trial negative).
•Refer to physiatrist for complex spasticity management (botulinum toxin injections + stretching), and to orthotist for custom AFO. Refer to speech-language pathologist for aphasia therapy and augmentative communication devices. For locked-in syndrome, provide eye-gaze control and internet-based AAC systems.

Board Review — High Yield

•ICF Framework, Stroke rehabilitation addresses three domains: impairment (body functions), activity limitation (task execution), and participation restriction (life involvement).
•Very Early Mobilization (VEM), Within 24-48 hours, safe and reduces pulmonary infection (RR 0.75) and improves functional independence (Barthel Index SMD 0.61).
•Dose-Response Relationship, 60 hours of arm therapy over 3 weeks yields a 0.92-point gain on Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement; ≥50 repetitions per session needed.
•Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Gold standard for motor impairment; MCID 5-10 points for upper extremity.
•Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), Effective in chronic stroke (SMD 0.34 for arm function); delay until subacute phase (≥2 weeks) for maximal benefit.
•Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO), Early provision within 2 weeks improves Berg Balance Scale by 5.1 points and Barthel Index by 1.9 points.
•Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), Noninferior to AFO for gait speed; may improve endurance; user preference important.
•Prognostic Factors, Normal SSEP and MEP within first week predict good upper limb recovery; frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale) predicts lower discharge FIM and home discharge (OR 0.26).
•Dysphagia Screening, Mandatory before oral intake; NIHSS >9 predicts risk (sensitivity 75%, specificity 62%); repeat on rehabilitation admission (11% missed in acute care).
•Rehabilitation Plateau, Most rapid gains in first 3 months; plateau by 6 months, but intensive training in chronic phase can still produce 10-point FMA improvements.

Deep Dive — Evidence Details

Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature

▸Stroke rehabilitation is defined by the WHO ICF framework across impairment, activity, and participation.
▸Phases are acute (0-3 days), subacute (3 days-6 months), and chronic (>6 months), each with distinct goals.
▸Task-specific training at the activity level is superior to impairment-focused approaches for functional recovery.

Stroke rehabilitation is a coordinated, multidisciplinary process that uses assessment, goal-setting, and evidence-based interventions to maximize functional recovery, minimize disability, and optimize participation after stroke. The field is anchored in the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which frames stroke outcomes across three interconnected domains: impairment (body functions and structure), activity limitation (execution of tasks), and participation restriction (involvement in life situations) ^[1]^A1c^[2]^A1c. This framework shifts the goal from simply repairing the lesion to enabling the person to live meaningfully.

Also Called / Synonyms

Stroke rehabilitation (standard term)
Post-stroke rehabilitation (clinical usage)
Neurorehabilitation after stroke (specialty context)
Stroke recovery therapy (patient-facing)
Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) rehabilitation (historical)

Phase Definitions

Acute rehabilitation begins within 24-48 hours of stroke onset, focused on preventing complications (e.g., contracture, pressure injury, venous thromboembolism) and enabling early mobilization. Subacute rehabilitation spans the first 3-6 months, the window of greatest neuroplasticity and the period when most functional gains occur. Chronic rehabilitation extends beyond 6 months, targeting maintenance, adaptation, and community reintegration, often with lower intensity but sustained benefit ^[1]^A1c^[52]^A1a.

ICF Classification of Stroke Disability

ICF Domain	Definition	Stroke Example
Body Functions & Structure	Impairment of physiological systems or anatomical parts	Hemiparesis, spasticity, aphasia, hemianopia ^[1]^A1c
Activity	Difficulty executing a task or action	Inability to walk 10 m, dress, or communicate a need ^[1]^A1c
Participation	Problem involvement in life situations	Unable to return to work, drive, or attend social events ^[2]^A1c

This classification dictates both assessment (using tools like the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for impairment, the Functional Independence Measure for activity, and the Stroke Impact Scale for participation) and intervention selection (e.g., task-specific training for activity limitation, environmental modification for participation restriction) ^[1]^A1c^[5]^D5.

Stroke rehabilitation is the leading cause of complex adult disability worldwide; approximately 50% of survivors are left with chronic functional deficits that require ongoing rehabilitation services ^[1]^A1c. The ICF-based model ensures that care addresses not only the neurologic deficit but the person’s lived experience across all phases of recovery.

Controversies and Guideline Disagreement

Question	Position A	Position B	Strength	Implication
Should rehabilitation focus primarily on impairment vs. activity?	AHA/ASA ^[1]^A1c emphasizes task-specific training at the activity level (e.g., walking practice)	Some historical approaches (e.g., Bobath) prioritized normalizing tone and movement quality ^[43]^A1a	Moderate evidence: task-specific training outperforms neurophysiological approaches for activity outcomes ^[1]^A1c^[43]^A1a	Rehabilitation should be task-oriented, not impairment-focused, from the start

Pearl: When evaluating a stroke survivor for rehabilitation, always assess at all three ICF levels, impairment, activity, and participation, because improvements in one do not automatically transfer to the others; use the ICF framework to set goals that matter to the patient, not just the therapist.

Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade

▸The ischemic lesion triggers excitotoxicity, inflammation, and diaschisis, with recovery mediated by neuroplasticity including interhemispheric balance restoration, cortical map expansion, and BDNF upregulation.
▸Inflammatory activation (elevated hsCRP) is associated with reduced motor recovery, while interventions that modulate cortical excitability (rTMS, tDCS, BCI, passive exoskeleton) enhance plasticity.
▸Recovery potential is time-dependent: acute/subacute interventions show greater gains than chronic, and the dose-response relationship is linear (e.g., 60 hours of arm therapy = 0.92 gain in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement [7]).

HY High Yield: Majority of recovery from visuospatial neglect occurs in the first 3 months (42% recovery rate), with minimal additional recovery after 6 months [89]. Lateropulsion (active pushing) severely impairs outcomes: adjusted mean LOS 35.6 vs 27.0 days [122].

The transition from the ICF framework of stroke-related disability to the underlying biology requires tracing the path from the ischemic lesion to the functional impairments that rehabilitation aims to reverse. The ischemic cascade, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, destroys neurons in the infarct core while creating a salvageable penumbra ^[1]^A1c. The location dictates the impairment: a middle cerebral artery territory lesion disrupts motor cortex, corticospinal tract, and somatosensory pathways, producing hemiparesis, sensory loss, and apraxia. However, the clinical deficit extends beyond the infarct because of diaschisis, remote functional depression in connected but structurally intact regions. Recovery begins with resolution of this diaschisis, followed by structural and functional neuroplasticity.

Neuroplasticity: The Substrate for Recovery

Rehabilitation exploits the brain's capacity for reorganization. Key mechanisms include:

Interhemispheric balance restoration: The lesioned hemisphere loses inhibitory control over the contralesional hemisphere, leading to excessive transcallosal inhibition. Interventions that restore balance, such as passive exoskeleton training, which increases wavelet phase coherence in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (P = .02) ^[77]^A1b, or low-frequency rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere, improve motor outcomes ^[13]^A1a^[20]^A1a.
Cortical mapping and connectivity: Virtual reality (VR) training enhances cortical mapping of the affected limb, increases interhemispheric balance, and strengthens functional connectivity in the sensorimotor network ^[11]^C4. Electroacupuncture selectively augments alpha-band (8-13 Hz) functional connectivity between sensorimotor regions, explaining 68.7% of the variance in upper-limb motor improvement (R² = 0.687) ^[119]^A1b.
Neurotrophin upregulation: An enriched environment (music-based therapy) increases serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and reduces post-stroke depression ^[4]^A1b. However, cardiovascular exercise alone did not significantly change BDNF in subacute stroke ^[42]^D5, suggesting that enrichment context matters.
Inflammatory modulation: Higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels during rehabilitation are associated with less Fugl-Meyer improvement (β = -0.75, P = .01), indicating that systemic inflammation impairs plasticity ^[71]^C4.

The Lesion-to-Disability Cascade

A cortical lesion → impaired motor planning → reduced dexterity → difficulty with activities of daily living (ADLs) → participation restriction. Sensory loss compounds the problem: tactile sensation improves after motor rehabilitation (32% less stimulus detectable after training) ^[104]^A1b, and somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials provide complementary prognostic information ^[102]^B2b. Visuospatial neglect, common after right hemisphere strokes, shows 42% recovery in the first 3 months but plateaus by 6 months, with >40% remaining chronic ^[89]^B2a. Lateropulsion, active pushing toward the hemiplegic side, is associated with longer length of stay (adjusted mean 35.6 vs 27.0 days) and reduced likelihood of home discharge ^[122]^B2b.

Time Window and Dose Dependency

Recovery potential is time-sensitive. Interventions tested in the acute/subacute phase (first 90 days) show greater Fugl-Meyer gains than when tested in the chronic phase ^[52]^A1a. High-intensity stepping training (≈5777 steps/day, reaching 70-85% maximum heart rate) during inpatient rehabilitation produced clinically meaningful improvements in self-selected gait speed (0.39 vs 0.16 m/s) compared with usual care ^[107]^B2b. Very early mobilization (within 24-48 hours) is safe and improves functional independence (RR = 1.14 for 0-2) while reducing pulmonary infection (RR = 0.75) ^[88]^B2a. The dose-response relationship is evident: 60 hours of arm therapy yields a gain of 0.92 points on the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement over 3 weeks ^[7]^A1b.

Why Rehabilitation Works

Every rehabilitation intervention discussed in subsequent sections, from robot-assisted therapy to constraint-induced movement therapy to non-invasive brain stimulation, targets one or more of these plasticity mechanisms. The lesion initiates the disability; rehabilitation guides the brain's recovery cascade.

Pearl: The brain's capacity for reorganization is greatest in the first 3 months after stroke, and the dose of task-specific practice directly correlates with the gain in real-world arm use (Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement gain of 0.92 after 60 hours of therapy ^[7]^A1b). High-intensity stepping training (5777 steps/day) produced clinically meaningful improvements in gait speed (0.39 vs 0.16 m/s) ^[107]^B2b.

Neuroplasticity Mechanisms and Rehabilitation Interventions

Mechanism	Evidence	Rehabilitation Intervention
Restore interhemispheric balance	Passive exoskeleton increases ipsilesional M1 coherence (P = .02) ^[77]^A1b	Robotic-assisted gait training, low-frequency rTMS
Enhance cortical connectivity	VR increases sensorimotor network connectivity ^[11]^C4; EA augments alpha-band FC (R² = 0.687) ^[119]^A1b	Virtual reality, electroacupuncture
Upregulate neurotrophins	Music therapy ↑ BDNF ^[4]^A1b; CE alone does not ↑ BDNF ^[42]^D5	Enriched environment, music-based therapy
Reduce inflammation	↑ hsCRP ↓ FMA-UE improvement (β = -0.75, P = .01) ^[71]^C4	Anti-inflammatory management, early mobilization
Increase cortical mapping	VR improves mapping of affected limb muscles ^[11]^C4	Task-specific training, BCI

Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability

▸Stroke causes 144.8 million DALYs globally, with projections of 189.3 million by 2050; incidence is rising in adults <55 years.
▸Age ≥85 years, non-ambulatory status, hemorrhagic stroke, and lower socioeconomic status are independent predictors of worse functional outcomes and exclusion from rehabilitation.
▸Modifiable risk factors for post-stroke disability include higher BMI, cognitive impairment, executive dysfunction, and poor nutritional status; each is associated with reduced gains in motor function or participation.

HY High Yield: The strongest modifiable predictors of post-stroke disability are **stroke severity, time to rehabilitation admission, and cognitive impairment** - each independently associated with functional gain and long-term outcomes [160,153].

From the lesion-to-disability cascade, the burden of stroke-related disability is substantial and growing. In 2020, stroke caused 6.6 million deaths (95% uncertainty interval 6.0-7.1 million) and 144.8 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) (133.9-156.9 million); by 2050, deaths are projected to rise to 9.7 million (8.0-11.6 million) and DALYs to 189.3 million (161.8-224.9 million) ^[169]^D5. Alarmingly, stroke incidence is increasing in people <55 years globally ^[169]^D5. Among Indigenous Australians, 38-47% of all strokes occur before age 55, compared with 10-15% in non-Indigenous Australians, and the age-standardized death rate from -related stroke is 1.8 times higher ^[181]^B2a.

Demographic and Socioeconomic Disparities

Age is a powerful predictor of both stroke occurrence and rehabilitation access. Patients aged ≥85 years have an odds ratio of 2.07 for exclusion from early mobilization after stroke, and among those unable to walk at discharge, the OR for exclusion from postacute rehabilitation climbs to 9.15 compared with patients aged 65-74 years ^[149]^B2b. Racial and ethnic disparities are pronounced: Black and Hispanic stroke survivors have significantly lower Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at 3 and 12 months poststroke, with Black-White disparities in hemorrhagic stroke being over three times larger (-10.4 points) than in ischemic stroke (-3.1 points) at 12 months ^[151]^B2b. Low socioeconomic status further worsens outcome: unemployed patients have a common odds ratio of 0.70 for achieving a lower score at 90 days, an effect largely explained by a more adverse prognostic profile including greater stroke severity ^[158]^B2b.

Risk Factors for Post-Stroke Disability

Multiple factors determine who becomes disabled versus who recovers functional independence. The table below summarizes key risk factors with available effect estimates.

Risk Factor	Odds Ratio / Hazard Ratio	Evidence Level
Hemorrhagic stroke (predictor of spasticity at 3-6 months)	p = 0.049 ^[134]^B2b	2b
Younger age (predictor of spasticity)	p < 0.001 ^[134]^B2b	2b
Hemiplegia (predictor of spasticity)	p < 0.001 ^[134]^B2b	2b
Diabetes comorbidity (moderated by age)	Significant predictor ^[150]^B2b	2b
Black race (lower FIM at 12 months, hemorrhagic stroke)	-10.4 points difference ^[151]^B2b	2b
Hispanic race (lower FIM at 12 months)	-10.1 points difference ^[151]^B2b	2b
Higher BMI (less motor improvement after gait training)	β = -0.207, p = 0.036 ^[130]^B2b	2b
Cognitive impairment (fewer arm practice repetitions)	-34.9 repetitions per day, p = 0.03 ^[153]^B2b	2b
Executive dysfunction (poor rehabilitation participation)	R² = 0.54, p < 0.001 ^[126]^B2b	2b
Nutritional improvement during rehab (better FIM efficiency)	p < 0.001 ^[176]^B2c	2c
Sitting-to-standing ability (good ADL outcome)	Accuracy 92.4% ^[173]^C4	4

Prestroke frailty, assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale, is associated with lower functional scores at admission and discharge but not with the magnitude of functional gain during inpatient rehabilitation ^[93]^B3b. Medical comorbidities such as osteoarthritis are common in the aging stroke population but high-quality evidence on their impact on rehabilitation outcomes is lacking ^[159]^D5.

Temporal Trends and Special Populations

Stroke incidence is declining in high-income countries but rising in low- and middle-income countries, where the disability burden is accelerating fastest ^[169]^D5. Seasonal variation in stroke incidence is well described but not specifically addressed in the rehabilitation literature reviewed here. Post-infection timing (e.g., recent respiratory infection) may increase stroke risk, but this is covered in prevention sections. No vaccine-related risk for disability after stroke was identified.

These epidemiological patterns and risk factors for disability set the stage for the clinical presentation and functional phenotype that rehabilitation teams must address.

Pearl: Modifiable risk factors for post-stroke disability include higher BMI, cognitive impairment, executive dysfunction, and poor nutritional status; each is associated with reduced gains in motor function or participation.

Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype

▸Stroke deficits are determined by lesion location and vascular territory; the dominant motor syndrome is contralateral hemiparesis evolving from flaccidity to spasticity over days to weeks.
▸Gait velocity thresholds (<0.4 m/s household, 0.4-0.8 m/s limited community, >0.8 m/s full community) stratify functional ambulation class and predict outcomes [191].
▸Early identification of predictors (hemiparesis, hemihypesthesia, low Barthel Index) flags patients at high risk for post-stroke spasticity, enabling targeted intervention [25][134].

HY High Yield: The presence of any voluntary movement in the paretic limb within 72 hours is a strong predictor of independent walking at 6 months [19].

From the epidemiological profile of disability risk, the clinician now encounters the patient whose deficits have declared themselves. The presentation of stroke-related impairments is determined by lesion location, volume, and the brain's capacity for early reorganization. The functional phenotype, what the patient can and cannot do, emerges from the interplay of motor, sensory, cognitive, and psychological losses, each with a characteristic time course and recovery trajectory.

Presenting Symptoms

Symptoms typically appear suddenly, reaching nadir within minutes to hours. The dominant deficit is contralateral hemiparesis, affecting face, arm, and leg in proportion to the involved vascular territory. Patients report difficulty lifting the arm, gripping objects, or dragging a leg when walking. Sensory loss, often hemi-sensory, manifests as numbness, altered temperature perception, or a heavy, dead feeling on one side. Language deficits may be obvious (aphasia: impaired expression or comprehension) or subtle (anomia, paraphasic errors). Neglect, most common after right hemisphere lesions, causes the patient to ignore the left side of space, failing to eat from the left half of a plate or bumping into objects on the left ^[75]^A1c. A minority present with ataxia, vertigo, or diplopia from posterior circulation involvement.

Neurological Examination Findings

Examination is organized by system. Motor: Tone is initially flaccid (hypotonia) in the acute phase, evolving over days to weeks to spasticity, particularly in the antigravity muscles (elbow flexors, wrist flexors, knee extensors, ankle plantar flexors). Spasticity is velocity-dependent, captured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), a score of ≥1 indicates increased tone ^[134]^B2b. Power is graded using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale; the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) provides a more sensitive, stroke-specific measure of motor impairment, with FMA-UE scores < 30 indicating severe arm paresis ^[131]^B2b. Sensory: Pinprick, light touch, proprioception, and stereognosis are tested. Hemihypesthesia is a predictor of later spasticity ^[25]^B2a. Reflexes: Deep tendon reflexes are brisk on the affected side; a Babinski sign (extensor plantar response) is present. Cranial nerves: Central facial palsy spares the forehead. Visual field testing may reveal homonymous hemianopia. Autonomic: Blood pressure lability, urinary urgency, and constipation are common.

Critical thresholds: FVC < 15 mL/kg or rapid decline signals impending respiratory failure requiring intubation. Gait velocity < 0.4 m/s defines household ambulation; < 0.8 m/s defines limited community ambulation ^[191]^B2b.

Phenotypic Variants

Variant	Key Features	Frequency
Left hemisphere (dominant)	Aphasia (non-fluent/fluent), right hemiparesis, apraxia	~40% of ischemic strokes
Right hemisphere (non-dominant)	Left neglect, anosognosia, impaired prosody, left hemiparesis	~35%
Lacunar (small vessel)	Pure motor or pure sensory stroke, no cortical signs	~20%
Posterior circulation	Ataxia, vertigo, diplopia, dysphagia, crossed sensory loss	~15%

Red Flags

Respiratory compromise (FVC < 15 mL/kg, oxygen desaturation) → immediate airway assessment. Autonomic instability ( , bradycardia, ) may indicate brainstem involvement. Rapidly worsening hemiparesis or new headache suggests hemorrhagic transformation or expanding mass effect. Seizures in the first 24 hours require urgent neuroimaging. Neglect with anosognosia increases fall risk and impedes rehabilitation engagement.

Atypical Presentations

Younger patients with stroke may present with isolated headache, seizure, or cognitive change without focal signs. Patients with pre-existing disability (e.g., prior stroke, dementia) may have exaggerated functional loss. Psychogenic hemiparesis can mimic stroke but lacks consistent neurological signs and MRI correlate. Posterior circulation strokes may present solely as vertigo, mimicking labyrinthitis.

Pearl: The single most clinically useful early sign of motor recovery potential is the presence of any voluntary movement in the paretic arm or leg within 72 hours, a strong predictor of independent walking at 6 months ^[19]^B2a.

Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup

▸Functional assessment in stroke rehabilitation relies on a core set of validated scales: FMA for motor impairment, FIM for disability, BBS for balance, and BI for basic ADL.
▸MCID thresholds (e.g., FMA-UE 5-10 points, BBS 6.5-12.5 points, comfortable walking speed 0.18-0.25 m/s) define clinically meaningful change and guide treatment decisions.
▸Admission FIM motor and cognitive scores, lateropulsion severity, and prestroke frailty are strong predictors of discharge destination and functional outcome.

Dx Diagnostic Essentials: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is the gold-standard measure of motor impairment after stroke, with the upper-extremity subscale demonstrating the largest responsiveness among common motor scales [131, 221].

HY High Yield: Admission FIM motor score <55 and NIHSS >9 are strong predictors of dysphagia and prolonged rehabilitation stay; use these thresholds to trigger early swallow evaluation and discharge planning [230, 214].

The clinical phenotype described above guides the selection of standardized assessment tools that quantify impairment, activity limitation, and participation restriction. The diagnostic workup in stroke rehabilitation serves two purposes: confirm lesion characteristics and grade disability using validated scales with known measurement properties.

Lesion Characterization

Acute imaging (CT or MRI) establishes stroke type, location, and volume. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provide prognostic biomarkers for motor recovery, though methodological limitations, small samples, lack of cross-validation, constrain their clinical adoption ^[168]^B2a. Conventional structural MRI and combined biomarker categories rank highest in evidence quality for predicting motor outcome ^[168]^B2a.

Gold-Standard Functional Assessments

A core set of 30 frequently cited outcome measures dominates stroke rehabilitation trials ^[5]^D5. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is the gold standard for motor impairment, with the upper-extremity subscale (FMA-UE) showing large responsiveness (standardized response mean 0.95-1.42) and moderate predictive validity for discharge functional status ^[131]^B2b^[221]^D5. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is the most widely used disability scale in inpatient rehabilitation; admission FIM motor and cognitive scores independently predict discharge destination (area under the curve 0.88) ^[214]^B2b^[160]^B2b. The Barthel Index (BI) remains the standard for basic activities of daily living in community and research settings ^[240]^C4^[241]^A1a. For balance, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is the most frequently applied measure in lower-extremity trials (31.5% of RCTs) ^[162]^A1a. The 10-Meter Walk Test and 6-Minute Walk Test capture gait velocity and endurance ^[147]^B2a^[107]^B2b. Upper-limb dexterity is assessed with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) ^[131]^B2b^[217]^A1b. Spasticity is graded with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), though its psychometric evidence is limited ^[148]^B2a^[134]^B2b. Trunk control is measured by the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS) ^[222]^C4^[110]^A1b. Participation and quality of life are captured by the WHODAS 2.0, Stroke Impact Scale, and Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale ^[152]^B2b^[97]^A1b^[247]^C4.

Measurement Properties and Minimal Clinically Important Differences

Interpreting change requires established MCID thresholds. Table 1 summarizes key values.

Measure	MCID (anchor-based)	Responsiveness	Key Reference
FMA-UE	5-10 points	Large (SRM 0.95-1.42)	^[131]^B2b^[241]^A1a
BBS	6.5-12.5 points	Large	^[244]^C4
Comfortable walking speed	0.18-0.25 m/s	Moderate-large	^[244]^C4
PASS	4.5 points	AUC 0.94	^[222]^C4
TIS	8.5 points	AUC 0.98	^[222]^C4
Mini-BESTest	4-5 points	Effect size 0.7	^[146]^B2b
STREAM (UE subscale)	2.2 points	,	^[225]^C4
FIM total	22 points	,	^[9]^B2b
FIM motor	17 points	,	^[223]^C4
ARAT (Mini-ARAT)	9 points	ICC 0.99	^[243]^C4
BI	~10 points	SMD 0.95	^[241]^A1a
Modified Nottingham Extended ADL Scale	,	SRM 0.9	^[216]^C4

Diagnostic Algorithm

Step 1: Acute imaging (CT/MRI) to confirm stroke type and location. Step 2: Within 24-48 hours, administer the NIH Stroke Scale ( ) to quantify stroke severity; NIHSS >9 predicts clinically relevant dysphagia (sensitivity 75%, specificity 62%) ^[230]^B3b. Step 3: Within 72 hours, perform bedside swallow evaluation; if abnormal, obtain modified barium swallow ^[230]^B3b. Step 4: Within the first week of rehabilitation admission, administer the FMA for motor impairment, BBS for balance, FIM for disability, and a cognitive screen (e.g., MoCA) ^[63]^A1a^[173]^C4. Step 5: Use admission scores to guide prognosis: FIM motor <55 predicts longer stay and lower likelihood of home discharge ^[214]^B2b^[36]^B2a; lateropulsion severity (Four-Point Pusher Score) independently predicts reduced FIM efficiency and longer length of stay ^[122]^B2b; prestroke frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale) is associated with lower discharge FIM (B = -11.32, 95% CI -14.46 to -8.18) ^[219]^B2b. Step 6: Reassess at discharge using MCID thresholds to determine whether change is clinically meaningful.

Controversies and Guideline Disagreement

Question	Position A	Position B	Strength	Implication
Which FMA-UE protocol is standard?	No single protocol; variations produce up to 21-point differences ^[221]^D5	Consensus group recommends standardized general instructions ^[221]^D5	Moderate	Clinicians must specify protocol version; research comparisons may be confounded
Are spasticity measures valid?	MAS is most used but lacks evidence for validity and absolute reliability ^[148]^B2a	No alternative tool has superior psychometrics ^[148]^B2a	Weak	Spasticity assessment should combine MAS with patient-reported impact
Do racial/ethnic disparities affect assessment validity?	Many tools lack validation across racial/ethnic groups ^[186]^D5	Disparities in outcomes may reflect measurement bias ^[186]^D5	Moderate	Use culturally adapted versions when available; interpret scores cautiously

Pearl: The FMA-UE and FIM are the most widely recommended core outcome measures; using their established MCID thresholds (FMA-UE ≥5-10, FIM ≥22) allows clinicians to determine whether a patient's change is clinically meaningful and to adjust therapy intensity accordingly.

Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification

▸Prognostic stratification using pre-morbid frailty, lateropulsion severity, and electrophysiological markers (SSEP/MEP) predicts functional outcomes and discharge destination after stroke.
▸Most motor recovery occurs within the first 3-6 months; interventions studied in acute/subacute phases show greater effect sizes than those in chronic stroke.
▸Post-stroke fatigue is common and modifiable with structured aerobic exercise, but dopaminergic therapy shows no benefit.

HY High Yield: Combine SSEP and MEP testing within the first week of inpatient rehabilitation to stratify upper limb recovery potential: both normal predicts good outcome, both non-responsive predicts poor outcome [102].

Building on the comprehensive functional assessment, severity grading and prognostic stratification translate these findings into actionable predictions about recovery trajectory and rehabilitation potential. Stroke remains a leading cause of adult disability: mortality is 6-7% at 12 months ^[18]^A1b, and approximately 80% of stroke survivors achieve independent ambulation by 6 months ^[1]^A1c. However, only about 10% of survivors experience full recovery without residual deficits; the majority live with persistent motor, cognitive, or psychological impairments.

Recovery Timeline

Motor recovery follows a predictable temporal pattern. The most rapid gains occur in the first 3 months post-stroke, with continued improvement up to 6 months and slower progress thereafter ^[52]^A1a. For visuospatial neglect, recovery rates are 42% in the early phase (0-3 months), rising to 53% in the mid-phase (3-6 months), and plateauing at 56% in the late phase (>6 months) ^[89]^B2a. Upper limb interventions studied in acute/subacute phases show greater magnitude improvements in Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores compared with the chronic phase ^[52]^A1a.

Prognostic Factors

Multiple factors independently predict functional outcome after stroke. The table below summarizes key determinants:

Factor	Good Prognosis	Poor Prognosis
Pre-morbid frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale)	Low frailty	Higher frailty associated with lower discharge FIM (B = -11.32, 95% CI -14.46 to -8.18) and reduced likelihood of home discharge (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17-0.41) ^[219]^B2b
Lateropulsion severity (Four-Point Pusher Score)	Mild or absent	Severe lateropulsion: only 18.8% resolve, longer LOS (35.6 vs 27.0 days), lower FIM change ^[122]^B2b
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP)	Normal SSEP associated with higher FIM and Barthel Index at discharge ^[102]^B2b	Non-responsive SSEP predicts poorer functional outcomes ^[102]^B2b
Motor evoked potentials (MEP)	Normal MEP associated with higher Box and Block Test and Barthel scores ^[102]^B2b	Non-responsive MEP predicts limited upper limb recovery ^[102]^B2b
Timing of rehabilitation start	Starting within 2 days of admission optimizes functional outcomes ^[117]^B2b	Delay beyond day 3 reduces improvement ^[117]^B2b
Stroke severity ( )	Mild deficits	Higher severity independently associated with 6-month mortality (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.20) ^[219]^B2b
Cognitive function (executive function)	Intact executive function predicts better rehabilitation participation ^[126]^B2b	Impaired executive function reduces engagement in therapy ^[126]^B2b
Age and education	Age <65 years, higher education, white-collar employment predict return to work ^[258]^D5	Older age and lower education reduce vocational reintegration ^[258]^D5
Body mass index	Overweight/obese patients show similar functional gains as normal weight ^[30]^B3b	Underweight not associated with worse outcomes ^[30]^B3b

Validated Prognostic Scores

Electrophysiological testing provides objective prognostic information. In subacute stroke, normal SSEP within 1 week of admission predicts higher Functional Independence Measure and modified Barthel Index scores at discharge, while normal MEP predicts better Box and Block Test performance ^[102]^B2b. These tests offer complementary value: SSEP reflects sensory pathway integrity, MEP reflects corticospinal tract function. Combined, they stratify patients into three tiers: good (both normal), intermediate (one abnormal), and poor (both non-responsive) prognosis for upper limb recovery.

Long-Term Sequelae and Recurrence

Post-stroke fatigue affects nearly half of survivors and significantly hinders rehabilitation ^[253]^A1b. Home-based supervised interval training (35 min cycling, 3×/week at 70-80% max HR for 8 weeks) reduced fatigue by -5.35 points on the Swedish Fatigue Assessment Scale and improved cardiorespiratory fitness by +4.48 mL/kg/min ^[253]^A1b. Levodopa 100 mg/carbidopa 25 mg three times daily showed no benefit for fatigue ^[254]^B2b. Chronic pain, including complex regional pain syndrome and central post-stroke pain, affects up to 30% of survivors ^[118]^D5. Mirror therapy may improve pain (SMD -1.10, 95% CI -2.10 to -0.09) ^[115]^A1a. Recurrence risk after first stroke is approximately 10-15% at 1 year and 25-30% at 5 years, emphasizing the need for secondary prevention.

Prognostic Stratification for Rehabilitation Planning

Integrating these factors allows clinicians to assign patients to prognostic tiers:

Good prognosis: No frailty, no lateropulsion, normal SSEP/MEP, early rehab start, mild stroke → expect independent ambulation and home discharge.
Moderate prognosis: Some frailty, mild lateropulsion, abnormal but present SSEP/MEP → likely to achieve functional gains with longer LOS; may need transitional care.
Poor prognosis: Severe frailty, severe lateropulsion, non-responsive SSEP/MEP, delayed rehab start → high likelihood of residual disability, institutional discharge, and limited motor recovery.

These prognostic estimates inform the intensity and setting of acute and early rehabilitation , discussed next.

Pearl: Combine SSEP and MEP testing within the first week of inpatient rehabilitation to stratify upper limb recovery potential: both normal predicts good outcome, both non-responsive predicts poor outcome, and discordant results warrant intermediate expectations ^[102]^B2b.

Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management

▸Very early mobilization (VEM) within 24-48 hours reduces pulmonary and urinary tract infections and improves functional independence without increasing mortality or falls (meta-analysis of 23 studies, 84,936 patients) [88].
▸Structured, progressive walking exercise (Walk ’n Watch protocol) improves 6-minute walk distance by 43.6 m over usual care [27].
▸Early provision of an ankle-foot orthosis (within 2 weeks) yields greater gains in balance and basic activities of daily living than delayed provision [139].

! Warning: Do not initiate high-frequency, high-intensity mobilization within the first 24 hours after stroke, as this may increase the risk of poor neurological outcome (based on the AVERT trial, referenced in the 2025 meta-analysis [88] as a caution).

HY High Yield: The NIHSS score >9 at admission is a sensitive (75%) predictor of clinically relevant dysphagia, prompting immediate formal swallow evaluation before any oral intake [230].

The transition from severity stratification to acute rehabilitation begins within 24 to 48 hours of stroke onset, when the primary goals shift from survival and reperfusion to preventing secondary complications and harnessing the early neuroplastic window. This phase requires a coordinated, time-sensitive approach that balances the risk of early activity against the proven benefits of structured mobilization.

Step 1: Medical Stabilization and Secondary Prevention

Before any rehabilitation intervention, ensure hemodynamic stability (systolic blood pressure 120-180 mm Hg), adequate oxygenation, and control of fever, hyperglycemia, and hypoxia. The 2021 AHA/ASA primary care statement ^[2]^A1c emphasizes that risk-factor management (blood pressure, , diabetes, dyslipidemia) must begin immediately, as recurrent stroke prevention is the foundation of all rehabilitative efforts. Dysphagia screening is mandatory before any oral intake; the score >9 predicts clinically relevant dysphagia with 75% sensitivity and 62% specificity ^[230]^B3b, prompting a formal swallow evaluation.

Step 2: Prevention of Secondary Complications

Positioning programs, skin inspection, and early mobilization reduce the risk of pressure injuries, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary infection. The meta-analysis of 23 studies (84 936 patients receiving very early mobilization [VEM] vs. 32 753 controls) demonstrated that VEM reduced pulmonary infection (RR 0.75) and urinary tract infection (RR 0.76) without increasing mortality, neurologic deterioration, or falls ^[88]^B2a (2a). Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight or intermittent pneumatic compression should be initiated per institutional protocols if not contraindicated.

Step 3: Early Mobilization - Timing and Dose

The optimal mobilization protocol remains debated. The Li & Kong meta-analysis ^[88]^B2a showed that VEM significantly improved functional independence (Barthel Index SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.25-0.98; ≤2 RR 1.14) and shortened hospital length of stay (SMD -2.53, 95% CI -4.45 to -0.60). However, the earlier AVERT trial (not in the current evidence set) reported harm with very high-frequency, high-intensity mobilization starting within 24 hours. The pragmatic approach, supported by the 2023 AHA/ASA standards ^[284]^A1c and the meta-analysis ^[88]^B2a, is to initiate low-dose, supervised mobilization (e.g., sitting out of bed, standing, or walking with assistance) within 24-48 hours, titrated by the patient’s neurological stability and fatigue. The Walk ’n Watch trial ^[27]^A1b (n=306, phase 3 stepped-wedge cluster RCT) demonstrated that a structured, progressive exercise protocol (minimum 30 min of walking-related activities per session, with heart rate and step-count monitoring) improved **6-minute walk test by 43.6 m ** over usual care, with no serious adverse events during sessions.

Step 4: Initiation of Targeted Therapies

Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO): Early provision (within 2 weeks post-stroke) of an AFO significantly improved Berg Balance Scale (+5.1 points, p=0.002) and Barthel Index (+1.9 points, p=0.002) compared with delayed provision (8 weeks) in a randomized trial ^[139]^A1b (1b).
Functional electrical stimulation (FES): Motor training with FES for the upper extremity in acute/subacute stroke showed trends favoring improvement but no significant between-group differences in a pilot trial (n=23) ^[129]^A1b (1b). The authors estimated that ~50 participants per arm would be needed to detect superiority.
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT): In a trial of 23 patients starting within 2 weeks, CIMT showed trends favoring recovery over intensive traditional therapy, but only the Fugl-Meyer UE scale immediately post-treatment and hand function quality at 3 months reached significance ^[261]^A1b (1b). The motor recovery in the first 3 months was associated with increased motor excitability of the affected hemisphere.
Respiratory muscle training: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) over 6 weeks significantly improved FEV₁, FVC, and peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak) compared with breathing retraining or control ^[265]^A1b (1b), and may be added to early rehabilitation for patients with respiratory compromise.

Step 5: Monitoring and Transition to Definitive Therapy

Use standardized outcome measures at admission and weekly to guide progression. The Berg Balance Scale, 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment are responsive even in severely impaired patients (BBS ≤5 initially) after 1 week of rehabilitation ^[279]^B2b (2b). Early referral to a multidisciplinary program (see next section) is essential; the preferred post-acute care setting is an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) rather than a skilled nursing facility, as IRFs are associated with higher rates of community discharge and lower mortality, albeit at higher cost ^[132]^B2a (2a).

Controversies and Guideline Disagreement

Question	Position A	Position B	Strength of disagreement	Implication for practice
Timing of first mobilization	AHA/ASA 2023 standards ^[284]^A1c and Li & Kong meta-analysis 2025 ^[88]^B2a support very early mobilization (within 24-48 h) with low-dose, monitored activity	AVERT trial (2015), not in current evidence set, reported harm with high-frequency, high-intensity mobilization starting <24 h	Strong (different trial conclusions, but meta-analysis provides updated evidence of safety)	Clinicians should start mobilization early but avoid high-intensity protocols in the first 24 h; individualize based on stroke severity and hemodynamic status

Pearl: Initiate low-dose, supervised mobilization within 24-48 hours after stroke, with structured progression of walking activities (e.g., Walk ’n Watch protocol) and early provision of an ankle-foot orthosis when indicated; this approach reduces complications, improves functional independence, and shortens hospital stay ^[88]^B2a^[27]^A1b^[139]^A1b.

Key Early Rehabilitation Interventions: Timing and Evidence

Intervention	Recommended timing	Key evidence	Strength
Very early mobilization	24-48 h post-stroke, low-dose, supervised	Meta-analysis: RR 1.14 for functional independence (mRS ≤2); NNT = 17 to prevent one pulmonary infection ^[88]^B2a	2a
Ankle-foot orthosis provision	Within 2 weeks post-stroke	Berg Balance Scale +5.1 points (p=0.002) vs delayed provision ^[139]^A1b	1b
Inspiratory muscle training	As early as tolerated (≥6 weeks)	FEV₁, FVC, VO₂peak significantly improved ^[265]^A1b	1b
Constraint-induced movement therapy	Within 2-4 weeks post-stroke	Trends favoring CIMT; only Fugl-Meyer and hand function quality significant at 3 months ^[261]^A1b	1b

Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing

▸The AHA/ASA guideline recommends at least 45-60 minutes of active therapy per discipline per day, with dose-response evidence for upper limb (60 hours over 3 weeks) and gait (30 minutes walking per session, heart rate 70-85% max).
▸CIMT, repetitive task training, VR, NiBS, and robot-assisted therapy all show statistically significant but often modest effects; the strongest evidence supports high-intensity, task-specific practice rather than any single modality.
▸Very early mobilization is safe and reduces complications; co-careldopa and the Bobath approach alone are not supported by evidence.

Rx Drug of Choice: No pharmacological therapy has demonstrated benefit in definitive stroke rehabilitation; co-careldopa is ineffective (DARS trial: OR 0.78, 95%) [18].

! Warning: Do NOT rely on the Bobath concept as a sole approach; it is not superior to other methods for motor control or ADL recovery [43].

Once the patient is medically stable and can tolerate increased activity, the definitive rehabilitation program shifts from prevention of complications to active, task-specific, high-repetition training aimed at maximizing neuroplasticity and functional recovery ^[1]^A1c. The core principle is that repetition, intensity, and task specificity drive motor learning and cortical reorganization, with the strongest evidence for interventions started within the first 6 months post-stroke ^[52]^A1a.

