On this page
Quick Reference
Overview and Recommendations
Background
- •Recognize tetanus as a non-communicable, toxin-mediated disease caused by Clostridium tetani, an anaerobic gram-positive, spore-forming rod found ubiquitously in soil, dust, and animal feces. The disease occurs when spores enter the body through contaminated wounds, germinate in anaerobic conditions, and release , a neurotoxin that irreversibly blocks the release of inhibitory neurotransmitters (GABA and glycine) at the presynaptic terminals.
- •Identify the four clinical variants: generalized tetanus (the most common form, characterized by descending muscle rigidity and spasms), neonatal tetanus (occurring in infants due to umbilical contamination), cephalic tetanus (localized to the head following ear or head injuries, often involving cranial nerve palsies), and local tetanus (rigidity confined to the muscles near the site of injury).
- •Understand the shifting epidemiology in developed nations, where the disease primarily affects adults over age 65 due to waning vaccine-induced immunity and suboptimal booster compliance. In contrast, resource-limited settings still face a significant burden of neonatal and maternal tetanus due to inadequate antenatal care and unsterile delivery practices.
- •Note that the incubation period typically ranges from 3 to 21 days, with a shorter incubation period (less than 7 days) and a shorter period of onset (time from first symptom to first generalized spasm, less than 48 hours) serving as strong predictors of severe disease and higher mortality.
- •Acknowledge that clinical infection does not confer natural immunity because the lethal dose of tetanospasmin is lower than the dose required to stimulate an effective immune response; therefore, all survivors must receive a full primary vaccination series or booster.
Evaluation
- •Suspect tetanus in any patient presenting with unexplained muscle stiffness, difficulty swallowing, or painful spasms, especially if there is a history of a recent wound and an uncertain or incomplete vaccination history. Do not wait for laboratory confirmation, as the diagnosis is entirely clinical.
- •Perform the spatula test at the bedside by touching the posterior pharyngeal wall with a sterile spatula; a positive result occurs when the patient involuntarily bites down on the spatula due to masseter spasm, rather than the normal gag reflex (high specificity for tetanus).
- •Assess for trismus (lockjaw), which is the most common presenting symptom (occurring in over 85% of cases), and , a characteristic grimace caused by sustained contraction of the facial muscles.
- •Examine the patient for , a state of severe hyperextension where the head, neck, and spinal column enter a complete arching position due to dominant extensor muscle spasms.
- •Monitor for signs of autonomic nervous system dysfunction (ANSD), which typically appear in the second week of illness and include labile blood pressure, tachycardia, profuse diaphoresis, and intermittent hyperthermia.
- •Evaluate the portal of entry, which may include obvious traumatic wounds (e.g., rusty nail punctures), but also minor abrasions, chronic ulcers, dental infections, or surgical sites. In some cases, no clear entry point is identified.
- •Order baseline laboratory tests, including creatine kinase (CK), which is often elevated due to intense muscle activity, and a wound culture, though C. tetani is isolated in only about 30% of cases and a negative culture never rules out the disease.
- •Rule out differential diagnoses such as strychnine poisoning (which mimics generalized spasms), hypocalcemic tetany (look for Chvostek or Trousseau signs), dystonic reactions to neuroleptics, and meningoencephalitis (perform CSF analysis if meningism is present).
- •Grade the severity of the disease using the Ablett Classification: Grade 1 (mild trismus, no spasms), Grade 2 (moderate trismus, brief spasms), Grade 3 (severe trismus, frequent spasms, respiratory distress), and Grade 4 (Grade 3 plus severe autonomic instability).
- •Obtain a chest X-ray to screen for or fractures of the ribs or vertebrae, which are common complications of severe paroxysmal spasms.
Management
- •Admit all patients with suspected tetanus to a quiet, darkened room in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to minimize external stimuli (light, noise, touch) that can trigger life-threatening spasms.
- •Administer Human Tetanus Immunoglobulin (HTIG) immediately to neutralize unbound toxin; for treatment of active disease, doses of 3,000 to 6,000 units IM are often used, though some protocols suggest 500 units may be sufficient. If HTIG is unavailable, use equine antitoxin after performing a sensitivity test.
- •Initiate antibiotic therapy with Metronidazole 500 mg IV every 6 to 8 hours for 7 to 10 days as the first-line agent; avoid penicillin G if possible, as it is a GABA antagonist and may theoretically worsen spasms.
- •Perform surgical debridement of the wound only after the patient has been stabilized and antitoxin has been administered, to prevent the further release of toxin into the circulation.
- •Control muscle spasms using Magnesium Sulfate as a first-line adjunct; administer a 70 mg/kg IV bolus over 30 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 2 g/hour, titrating to maintain the patellar tendon reflex.
- •Utilize high-dose benzodiazepines for sedation and spasm control; Diazepam can be administered via IV infusion at 5 to 20 mg/kg/day, though clinicians must be prepared for the resulting respiratory depression.
- •Secure the airway early in patients with Grade 3 or 4 disease; perform a tracheostomy for those requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (often 3-4 weeks) to avoid triggering spasms during endotracheal suctioning.
- •Manage autonomic storms with alpha-2 agonists like Dexmedetomidine or short-acting beta-blockers like Labetalol (0.25-0.5 mg/min IV infusion); avoid non-selective beta-blockers (e.g., propranolol) which may cause sudden cardiac arrest.
- •Provide aggressive supportive care, including enteral nutrition to meet high metabolic demands, VTE prophylaxis with Enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily, and physical therapy to prevent joint contractures.
- •Administer a tetanus-containing vaccine (Tdap or Td) at a site distant from the HTIG injection to initiate active immunization, as the disease itself does not provide immunity.
- •Follow post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) protocols for future wounds: for clean wounds, give a booster if the last dose was >10 years ago; for tetanus-prone wounds, give a booster if >5 years ago and add HTIG 250 IU if the primary series is incomplete.
Board Review — High Yield
- •Risus sardonicus — Characteristic 'sneering' grimace due to facial muscle spasms.
- •Spatula test — Biting down on a tongue blade (positive) instead of gagging (negative); highly specific for tetanus.
- •Tetanospasmin mechanism — Cleaves SNARE proteins (synaptobrevin), blocking GABA and glycine release from Renshaw cells in the spinal cord.
- •Opisthotonus — Severe arching of the back due to spasms of the axial musculature.
- •Autonomic Storms — Labile hypertension and tachycardia occurring in the second week; managed with magnesium or dexmedetomidine.
- •Vaccination — Natural infection does NOT confer immunity; patients must be vaccinated during recovery.
- •Neonatal Tetanus — Usually presents with 'failure to suck' and grimacing in an infant 3-14 days after birth, often due to unsterile cord care.
Deep Dive — Evidence Details
Epidemiology and Risk Factors
- ▸Global tetanus incidence in children <5 has decreased by over 94% since 1990, yet the disease remains endemic in resource-limited regions.
- ▸Waning immunity in older adults is a primary driver of tetanus cases in developed nations, with seroprotection often falling below 70% in those over age 65.
- ▸Key clinical predictors of mortality include a short incubation period, autonomic dysfunction, and the presence of diabetes mellitus.
Tetanus is a vaccine-preventable disease caused by the potent neurotoxin produced by Clostridium tetani [13]D. While global incidence has declined significantly due to widespread immunization programs, the disease remains a critical public health concern in resource-limited settings and among undervaccinated populations in developed nations [14]D[24]D.
Global Incidence and Temporal Trends
Global surveillance data indicates a dramatic reduction in tetanus burden over the last three decades. In children under 5 years of age, the global incidence plummeted from 308,931 cases in 1990 to 17,788 cases in 2021 [16]D. This decline is largely attributed to the success of maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination programs and the inclusion of tetanus toxoid-containing vaccines (TTCV) in routine childhood immunization schedules [15]D[22]D. In the United States, the implementation of these "legacy" vaccines has reduced the incidence to less than 1 case per 10 million person-years [15]D. Despite these gains, outbreaks continue to occur in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, particularly among older children and adults who lack booster coverage [3][22]D.
Demographic Distribution
The demographic profile of tetanus varies significantly by geographic region and the local success of vaccination strategies. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), men are often disproportionately affected [24]D. This disparity arises because women and children are frequently targeted by specific immunization campaigns (e.g., maternal health programs), while adult men may lack access to routine booster doses [24]D. Conversely, in some developed nations like Slovenia, a female predominance has been observed in certain cohorts, with one study reporting that 87.1% of adult patients were female [10].
Age is a critical determinant of risk. In highly vaccinated populations, the burden has shifted toward older adults due to waning immunity [20]D[23]D. For example, in Italy, seroprotection rates are high in children aged 6–12 years (93.6%) but drop significantly to 65.4% in those aged over 65 years [20]D. Similarly, US data confirms that while childhood uptake is high, adult booster compliance is suboptimal, leaving older populations vulnerable [23]D.