Step 1: Determining Therapy Intensity and Dose

Dose-response relationships are now established. The AHA/ASA 2016 guideline recommends at least 45-60 minutes of active therapy per day for each discipline (PT, OT, SLP) in the acute and subacute phases ^[1]^A1c. The Dosage Matters trial demonstrated that for arm therapy, 60 hours of scheduled patient-centered, task-specific practice over 3 weeks produced a gain of 0.92 points on the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement compared with 0 hours (P = 0.002) ^[7]^A1b. For walking, the Walk ’n Watch protocol requires minimum 30 minutes of walking-related activities per session, progressively increased based on heart rate and step count; this yielded a 43.6 m greater improvement in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) than usual care ^[27]^A1b. High-intensity stepping training (average 5777 steps/day) produced clinically meaningful changes in self-selected gait speed (0.39 vs 0.16 m/s) and Berg Balance Scale ^[107]^B2b.

Key thresholds:

Upper extremity: >50 repetitions per session for arm function benefit ^[35]^A1a
Lower extremity: ≥30 minutes of walking practice per day; heart rate kept at 70-85% of maximum for aerobic conditioning ^[27]^A1b^[107]^B2b
Aerobic exercise: ≥150 minutes per week, initiated within 6 months, lasting ≥12 weeks to improve health-related quality of life ^[21]^A1a
Resistance training: High intensity (>70% 1RM) is superior to low intensity; leg press more efficient than knee extension ^[34]^A1a

Step 2: Upper Limb Rehabilitation Modalities

Intervention	Key Evidence	Dose/Intensity	Outcome
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT)	Cochrane 2015: SMD 0.34 for arm motor function (28 RCTs, 858 participants) ^[62]^A1a	2-6 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 2 weeks; restraint of unaffected arm 90% of waking hours	Functional use of affected arm; early CIMT (within 2 weeks) showed trend but not statistically significant ^[261]^A1b
Repetitive task-specific training (RTT)	Cochrane 2016: low-quality evidence for arm/hand function (SMD 0.25) ^[60]^A1a	>20 sessions and >50 repetitions per session for hand function ^[35]^A1a	Improved dexterity, upper limb activity
Virtual reality (VR)	Cochrane 2025 (190 RCTs, 7188 participants): no significant effect on upper limb function vs conventional therapy ^[112]^A1a; but meta-analysis of 21 RCTs showed improved FMA-UE (MD 3.49) and Box and Block Test (MD 6.59) ^[3]^A1a	30-60 min sessions, 5 days/week, for 2-4 weeks	Upper limb motor function, manual dexterity
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NiBS)	Network meta-analysis (87 RCTs, 3750 participants): taVNS best ranked for motor function (SMD 1.20), followed by iTBS, anodal tDCS, HF-rTMS ^[13]^A1a	rTMS: 1 Hz or 10 Hz, 20 min/day; tDCS: 1-2 mA, 20 min; iTBS: 600 pulses, 3 min	Improved motor function and ADLs
Robot-assisted therapy	Umbrella review (22 meta-analyses): SMD 0.29 vs conventional, 0.42 as add-on; but did not meet MCID ^[22]^A1a	30-60 min/session, 5 days/week, for 4-8 weeks	FMA-UE improvement but questionable clinical significance
Functional electrical stimulation (FES)	Meta-analysis: moderate effect on activity (SMD 0.40), large effect on upper limb (SMD 0.69) ^[10]^A1a	20-60 min/session, daily, for 4-6 weeks	Upper limb activity, walking speed (+0.08 m/s)

Step 3: Lower Limb and Gait Rehabilitation

Electromechanical-assisted gait training (robot or exoskeleton) combined with physiotherapy probably increases the odds of independent walking (Cochrane 2025, 101 RCTs, 4224 participants) ^[309]^A1a. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the lower limb improves motor function (SMD 0.42), gait speed, and balance ^[12]^A1a. Core stability training (400 minutes over 4 weeks) improved Trunk Impairment Scale, Brief-BESTest, and Timed Up-and-Go ^[39]^A1b. Dual-task proprioceptive training (3 times/week, 30 min, for 4 weeks) improves gait speed, cadence, and stride length ^[195]^B2a.

Step 4: Cognitive, Communication, and Psychosocial Interventions

Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment improves basic and instrumental ADLs (Cochrane 2022, 24 RCTs, 1142 participants) ^[63]^A1a. For spatial neglect, the Italian guideline recommends prism adaptation therapy and visuospatial training, started within 4-7 days post-stroke ^[314]^A1c. Brain-computer interface (BCI) training improves global cognition (SMD 0.62), attention, and executive function ^[292]^A1a. Music-based therapy reduces depression and increases BDNF ^[4]^A1b. Nurse-led caregiver training improves survivor motor function (SMD 0.60) and caregiver preparedness (SMD 0.87) ^[313]^A1a.

Step 5: Monitoring, Titration, and Transition

Functional outcomes should be reassessed every 1-2 weeks using standardized tools (Fugl-Meyer, Berg Balance Scale, 6MWT, FIM). Therapy intensity should be escalated if the patient is tolerating current dose and not reaching plateau. The AHA 2025 PAC standards emphasize that most sites lack stroke-specific protocols; implementing structured order sets and quality improvement mechanisms is critical ^[284]^A1c. Transition to home-based telerehabilitation is feasible and safe, with comparable outcomes to in-person care ^[242]^B2a^[303]^A1c.

Controversies and Guideline Disagreement

Question	Position A	Position B	Strength	Implication
Bobath concept vs other approaches	AHA/ASA 2016: recommends task-specific training, not Bobath ^[1]^A1c	Bobath proponents: neurophysiological approach still used in many settings	Strong (moderate evidence shows Bobath not superior) ^[43]^A1a	Use intensive task-specific training over Bobath; avoid low-repetition approaches
Optimal timing of CIMT	CIMT in chronic stroke is effective ^[62]^A1a	Early CIMT (<2 weeks) showed only trend, not significant ^[261]^A1b	Moderate	Delay CIMT until subacute phase (≥2 weeks) for maximal benefit
Virtual reality vs conventional therapy	Cochrane 2025: no significant benefit for upper limb ^[112]^A1a	Meta-analyses: small but significant effect on FMA-UE and manual dexterity ^[3]^A1a	Mild (discrepancy due to outcome measure selection)	Use VR as adjunct, not replacement; focus on immersive, task-specific programs

What NOT to Do

Do NOT rely on low-intensity, low-repetition therapy: dose matters; less than 30 minutes of active therapy per day is insufficient ^[1]^A1c^[7]^A1b.
Do NOT immobilize the patient: very early mobilization (within 24 hours) is safe and reduces complications (RR 0.75 for pulmonary infection) ^[88]^B2a.
Do NOT use Bobath as sole approach: it is not superior to other methods for motor control ^[43]^A1a.

Pearl: The definitive stroke rehabilitation program must deliver ≥45 minutes of task-specific, high-repetition therapy per discipline per day, with upper extremity >50 repetitions and gait training at ≥70% heart rate reserve, to drive neuroplasticity and functional recovery ^[1]^A1c^[7]^A1b^[27]^A1b^[107]^B2b^[35]^A1a.

History and Evolution of Treatment

▸The comprehensive stroke unit, validated by randomised trials in the 1990s, remains the single most impactful organisational innovation in stroke rehabilitation.
▸Task-specific, dose-intensive training (≥60 hours for arm recovery) is the cornerstone of modern therapy, supported by a clear dose-response relationship.
▸Pharmacological adjuncts (co-careldopa, anabolic steroids) and passive modalities (standing frames, integrated care pathways) have been abandoned after negative trials.
▸Neuromodulation (iTBS, tDCS, CCFES) and virtual reality show promise as adjuncts but are not yet recommended as replacements for conventional therapy.

HY High Yield: The integrated care pathway (ICP) was abandoned after a 2000 trial showed it slowed functional recovery compared with conventional multidisciplinary care [335]. Active, coordinated team work outperforms a fixed, time-managed plan.

The modern era of stroke rehabilitation began with the recognition that organised, multidisciplinary care improves outcomes more than any single therapy. In a landmark 1993 controlled study, 245 patients stratified by prognosis were randomly allocated to a stroke rehabilitation unit or general medical wards two weeks after stroke ^[331]^A1b. Patients on the stroke unit had better functional outcomes, fewer days in hospital (48.7 vs 104.6 days for intermediate-prognosis patients), and more were discharged home (75% vs 52%) despite receiving less physiotherapy ^[331]^A1b. A subsequent analysis of the same cohort showed that the stroke unit's advantage lay in earlier detection and of complications such as aspiration, infections, and depression, not in the volume of therapy delivered ^[332]^A1b. These findings established the comprehensive stroke unit as the standard of care and remain the foundation of every subsequent guideline ^[74]^A1c^[75]^A1c^[320]^A1c.

The Rise of Task-Specific and Dose-Intensive Training

Throughout the 2000s, the neurophysiological approaches (e.g., Bobath) that had dominated physical therapy for decades were challenged by evidence that no single approach outperforms another ^[61]^A1a^[354]^D5. A Cochrane review of 96 trials concluded that a mixed approach combining functional task training, musculoskeletal intervention, and neurophysiological components is significantly more effective than no treatment, but no one school of thought is superior ^[61]^A1a. Task-specific training, repetitive, goal-directed practice of real-world activities, emerged as the core principle. The 2019 "Dosage Matters" trial demonstrated a clear dose-response: 60 hours of arm therapy over 3 weeks produced a gain of 0.92 points on the Motor Activity Log-Quality of Movement compared with 0 hours ^[7]^A1b. The Walk 'n Watch protocol, a pragmatic implementation trial across 12 Canadian sites, showed that a structured, progressive walking programme improved 6-minute walk distance by 43.6 m over usual care, without any serious adverse events ^[27]^A1b.

Technologies That Expanded the Toolkit

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) was one of the first evidence-based interventions to gain widespread adoption, though a 2007 trial in subacute stroke found only non-significant trends favouring CIMT over intensive traditional therapy except for immediate post-treatment Fugl-Meyer gains ^[261]^A1b. More recently, robotic exoskeletons, virtual reality, and neuromodulation have been tested in dozens of randomised controlled trials. The combination of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over the cerebellum produced a 14.2-point improvement in Berg Balance Scale compared with sham, and a 5.6-point greater gain in lower-extremity Fugl-Meyer than M1 stimulation ^[8]^A1b. Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) improved upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer by 4.4 points more than cyclic NMES and 3.7 points more than task-oriented training alone at 6 months ^[334]^A1b.

Pharmacological Adjuncts: What Was Abandoned and Why

Several drug classes were investigated as adjuncts to motor rehabilitation, but the largest trials were negative. The DARS trial randomised 593 patients within 5-42 days of stroke to co-careldopa (levodopa 100 mg/carbidopa 25 mg) or placebo before therapy sessions; at 8 weeks, 41% of the co-careldopa group could walk independently versus 45% of placebo (OR 0.78) ^[18]^A1b. The ESTREL-Fatigue analysis found no association between levodopa and post-stroke fatigue (OR 0.88) ^[254]^B2b. Anabolic steroids (metenolone enanthate 100 mg weekly) increased thigh muscle cross-sectional area by 13-14% but did not translate into functional gains in routine practice ^[262]^A1b. Citalopram 20 mg daily improved 3-month stroke outcome (79% vs 54% achieving ≥50% reduction; NNT = 4) ^[145]^A1b, but this result has not been replicated in a large multicentre trial. As a result, no pharmacological agent is currently recommended as a routine adjunct to stroke rehabilitation ^[2]^A1c^[74]^A1c.

What Was Tried and Discarded

Integrated care pathways (ICPs) were promoted as a tool to standardise rehabilitation and reduce length of stay. A 2000 randomised trial of 152 patients found that ICP care actually slowed functional recovery compared with conventional multidisciplinary care (median Barthel change 2 vs 6 points at 12 weeks; P<0.01) and led to worse quality of life at 6 months ^[335]^A1b. The Oswestry Standing Frame, a device for passive standing in severely disabled patients, showed no benefit on the Rivermead Mobility Index in a 2005 randomised trial of 140 patients ^[342]^A1b. Positioning education for nursing staff, tested in a cluster randomised trial, improved positioning only marginally and had no effect on any patient outcome ^[345]^B2b. These negative trials helped refine the field: rehabilitation must be active, task-specific, and delivered by a coordinated team, not a fixed protocol or passive modality.

Controversies and Guideline Disagreement

Question	Position A	Position B	Strength	Implication
Optimal timing of high-intensity training	AHA/ASA 2021: early aerobic training is safe and may be initiated during inpatient rehabilitation ^[2]^A1c	Canadian Best Practice 2025: caution in the first week; progressive build-up recommended ^[74]^A1c	Moderate	Most guidelines agree on early initiation but differ on pace; individualised prescription is prudent.
Role of robot-assisted therapy as a replacement for therapist time	Veteran Affairs/DoD 2005: insufficient evidence to recommend routine use of robotic devices ^[320]^A1c	Canadian Best Practice 2025: robot-assisted gait training may be considered as an adjunct to conventional therapy, but not a replacement ^[75]^A1c	Weak	Robotics are adjunctive, not substitutive; the evidence base is growing but heterogeneous.

Pearl: The history of stroke rehabilitation is a story of incremental, evidence-driven refinement: organised stroke units replaced unstructured care, task-specific training replaced school-based approaches, and negative trials of drugs and devices taught the field that active, dose-intensive, patient-centred therapy is the irreplaceable core. The next section turns to how these principles are operationalised through goal-setting, team structure, and care coordination.

Landmark Trials That Shaped Stroke Rehabilitation

Trial / Year	Intervention	Key Finding	Clinical Impact
Kalra 1993 ^[331]^A1b	Stroke unit vs general ward	Higher home discharge (75% vs 52%), shorter LOS (48.7 vs 104.6 days)	Established the stroke unit as standard of care
Kalra 1995 ^[332]^A1b	Complication management in stroke unit	Earlier detection of aspiration, infections; more treatment of depression	Shifted focus to proactive medical management
Bates 2005 (VA/DoD) ^[320]^A1c	First comprehensive guideline	Level I evidence for multidisciplinary care, early swallow screen, depression treatment	Provided a framework for evidence-based rehabilitation
Winstein 2019 ^[7]^A1b	Dose-response of arm therapy	60 h of task-specific training improved Motor Activity Log by 0.92 points	Quantified the dose needed for meaningful motor gains
Ford 2019 (DARS) ^[18]^A1b	Co-careldopa vs placebo	No improvement in walking independence (OR 0.78)	Discouraged routine use of dopaminergic agents
Liao 2023 (iTBS) ^[8]^A1b	Cerebellar iTBS vs sham	Berg Balance Scale improved by 14.2 points; lower-extremity FMA by 5.6 points more than M1 stimulation	Identified cerebellum as a promising neuromodulation target

Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination

▸Interdisciplinary team with physiatrist leadership improves functional outcomes through coordinated communication and weekly team conferences [1].
▸Level-of-care selection (IRF vs SNF) is guided by therapy tolerance, medical complexity, functional improvement potential, and social support; IRFs are associated with better outcomes but higher costs [132].
▸SMART goals anchored to participation (e.g., return to work) reduce disability; current goal-setting methods are often inadequate and require tailored processes and better communication [298].

HY High Yield: Each 1-point increase in admission total FIM score above 40 raises the odds of home discharge by ~34% [36].

From the historical evolution of stroke rehabilitation as a therapy-centric discipline, the field has matured into a coordinated enterprise where the physiatrist serves as the orchestrator of care. Communication and coordination among team members are paramount in maximizing effectiveness ^[1]^A1c; without them, isolated efforts fail to achieve their full potential ^[1]^A1c.

Interdisciplinary Team Model

The AHA/ASA guideline recommends a sustained, coordinated effort from a large team that includes the patient and their goals, family, caregivers, physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others ^[1]^A1c. The physiatrist leads weekly team conferences where assessment data, goal progress, and discharge plans are reviewed. The Model of Bobath clinical practice, though not superior to other approaches for motor outcomes, illustrates the value of integrating posture and movement within a shared framework ^[212]^C4^[43]^A1a. Systematic reviews of guidelines consistently recommend multidisciplinary teams providing comprehensive services as a consistent recommendation ^[301]^D5.

Level-of-Care Triage

Deciding the rehabilitation setting, inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) versus skilled nursing facility (SNF) versus home-based services, is a key physiatric decision. The few studies comparing poststroke outcomes indicate better outcomes (with higher costs) for patients in IRFs versus SNFs ^[132]^B2a. Two studies evaluating community discharge, one evaluating predicted probability of readmission, and three evaluating all-cause mortality favored IRFs over SNFs ^[132]^B2a. Functional status comparisons were inconsistent, and no studies evaluated quality of life ^[132]^B2a.

Factor	Favors IRF	Favors SNF	Evidence
Tolerates ≥3 hours therapy/day	Strong	Weak	Consensus ^[1]^A1c
Medical complexity requiring daily physician oversight	Strong	Weak	Consensus ^[1]^A1c
Functional improvement potential	Moderate	Weak	^[132]^B2a
Social support at home	Weak	Strong	^[36]^B2a
Severe cognitive impairment / dementia	Weak	Strong	^[299]^D5
Falls risk requiring 24-hour supervision	Moderate	Strong	^[31]^B2b

Patient-level factors most often described in decision-making include pre- and post-stroke function, presence of dementia, social/family support, organizational service pressures, and the clinician's own knowledge and emotions ^[299]^D5.

Goal-Setting: SMART and Participation-Anchored

Goal-setting is a core rehabilitation process, yet current methods during inpatient stroke rehabilitation are often "not fit for purpose" ^[298]^D5. Main barriers include differences in staff and patient perspectives, patient-related barriers (e.g., cognitive impairment, lack of insight), staff-related barriers (e.g., time constraints, lack of training), and organizational-level barriers (e.g., lack of protocols) ^[298]^D5. Facilitators include individually tailored goal-setting processes, strategies to promote communication and understanding, and strategies to avoid disappointment from unrealistic goals ^[298]^D5. SMART goals, Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound, should be anchored to participation outcomes (e.g., return to work, community mobility). The RETAKE trial of early stroke specialist vocational rehabilitation found no statistically significant difference in return to work at 12 months (64.2% vs 59.4%; adjusted OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.8-1.87, p=0.3582), but the intervention was safe and feasible ^[56]^A1b.

Caregiver Integration

Stroke survivors report that recreation is also rehabilitation, and that motivation needs nurturing ^[15]^D5. Caregivers should be involved in goal-setting and discharge planning from admission. Implementation of home-based rehabilitation requires committed professionals, smooth transfer to the home environment, and essential therapy equipment at home ^[46]^D5. Determinants include intervention effectiveness, satisfaction with services, coordination of services, inter-professional collaborations, and costs ^[46]^D5.

Discharge and Transition Planning

Higher independence in activities of daily living on admission is associated with home discharge after inpatient stroke rehabilitation ^[36]^B2a. In meta-analyses, motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score (OR 1.23) and total FIM score (OR 1.34) on admission were significantly associated with returning home ^[36]^B2a. At discharge, lower Berg Balance Scale scores (OR 0.95), lower Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care basic mobility scores (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97), and lower Motricity Index scores (OR 0.96) predicted falls within 6 months ^[31]^B2b. Virtual stroke rehabilitation has been shown to safely and effectively increase access to therapies, and uptake of these recommendations should be a priority ^[303]^A1c. In low- and middle-income countries, tele-rehabilitation, task shifting, and community-based rehabilitation services are possible strategies to improve access ^[302]^D5.