Environmental and Clinical Risk Factors
Clostridium tetani spores are ubiquitous in the environment. They are commonly found in soil, dog feces, and on rusted metal surfaces [17]D. Infection typically occurs through contaminated wounds, including minor abrasions, chronic ulcers, or dermatological conditions [2][13]D.
Clinical factors significantly influence the risk of fatality. A meta-analysis of 182 cases identified several key risk factors for mortality, including shorter incubation periods, the presence of opisthotonus, and autonomic dysfunction [2]. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease also increase the risk of a fatal outcome [2]. In hospitalized adults, the case fatality rate remains high in settings where access to mechanical ventilation and advanced critical care is limited [1][24]D.
Special Considerations
- Conflict Zones: Armed conflict significantly disrupts maternal health-seeking behaviors, leading to lower vaccination rates and increased tetanus risk in these regions [25]D.
- HIV Exposure: In regions like Malawi, infants born to mothers living with HIV (HIV-exposed-uninfected) generally show high seroprotection (94.8%), though maternal antiretroviral therapy duration is a key correlate of infant antibody levels [18]D.
- Delirium: Tetanus-associated delirium is an emerging concern that exacerbates morbidity and complicates the of severe cases [11].
Risk Assessment Protocol
Clinicians should follow this step-by-step protocol to assess epidemiological risk in patients with acute wounds:
- Step 1: Evaluate Wound Severity. Determine if the wound is "tetanus-prone" (e.g., contaminated with soil, feces, or saliva; puncture wounds; avulsions; or wounds resulting from , crush injury, or burns) [13]D.
- Step 2: Verify Vaccination History. Confirm the number of prior TTCV doses. Patients with <3 doses or an unknown history are at the highest risk [13]D[23]D.
- Step 3: Assess Time Since Last Booster. For clean, minor wounds, a booster is required if the last dose was >10 years ago. For tetanus-prone wounds, the threshold is >5 years [13]D.
- Step 4: Identify Host Factors. Screen for high-risk comorbidities such as diabetes, advanced age, or immunosuppression which may necessitate more aggressive prophylaxis [2].
| Risk Factor | Impact | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of Vaccination | Primary driver of incidence and severity | 2a [2][13]D |
| Short Incubation Period | Significant predictor of fatality | 2a [2] |
| Autonomic Dysfunction | High risk for cardiovascular collapse/death | 2a [2] |
| Diabetes Mellitus | Increased risk of fatal outcome | 2a [2] |
| Advanced Age (>65) | Higher risk due to waning seroprotection | 2b [20]D[23]D |
| Male Sex (in LMICs) | Higher incidence due to lack of booster access | 5 [24]D |
Clinical Features
- ▸Trismus is the most frequent clinical sign, present in over 85% of patients, and often the first symptom to appear.
- ▸Autonomic nervous system dysfunction (ANSD), characterized by labile blood pressure and heart rate, is a leading cause of death and requires intensive monitoring.
- ▸A history of complete vaccination or the presence of anti-tetanus antibodies does not definitively rule out a diagnosis of tetanus.
The clinical presentation of tetanus is primarily defined by progressive muscle rigidity and paroxysmal spasms caused by the tetanospasmin toxin. While the classic presentation involves trismus and generalized hypertonicity, the disease can manifest in several distinct phenotypic variants depending on the portal of entry and the patient's age [9][36]D.
Presenting Symptoms
Patients typically present with a median duration of 4 days from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission [36]D. The incubation period—the time from inoculation to the first symptom—is variable but often ranges from 3 to 21 days; for instance, a classic case following a rusty nail puncture reported a 10-day incubation [33]C.
- Trismus (Lockjaw): This is the most common presenting symptom, occurring in approximately 85.7% of cases [36]D. It results from masseter muscle rigidity, making it difficult for the patient to open their mouth [9][27]C.
- Dysphagia and Neck Pain: Early symptoms often include difficulty swallowing or localized pain in the neck and jaw [32]C[33]C. In the elderly, dysphagia and tremors may be the only initial symptoms, leading to potential diagnostic delays [32]C[35]D.
- Portal of Entry: History should focus on potential inoculation sites. While traumatic wounds (e.g., rusty nails, scalp lacerations) are classic [29]C[33]C, atypical portals include breast cancer-related skin ulcers [27]C, ear discharge (otogenic tetanus) [31]C, and myelomeningocele repair sites in infants [30]C.
Neurological Examination Findings
The physical examination is the cornerstone of diagnosis, as laboratory confirmation is often difficult [31]C[39]D. The examination should be conducted in a quiet environment, as external stimuli can trigger painful spasms.
- Cranial Nerves: Trismus is the hallmark. Facial nerve involvement leads to risus sardonicus, a characteristic grimace caused by sustained contraction of the facial muscles [30]C. In cephalic tetanus, cranial nerve palsies (especially CN VII) may be present [29]C.
- Motor System: Generalized muscle rigidity is common. Opisthotonus, a state of severe hyperextension and spasticity in which the patient's , neck, and spinal column enter a complete arching position, is a classic finding [27]C[30]C.
- Reflexes: Patients exhibit generalized hyperreflexia. Spasms are often paroxysmal and can be triggered by touch, light, or sound [35]D.
- Autonomic Nervous System: Autonomic nervous system dysfunction (ANSD) is a critical finding and a major cause of mortality [37]D. Signs include labile blood pressure, tachycardia, and intermittent hyperthermia [28]C[38]D.
Phenotypic Variants
Tetanus is classified into four clinical types based on the extent and location of symptoms.
| Variant | Key Features | Frequency/Context |
|---|---|---|
| Generalized | Trismus, risus sardonicus, opisthotonus, and generalized spasms. | Most common form (up to 100% in some cohorts) [36]D. |
| Neonatal | Poor feeding, lethargy, and increased tone in infants (usually <28 days). | High mortality; often due to umbilical cord contamination [30]C[38]D. |
| Cephalic | Follows head/ear injury; involves cranial nerves; high risk of progression to generalized. | Rare but often fatal [29]C[31]C. |
| Local | Persistent muscle contractions in the same anatomic area as the injury. | May progress to generalized tetanus. |
Red Flags
Certain clinical signs indicate a high risk of rapid deterioration and require immediate intensive care intervention:
- Respiratory Compromise: Rigidity of the thoracic and abdominal muscles can lead to ventilatory failure. While specific FVC thresholds are used in some protocols, any sign of tachypnea or accessory muscle use in a tetanus patient is a critical warning [28]C[30]C.
- Autonomic Instability: Labile hemodynamics or profound diaphoresis suggest ANSD, which may require invasive monitoring and pharmacological (e.g., magnesium sulfate) [38]D.
- Rapid Progression: A short interval between the first symptom and the first generalized spasm (the 'period of onset') is a poor prognostic indicator [39]D.
Atypical Presentations and Differentials
Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion in non-classic cases. Tetanus can occur even in individuals with a history of vaccination or "protective" antibody levels [33]C.
- Elderly Patients: May present with delirium or isolated tremors, often lacking the classic trismus initially [32]C[35]D.
- Crisponi Syndrome: This rare autosomal recessive disorder mimics neonatal tetanus, presenting with trismus, abundant salivation, and hyperthermia from day one of life [28]C. It is distinguished by characteristic facial dysmorphism and camptodactyly [28]C.
- Otogenic Tetanus: Presentation with ear discharge and localized rigidity, often in pediatric populations in resource-limited settings [31]C.
Diagnosis and Workup
- ▸Tetanus is a clinical diagnosis; a negative wound culture is found in approximately 70% of confirmed cases.
- ▸The spatula test is a highly specific bedside tool where a reflex bite response indicates a positive result.
- ▸Differential diagnosis must include Crisponi syndrome in neonates and ADEM or meningoencephalitis in adults.
The diagnosis of tetanus is primarily clinical, based on the presence of characteristic muscle spasms and a history of potential exposure to Clostridium tetani [41][42]. Laboratory and imaging studies are generally used to exclude other conditions or to identify complications rather than to confirm the diagnosis itself [50]D. Because the disease can progress rapidly to life-threatening respiratory failure, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion in patients with trismus or generalized rigidity, especially if they are under-immunized [45]C[51].
Diagnostic Criteria
Formal diagnosis requires the presence of specific clinical features. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines tetanus by the presence of at least one of the following: trismus (lockjaw), risus sardonicus (sustained contraction of facial muscles), or painful muscle spasms [41][43]C.
- Required Features: Clinical evidence of generalized muscle rigidity or spasms without another apparent medical cause [41][46]C.