Controversies and Guideline Disagreement

Question	Position A	Position B	Strength	Implication
Optimal level of care post-stroke	IRF preferred for most patients	SNF adequate for those with lower therapy tolerance	Moderate	Cost constraints may limit IRF access; individualize based on function and support
Role of tele-rehabilitation	Equivalent to in-person therapy for selected outcomes	Not yet proven for all domains	Moderate	Acceptable for follow-up and home programs; may worsen outcomes if used as sole therapy

Pearl: The strongest single predictor of home discharge is the admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score; each 1-point increase in total FIM above 40 raises the odds of returning home by approximately 34% ^[36]^B2a. Early goal-directed therapy targeting that threshold maximizes return-to-community rates.

Home Discharge Predictors: Meta-Analysis Findings

Predictor at Admission	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	p-value	Source
Motor FIM score	1.23 (1.12-1.35)	<0.001	^[36]^B2a
Total FIM score	1.34 (1.14-1.57)	<0.001	^[36]^B2a

Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics

▸Ankle-foot orthoses improve gait and balance early after stroke; early provision yields greater functional gains.
▸Peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation is noninferior to AFO for foot drop, with user preference often favoring FES.
▸Robotic orthoses (Lokomat, soft hand orthoses, MERLIN) enable high-dose, task-specific training and show promise for motor recovery.

HY High Yield: Self-propulsion of a manual wheelchair within 1 week of admission predicts walking at discharge [379].

! Warning: Kinesio taping has very low certainty evidence of benefit for gait, balance, or upper limb function after stroke; do not rely on it as a primary intervention [199].

From the team’s coordinated goal-setting, the focus shifts to selecting the specific rehabilitation technologies that operationalize those goals. The compensatory toolkit, orthoses, prostheses, mobility aids, augmentative communication devices, and environmental modifications, substitutes for residual impairment to restore activity and participation.

Ankle-Foot Orthoses and Functional Electrical Stimulation

Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are the most commonly prescribed lower-limb orthosis after stroke. AFOs improve foot clearance during swing, prevent plantarflexion at initial contact, and enhance stance stability. In a randomized controlled trial of 33 subacute stroke patients, AFO provision produced significant improvements in walking speed, balance, and activities of daily living within two weeks ^[139]^A1b. Early provision (at inclusion) led to greater gains on the Berg Balance Scale (+5.1 points, p=0.002) and Barthel Index (+1.9 points, p=0.002) compared with delayed provision at eight weeks ^[139]^A1b. Importantly, AFO use does not alter compensatory pelvis, hip, or knee kinematics over 26 weeks, so its primary role is to correct drop-foot rather than influence proximal movement patterns ^[374]^A1b.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the peroneal nerve is an effective alternative. In a multicenter randomized trial of 495 chronic stroke patients, FES was noninferior to AFO for gait speed (10-Meter Walk Test) and quality of life at six months ^[369]^A1b and at 12 months ^[371]^A1b. Both devices produced clinically meaningful improvements in walking speed, and within the FES group there were additional gains in walking endurance (6-Minute Walk Test) and functional ambulation (Modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile stair-time subscore) ^[371]^A1b. The WalkAide foot-drop stimulator showed equivalent functional gains to an AFO but significantly more users preferred the FES device (p<0.05) ^[370]^A1b. The immediate effects of a plastic AFO on gait performance depend on the patient’s plantarflexor motor module subtype, suggesting that individualized gait analysis may guide device selection ^[372]^C4. User satisfaction with AFOs is mixed: 60.8% of patients in one study found the device unaesthetic, despite objective improvements in gait speed and balance ^[384]^C4.

Upper Limb Orthoses

Upper limb orthoses address shoulder subluxation, wrist flexor spasticity, and hand function. A 3D-printed wrist-hand orthosis worn 4-8 hours/day for six weeks reduced spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale: 65% improvement vs 30% with low-temperature thermoplastic, p=0.02) and improved passive range of wrist extension and ulnar deviation more than a conventional orthosis ^[367]^A1b. An 8-figure shoulder brace integrated into rehabilitation exercises over four weeks improved trunk control, balance, and gait speed in chronic stroke patients ^[368]^A1b. Kinesio taping, however, showed very low certainty evidence for any effect on gait, balance, or upper limb function in chronic stroke ^[199]^A1a.

Robotic Devices

Robotic orthoses enable high-dose, task-specific training that is difficult to deliver manually. The Lokomat robotic gait orthosis, in a randomized crossover study of 16 subacute patients, produced significantly greater improvements in walking distance, motor strength, and spasticity than conventional physical therapy during each three-week phase ^[366]^A1b. Soft robotic hand orthoses (e.g., RELab tenoexo 2.0) are feasible for home-based training; in eight chronic stroke patients, the device supported an average of 809 in-clinic and 1293 home repetitions per day, with mean improvements of 5.0 points on the Action Research Arm Test and 6.0 points on the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity score, retained at one month ^[376]^C4. The MERLIN robotic system for upper limb rehabilitation, used at home after a training week, achieved high usability scores (System Usability Scale mean 71.9%) and moderate improvements in Fugl-Meyer motor scores (p=0.002) ^[377]^C4.

Wheeled Mobility and Assistive Technology

Non-ambulatory patients rely on wheelchair self-propulsion for independent mobility. The ability to self-propel a manual wheelchair within a week of admission to a stroke rehabilitation unit is a strong predictor of eventual walking: 97% of self-propellors achieved walking at discharge compared with 62% of non-propellors (odds ratio 21.54, 95%) ^[379]^B2b. Moreover, the daily wheelchair self-propulsion distance is independently associated with functional recovery (Functional Independence Measure effectiveness >50%): odds ratios of 7.26 for 0.60-1.23 km/day and 10.19 for ≥1.24 km/day compared with ≤0.59 km/day ^[381]^B2b.

For patients with locked-in syndrome, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, including eye-gaze control, switches, and internet-based connectivity, are essential to restore interaction and autonomy ^[49]^D5. Environmental modifications, such as adapted call systems and smart home technology, further support participation.

Pearl: For patients with foot drop post-stroke, both AFO and FES produce equivalent gait speed gains at 12 months, but consider user preference and device aesthetics (60.8% find AFO unaesthetic) to maximize adherence ^[384]^C4^[370]^A1b.

Controversies and Guideline Disagreement

Question	Position A	Position B	Strength	Implication
Optimal timing of AFO provision	Early provision (within 6 weeks) improves balance and ADL ^[139]^A1b	Delayed provision (8 weeks later) does not alter kinematics or walking speed at 26 weeks ^[374]^A1b	Moderate	Early AFO is recommended for functional gains, but timing does not affect long-term compensatory patterns
FES vs AFO superiority	FES is noninferior and may offer additional endurance benefits ^[369]^A1b^[371]^A1b	AFO provides equivalent gait speed and is more widely available	High	Device choice should be guided by patient preference, cost, and availability

Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability

▸Dysphagia reassessment on rehabilitation admission identifies 11% of cases missed in acute care and changes diet orders in 51% of patients [394].
▸Very early mobilization reduces pulmonary infection (NNT=20) and urinary tract infection (NNT=12) while improving functional independence [88].
▸Contrast compression therapy and mirror therapy are effective non-pharmacologic adjuncts for post-stroke CRPS pain and edema [397,386].

HY High Yield: Dysphagia reassessment on rehabilitation admission is mandatory, 11% of cases are missed in acute care, and 12% require diet downgrades [394].

! Warning: Do not rely on very early mobilization alone for DVT prophylaxis; pharmacologic prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH is still required [88].

Orthotic reduces deformity and improves function, but even with optimal bracing, the disabled limb and the bedbound patient remain vulnerable to predictable secondary complications that the rehabilitation team must actively surveil and prevent. The AHA/ASA guidelines mandate screening for depression, cognitive impairment, fall risk, and other complications as a core component of poststroke care ^[2]^A1c.

Respiratory Monitoring

Dysphagia is the dominant respiratory threat. Postacute reassessment is essential: 11% of dysphagic patients are missed in acute care, and 12% require diet downgrades on rehabilitation admission ^[394]^B2b. Intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding (IOE) reduces stroke-associated pneumonia from 35.14% to 4.05% compared with nasogastric tube feeding (NNT = 3.2) ^[330]^A1b. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse combined with mechanical plaque removal significantly reduces gingival bleeding and dental plaque, with no pneumonia observed in one trial ^[325]^A1b. Very early mobilization (VEM) reduces pulmonary infection (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.99; NNT = 20) ^[88]^B2a.

Autonomic Complications

Autonomic instability, arrhythmias, blood pressure lability, ileus, and urinary retention, occurs frequently in the first weeks poststroke. Urinary tract infection is reduced by VEM (RR 0.76; 95%; NNT = 12) ^[88]^B2a. Ileus and constipation require bowel protocols; bladder management should include postvoid residual checks and catheter removal as soon as feasible.

DVT/PE Prophylaxis

All patients with hemiplegia and limited mobility should receive pharmacologic prophylaxis. Low-molecular-weight (e.g., 40 mg subcutaneously once daily) or unfractionated heparin 5000 units subcutaneously twice daily is recommended until the patient is ambulating consistently. VEM does not significantly reduce DVT (RR not significant) ^[88]^B2a, so pharmacologic prophylaxis remains the cornerstone.

Pain Management

Poststroke pain has multiple etiologies. Central poststroke pain responds to gabapentin or amitriptyline. Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I occurs in up to 30% of hemiplegic patients; contrast compression therapy added to conventional rehabilitation significantly reduces edema volume and activity-related pain (VAS difference favoring experimental group, P=0.001) ^[397]^A1b. Mirror therapy also improves pain perception in CRPS (P=0.03) ^[386]^A1b. Spasticity-related pain is managed with botulinum toxin injections plus stretching ^[389]^C4.

Hospital-Acquired Complications

Pressure injuries, falls, and recurrent stroke are the most common readmission causes ^[179]^B2b. The table below summarizes frequency, prevention, and management.

Complication	Frequency	Prevention	Management
Stroke-associated pneumonia	4-35% depending on feeding method ^[330]^A1b	Dysphagia screening, IOE, chlorhexidine oral care, VEM ^[325]^A1b^[330]^A1b^[88]^B2a	, airway clearance, nutritional support
Urinary tract infection	~15-25%	Early catheter removal, VEM ^[88]^B2a	Antibiotics based on culture
Pressure injury	5-15%	Regular turning, pressure-relieving surfaces, skin inspection	Wound care, offloading
Falls	20-40% in first year	Fall risk assessment, environmental modifications, balance training ^[2]^A1c	Treat injuries, adjust medications
Shoulder-hand complications (CRPS, subluxation)	10-30% ^[155]^B2b	Positioning, sling, early mobilization	Contrast compression, mirror therapy, botulinum toxin ^[397]^A1b^[386]^A1b
Spasticity	20% by 4 months ^[134]^B2b	Early identification of predictors (hemorrhagic stroke, younger age, hemiplegia) ^[134]^B2b	Botulinum toxin, stretching, orthoses, neurotomy ^[389]^C4^[390]^A1b

Rehabilitation Timing

VEM (within 24-48 hours) is safe and improves functional independence (Barthel Index SMD 0.61; 95% CI 0.25-0.98) while reducing length of stay by a mean 2.5 days ^[88]^B2a. However, the optimal dose and intensity remain under investigation; the AHA/ASA guidelines emphasize individualized progression based on stroke severity and medical stability ^[284]^A1c.

Pearl: Dysphagia reassessment on admission to rehabilitation identifies 11% of cases missed in acute care and changes diet orders in 51% of patients, always repeat the swallowing evaluation before resuming oral intake ^[394]^B2b.

Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory

▸Functional recovery is most rapid in the first 3 months, with a plateau by 6 months for most domains, but intensive training can still yield gains in the chronic phase.
▸Frailty, stroke severity, and therapy dose are the strongest modifiable predictors of functional outcome; postacute care setting (IRF vs SNF) also influences discharge destination.
▸Return to work rates vary widely (19-73%) and are associated with age, education, and occupation type.

HY High Yield: The recovery plateau at 6 months is not absolute, intensive, high-dose training in the chronic phase can still produce large gains (e.g., 10-point Fugl-Meyer improvement [41]), but the greatest bang for the rehabilitation hour is in the first 3 months.

Complications of stroke can delay recovery, but the underlying trajectory of neurological and functional restitution follows a predictable pattern that informs goal-setting, discharge planning, and patient counseling.

Time Course of Recovery

Functional recovery is most rapid in the first 3 months after stroke, with a decelerating slope between 3 and 6 months and a plateau thereafter in most domains. Visuospatial neglect resolves in 42% of patients in the early phase (0-3 months), increasing to 53% by mid-recovery (3-6 months) and only 56% in the late phase (>6 months) ^[89]^B2a. Lateropulsion resolves completely in 69.4% of patients with mild severity on admission, 49.3% with moderate severity, and 18.8% with severe severity ^[122]^B2b. Upper extremity motor recovery, as measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, shows greater magnitude of improvement when interventions are delivered in the acute and subacute phases compared with the chronic phase ^[52]^A1a. Mental practice for upper limb function is most effective in the first 3 months (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.01, 95%) ^[410]^A1a.

Factors Influencing the Trajectory

Factor	Direction of Effect	Key Evidence
Frailty	Lower functional gain, less home discharge	Discharge FIM lower by -11.32 points (95% CI -14.46 to -8.18); odds ratio for home discharge 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.41) ^[219]^B2b
Stroke severity	Stronger predictor of mortality than frailty	Odds ratio per unit increase in : 1.13 (95% CI 1.06-1.20) ^[219]^B2b
Therapy dose	Dose-response for arm use	Motor Activity Log gain 0.92 for 60-hour group vs 0-hour group over 3 weeks ^[7]^A1b
High-intensity stepping	Greater walking speed gains	Self-selected speed +0.39 m/s vs +0.16 m/s in usual care ^[107]^B2b
Cognitive impairment (executive function)	Predicts rehabilitation participation	Executive Interview score significant correlate in regression (F(4,32)=9.35, R²=0.54) ^[126]^B2b
Postacute care setting	IRF superior to SNF for community discharge and mortality	Two studies favored IRF; IRF had higher costs ^[132]^B2a
Body mass index	No effect on FIM change	No significant difference in FIM change or efficiency across BMI categories ^[30]^B3b

Return to work after stroke ranges from 19% to 73%, with younger age, higher education, and white-collar occupation favoring successful return ^[258]^D5.

Plateau and Long-Term Prognosis

Although a functional plateau is typically observed by 6 months, intensive rehabilitation can still produce meaningful gains in the chronic phase. Boot Camp (90 hours of group-based upper limb therapy in chronic stroke) yielded a mean Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity improvement of 10.2 points (P < .001) ^[41]^A1b. Inflammatory biomarkers may stratify prognosis: each unit increase in hsCRP was associated with less FMA-UE improvement in the subacute phase (β = -0.75 ± 0.26, P = 0.01) ^[71]^C4. Pre-morbid frailty independently predicts lower discharge function and reduced likelihood of home discharge ^[219]^B2b, but most patients improve at all levels of frailty.

Implications for Discharge Planning

Calibrate goal-setting to the expected recovery trajectory: emphasize early, high-intensity, task-specific training in the acute and subacute windows; anticipate that severe neglect, lateropulsion, and frailty require longer rehabilitation stays and often transition to institutional care. Prognosis must be further individualized in special populations, such as patients with hemorrhagic stroke or those who are pregnant, as discussed in the next section.

Pearl: The recovery plateau at 6 months is not absolute, intensive, high-dose training in the chronic phase can still produce large gains (e.g., 10-point Fugl-Meyer improvement ^[41]^A1b), but the greatest bang for the rehabilitation hour is in the first 3 months.

Special Populations

▸Frailty, not age, independently predicts poorer functional outcomes and lower likelihood of home discharge after stroke [219].
▸Pediatric stroke rehabilitation lacks specific trial data; management relies on extrapolation from adult guidelines with developmental adaptation.
▸Pregnancy-related stroke rehabilitation requires coordination with maternal-fetal medicine and avoidance of teratogenic medications; aerobic exercise is safe with appropriate monitoring [253].

Prognosis after stroke varies substantially by age, frailty, and reproductive status, requiring rehabilitation goals and methods to be re-tuned for each group. The evidence base for these special populations is limited, and clinicians must extrapolate from adult trials while adapting to each patient's physiological context.

Elderly

Frailty, not chronological age alone, drives outcome. Among elderly patients, higher pre-morbid Clinical Frailty Scale scores are independently associated with lower discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (B = -11.32; 95% CI, -14.46 to -8.18) and a reduced likelihood of returning home (odds ratio 0.26; 95% CI, 0.17-0.41) ^[219]^B2b. Yet most frail patients still improve function ^[219]^B2b. Comorbidity interactions (polypharmacy, falls risk, cognitive impairment) demand modified therapy intensity: older patients tolerate lower daily therapy hours and prefer rest periods ^[421]^D5. Screening for depression, cognitive decline, and fall risk is both a short-term and long-term component of poststroke care ^[2]^A1c. The dose-response relationship for arm therapy (Motor Activity Log gain of 0.92 for 60 h vs 0 h over 3 wk) applies broadly, but older adults may require more frequent breaks to maintain adherence ^[7]^A1b.

Pediatrics

Pediatric stroke rehabilitation lacks robust trial data; is extrapolated from adult guidelines and adapted for developmental stage. The goal shifts from restoring lost function to enabling age-appropriate skill acquisition. Rehabilitation must address school reintegration, language development, and social participation. Family-centered care and caregiver training, shown to improve outcomes in adult stroke, are even more critical here ^[213]^A1b^[296]^D5. No pediatric-specific dosing of therapy intensity is established; clinicians should follow the same task-specific, high-repetition principles used in adults, with graduated progression.

Pregnancy

Stroke during pregnancy or the postpartum period is rare but carries high morbidity. Acute rehabilitation must be coordinated with maternal-fetal medicine. Aerobic exercise, a cornerstone of stroke recovery, is safe during pregnancy with appropriate monitoring (target heart rate 70-80% of maximum, as used in poststroke interval training protocols ^[253]^A1b). Avoid medications with known teratogenicity; no specific drug data from stroke trials are available. is generally safe after stroke, but the effects of continued rehabilitation therapies on milk production or infant exposure have not been studied. Delivery planning should involve the obstetric team to time cesarean section if needed for residual motor deficits.

Immunocompromised

Patients with HIV, transplant recipients, or those on long-term immunosuppressants face heightened infection risk during inpatient rehabilitation. Standard pneumonia prevention measures (e.g., intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding over nasogastric tube for dysphagia) become even more important ^[330]^A1b. No dose modifications for rehabilitation intensity are established; therapy should proceed as tolerated, with close monitoring for infections. The goal of maximizing functional independence remains unchanged.

Pearl: For elderly stroke patients, pre-morbid frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale) predicts discharge destination and functional outcome more strongly than age alone; use it to set realistic expectations with families and to guide intensity of therapy ^[219]^B2b.

Prevention, Screening & Surveillance

▸Secondary prevention of recurrent stroke requires aggressive blood pressure (<130/80 mm Hg), statin therapy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, and lifestyle modification initiated at stroke onset [2][75].
▸Systematic screening for cognitive impairment (MoCA/miniMoCA), depression (PHQ-9/CORE-10), dysphagia (3-sip test), and fall risk (SAFR) is recommended by AHA/ASA 2021 and Canadian 2025 guidelines within 72 hours of admission [2][74][445].
▸Vaccination against influenza, pneumococcus, and COVID-19 is part of standard preventive care after stroke, with deferral only during acute febrile illness or within 48 hours of thrombolysis [2][446].

HY High Yield: The 3-sip water test has poor sensitivity (21%) for dysphagia in stroke rehabilitation patients; a low Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score <60 should raise suspicion even if the screen is passed [434][230].

After addressing the unique needs of special populations, the focus shifts to the lifelong prevention of secondary disability and recurrent vascular events in all stroke survivors. Prevention operates on three tiers: primary prevention of stroke (public health measures, not detailed here), secondary prevention of recurrent stroke, and tertiary prevention of disability progression and secondary complications.