- Supportive Features:
- History of a recent wound or injury (e.g., lacerations, orbital trauma, or surgical sites) [46]C[49]D.
- Autonomic instability (tachycardia, , or hyperthermia) [28]C[44].
- Incubation period typically between 7 to 8 days, though it can range from 1 to 60 days [51].
- Exclusion Criteria: Alternative diagnoses such as strychnine poisoning, hypocalcemic tetany, or rare genetic mimics like Crisponi syndrome (characterized by neonatal trismus and hyperthermia due to CRLF1 mutations) must be ruled out [28]C.
Clinical Examination and the Spatula Test
The spatula test is a bedside diagnostic tool with high specificity.
- Procedure: The clinician touches the posterior pharyngeal wall with a sterile spatula.
- Negative Result: A normal gag reflex occurs, and the patient attempts to expel the spatula.
- Positive Result: The patient involuntarily bites down on the spatula due to a reflex spasm of the masseter muscles. This finding is highly suggestive of tetanus [43]C.
Laboratory Investigations
Laboratory tests are often unremarkable in the early stages of tetanus but are necessary for baseline assessment and differential diagnosis [42].
- Wound Culture: C. tetani is isolated from the wound in only 30% of cases. A negative culture does not exclude the diagnosis because the organism is highly anaerobic and may not survive transport [50]D.
- Serum Antitoxin Levels: Protective levels of tetanus antitoxin (>0.01 IU/mL) make the diagnosis less likely but do not absolutely rule it out in cases of massive toxin exposure [41].
- General Bloods: Leukocytosis may be present if the primary wound is infected. Elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels often reflect intense muscle activity and spasms [42].
- Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF): Analysis is typically normal. It is primarily used to exclude bacterial meningoencephalitis or Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM), which can present with similar neurological symptoms [48]C.
Imaging and Electrodiagnostics
Imaging is not diagnostic for tetanus but is used to identify the source of infection or manage complications [49]D[52].
- Modality of Choice: CT or MRI of the affected area (e.g., orbit or limb) to identify retained foreign bodies or abscesses [49]D.
- Chest Radiography: Essential for patients with respiratory distress to evaluate for , a common complication in severe (Grade 4) tetanus [52].
- Electroencephalogram (EEG): While usually normal in wakefulness, EEG may reveal in patients with generalized tetanus, characterized by excessive motor activity during REM sleep [47]C.
- Electromyography (EMG): May show continuous motor unit activity and a lack of the normal silent period following a tendon reflex [26].
Diagnostic Algorithm
should not be delayed while awaiting laboratory results if clinical suspicion is high.
- Step 1: Clinical Assessment: Evaluate for trismus, pharyngeal spasms, or generalized rigidity [43]C. Perform the spatula test.
- Step 2: History Review: Assess vaccination status and identify potential entry wounds (e.g., trauma, surgery, or pregnancy-related trauma) [40][46]C.
- Step 3: Severity Grading: Use the APACHE II score or Barthel Index to assess functional status and mortality risk [42][44].
- Step 4: Differential Exclusion: Order bloods (calcium, toxicology) and consider CSF analysis if meningism is present [48]C.
- Step 5: Complication Screening: Perform chest X-ray to rule out upper airway obstruction or pneumonia [52].
| Test | Expected Finding | Timing | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Exam | Trismus, Risus Sardonicus | Early | High | High |
| Spatula Test | Reflex masseter spasm | Early | Moderate | High |
| Wound Culture | C. tetani growth | 2–7 days | Low (~30%) | High |
| Serum Antitoxin | <0.01 IU/mL (susceptible) | Early | High (for exclusion) | Low |
| EMG | Continuous motor unit activity | Variable | Moderate | Moderate |
| Chest X-ray | Aspiration pneumonia | Late | Moderate | N/A |
Supportive Care and Complication Management
- ▸Spasm-related respiratory failure is the leading cause of death in non-ventilated patients, while autonomic dysfunction is the primary cause in ventilated patients.
- ▸Magnesium sulfate (70 mg/kg bolus, then 2 g/hr) is the preferred agent for both spasm control and autonomic stability as it reduces catecholamine release.
- ▸Early tracheostomy is often necessary due to the prolonged nature of the disease (3-6 weeks) and the risk of laryngospasm.