Secondary Prevention (Recurrent Stroke)

The cornerstone of recurrent stroke prevention is aggressive risk factor . The AHA/ASA recommends blood pressure targets <130/80 mm Hg, high‑intensity statin therapy, antiplatelet agents (e.g., 75-100 mg daily, 75 mg daily), and anticoagulation for (direct oral anticoagulants preferred over ) ^[2]^A1c. Lifestyle counseling, including smoking cessation, , and ≥150 minutes/week of moderate aerobic activity, is equally essential ^[2]^A1c^[75]^A1c. The Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (2025) emphasize that these interventions must be initiated in the acute setting and sustained across all transitions of care ^[74]^A1c.

Screening for Complications and Unmet Needs

Systematic screening is mandated by multiple guidelines to detect impairments that are often clinically silent but impede recovery. The AHA/ASA (2021) and Canadian (2025) guidelines recommend screening within the first week and at regular intervals thereafter ^[2]^A1c^[74]^A1c. The table below summarizes key screening domains, recommended tools, and timing.

Domain	Screening Tool	Timing	Guideline Source
Cognitive impairment	Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or miniMoCA	Admission, then at transition	AHA/ASA 2021, Canadian 2025 ^[2]^A1c^[74]^A1c^[445]^C4
Depression / psychological distress	Patient Health Questionnaire‑9 (PHQ‑9) or CORE‑10	Admission, 4‑6 weeks, and at follow‑up	AHA/ASA 2021 ^[2]^A1c^[441]^C4
Dysphagia	3‑sip water test; modified barium swallow if indicated	Within 24 hours of admission	Canadian 2025 ^[74]^A1c; >9 predicts risk ^[230]^B3b
Fall risk	Stroke Assessment of Fall Risk (SAFR)	Admission and weekly	AHA/ASA 2021 ^[2]^A1c^[163]^B2b^[439]^B2b
Visual perception	Oxford Visual Perception Screen (OxVPS)	Within 72 hours	Canadian 2025 ^[74]^A1c^[442]^C4
Sleep apnea	Berlin Questionnaire or nocturnal oximetry	Admission (especially if BMI >30)	AHA/ASA 2021, PM&R perspective ^[2]^A1c^[432]^D5
Nutritional status	Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS‑2002)	Admission and weekly	Canadian 2025 ^[74]^A1c^[435]^A1b
Bladder function	Post‑void residual volume	Within 48 hours	Canadian 2025 ^[74]^A1c (noted as rare in practice ^[436]^B2c)

Vaccination

Influenza and are recommended for all stroke survivors as part of standard adult preventive care, with special attention to COVID‑19 vaccination given the increased risk of severe disease post‑stroke ^[2]^A1c^[446]^D5. The AHA/ASA does not specify a post‑stroke interval, but vaccination should be deferred only during acute febrile illness or within 48 hours of thrombolysis (per manufacturer guidance).

Patient Education

Education must be provided in accessible formats, including written materials and communication‑partner training for patients with aphasia ^[2]^A1c^[444]^D5. Key topics include medication adherence, blood pressure self‑monitoring, recognition of stroke warning signs, healthy lifestyle, and fall prevention strategies. The Canadian guidelines stress that education should be a continuous, team‑based process reinforced at every transition ^[74]^A1c.

Pearl: The single most actionable step is to implement a structured screening protocol for cognition, depression, and dysphagia within the first 72 hours of admission, undetected impairments in these domains are the strongest independent predictors of poor functional outcome and recurrent stroke ^[2]^A1c^[431]^C4^[230]^B3b.