The of severe tetanus requires a multi-faceted approach focused on neutralizing the toxin, controlling life-threatening muscle spasms, and stabilizing the autonomic nervous system. In resource-limited settings, spasm-related respiratory failure is the primary cause of death, whereas in modern intensive care units (ICUs), autonomic dysfunction and secondary nosocomial infections are the leading contributors to mortality [56][60]D. Effective supportive care involves minimizing external stimuli (light and noise) to prevent triggered spasms and providing aggressive [61]D.
Step 1: Initial Assessment and Severity Classification
Upon presentation, clinicians must immediately classify the severity of tetanus to determine the appropriate level of care. Patients with a short incubation period (< 7 days) or a short onset period (< 48 hours) are at the highest risk for rapid progression and death [1][2].
- Mild/Moderate (Grade 1-2): Characterized by mild trismus or localized spasms without respiratory compromise. These patients may be managed in a high-dependency unit but require frequent monitoring for progression.
- Severe (Grade 3-4): Defined by generalized spasms, opisthotonus, and respiratory distress [2]. These patients require immediate ICU admission for airway protection and continuous monitoring of autonomic stability [53][60]D.
Step 2: Airway Protection and Ventilatory Support
Airway management is the highest priority. or severe spasms of the intercostal muscles and diaphragm can lead to sudden asphyxia [57]C[63]C.
- Protocol: For patients with Grade 3 or 4 tetanus, early tracheal intubation or tracheostomy is recommended [60]D. Tracheostomy is often preferred due to the anticipated long duration of mechanical ventilation (often 3-4 weeks) and the risk of triggering spasms during endotracheal tube [57]C.
- Reasoning: Spasm-related respiratory failure is the most common cause of death in non-ventilated patients [56]. While general anesthetics like propofol or sevoflurane can temporarily relieve tetany to allow for airway control, they do not address the underlying toxin-mediated pathology [63]C.
Step 3: Control of Muscle Spasms
Muscle spasms are painful and can lead to fractures, , and respiratory arrest.
- First-line (Magnesium Sulfate): Administer a 70 mg/kg IV bolus over 30 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 2 g/hour [58]. The infusion should be titrated to maintain the patellar tendon reflex; if the reflex is lost, the dose must be reduced to avoid magnesium toxicity [58].
- Second-line (Benzodiazepines): Diazepam (IV infusion 5-20 mg/kg/day) is traditionally used but carries a high risk of prolonged sedation and respiratory depression, which may necessitate mechanical ventilation even if spasms are controlled [4][54].
- Reasoning: Magnesium sulfate acts as a calcium antagonist at the neuromuscular junction and reduces presynaptic acetylcholine release. It has been shown to improve muscle spasm control and reduce the requirement for other sedatives (Level 1b) [55][56].
Step 4: Management of Autonomic Instability
Autonomic dysfunction typically manifests in the second week of the disease as "autonomic storms," characterized by labile , tachycardia, and profound diaphoresis [64]C[65]C.
- Protocol: Continue Magnesium Sulfate as the primary stabilizer. If hypertension persists, add Labetalol (0.25-0.5 mg/min IV infusion) or alpha-2 agonists such as Dexmedetomidine [65]C.
- Reasoning: Autonomic impairment in tetanus involves a loss of inhibitory control over the sympathetic nervous system and impaired baroreflex sensitivity [64]C. Magnesium is preferred because it reduces urinary catecholamine excretion, specifically adrenaline, thereby stabilizing the cardiovascular system (Level 1b) [55].
Step 5: Prevention of Complications and Transition
Long-term ICU stays place tetanus patients at high risk for secondary complications.
- Secondary Infections: and sepsis are major risk factors for mortality [1]. Prophylactic are not recommended, but a low threshold for treating suspected infections is necessary.
- Nutrition and Thromboembolism: High caloric intake is required due to the metabolic demands of constant muscle rigidity. Start enteral nutrition early. Administer Enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily for VTE prophylaxis.
- Resolution and Discharge: Spasms typically subside over 3-6 weeks. Transition from IV to oral medications (e.g., oral diazepam or baclofen) once the patient can swallow and spasms are infrequent. Functional recovery, especially in older adults, may be prolonged, requiring intensive physical therapy to restore activities of daily living (ADL) [42].
| Drug | Dose | Route | Indication | Key ADR / Monitoring | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnesium Sulfate | 70 mg/kg bolus, then 2 g/hr | IV | Spasms & Autonomic instability | Loss of patellar reflex, respiratory depression | 1b [56][58] |
| Diazepam | 5-20 mg/kg/day | IV Infusion | Muscle rigidity/spasms | Severe sedation, respiratory failure | 2a [4][54] |
| Labetalol | 0.25-0.5 mg/min | IV Infusion | Refractory hypertension | Bradycardia, heart block | 4 [65]C |
| Intrathecal Baclofen | 50-2000 μg/day | Intrathecal | Refractory Grade 4 spasms | CSF leak, meningitis risk | 4 [46]C |
| Human Antitoxin | 3000-6000 IU | IM | Toxin neutralization | Injection site pain | 1b [41] |
Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes
- ▸The incubation period (<7 days) and period of onset (<48 hours) are the most reliable clinical predictors of mortality.
- ▸Natural infection does not confer immunity; survivors must be vaccinated with Td or Tdap to prevent recurrence.
- ▸Functional recovery is slow, often requiring 6 months for patients to regain independent ambulation.
The prognosis of tetanus is highly variable, ranging from mild muscle stiffness to a rapidly fatal course characterized by autonomic instability and respiratory failure. Despite the availability of intensive care and antitoxins, tetanus remains associated with significant morbidity and a high mortality rate, particularly in resource-limited settings [1][53]. The clinical course is often protracted, requiring weeks of mechanical ventilation and months of physical rehabilitation to achieve functional independence [42].
Mortality and Case Fatality Rates
Global mortality from tetanus is estimated between 26,000 and 48,000 deaths annually, with the majority of these occurring in children within lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [42]. In hospitalized adult populations, mortality rates vary significantly by region and the level of supportive care available. A systematic review of adult tetanus in Africa reported high case-fatality rates, reflecting the challenges of managing severe autonomic dysfunction without advanced monitoring [53]. In specialized centers in China, mortality has been reported at approximately 25.3% for moderate to severe cases [44]. Conversely, in high-income countries like Japan, where the disease primarily affects older adults, the mortality 3-7% range is achievable with modern intensive care, though the functional toll on survivors remains high [42].
Prognostic Factors and Risk Stratification
The most critical predictors of a poor outcome are the speed of disease progression and the patient's age. The incubation period (time from injury to first symptom) and the period of onset (time from first symptom to first generalized spasm) are the primary clinical indicators of severity [44][51].
- Incubation Period: An incubation period <7 days is strongly associated with severe disease and higher mortality [44][51].
- Period of Onset: A period of onset <48 hours indicates a rapid toxin fixation within the central nervous system, often leading to life-threatening spasms and autonomic storms [44].
- Age: Advanced age is a significant independent risk factor for mortality, likely due to reduced physiological reserve and a higher prevalence of comorbidities [51].
- Respiratory Complications: The development of or upper airway obstruction significantly worsens the prognosis, with survival rates dropping sharply in patients who develop these secondary complications [52].
Validated Prognostic Scoring
Clinicians use several scoring systems to predict outcomes and guide the intensity of intervention. While the APACHE II score is often used in general ICU settings (with mean scores of 10.6 ± 3.4 in surviving tetanus patients), disease-specific scores like the Dakar or Phillips scores are more tailored to the unique pathophysiology of tetanospasmin [44]. These scores typically incorporate the incubation period, the site of entry (e.g., umbilical or postsurgical infections carry higher risk), and the presence of generalized spasms upon admission.
Recovery Timeline and Functional Outcomes
Recovery from tetanus is a slow process because the binding of tetanospasmin to neuronal membranes is irreversible. Clinical improvement requires the growth of new axonal terminals, which can take several weeks [41].
- Weeks 1–2 (Acute Phase): Focus is on survival, managing spasms, and preventing autonomic instability.
- Weeks 3–6 (Stabilization): Gradual reduction in spasms; patients may begin .
- Months 1–6 (Rehabilitation): Intensive physical therapy is required to overcome muscle atrophy and joint contractures. Approximately 80% walk independently at 6 months, though older adults may experience a permanent decline in their Activities of Daily Living (ADL) as measured by the Barthel Index [42].
Long-term Sequelae and Recurrence
Survivors often face a constellation of physical and psychological challenges. Common long-term issues include persistent muscle stiffness, chronic pain, and psychological distress, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following prolonged ICU stays. Rare complications, such as the induction of type 1 leprosy reactions in patients with co-existing leprosy, have also been documented [43]C.