References

[1]
Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R et al.. “Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.” Stroke (2016). PMID: 27145936 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[2]
Kernan WN, Viera AJ, Billinger SA et al.. “Primary Care of Adult Patients After Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.” Stroke (2021). PMID: 34261351 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Special Populations & Pregnancy, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[3]
Fang Z, Wu T, Lv M et al.. “Effect of Traditional Plus Virtual Reality Rehabilitation on Prognosis of Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 33929347 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[4]
Palumbo A, Aluru V, Battaglia J et al.. “Music Upper Limb Therapy-Integrated Provides a Feasible Enriched Environment and Reduces Post-stroke Depression: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34864768 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[5]
Salter KL, Teasell RW, Foley NC et al.. “Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17912137 ↗
L5RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[6]
Gunduz MS, Mustafaoglu R, Ural IH. “Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Balance and Fear of Falling in Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39642346 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[7]
Winstein C, Kim B, Kim S et al.. “Dosage Matters.” Stroke (2019). PMID: 31164067 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[8]
Liao LY, Zhu Y, Peng QY et al.. “Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation for Stroke: Primary Motor Cortex Versus Cerebellar Stimulation: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.” Stroke (2023). PMID: 38037225 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[9]
Skidmore ER, Shih M, Terhorst L et al.. “Lesion location may attenuate response to strategy training in acute stroke.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33728742 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[10]
Howlett OA, Lannin NA, Ada L et al.. “Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 25634620 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[11]
Hao J, Xie H, Harp K et al.. “Effects of Virtual Reality Intervention on Neural Plasticity in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34352269 ↗
L4SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[12]
Hong Z, Sui M, Zhuang Z et al.. “Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Lower Limbs of Patients With Hemiplegia After Chronic Stroke: A Systematic Review.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29357280 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[13]
Ahmed I, Mustafaoglu R, Rossi S et al.. “Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for the Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function and Performance in Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37245690 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[14]
Veldema J, Jansen P. “Ergometer Training in Stroke Rehabilitation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31689416 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[15]
Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S et al.. “Stroke Survivors' Experiences of Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 25847387 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[16]
Lohse KR, Pathania A, Wegman R et al.. “On the Reporting of Experimental and Control Therapies in Stroke Rehabilitation Trials: A Systematic Review.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29412168 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[17]
Saposnik G, Cohen LG, Mamdani M et al.. “Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial.” The Lancet. Neurology (2016). PMID: 27365261 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
[18]
Ford GA, Bhakta BB, Cozens A et al.. “Safety and efficacy of co-careldopa as an add-on therapy to occupational and physical therapy in patients after stroke (DARS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.” The Lancet. Neurology (2019). PMID: 31122493 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[19]
Wouda NC, Knijff B, Punt M et al.. “Predicting Recovery of Independent Walking After Stroke: A Systematic Review.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38363655 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[20]
Li Y, Fan J, Yang J et al.. “Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Walking and Balance Function after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29734235 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[21]
Ali A, Tabassum D, Baig SS et al.. “Effect of Exercise Interventions on Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Stroke (2021). PMID: 34039033 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[22]
Park JM, Park HJ, Yoon SY et al.. “Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 40115991 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[23]
Lin X, Li H, Chen N et al.. “Network Meta-Analysis of 4 Rehabilitation Methods With rTMS on Upper Limb Function and Daily Activities in Patients With Stroke.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 40444349 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[24]
Cormican A, Hirani SP, McKeown E. “Healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review.” Clinical rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 36475911 ↗
L5GUIDELINECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[25]
Wissel J, Verrier M, Simpson DM et al.. “Post-stroke spasticity: predictors of early development and considerations for therapeutic intervention.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25171879 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[26]
Kringle EA, Barone Gibbs B, Campbell G et al.. “Influence of Interventions on Daily Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior after Stroke: A Systematic Review.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31329372 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[27]
Peters S, Hung SH, Bayley MT et al.. “Safety and effectiveness of the Walk 'n Watch structured, progressive exercise protocol delivered by physical therapists for inpatient stroke rehabilitation in Canada: a phase 3, multisite, pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial.” The Lancet. Neurology (2025). PMID: 40683274 ↗
L1TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[28]
Bird ML, Miller T, Connell LA et al.. “Moving stroke rehabilitation evidence into practice: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.” Clinical rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31066289 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[29]
Abdelraouf OR, Abdel Ghafar MA, Mohamed ME et al.. “Soft robotic gloves versus mirror therapy: a long-term comparative study on hand function and motor recovery in post-stroke rehabilitation.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2025). PMID: 40874348 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[30]
Weidman M, MacDonald SL. “The Impact of Body Mass Index Classification on Outcomes After Stroke Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Study.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35067556 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[31]
Campo M, Toglia J, Batistick-Aufox H et al.. “Standardized Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation and Falls After Discharge: A Cohort Study.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32358887 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[32]
Wong Y, Ada L, Wang R et al.. “Self-administered, home-based, upper limb practice in stroke patients: A systematic review.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2020). PMID: 32915239 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[33]
Geller D, Nilsen DM, Quinn L et al.. “Home mirror therapy: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing unimanual and bimanual mirror therapy for improved arm and hand function post-stroke.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34538193 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[34]
Veldema J, Jansen P. “Resistance training in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.” Clinical rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32527148 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[35]
Ibrahim R, Abdullahi A, Salihu AT et al.. “Intensity of task-specific training for functional ability post-stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis.” Clinical rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40576954 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[36]
Chevalley O, Truijen S, Opsommer E et al.. “Physical functioning factors predicting a return home after stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Clinical rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37424501 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[37]
Shaik MA, Choo PY, Tan-Ho G et al.. “Recovery needs and psychosocial rehabilitation trajectory of stroke survivors (PReTS): A qualitative systematic review of systematic reviews.” Clinical rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37933440 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[38]
Jolliffe L, Hoffmann T, Laver K et al.. “Stroke rehabilitation research translation in Australia: a survey of clinical trialists.” Disability and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32847418 ↗
L5TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature
[39]
Haruyama K, Kawakami M, Otsuka T. “Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2016). PMID: 27821673 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[40]
Simpson LA, Barclay R, Bayley MT et al.. “A Randomized Control Trial of a Virtually Delivered Program for Increasing Upper Limb Activity After Stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2024). PMID: 39727287 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[41]
Hordacre B, Uy J, Chamberlain S et al.. “Boot Camp: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Intensive Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Chronic Stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2025). PMID: 40629830 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[42]
De Las Heras B, Rodrigues L, Cristini J et al.. “Investigating the Acute and Chronic Effects of Cardiovascular Exercise on Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Early Subacute Stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2025). PMID: 40462267 ↗
L5RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
[43]
Díaz-Arribas MJ, Martín-Casas P, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R et al.. “Effectiveness of the Bobath concept in the treatment of stroke: a systematic review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31017023 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[44]
Debeuf R, De Vlieger D, Defour A et al.. “Electrotherapy in stroke rehabilitation can improve lower limb muscle characteristics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38557249 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[45]
Walter AA, Van Puymbroeck M, Bosch P et al.. “Complementary and integrative health interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic PRISMA review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 33044872 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[46]
Siemonsma P, Döpp C, Alpay L et al.. “Determinants influencing the implementation of home-based stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24520957 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[47]
Martin-Saez MM, James N. “The experience of occupational identity disruption post stroke: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31373246 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[48]
Rustamov N, Souders L, Sheehan L et al.. “IpsiHand Brain-Computer Interface Therapy Induces Broad Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2024). PMID: 39345118 ↗
L4TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[49]
Farr E, Altonji K, Harvey RL. “Locked-In Syndrome: Practical Rehabilitation Management.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33465298 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[50]
Brogårdh C, Lexell J. “Effects of cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle-resistance training after stroke.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 23174557 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[51]
Teo WP, Chew E. “Is motor-imagery brain-computer interface feasible in stroke rehabilitation?” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24429072 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[52]
Mehrabi S, Flores-Sandoval C, Fleet JL et al.. “Time Post-Stroke and Upper Extremity Stroke Motor Recovery Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2025). PMID: 40698597 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[53]
Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S et al.. “Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation.” The Lancet. Neurology (2020). PMID: 32004440 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[54]
Butcher T, Warland A, Stewart V et al.. “Rehabilitation using virtual gaming for Hospital and hOMe-Based training for the Upper limb in acute and subacute Stroke (RHOMBUS II): a qualitative analysis of participants' experience.” BMJ open (2026). PMID: 42392628 ↗
L4RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
[55]
Khan M, Alhammad AA, Alghadier M et al.. “Targeted ankle proprioceptive training improves balance, gait, and functional mobility in chronic stroke survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial with longitudinal follow-up.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42216149 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[56]
Radford K, Wright-Hughes A, Clarke D et al.. “Early stroke specialist vocational rehabilitation for REturn To work After stroKE: a synopsis from the RETAKE RCT.” Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) (2026). PMID: 42117778 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[57]
Wang Y, Huang Y, Mao Y et al.. “Effects of semi-independent bedside rehabilitation of the upper limb assisted with a mobile wrist-hand exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) for inpatients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial (RCT).” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42108489 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[58]
Laver KE, Lange B, George S et al.. “Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017). PMID: 29156493 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[59]
Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Hayes S et al.. “Physical fitness training for stroke patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020). PMID: 32196635 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[60]
French B, Thomas LH, Coupe J et al.. “Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2016). PMID: 27841442 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[61]
Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P et al.. “Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2014). PMID: 24756870 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[62]
Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Castellini G et al.. “Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in people with stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2015). PMID: 26446577 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[63]
Gibson E, Koh CL, Eames S et al.. “Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2022). PMID: 35349186 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[64]
Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC et al.. “Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2014). PMID: 25387001 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[65]
Walker MF. “Stroke rehabilitation: evidence-based or evidence-tinged?” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2007). PMID: 17468786 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[66]
McConnell AC, Moioli RC, Brasil FL et al.. “Robotic devices and brain-machine interfaces for hand rehabilitation post-stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2017). PMID: 28597018 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[67]
Marwaa MN, Guidetti S, Ytterberg C et al.. “Use of Mobile/Tablet and Web-Based Applications to Support Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Scoping Review.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2022). PMID: 35174871 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[68]
de Vries S, Mulder T. “Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: a critical discussion.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2007). PMID: 17225031 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[69]
Vuori O, Wik H, Wikström A et al.. “Feasibility of a novel web-based neuropsychological rehabilitation programme for stroke patients.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2025). PMID: 40985715 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
[70]
Oglakci MF, Altindag O, Akaltun MS et al.. “Functional and ultrasonographic evaluation of high intensity laser therapy and Kinesio taping in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial.” Lasers in medical science (2026). PMID: 42168684 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[71]
Kolmos M, Sørensen NV, Gandrup KL et al.. “Biomarkers of plasticity and recovery after stroke: Insights from the PRACTISE trial.” Clinical neurology and neurosurgery (2026). PMID: 42155300 ↗
L4RCTCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[72]
Khawprapa S, Manimmanakorn N, Otaka Y et al.. “Effects of Bilateral Robotic Arm Training in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) (2026). PMID: 42346832 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[73]
Nolan J, Jacques A, Godecke E et al.. “Clinical practice recommendations for management of lateropulsion after stroke determined by a Delphi expert panel.” Clinical rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37122265 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definition, ICF Classification & Nomenclature, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[74]
Nelson M, Shi J, Lindsay MP et al.. “Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery and Community Participation Following Stroke. Part One: Stroke Rehabilitation Planning for Optimal Care Delivery, 7th Edition Update 2025.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41257448 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[75]
Salbach NM, Yao JK, Lindsay MP et al.. “Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation Following Stroke, Part Two: Delivery of Stroke Rehabilitation to Optimize Functional Recovery, 7th Edition Update 2025.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41257457 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[76]
Jia F, Zhao Y, Wang Z et al.. “Effect of Graded Motor Imagery Combined With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 38110138 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[77]
Xie H, Li X, Tan Q et al.. “Differential Neuronal Network Remodeling Induced by Passive and Assistive Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Robot Training in Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40972698 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, History and Evolution of Treatment
[78]
Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Stevens AB et al.. “Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2008). PMID: 18164324 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[79]
Yoo HJ, Pyun SB. “Efficacy of Bedside Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29570467 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[80]
Yan L, Muccini J, Lugo L et al.. “Virtual reality glove for home-based hand and arm stroke rehabilitation (vREHAB).” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40948414 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[81]
Esquenazi A, Lee S, Watanabe T et al.. “A Comparison of the Armeo to Tabletop-assisted Therapy Exercises as Supplemental Interventions in Acute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Single Blind Study.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32358874 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[82]
Alber R, Moser H, Gall C et al.. “Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Vision Restoration Training in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28082176 ↗
L4RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[83]
Hung CS, Hsieh YW, Wu CY et al.. “The Effects of Combination of Robot-Assisted Therapy With Task-Specific or Impairment-Oriented Training on Motor Function and Quality of Life in Chronic Stroke.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 26805909 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[84]
Lin R, Hsu MJ, Lin RT et al.. “No Difference Between Noxious and Innocuous Thermal Stimulation on Motor Recovery of Upper Extremity in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 6-Month Follow-up.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28610960 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[85]
Sheehy L, Taillon-Hobson A, Sveistrup H et al.. “Sitting Balance Exercise Performed Using Virtual Reality Training on a Stroke Rehabilitation Inpatient Service: A Randomized Controlled Study.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 31970898 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[86]
Mete E, Sari Z, Karadeli HH et al.. “Integrating modified constraint-induced movement therapy with sensory threshold somatosensory electrical stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40411375 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[87]
Gor-García-Fogeda MD, Molina-Rueda F, Cuesta-Gómez A et al.. “Scales to assess gross motor function in stroke patients: a systematic review.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24582618 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[88]
Li X, Kong Y. “Safety and Efficacy of Very Early Mobilization in Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41242679 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[89]
Overman MJ, Binns E, Milosevich ET et al.. “Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect With Standard Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Stroke (2024). PMID: 39016005 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[90]
Hayward KS, Kramer SF, Dalton EJ et al.. “Timing and Dose of Upper Limb Motor Intervention After Stroke: A Systematic Review.” Stroke (2021). PMID: 34601901 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[91]
Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B et al.. “The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence?” Stroke (2009). PMID: 19182079 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[92]
Türkbey TA, Kutlay S, Gök H. “Clinical feasibility of Xbox KinectTM training for stroke rehabilitation: A single-blind randomized controlled pilot study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2017). PMID: 27973678 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[93]
Michail R, Yavarizadeh B, Mountain A. “Prestroke Frailty and Functional Outcomes After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41534095 ↗
L3COHORTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[94]
Johnson L, Burridge J, Ewings S et al.. “A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial, of an IMPlicit learning approach versus standard care, on recovery of mobility following stroke (IMPS).” Clinical rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39105429 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[95]
Wang H, Xiang Y, Wang C et al.. “Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on upper-limb impairment after stroke: A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 36380681 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment
[96]
Rasmussen RS, Østergaard A, Kjær P et al.. “Stroke rehabilitation at home before and after discharge reduced disability and improved quality of life: a randomised controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 25758941 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[97]
Swank C, Trammell M, Callender L et al.. “The impact of a patient-directed activity program on functional outcomes and activity participation after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation-a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 31937123 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[98]
Cannell J, Jovic E, Rathjen A et al.. “The efficacy of interactive, motion capture-based rehabilitation on functional outcomes in an inpatient stroke population: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28719977 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[99]
Fox M, Dickens A, Greaves C et al.. “Marma therapy for stroke rehabilitation -- a pilot study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2006). PMID: 16801211 ↗
L2TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[100]
Tyson SF, Burton L, McGovern A. “The effect of a structured model for stroke rehabilitation multi-disciplinary team meetings on functional recovery and productivity: a Phase I/II proof of concept study.” Clinical rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25490894 ↗
L4TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
[101]
Pollock A, Baer G, Langhorne P et al.. “Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: a systematic review.” Clinical rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17613560 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
[102]
Shim J, Kim C. “Comparison of the predictive value of upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials for functional recovery in subacute stroke: a retrospective study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2026). PMID: 41804271 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[103]
Daumas L, Zory R, Garcia A et al.. “Effects of individualized lower limb isokinetic strengthening in clinical rehabilitation of older post-stroke patients: A retrospective study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2023). PMID: 37548388 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[104]
Borstad A, Nichols-Larsen D, Uswatte G et al.. “Tactile Sensation Improves Following Motor Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: The VIGoROUS Randomized Controlled Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2022). PMID: 35695197 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, History and Evolution of Treatment
[105]
Wu M, Mo MY, Huang XD et al.. “Implications for respiratory muscle training in patients with stroke-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38329457 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
[106]
Pan H, Liu TW, Ng SSM et al.. “Effects of mirror therapy with electrical stimulation for upper limb recovery in people with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38334111 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[107]
Moore JL, Nordvik JE, Erichsen A et al.. “Implementation of High-Intensity Stepping Training During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Improves Functional Outcomes.” Stroke (2019). PMID: 31884902 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[108]
Katrak PH, Black D, Peeva V. “Stroke rehabilitation in Australia in a freestanding inpatient rehabilitation unit compared with a unit located in an acute care hospital.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2011). PMID: 21871415 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[109]
Maier M, Rubio Ballester B, Duff A et al.. “Effect of Specific Over Nonspecific VR-Based Rehabilitation on Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Systematic Meta-analysis.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2019). PMID: 30700224 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[110]
El-Sherbini AEIEM, Elgayar SL, Elhamrawy MY et al.. “Unlocking trunk potential after stroke: a novel approach combining transcranial direct current stimulation and core stability exercise: a randomized controlled trial.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41964055 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Special Populations & Pregnancy
[111]
Chen X, Qi R, Zou H et al.. “Effect of Tai Chi Yunshou motor imagery training on upper limb motor dysfunction with stroke patients.” BMC complementary medicine and therapies (2026). PMID: 41787487 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[112]
Laver KE, Lange B, George S et al.. “Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2025). PMID: 40537150 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[113]
Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M et al.. “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020). PMID: 33175411 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[114]
Lawrence M, Celestino Junior FT, Matozinho HH et al.. “Yoga for stroke rehabilitation.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2017). PMID: 29220541 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[115]
Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M et al.. “Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2012). PMID: 22419334 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[116]
West C, Bowen A, Hesketh A et al.. “Interventions for motor apraxia following stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2008). PMID: 18254038 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[117]
Otokita S, Uematsu H, Kunisawa S et al.. “Impact of rehabilitation start time on functional outcomes after stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2021). PMID: 33284355 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[118]
Acerra NE, Souvlis T, Moseley GL. “Stroke, complex regional pain syndrome and phantom limb pain: can commonalities direct future management?” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2007). PMID: 17351691 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[119]
Li M, Zou W, Xie G et al.. “Electroacupuncture improves upper-limb motor function and modulates sensorimotor network connectivity in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Frontiers in neurology (2026). PMID: 42404112 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[120]
Xu W, Lai NYG, Wong KH et al.. “Post-stroke lower limb rehabilitation: a comparative study between exoskeleton robots and traditional gait training.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42104373 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
[121]
Amat ML, García-Quintana M, Vilchez-Barrera M et al.. “Non-Invasive Electrotherapy in the Rehabilitation of Motor Sequelae and Spasticity Following Stroke: A Systematic Review.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 42074886 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade
[122]
Nolan J, Godecke E, Spilsbury K et al.. “Post-stroke lateropulsion and rehabilitation outcomes: a retrospective analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34038657 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[123]
Kwakkel G. “Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration.” Disability and rehabilitation (Unknown). PMID: 16777769 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[124]
Horne M, Thomas N, McCabe C et al.. “Patient-directed therapy during in-patient stroke rehabilitation: stroke survivors' views of feasibility and acceptability.” Disability and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 25919054 ↗
L2REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[125]
Kalichman L, Alperovitch-Najenson D, Treger I. “The impact of patient's weight on post-stroke rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27248186 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Pathophysiology & the Lesion-to-Disability Cascade, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[126]
Skidmore ER, Whyte EM, Holm MB et al.. “Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after stroke.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 20159122 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[127]
Zhang L, Huang G, Bian L et al.. “Cathodal High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Primed Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation for Upper Limb Motor Recovery in Stroke: A Secondary Analysis.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40925476 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[128]
Thrasher TA, Zivanovic V, McIlroy W et al.. “Rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function in severe hemiplegic patients using functional electrical stimulation therapy.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2008). PMID: 18971385 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[129]
Mangold S, Schuster C, Keller T et al.. “Motor training of upper extremity with functional electrical stimulation in early stroke rehabilitation.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2009). PMID: 19189940 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[130]
Sheffler LR, Knutson JS, Gunzler D et al.. “Relationship between body mass index and rehabilitation outcomes in chronic stroke.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 22854910 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, History and Evolution of Treatment
[131]
Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC et al.. “Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation.” Stroke (2009). PMID: 19228851 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[132]
Alcusky M, Ulbricht CM, Lapane KL. “Postacute Care Setting, Facility Characteristics, and Poststroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28965738 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[133]
Do JG, Choi JH, Park CH et al.. “Prevalence and Related Factors for Poststroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34480888 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[134]
McIntyre A, Teasell R, Saikaley M et al.. “Predictors of Spasticity 3-6 Mos After Stroke: A 5-Yr Retrospective Cohort Study.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38713591 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[135]
Chan L, Wang H, Terdiman J et al.. “Disparities in outpatient and home health service utilization following stroke: results of a 9-year cohort study in Northern California.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2009). PMID: 19942185 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[136]
Mulder M, Nikamp CD, Prinsen EC et al.. “Allied rehabilitation using caregiver-mediated exercises combined with telerehabilitation for stroke (ARMed4Stroke): A randomised controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39091094 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[137]
Clark DJ, Rose DK, Butera KA et al.. “Rehabilitation with accurate adaptability walking tasks or steady state walking: A randomized clinical trial in adults post-stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33722075 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[138]
Khan F, Rathore C, Kate M et al.. “The comparative efficacy of theta burst stimulation or functional electrical stimulation when combined with physical therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 30618285 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[139]
Nikamp CD, Buurke JH, van der Palen J et al.. “Early or delayed provision of an ankle-foot orthosis in patients with acute and subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27390153 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[140]
Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Wang WE et al.. “Bilateral robotic priming before task-oriented approach in subacute stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 26893457 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment
[141]
Marciniak C, Korutz AW, Lin E et al.. “Examination of selected clinical factors and medication use as risk factors for pneumonia during stroke rehabilitation: a case-control study.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2009). PMID: 19096289 ↗
L3CASE_CONTROLCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[142]
Pouwels S, Lalmohamed A, Leufkens B et al.. “Risk of hip/femur fracture after stroke: a population-based case-control study.” Stroke (2009). PMID: 19661475 ↗
L3CASE_CONTROLCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[143]
Knutson JS, Fu MJ, Cunningham DA et al.. “Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation video game therapy for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Disability and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37962171 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, History and Evolution of Treatment
[144]
Chou YC, Liao CC, Su LT et al.. “Stroke rehabilitation is associated with a reduction in dementia risk: a population-based retrospective cohort study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2012). PMID: 22366821 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[145]
Savadi Oskouie D, Sharifipour E, Sadeghi Bazargani H et al.. “Efficacy of Citalopram on Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2017). PMID: 28454498 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, History and Evolution of Treatment
[146]
Beauchamp MK, Niebuhr R, Roche P et al.. “A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34128411 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[147]
Ramstrand N, Stevens PM. “Clinical outcome measures to evaluate the effects of orthotic management post-stroke: a systematic review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33438496 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[148]
Aloraini SM, Gäverth J, Yeung E et al.. “Assessment of spasticity after stroke using clinical measures: a systematic review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 25690684 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[149]
Forti P, Maioli F, Magni E et al.. “Risk of Exclusion From Stroke Rehabilitation in the Oldest Old.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28890380 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[150]
Piernik-Yoder B, Ketchum N. “Rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients with and without diabetes.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23639547 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[151]
Simmonds KP, Luo Z, Reeves M. “Race/Ethnic and Stroke Subtype Differences in Poststroke Functional Recovery After Acute Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33684363 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[152]
Kilkki M, Stolt M, Rannikko S et al.. “Patient- and proxy-perceptions on functioning after stroke rehabilitation using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0: a longitudinal cohort study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 36786275 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[153]
Vratsistas-Curto A, Sherrington C, McCluskey A. “Dosage and predictors of arm practice during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: an inception cohort study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31311348 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[154]
Sindorf J, Campagnini S, O'Brien MK et al.. “Sleep Following a Stroke: Multimodal Evaluation of Sleep Health and Disruptions and Impact on Recovery During Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2025). PMID: 40326398 ↗
L2TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[155]
Wee JY, Hopman WM. “Comparing consequences of right and left unilateral neglect in a stroke rehabilitation population.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2008). PMID: 18936556 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[156]
Kim WH, Park YG, Shin HI et al.. “The World Report on Disability and recent developments in South Korea.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24356084 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[157]
Minor M, Jaywant A, Toglia J et al.. “Discharge Rehabilitation Measures Predict Activity Limitations in Patients With Stroke 6 Months After Inpatient Rehabilitation.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34686630 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[158]
Buus SMØ, Schmitz ML, Cordsen P et al.. “Socioeconomic Inequalities in Functional Outcome After Reperfusion-Treated Ischemic Stroke.” Stroke (2023). PMID: 37377030 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[159]
Fournier J, Finestone H, Lauzon J et al.. “Prevalence, Impact, and Treatment of Co-Occurring Osteoarthritis in Patients With Stroke Undergoing Rehabilitation: A Review.” Stroke (2021). PMID: 34372669 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[160]
Scrutinio D, Monitillo V, Guida P et al.. “Functional Gain After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Correlates and Impact on Long-Term Survival.” Stroke (2015). PMID: 26337968 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[161]
Dumoulin C, Korner-Bitensky N, Tannenbaum C. “Urinary incontinence after stroke: identification, assessment, and intervention by rehabilitation professionals in Canada.” Stroke (2007). PMID: 17823380 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[162]
Teasell R, Flores-Sandoval C, Mehrabi S et al.. “Outcome Measure Frequency in Stroke Rehabilitation Lower Extremity Randomized Controlled Trials and Its Correlation With Research and Clinical Practice Recommendations.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41759809 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[163]
Yang C, Ghaedi B, Campbell TM et al.. “Predicting Falls Using the Stroke Assessment of Fall Risk Tool.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32515060 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[164]
Jones EM, Venkatachalam AM, Ifejika NL. “Weathering the storm: Effect of climate change on acute stroke care and stroke rehabilitation.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39016015 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[165]
Rice DB, McIntyre A, Mirkowski M et al.. “Patient-Centered Goal Setting in a Hospital-Based Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Center.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28082180 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[166]
Ekstrand E, Lindgren I, Lexell J et al.. “Test-retest reliability of the ABILHAND questionnaire in persons with chronic stroke.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 24113290 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[167]
Ward I, Pivko S, Brooks G et al.. “Validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement scale in acute rehabilitation: a comparison with the functional independence measure and stroke impact scale-16.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2011). PMID: 22108228 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[168]
Kim B, Winstein C. “Can Neurological Biomarkers of Brain Impairment Be Used to Predict Poststroke Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2016). PMID: 27503908 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[169]
Feigin VL, Owolabi MO. “Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission.” The Lancet. Neurology (2023). PMID: 37827183 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[170]
Brazzelli M, Saunders DH, Greig CA et al.. “Physical fitness training for stroke patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2011). PMID: 22071806 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[171]
Saunders DH, Greig CA, Mead GE et al.. “Physical fitness training for stroke patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2009). PMID: 19821305 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[172]
Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Brazzelli M et al.. “Physical fitness training for stroke patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2013). PMID: 24142492 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[173]
Kim H, Lee C, Kim N et al.. “Early functional factors for predicting outcome of independence in daily living after stroke: a decision tree analysis.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2024). PMID: 38712968 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[174]
Tarvonen-Schröder S, Koivisto M. “Predicting institutionalization after Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation using the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2023). PMID: 37548437 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[175]
Kovindha A, Wattanapan P, Dejpratham P et al.. “Prevalence of incontinence in patients after stroke during rehabilitation: a multi-centre study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2009). PMID: 19479163 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[176]
Kishimoto H, Yozu A, Kohno Y et al.. “Nutritional improvement is associated with better functional outcome in stroke rehabilitation: A cross-sectional study using controlling nutritional status.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2020). PMID: 32052852 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[177]
Lam OL, McMillan AS, Li LS et al.. “Predictors of oral health-related quality of life in patients following stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2014). PMID: 24941135 ↗
L1OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[178]
Kristersson T, Persson HC, Alt Murphy M. “Evaluation of a short assessment for upper extremity activity capacity early after stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2019). PMID: 30767025 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[179]
Tay MRJ. “Hospital readmission in stroke survivors one year versus three years after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: Prevalence and associations in an Asian cohort.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2021). PMID: 34096610 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[180]
Yan L, Zhou X, Pang Q et al.. “Application of an ERAS-based care bundle strategy in early rehabilitation care of patients with acute ischemic stroke.” Aging clinical and experimental research (2025). PMID: 41460265 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[181]
Christie V, Lowres N, Hung J et al.. “Evidence for Decreasing the Age of Atrial Fibrillation Screening for Indigenous People in Australia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.” The Medical journal of Australia (2026). PMID: 42177661 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[182]
Matsuzaki H, Fukuda T, Furukawa D et al.. “Association Between Trajectories of Activity-Level Recovery and Fall Risk: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Older Patients With Stroke in a Subacute Rehabilitation Setting.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41980651 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[183]
Taylor SR, Awad LN, Carlowicz CA et al.. “Outcomes and Health Economics of Stroke using Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (OrcHESTRAS): a protocol for a pragmatic, decentralized, longitudinal, multi-phase, withdrawal with randomized re-treatment trial of MR-001 in chronic stroke.” Trials (2026). PMID: 41501870 ↗
L5TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[184]
Egan MY, Kessler D, Ceci C et al.. “Problematising risk in stroke rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 26731429 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment
[185]
Egan MY, Laliberte Rudman D, Ceci C et al.. “Seniors, risk and rehabilitation: broadening our thinking.” Disability and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27291255 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability
[186]
Burns SP, White BM, Magwood G et al.. “Racial and ethnic disparities in stroke outcomes: a scoping review of post-stroke disability assessment tools.” Disability and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29569497 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology, Etiology & Risk Factors for Disability, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[187]
Liu S, Li M, Ding J et al.. “Effectiveness, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Safety of Digital Interventions in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40714042 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
[188]
Vanroy C, Feys H, Swinnen A et al.. “Effectiveness of Active Cycling in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28284834 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment
[189]
Seo NJ, Schranz C, Coupland K et al.. “Biofeedback Training for 3-Dimensional Finger Force Control to Improve Upper Limb Function Poststroke: An RCT.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 40401398 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[190]
Rodgers H, Howel D, Bhattarai N et al.. “Evaluation of an Extended Stroke Rehabilitation Service (EXTRAS): A Randomized Controlled Trial and Economic Analysis.” Stroke (2019). PMID: 31637972 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[191]
Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S et al.. “Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful.” Stroke (2007). PMID: 17510461 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[192]
Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M et al.. “Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle.” Stroke (2010). PMID: 20508185 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
[193]
Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC et al.. “A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial.” Stroke (2009). PMID: 19359633 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
[194]
Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ et al.. “The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2006). PMID: 16731221 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[195]
Vecchio M, Chiaramonte R, De Sire A et al.. “Do proprioceptive training strategies with dual-task exercises positively influence gait parameters in chronic stroke? A systematic review.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2024). PMID: 39145519 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[196]
Sullivan JE, Hedman LD. “Effects of home-based sensory and motor amplitude electrical stimulation on arm dysfunction in chronic stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17264108 ↗
L4TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[197]
Iliescu AM, McIntyre A, Wiener J et al.. “Evaluating the effectiveness of aquatic therapy on mobility, balance, and level of functional independence in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Clinical rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31625407 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
[198]
Linder SM, Bischof-Bockbrader A, Ince Hocaoglu OE et al.. “Task Practice With and Without Aerobic Exercise Improves Health-related Quality of Life and Social Participation Post-stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2025). PMID: 40401784 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[199]
Fandim JV, Amaral AL, Andrade LM et al.. “Effectiveness of kinesio taping for chronic stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37530391 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[200]
van Peppen RP, Hendriks HJ, van Meeteren NL et al.. “The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The Netherlands: a systematic review of available evidence.” Disability and rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17457735 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
[201]
Ekstrand E, Brogårdh C. “Life satisfaction after stroke and the association with upper extremity disability, sociodemographics, and participation.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34541828 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[202]
Kitamura S, Otaka Y, Murayama Y et al.. “Reliability and Validity of a New Toileting Assessment Form for Patients with Hemiparetic Stroke.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32418365 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[203]
Lau SCL, Hall ML, Terhorst L et al.. “Bidirectional temporal associations between sleep and affect and cognitive symptoms among community-dwelling stroke survivors: An ecological momentary assessment study.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 37950680 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[204]
Wingfield M, Fini NA, Brodtmann A et al.. “Upper-Limb Motor Intervention Elements That Drive Improvement in Biomarkers and Clinical Measures Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review in a Systems Paradigm.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2022). PMID: 36214052 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[205]
Dong Y, Xing R, Yao J et al.. “Effects of whole-body vibration exercise on lower limb spasticity for stroke survivors: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.” Topics in stroke rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42077180 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[206]
Demirhan İ, Ayvat E, Ayvat F et al.. “The Efficacy of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation-Based Robot-Assisted Therapy in Individuals With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42049149 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[207]
Han YK, Kim KH, Son JE et al.. “Effects of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Stage-Based Lower Limb Motor Recovery and Muscle Tone in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of clinical medicine (2026). PMID: 41976815 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[208]
Li S, Chen P, Qin Y et al.. “Transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves dual-task performance in people with stroke.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41943073 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[209]
Ke M, Zhou P, Li D et al.. “Efficacy of different frequencies of extracorporeal shockwave on plantar flexor spasticity of the ankle in patients with stroke: a single-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41913227 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[210]
Riazi A, Aspden T, Jones F. “Stroke Self-efficacy Questionnaire: a Rasch-refined measure of confidence post stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2014). PMID: 24658341 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype
[211]
Liu S, Huang X, Liu Y et al.. “A scoping review of the use of creative activities in stroke rehabilitation.” Clinical rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38232974 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[212]
Michielsen M, Vaughan-Graham J, Holland A et al.. “The Bobath concept - a model to illustrate clinical practice.” Disability and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 29250987 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Clinical Presentation & Functional Phenotype, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[213]
Zhou B, Zhang J, Zhao Y et al.. “Caregiver-Delivered Stroke Rehabilitation in Rural China.” Stroke (2019). PMID: 31177978 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[214]
Itaya T, Murakami Y, Ota A et al.. “Assessment Model to Identify Patients With Stroke With a High Possibility of Discharge to Home: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” Stroke (2017). PMID: 28842511 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[215]
Ryan CM, Bayley M, Green R et al.. “Influence of continuous positive airway pressure on outcomes of rehabilitation in stroke patients with obstructive sleep apnea.” Stroke (2011). PMID: 21372306 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[216]
Wu CY, Chuang LL, Lin KC et al.. “Responsiveness and validity of two outcome measures of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapies.” Clinical rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 21059664 ↗
L4RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[217]
Thrane G, Askim T, Stock R et al.. “Efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Early Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Multisite Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2014). PMID: 25398726 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[218]
Ghaziani E, Couppé C, Siersma V et al.. “Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2018). PMID: 30251591 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[219]
Cho TYJ, Hanger HC, Wilkinson TJ. “The association between frailty and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: A cohort study.” Clinical rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40289524 ↗
L2COHORTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[220]
Burke DT, Al-Adawi S, Bell RB et al.. “Effect of body mass index on stroke rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24508185 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[221]
Fasoli SE, Mazariegos J, Rishe K et al.. “Interpreting Variations in Fugl-Meyer Assessment Protocols: Results and Recommendations From a Nominal Group Consensus Process.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39461495 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[222]
Aka T, Kahraman T, Altas EU. “Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) and Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) in Persons With Stroke.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40633606 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[223]
Linkewich E, Avery L, Rios J et al.. “Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Functional Independence After a Knowledge Translation Intervention in Stroke Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31738892 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[224]
Kubo H, Kanai M, Nozoe M et al.. “Association of Malnutrition With Physical Activity Intensity in Patients With Subacute Stroke.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37257550 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[225]
Hsieh YW, Wang CH, Sheu CF et al.. “Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement measure.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2008). PMID: 18776067 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[226]
Gillen R, Tennen H, McKee T. “The impact of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system on stroke program outcomes.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17449980 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[227]
Somani S, Nanavati H, Zhou X et al.. “African Americans and Women Have Lower Functional Gains During Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation After Hemorrhagic Stroke.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35034054 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[228]
Taylor-Rowan M, Eton DT, McLeod HJ et al.. “Validation and Feasibility of PETS-Stroke: A Patient-Reported Measure of Treatment Burden After Stroke.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 40438944 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[229]
Edmans JA, Gladman JR, Cobb S et al.. “Validity of a virtual environment for stroke rehabilitation.” Stroke (2006). PMID: 17008609 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[230]
Jeyaseelan RD, Vargo MM, Chae J. “National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as An Early Predictor of Poststroke Dysphagia.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25556573 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[231]
Freeman C, Blough A, Rotich D et al.. “The obesity paradox may not lead to functional gains in stroke patients undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34240565 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[232]
Monte-Silva K, Piscitelli D, Norouzi-Gheidari N et al.. “Electromyogram-Related Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Restoring Wrist and Hand Movement in Poststroke Hemiplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2019). PMID: 30704366 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[233]
Xie Q, Li Y, Zheng N et al.. “Tai Ji for stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial on improving upper limb function and cortico-muscular coupling in stroke patients.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42351241 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[234]
Yang A, Wu HM, Tang JL et al.. “Acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2016). PMID: 27562656 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[235]
Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M et al.. “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2013). PMID: 24234980 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[236]
Li G, Wang Q, Li L et al.. “Acupuncture combined with rehabilitation robot for recovery of hemiplegia after ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.” Frontiers in neurology (2026). PMID: 42037705 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[237]
Ng SSM, Liu TW, Chan CY et al.. “Reliability and validity of the long-distance corridor walk among stroke survivors.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2020). PMID: 32412645 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[238]
Hernández ED, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE et al.. “Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity in stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2019). PMID: 31448807 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[239]
Durand A, D'Amours L, Giroux A et al.. “Benchmarking length of stay for inpatient stroke rehabilitation without adversely affecting functional outcomes.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2020). PMID: 33000174 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[240]
Kuptniratsaikul V, Kovindha A, Dajpratham P et al.. “Main outcomes of stroke rehabilitation: a multi-centre study in Thailand.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2009). PMID: 19197570 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[241]
Zou Z, Liu Y, Zhang Z et al.. “Exercise intervention improves the modified Barthel index, Berg balance scale, and Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper limb motor function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42174719 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[242]
BaniHani HA, Esmail MM, Ibrahim SM et al.. “Effectiveness of telemedicine-based rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 42171799 ↗
L2SR_OBSCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[243]
Daghsen L, Fleury L, Bouvier J et al.. “Evaluation of a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) for upper extremity function after stroke: The Mini-ARAT.” Clinical rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35522473 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[244]
Hayashi S, Miyata K, Takeda R et al.. “Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in patients with acute stroke: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study.” Clinical rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35730136 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[245]
Vratsistas-Curto A, Sherrington C, McCluskey A. “Responsiveness of five measures of arm function in acute stroke rehabilitation.” Clinical rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29843521 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[246]
Cecchi F, Carrabba C, Bertolucci F et al.. “Transcultural translation and validation of Fugl-Meyer assessment to Italian.” Disability and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32356509 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[247]
Zhao J, Bai L, Ying Z et al.. “Validation of Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale among Chinese stroke survivors.” Disability and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37555576 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[248]
De Wit L, Theuns P, Dejaeger E et al.. “Long-term impact of stroke on patients' health-related quality of life.” Disability and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27385479 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[249]
James J, McGlinchey MP. “How active are stroke patients in physiotherapy sessions and is this associated with stroke severity?” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33794718 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Functional Assessment & Diagnostic Workup
[250]
Lee MS, Shin BC, Kim JI et al.. “Moxibustion for stroke rehabilitation: systematic review.” Stroke (2010). PMID: 20150551 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[251]
Ngimron AF, Zainudin MF, Rusli MRM et al.. “Metachronous Cardio-Cerebral Infarction: A Rehabilitation Conundrum in Dual Pathology Recovery.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41384746 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[252]
Janssen H, Bernhardt J, Collier JM et al.. “An enriched environment improves sensorimotor function post-ischemic stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2010). PMID: 20834046 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[253]
Bråndal A, Svedjebrant M, Nilsagård Y et al.. “Home-Based Supervised Cardiorespiratory Interval Training Decreases Poststroke Fatigue and Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Stroke (2026). PMID: 42089147 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[254]
Boos L, Kaufmann JE, Sauter MI et al.. “ESTREL-Fatigue-association of levodopa with post-stroke fatigue.” European stroke journal (2026). PMID: 41947565 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, History and Evolution of Treatment, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[255]
Sharma A, Han L, Deng H et al.. “Optimising electroacupuncture parameters for post-stroke hand dysfunction: protocol for a multi-arm randomised controlled trial using orthogonal design.” BMJ open (2026). PMID: 41730554 ↗
L5TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification
[256]
Ramey SL, Lo WD, DeLuca SC et al.. “Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke Phase 3 Trial Protocol for Intensive Infant-Toddler Rehabilitation (I-ACQUIRE).” Stroke (2026). PMID: 41649967 ↗
L5TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification
[257]
Ghai S, Pohl P. “Evaluation of the Ronnie Gardiner Method in individuals with stroke in the late phase of recovery: a protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial.” BMJ open (2026). PMID: 41638729 ↗
L5TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[258]
Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S et al.. “Return to work in stroke patients.” Disability and rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17729085 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Severity Grading, Staging & Prognostic Stratification, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[259]
Mehrabi S, Harnett A, Saikaley M et al.. “Female Enrollment in Rehabilitation Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Sex and Female Participation in Randomized Controlled Trials of Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Over 50 Years.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38367832 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[260]
Teasell R, Safaei-Qomi MR, Fleet JL et al.. “Comparing the Characteristics of Randomized Controlled Trials of Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Low-Middle-Income and High-Income Countries.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40101792 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[261]
Boake C, Noser EA, Ro T et al.. “Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2007). PMID: 17172550 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, History and Evolution of Treatment
[262]
Okamoto S, Sonoda S, Tanino G et al.. “Change in thigh muscle cross-sectional area through administration of an anabolic steroid during routine stroke rehabilitation in hemiplegic patients.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2011). PMID: 21173687 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment
[263]
Kozlowski AJ, Gooch C, Reeves MJ et al.. “Prognosis of Individual-Level Mobility and Self-Care Stroke Recovery During Inpatient Rehabilitation, Part 1: A Proof-of-Concept Single Group Retrospective Cohort Study.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 36596405 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[264]
Lin YN, Hu CJ, Chi JY et al.. “Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere leg motor area in patients with subacute stroke and substantial leg impairment: A pilot study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2015). PMID: 25679340 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment
[265]
Sutbeyaz ST, Koseoglu F, Inan L et al.. “Respiratory muscle training improves cardiopulmonary function and exercise tolerance in subjects with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 20156979 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[266]
Karner S, Stenner H, Spate M et al.. “Effects of a robot intervention on visuospatial hemineglect in postacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31409126 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment
[267]
Renner CIe, Outermans J, Ludwig R et al.. “Group therapy task training versus individual task training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 26316552 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[268]
Tripp F, Krakow K. “Effects of an aquatic therapy approach (Halliwick-Therapy) on functional mobility in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 24177711 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[269]
Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Lui M et al.. “Patients' and therapists' experience and perception of exoskeleton-based physiotherapy during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34694189 ↗
L5RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment
[270]
Kolmos M, Johansen KL, Olsen MH et al.. “Patient-Tailored Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Versus Sham for Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Feasibility and Pilot Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2026). PMID: 41549053 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[271]
Swanson VA, Johnson C, Zondervan DK et al.. “Optimized Home Rehabilitation Technology Reduces Upper Extremity Impairment Compared to a Conventional Home Exercise Program: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Trial in Subacute Stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2023). PMID: 36636751 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[272]
Liao LY, Xie YJ, Chen Y et al.. “Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation Combined With Physiotherapy in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2020). PMID: 33166213 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[273]
van Bloemendaal M, Bus SA, Nollet F et al.. “Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Gait Training Assisted by Multichannel Functional Electrical Stimulation in Early Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2021). PMID: 33410388 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[274]
Ding L, Wang X, Chen S et al.. “Camera-Based Mirror Visual Input for Priming Promotes Motor Recovery, Daily Function, and Brain Network Segregation in Subacute Stroke Patients.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2019). PMID: 30909797 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[275]
Cordo P, Wolf S, Rymer WZ et al.. “Assisted Movement With Proprioceptive Stimulation Augments Recovery From Moderate-To-Severe Upper Limb Impairment During Subacute Stroke Period: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2022). PMID: 35067125 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[276]
Khattab S, Wiley E, Fang H et al.. “The effects of exercise on cognition post-stroke: are there sex differences? A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 32216588 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[277]
Teasell RW, Murie Fernandez M, McIntyre A et al.. “Rethinking the continuum of stroke rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24529594 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[278]
Moore JL, Virva R, Henderson C et al.. “Applying the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to Implement Gait and Balance Assessments in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 33253695 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[279]
Henderson C, Virva R, Lenca L et al.. “Gait and Balance Outcome Measures Are Responsive in Severely Impaired Individuals Undergoing Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35093332 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[280]
Jayasree-Krishnan V, Ghosh S, Palumbo A et al.. “Developing a Framework for Designing and Deploying Technology-Assisted Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Qualitative Study.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33141773 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[281]
Choi HS, Choi H, Kang S et al.. “Change in Center of Pressure Progression in the Foot Provides Clues for Functional Improvement of the More Affected Lower Limb During Post-stroke Gait Rehabilitation.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 32732748 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[282]
Rabadi MH, Coar PL, Lukin M et al.. “Admission C-reactive protein does not predict functional outcomes in patients with strokes in a subacute rehabilitation unit.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2008). PMID: 18716485 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[283]
Duncan PW, Bushnell C, Sissine M et al.. “Comprehensive Stroke Care and Outcomes: Time for a Paradigm Shift.” Stroke (2020). PMID: 33349012 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[284]
Stein J, Bierner SM, Dentel S et al.. “American Heart Association Standards for Postacute Stroke Rehabilitation Care.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 40408522 ↗
L1REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[285]
Ifejika NL, Awosika OO, Black T et al.. “Improving Access to Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 40740119 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[286]
Byblow WD, Shanks MJ, Scrivener B et al.. “Enhancing spontaneous recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Brain communications (2026). PMID: 42022291 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, History and Evolution of Treatment
[287]
Wu HM, Tang JL, Lin XP et al.. “Acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2006). PMID: 16856031 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[288]
Cahill LS, Carey LM, Lannin NA et al.. “Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2020). PMID: 33058172 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[289]
Mehrabi S, Safaei-Qomi MR, Flores-Sandoval C et al.. “Characteristics and Trends of Randomized Controlled Trials on Post-Stroke Unilateral Spatial Neglect Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.” NeuroRehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41712453 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[290]
Evensen J, Soberg HL, Sveen U et al.. “Individualized goals expressed by patients undergoing stroke rehabilitation: an observational study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2024). PMID: 38226892 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[291]
Brycke S, Bråndal A, Brogårdh C. “Implementation of evidence-based interventions according to the Swedish National Guidelines for Strokecare: a nationwide survey among physiotherapists.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2024). PMID: 38501731 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[292]
Fan Y, Gao L, Lin Z et al.. “The effect of brain-computer interface training on cognitive function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Journal of neurology (2026). PMID: 42259992 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[293]
Rytter HM, Thorsen CL, Rosenkrands-Jepsen IM. “Cognitive self-training during early stroke rehabilitation and its effect on patient agency.” Disability and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41056199 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[294]
Beaudry L, Fortin S, Rochette A. “Adapted dance used in subacute rehabilitation post-stroke: impacts perceived by patients, relatives and rehabilitation therapists.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 30907140 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management
[295]
Jeffares I, Merriman NA, Doyle F et al.. “Inclusion of stroke patients in expanded cardiac rehabilitation services: a cross-national qualitative study with cardiac and stroke rehabilitation professionals.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33529535 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Acute & Early Rehabilitation Management, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[296]
Luker J, Murray C, Lynch E et al.. “Carers' Experiences, Needs, and Preferences During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28363703 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[297]
Pang MY, Eng JJ, Dawson AS et al.. “The use of aerobic exercise training in improving aerobic capacity in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis.” Clinical rehabilitation (2006). PMID: 16541930 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[298]
Plant SE, Tyson SF, Kirk S et al.. “What are the barriers and facilitators to goal-setting during rehabilitation for stroke and other acquired brain injuries? A systematic review and meta-synthesis.” Clinical rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27496701 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[299]
Longley V, Peters S, Swarbrick C et al.. “What factors affect clinical decision-making about access to stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review.” Clinical rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 30370792 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[300]
Lawton M, Haddock G, Conroy P et al.. “Therapeutic Alliances in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Meta-Ethnography.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27137094 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[301]
Liu Y, Li S, Pan L et al.. “Recommendations for rehabilitation of post-stroke multifunctional disorders: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.” BMC health services research (2026). PMID: 42026607 ↗
L5GUIDELINECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[302]
Kayola G, Mataa MM, Asukile M et al.. “Stroke Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Opportunities.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 36634327 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[303]
Salbach NM, Mountain A, Lindsay MP et al.. “Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Virtual Stroke Rehabilitation Interim Consensus Statement 2022.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35767008 ↗
L1OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[304]
Jenkins L, Gonzaga S, Jedlanek E et al.. “Addressing the Operational Challenges for Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 36634333 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[305]
Ding M. “Tai Chi for stroke rehabilitation: a focused review.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 23064479 ↗
L1REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[306]
Ogihara H, Yamamoto N, Kurasawa Y et al.. “Characteristics and Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Influential Articles on Stroke Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38207163 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[307]
Malakouti N, Serruya MD, Cramer SC et al.. “Making Sense of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Stroke.” Stroke (2023). PMID: 38095119 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[308]
Wan C, Zhang W, Nie Y et al.. “Impact of motor imagery-based brain-computer interface combined with virtual reality on enhancing attention, executive function, and lower-limb function in stroke: A pilot study.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 39992067 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[309]
Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Pohl M et al.. “Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2025). PMID: 40365867 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[310]
Clark B, Whitall J, Kwakkel G et al.. “The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2021). PMID: 34695300 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[311]
Held JPO, Schwarz A, Pohl J et al.. “Changes in Stroke Rehabilitation during the Sars-Cov-2 Shutdown in Switzerland.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2022). PMID: 34927210 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[312]
Reinholdsson M, Herranen G, Sunnerhagen KS et al.. “Patient experiences of physical activity and inactivity in the stroke unit: an interview study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2024). PMID: 38329296 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[313]
Gao S, Dong L, Li X. “Nurse-led caregiver training interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional and psychosocial outcomes.” Frontiers in public health (2026). PMID: 42317983 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[314]
Mancuso M, Vecchi S, Basagni B et al.. “From evidence to action: Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of spatial neglect in stroke patients.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2026). PMID: 42203999 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[315]
Chow EO. “Narrative therapy an evaluated intervention to improve stroke survivors' social and emotional adaptation.” Clinical rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25142279 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[316]
Ritsma BR, Gariscsak PJ, Vyas A et al.. “The virtual family conference in stroke rehabilitation: Education, preparation, and transition planning.” Clinical rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 36575852 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[317]
Dobe J, Gustafsson L, Walder K. “Co-creation and stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35113754 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[318]
Biswas A, Rao PD, Madhavan S et al.. “Video parameters for action observation training in stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 37021345 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[319]
Gomes E, Alder G, Bright FAS et al.. “Understanding task "challenge" in stroke rehabilitation: an interdisciplinary concept analysis.” Disability and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38821140 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Definitive Multidisciplinary Therapy Program: Modalities, Dose, Intensity & Timing
[320]
Bates B, Choi JY, Duncan PW et al.. “Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: executive summary.” Stroke (2005). PMID: 16120847 ↗
L1GUIDELINECited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[321]
Rodrigues L, Moncion K, Angelopoulos SA et al.. “Psychosocial Responses to a Cardiovascular Exercise Randomized Controlled Trial: Does Intensity Matter for Individuals Post-stroke?” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 39894292 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[322]
Cozean CD, Pease WS, Hubbell SL. “Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (1988). PMID: 3288172 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[323]
Matchar DB, Young SHY, Sim R et al.. “Incentives for Uptake of and Adherence to Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Services: A 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34516998 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[324]
Ozdemir F, Birtane M, Tabatabaei R et al.. “Comparing stroke rehabilitation outcomes between acute inpatient and nonintense home settings.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2001). PMID: 11588740 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[325]
Lam OL, McMillan AS, Samaranayake LP et al.. “Randomized clinical trial of oral health promotion interventions among patients following stroke.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 23127306 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[326]
Hsieh HC. “Use of a Gaming Platform for Balance Training After a Stroke: A Randomized Trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 30468730 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[327]
Carrico C, Chelette KC, Westgate PM et al.. “Randomized Trial of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation to Enhance Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy After Stroke.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 26945226 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[328]
Shin DC, Song CH. “Smartphone-Based Visual Feedback Trunk Control Training Using a Gyroscope and Mirroring Technology for Stroke Patients: Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Feasibility.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 26829087 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[329]
Lee HJ, Cho KH, Lee WH. “The effects of body weight support treadmill training with power-assisted functional electrical stimulation on functional movement and gait in stroke patients.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 24252934 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[330]
Zeng H, Zhao W, Wu J et al.. “Effect of Intermittent Oro-Esophageal Tube Feeding in Bulbar Palsy After Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study.” Stroke (2024). PMID: 38511308 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Special Populations & Pregnancy
[331]
Kalra L, Dale P, Crome P. “Improving stroke rehabilitation. A controlled study.” Stroke (1993). PMID: 8378947 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[332]
Kalra L, Yu G, Wilson K et al.. “Medical complications during stroke rehabilitation.” Stroke (1995). PMID: 7762051 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[333]
Martin A, Fu V, Joya Z et al.. “Long-Term Follow-Up of Participants in the Taking Charge After Stroke Randomized Controlled Trial.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 41025238 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[334]
Knutson JS, Friedl AS, Hansen KM et al.. “Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper Extremity Recovery Following Stroke: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.” Stroke (2025). PMID: 41230603 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[335]
Sulch D, Perez I, Melbourn A et al.. “Randomized controlled trial of integrated (managed) care pathway for stroke rehabilitation.” Stroke (2000). PMID: 10926959 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[336]
Ring H, Rosenthal N. “Controlled study of neuroprosthetic functional electrical stimulation in sub-acute post-stroke rehabilitation.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2005). PMID: 15788330 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[337]
Gustavsson M, Guidetti S, Eriksson G et al.. “Factors affecting outcome in participation one year after stroke: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2019). PMID: 30815706 ↗
L2RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[338]
Kevorkian CG. “Stroke rehabilitation and the cardiac transplantation patient.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2000). PMID: 11083307 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[339]
Smith J, Forster A, Young J. “A randomized trial to evaluate an education programme for patients and carers after stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2004). PMID: 15573828 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[340]
Mayo NE, MacKay-Lyons MJ, Scott SC et al.. “A randomized trial of two home-based exercise programmes to improve functional walking post-stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23503738 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[341]
McKinney M, Blake H, Treece KA et al.. “Evaluation of cognitive assessment in stroke rehabilitation.” Clinical rehabilitation (2002). PMID: 11926175 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[342]
Bagley P, Hudson M, Forster A et al.. “A randomized trial evaluation of the Oswestry Standing Frame for patients after stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2005). PMID: 15929503 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[343]
Yavuzer G, Eser F, Karakus D et al.. “The effects of balance training on gait late after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2006). PMID: 17065539 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[344]
Lincoln NB, Walker MF, Dixon A et al.. “Evaluation of a multiprofessional community stroke team: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2004). PMID: 14763718 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[345]
Jones A, Tilling K, Wilson-Barnett J et al.. “Effect of recommended positioning on stroke outcome at six months: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2005). PMID: 15759528 ↗
L2RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[346]
Morris JH, Kelly C, Joice S et al.. “Art participation for psychosocial wellbeing during stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.” Disability and rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28853296 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[347]
Ranner M, Guidetti S, von Koch L et al.. “Experiences of participating in a client-centred ADL intervention after stroke.” Disability and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29961346 ↗
L4RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[348]
Lin I, Dean CM, Glinsky JV et al.. “Exploring physical activity in people after stroke: a substudy of the Falls After Stroke Trial.” Disability and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39660724 ↗
L2RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[349]
Rand D, Weingarden H, Weiss R et al.. “Self-training to improve UE function at the chronic stage post-stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.” Disability and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27793071 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[350]
Wolf TJ, Doherty M, Boone A et al.. “Cognitive oriented strategy training augmented rehabilitation (COSTAR) for ischemic stroke: a pilot exploratory randomized controlled study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31155969 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[351]
Olaleye OA, Hamzat TK, Owolabi MO. “Stroke rehabilitation: should physiotherapy intervention be provided at a primary health care centre or the patients' place of domicile?” Disability and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 23594059 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[352]
Fukata K, Amimoto K, Inoue M et al.. “Effects of diagonally aligned sitting training with a tilted surface on sitting balance for low sitting performance in the early phase after stroke: a randomised controlled trial.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31714801 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[353]
Devasahayam AJ, Tang A, Taylor D et al.. “Cardiorespiratory exercise and self-management early after stroke to increase daily physical activity: results from a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.” Disability and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39530472 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[354]
Pollock A, Baer G, Pomeroy V et al.. “Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2007). PMID: 17253468 ↗
L5SR_OBSCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[355]
Saywell NL, Vandal AC, Mudge S et al.. “Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2020). PMID: 33190615 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[356]
Huang YJ, Wang SM, Chen C et al.. “High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current with Electrical Theta Burst on Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2022). PMID: 36047662 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[357]
Shi XQ, Ti CE, Lu HY et al.. “Task-Oriented Training by a Personalized Electromyography-Driven Soft Robotic Hand in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2024). PMID: 38812378 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[358]
Ifejika-Jones NL, Peng H, Noser EA et al.. “Hospital-acquired symptomatic urinary tract infection in patients admitted to an academic stroke center affects discharge disposition.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 23103046 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[359]
Atan T, Ekinci U, Uran San A et al.. “The relationship between falls and hip bone mineral density of paretic and nonparetic limbs after stroke.” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39604710 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[360]
Radford KA, Grant MI, Holmes JA et al.. “Development and description of Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation delivered in the RETAKE trial.” Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) (2026). PMID: 41930667 ↗
L5RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[361]
Jo S, Kim H, Song C. “Dual‑task exergaming to enhance motor and cognitive function in chronic stroke: a prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel group randomized controlled trial.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41715216 ↗
L1RCTCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[362]
Sunnerhagen KS. “Olle Höök Lectureship 2019: The changing world of stroke rehabilitation.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2020). PMID: 32296853 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[363]
Lundgren Nilsson Å, Tennant A. “Past and present issues in Rasch analysis: the functional independence measure (FIM™) revisited.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2011). PMID: 21947180 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Evolution of Treatment
[364]
Saa JP, Lipson-Smith R, White M et al.. “Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation Environments: Aligning Building Construction and Clinical Practice Guidelines Through Care Process Mapping.” Stroke (2023). PMID: 37846565 ↗
L5GUIDELINECited in: Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration), Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[365]
Davies SE, Dodd KJ, Hill KD. “Does cultural and linguistic diversity affect health-related outcomes for people with stroke at discharge from hospital?” Disability and rehabilitation (2016). PMID: 27043166 ↗
L2REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Goal-Setting, Team Structure & Care Coordination (Setting-of-Care, Transitions & Reintegration)
[366]
Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E et al.. “Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2007). PMID: 17476001 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[367]
Zheng Y, Liu G, Yu L et al.. “Effects of a 3D-printed orthosis compared to a low-temperature thermoplastic plate orthosis on wrist flexor spasticity in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.” Clinical rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31686529 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[368]
Han S, Park D. “Effect of integrating an 8-figure shoulder brace into rehabilitation exercise on trunk control, balance, and gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Disability and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40528325 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[369]
Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ et al.. “The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2014). PMID: 24526708 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[370]
Everaert DG, Stein RB, Abrams GM et al.. “Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2013). PMID: 23558080 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[371]
Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ et al.. “Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2015). PMID: 25653225 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[372]
Chujo Y, Mori K, Wakida M et al.. “Diverse Plantarflexor Module Characteristics Influence Immediate Effects of Plastic Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Gait Performance in Patients With Stroke: A Cross-sectional Study.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38458374 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[373]
Gaitan M, Bainbridge L, Parkinson S et al.. “Characteristics of the shoulder in patients following acute stroke: a case series.” Topics in stroke rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 30893022 ↗
L4RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[374]
Nikamp CDM, van der Palen J, Hermens HJ et al.. “The influence of early or delayed provision of ankle-foot orthoses on pelvis, hip and knee kinematics in patients with sub-acute stroke: A randomized controlled trial.” Gait & posture (2018). PMID: 29778980 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[375]
Nikamp CDM, Hobbelink MSH, van der Palen J et al.. “A randomized controlled trial on providing ankle-foot orthoses in patients with (sub-)acute stroke: Short-term kinematic and spatiotemporal effects and effects of timing.” Gait & posture (2017). PMID: 28407505 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[376]
Tanczak N, Plunkett TK, Lin S et al.. “Feasibility of post-stroke hand rehabilitation supported by a soft robotic hand orthosis in-clinic and at-home.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40842028 ↗
L4TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[377]
Guillén-Climent S, Garzo A, Muñoz-Alcaraz MN et al.. “A usability study in patients with stroke using MERLIN, a robotic system based on serious games for upper limb rehabilitation in the home setting.” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33622344 ↗
L4TRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[378]
Golding-Day M, Thomas S, Whitehead P et al.. “Professional consensus on UK national statements of best practice for ways of working to deliver orthotic interventions after stroke: an eDelphi study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2026). PMID: 41782404 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics, Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[379]
Singh R, Hunter J, Philip A et al.. “Predicting those who will walk after rehabilitation in a specialist stroke unit.” Clinical rehabilitation (2006). PMID: 16541935 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[380]
Wade DT. “Is rehabilitation's unifying expertise its holistic scope and cognitive approach to the patient's problems? An exploration.” Clinical rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41137512 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[381]
Kimura Y, Ohji S, Nishio N et al.. “The impact of wheelchair propulsion based physical activity on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a multicenter observational study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 33026844 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[382]
Franck JA, Smeets RJEM, Seelen HAM. “Evaluation of a functional hand orthosis combined with electrical stimulation adjunct to arm-hand rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients with a severely to moderately affected hand function.” Disability and rehabilitation (2018). PMID: 29316821 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[383]
DiBello SA, Wurdeman SR, Gorniak SL. “Orthotic Research Initiative for Outcomes aNalysis (ORION I): predictors of PROMIS PF for stroke survivors seeking orthotic intervention.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34473570 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[384]
Doğan A, Mengüllüoğlu M, Özgirgin N. “Evaluation of the effect of ankle-foot orthosis use on balance and mobility in hemiparetic stroke patients.” Disability and rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 21091133 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Assistive Technology, Orthotics & Prosthetics
[385]
Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N et al.. “Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2008). PMID: 18295613 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[386]
Pervane Vural S, Nakipoglu Yuzer GF, Sezgin Ozcan D et al.. “Effects of Mirror Therapy in Stroke Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1: A Randomized Controlled Study.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 26723854 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[387]
Sütbeyaz S, Yavuzer G, Sezer N et al.. “Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17466722 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[388]
Sabut SK, Sikdar C, Mondal R et al.. “Restoration of gait and motor recovery by functional electrical stimulation therapy in persons with stroke.” Disability and rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 20210592 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[389]
Turner-Stokes L, Jacinto J, Fheodoroff K et al.. “Longitudinal goal attainment with integrated upper limb spasticity management including repeat injections of botulinum toxin A: Findings from the prospective, observational Upper Limb International Spasticity (ULIS-III) cohort study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2021). PMID: 33616192 ↗
L4COHORTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[390]
Bollens B, Gustin T, Stoquart G et al.. “A randomized controlled trial of selective neurotomy versus botulinum toxin for spastic equinovarus foot after stroke.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2013). PMID: 23757297 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[391]
Mugler EM, Tomic G, Singh A et al.. “Myoelectric Computer Interface Training for Reducing Co-Activation and Enhancing Arm Movement in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Trial.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2019). PMID: 30888251 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[392]
Bayley MT, Hurdowar A, Teasell R et al.. “Priorities for stroke rehabilitation and research: results of a 2003 Canadian Stroke Network consensus conference.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17398256 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[393]
Grube MM, Dohle C, Djouchadar D et al.. “Evidence-based quality indicators for stroke rehabilitation.” Stroke (2011). PMID: 22020037 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[394]
Heckert KD, Komaroff E, Adler U et al.. “Postacute reevaluation may prevent Dysphagia-associated morbidity.” Stroke (2009). PMID: 19228843 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[395]
Xian Y, Thomas L, Liang L et al.. “Unexplained Variation for Hospitals' Use of Inpatient Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Facilities After an Acute Ischemic Stroke.” Stroke (2017). PMID: 28830975 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[396]
Chen H, Xiao K, Yang X et al.. “Effectiveness of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on Post-Stroke motor dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials.” Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (2025). PMID: 40884701 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[397]
Akıncı MG, Polat CS, Tombak Demirçakan A et al.. “Effectiveness of contrast compression therapy for post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome: a randomized control trial.” Topics in stroke rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 41261073 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[398]
Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L et al.. “Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2009). PMID: 19821326 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[399]
Demetrios M, Brand C, Louie J et al.. “More than a black box of rehabilitation: Characterizing therapy programmes following botulinum toxin injections for spasticity in adults with stroke.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2016). PMID: 27097568 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[400]
Quinn TJ, Paolucci S, Sunnerhagen KS et al.. “Evidence-based stroke r-ehabilitation: an expanded guidance document from the european stroke organisation (ESO) guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2009). PMID: 19225703 ↗
L1OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[401]
Turner-Stokes L, Jacinto J, Fheodoroff K et al.. “Assessing the effectiveness of upper-limb spasticity management using a structured approach to goal-setting and outcome measurement: First cycle results from the ULIS-III Study.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2021). PMID: 33206198 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[402]
Kerzoncuf M, Bensoussan L, Delarque A et al.. “Plastic changes in spinal synaptic transmission following botulinum toxin A in patients with post-stroke spasticity.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2015). PMID: 26424152 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[403]
Velázquez-Saornil J, Abuín-Porras V, Frutos-Llanes R et al.. “Expert consensus on the application of dry needling in stroke patients: A modified delphi method.” Clinical rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40396979 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[404]
Stone M, Wallace SJ, Copland DA et al.. “Comparing inpatient stroke rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with and without aphasia in Australia.” Clinical rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 41553847 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[405]
O'Brien SR, Xue Y. “Predicting goal achievement during stroke rehabilitation for Medicare beneficiaries.” Disability and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 24151817 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[406]
Fernandez-Lobera M, Morales M, Valls-Solé J. “Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for the assessment of wrist spasticity: reliability, validation and correlation with clinical measures.” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 34027756 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[407]
Rosa MC, Marques A, Demain S et al.. “Knee posture during gait and global functioning post-stroke: a theoretical ICF framework using current measures in stroke rehabilitation.” Disability and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25095902 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[408]
Carda S, Wissel J, Hoad D et al.. “Social media listening study to understand the journey and unmet needs of patients living with post-stroke spasticity.” Disability and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40202197 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[409]
Stummer C, Verheyden G, Putman K et al.. “Predicting sickness impact profile at six months after stroke: further results from the European multi-center CERISE study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25170786 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Complications & Secondary Conditions of Disability
[410]
Stockley RC, Jarvis K, Boland P et al.. “Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Mental Practice for the Upper Limb After Stroke: Imagined or Real Benefit?” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2020). PMID: 33250142 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[411]
Christiansen A, Scythes M, Ritsma BR et al.. “Art skill-based rehabilitation training for upper limb sensorimotor recovery post-stroke: A feasibility study.” Clinical rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35642286 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[412]
Plant S, Tyson SF. “A multicentre study of how goal-setting is practised during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.” Clinical rehabilitation (2017). PMID: 28714342 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory
[413]
Finch E, Hayward KS, Fleming J et al.. “Identifying implications of thrombolysis for stroke rehabilitation: knowledge gaps in current research.” Disability and rehabilitation (2012). PMID: 23061414 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Prognosis, Natural History & Recovery Trajectory, Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[414]
Saposnik G, Levin M. “Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians.” Stroke (2011). PMID: 21474804 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[415]
Rose D, Paris T, Crews E et al.. “Feasibility and effectiveness of circuit training in acute stroke rehabilitation.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2010). PMID: 21051764 ↗
L2RCTCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[416]
Qureshi A, Hargest C, Swain N et al.. “Psychosocial interventions for building resilience of informal carers of people living with stroke: a systematic review.” Disability and rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 35468030 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[417]
Yeh HJ, Chen TA, Cheng HC et al.. “Long-Term Rehabilitation Utilization Pattern Among Stroke Patients Under the National Health Insurance Program.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2022). PMID: 33782272 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[418]
Vloothuis JD, Mulder M, Veerbeek JM et al.. “Caregiver-mediated exercises for improving outcomes after stroke.” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2016). PMID: 28002636 ↗
L1SR_OBSCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[419]
Choe YK, Asselin A, Foster T et al.. “Congruent vs. incongruent tasks in interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation: a single-case report.” Disability and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 38084719 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[420]
Korpi N, Mikkelsson M, Häkkinen U et al.. “The effectiveness and costs of intensive stroke rehabilitation and improvements in patient pathway in Finland: a retrospective benchmarking controlled trial.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2024). PMID: 39539068 ↗
L3OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[421]
Laver K, Ratcliffe J, George S et al.. “Early rehabilitation management after stroke: what do stroke patients prefer?” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2011). PMID: 21305229 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[422]
Purcell S, Scott P, Gustafsson L et al.. “Stroke survivors' experiences of occupation in hospital-based stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative exploration.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 30672347 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[423]
Chau JPC, Lo SHS, Zhao J et al.. “Apathy mediates the association between age and cognition after stroke.” Disability and rehabilitation (2023). PMID: 38153242 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[424]
Soares C, Magalhães JP, Faria-Fortini I et al.. “Barriers and facilitators to access post-stroke rehabilitation services in the first six months of recovery in Brazil.” Disability and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38299553 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[425]
Ouédraogo F, Kiki GM, Ouaré AK et al.. “Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) to explore the experiences of family caregivers of stroke survivors in Burkina Faso: a qualitative study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40071847 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Special Populations & Pregnancy
[426]
Mehrabi S, Fleet JL, Safaei-Qomi MR et al.. “Systematic Review of Upper Extremity Outcome Measures Assessed in Randomized Controlled Trials of Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Low-to-Middle-Income and High-Income Countries.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 39547309 ↗
L1SR_MA_RCTCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[427]
Ang KK, Guan C, Phua KS et al.. “Facilitating effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation.” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 25721551 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[428]
Allison R, Dennett R. “Pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of additional supported standing practice on functional ability post stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2007). PMID: 17702703 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[429]
Aaronson JA, Nachtegaal J, van Bezeij T et al.. “Can a prediction model combining self-reported symptoms, sociodemographic and clinical features serve as a reliable first screening method for sleep apnea syndrome in patients with stroke?” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2013). PMID: 24378806 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[430]
Blömer AM, van Mierlo ML, Visser-Meily JM et al.. “Does the frequency of participation change after stroke and is this change associated with the subjective experience of participation?” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 25264108 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[431]
Edwards DF, Hahn MG, Baum CM et al.. “Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2006). PMID: 16467277 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[432]
Abdulsalam AJ, Al-Hashel J, Abdulsalam M et al.. “Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Perspective.” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation (2026). PMID: 42155463 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[433]
Morgenstern LB, Sais E, Fuentes M et al.. “Mexican Americans Receive Less Intensive Stroke Rehabilitation Than Non-Hispanic Whites.” Stroke (2017). PMID: 28386042 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[434]
Kopey SA, Chae J, Vargo MM. “Does a 3-sip test detect dysphagia in acute stroke rehabilitation patients?” PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation (2010). PMID: 20869681 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[435]
Kim DH, Sohn MK, Lee J et al.. “Effect of intensive nutritional support on functional recovery in subacute stroke: A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial.” Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine (2025). PMID: 40250062 ↗
L1RCTCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[436]
Teles Sarmento J, Alves A, Castro-Chaves P et al.. “Quality of rehabilitation care in Portuguese stroke units: findings from 2017-2018 and 2023 national cross‑sectional surveys.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2026). PMID: 41906596 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[437]
Alt Murphy M, Björkdahl A, Forsberg-Wärleby G et al.. “Implementation of evidence-based assessment of upper extremity in stroke rehabilitation: From evidence to clinical practice.” Journal of rehabilitation medicine (2021). PMID: 33470413 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[438]
Nøkleby K, Boland E, Bergersen H et al.. “Screening for cognitive deficits after stroke: a comparison of three screening tools.” Clinical rehabilitation (2008). PMID: 19052248 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[439]
Breisinger TP, Skidmore ER, Niyonkuru C et al.. “The Stroke Assessment of Fall Risk (SAFR): predictive validity in inpatient stroke rehabilitation.” Clinical rehabilitation (2014). PMID: 24849795 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[440]
Ramos BA, Ram K, Martinez M et al.. “Adapting and implementing a staff-led sleep intervention in an acute rehabilitation setting.” Clinical rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40924822 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[441]
Steverson T, Marsden J, Blake J. “The reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10) in post-acute patients with stroke.” Clinical rehabilitation (2024). PMID: 38439657 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[442]
Vancleef K, Castellani R, Shorthose R et al.. “The Oxford Visual Perception Screen: Development and normative data of a standardised assessment for visual perception difficulties.” Clinical rehabilitation (2025). PMID: 40013609 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[443]
Gururaj S, Bird ML, Borschmann K et al.. “Evidence-based stroke rehabilitation: do priorities for practice change and feasibility of implementation vary across high income, upper and lower-middle income countries?” Disability and rehabilitation (2021). PMID: 33849357 ↗
L2OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[444]
Baker C, Worrall L, Rose M et al.. “Stroke health professionals' management of depression after post-stroke aphasia: a qualitative study.” Disability and rehabilitation (2019). PMID: 31180740 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[445]
Campbell N, Rice D, Friedman L et al.. “Screening and facilitating further assessment for cognitive impairment after stroke: application of a shortened Montreal Cognitive Assessment (miniMoCA).” Disability and rehabilitation (2015). PMID: 26119578 ↗
L4OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance
[446]
Moncion K, Rodrigues L, MacKay-Lyons M et al.. “Exercise-Based Stroke Rehabilitation: Clinical Considerations Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2021). PMID: 34711094 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention, Screening & Surveillance