Crucially, tetanus does not confer natural immunity. The amount of toxin required to cause disease is lower than the amount required to stimulate an immune response. Therefore, all survivors must receive a complete primary vaccination series or booster (e.g., Td or Tdap) to prevent recurrence [68][70]. Maternal immunization remains the most effective strategy for preventing neonatal tetanus, ensuring the transfer of protective antibodies to the fetus [69][71]D.
| Factor | Good Prognosis | Poor Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
| Incubation Period | >10 days | <7 days |
| Period of Onset | >48 hours | <48 hours |
| Age | Younger adults/Children | Neonates and Elderly (>65) |
| Site of Entry | Distal extremity (e.g., foot) | Head, neck, or umbilical cord |
| Autonomic Symptoms | Absent | Present (tachycardia, labile BP) |
| Respiratory Status | Spontaneous breathing | Requirement for mechanical ventilation |
Special Populations
- ▸Seroprotection rates drop to approximately 5.38% in adults over age 50, necessitating aggressive booster strategies in the elderly.
- ▸Maternal Tdap vaccination between 27-36 weeks gestation is the gold standard for preventing neonatal tetanus via transplacental IgG transfer.
- ▸Immunosuppressive therapy, specifically Mycophenolate mofetil, significantly blunts the serological response to tetanus toxoid boosters.
of tetanus requires specific adjustments for populations with altered immune responses, physiological changes, or waning immunity. While the core pathophysiology of Clostridium tetani neurotoxicity remains constant, the clinical approach to prevention and treatment must be tailored to address the unique risks of neonates, pregnant women, the elderly, and the immunocompromised.
Pregnancy and Maternal-Fetal Health
Tetanus in pregnancy remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where vaccination coverage is often suboptimal [72][82]D. Maternal immunization is the primary strategy for preventing both maternal and neonatal tetanus through the passive transfer of maternal neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG) and secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) across the placenta and through human milk [73][79]. This transfer provides the neonate with critical protection during the first few months of life before they can complete their own primary vaccination series [79].
Vaccination Protocols in Pregnancy Routine administration of the tetanus, , and acellular (Tdap) vaccine is recommended during each pregnancy, ideally between 27 and 36 weeks of gestation. This timing maximizes the concentration of antibodies transferred to the fetus [76]. Recent evidence suggests that recombinant pertussis booster vaccines (ap1gen) containing genetically inactivated pertussis toxin are highly immunogenic in pregnant women and may offer a viable alternative to chemically inactivated vaccines [76]. Furthermore, maternal Tdap vaccination has not been found to increase the risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children, despite theoretical concerns regarding antibody blunting [81].
Management of Tetanus-Prone Wounds in Pregnancy
- Step 1: Assess wound severity and maternal vaccination history.
- Step 2: For clean, minor wounds in women with <3 prior doses or unknown history, administer Td or Tdap.
- Step 3: For all other wounds in women with <3 doses, administer both Tdap and Human Tetanus Immunoglobulin (HTIG) 250 IU intramuscularly at separate sites.
- Step 4: If clinical tetanus develops, standard management (metronidazole, benzodiazepines) is initiated, though delivery planning must involve a multidisciplinary team to manage potential autonomic instability during labor.
Pediatrics and Neonatal Tetanus
Neonatal tetanus typically occurs due to umbilical cord contamination in infants born to inadequately immunized mothers [82]D. The prognosis is often poor, with high mortality rates in resource-limited settings. In older children (≥6 years), new vaccine formulations such as Tdcp (adsorbed tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) have demonstrated high safety and immunogenicity, achieving universal seroconversion for the tetanus component [5].
Antibody Kinetics The half-life of maternally derived antibodies is a critical factor in determining the window of vulnerability for infants. In both term and preterm infants, pertussis-specific and tetanus antibodies decay over time, necessitating the timely initiation of the pediatric primary series at 2 months of age [77].
Geriatric Populations
In high-income countries, tetanus is increasingly a disease of the elderly due to waning vaccine-induced immunity [42][80]. Seroprotection rates (defined as anti-tetanus IgG ≥0.1 IU/mL) show a sharp age-dependent decline: while 44.00% of individuals aged 16–18 years are protected, this drops to only 5.38% in those aged ≥50 years [78].
Clinical Presentation and Prognosis Elderly patients often present with more severe disease and have a higher risk of complications such as respiratory failure and autonomic dysfunction [51]. Functional prognosis is a major concern; a significant proportion of older adults who survive tetanus experience a decline in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), as measured by the Barthel Index, and may not return to their baseline functional status upon discharge [42].
Management Modifications
- Aggressive Booster Strategy: A single booster dose in adults ≥50 years can elevate geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) from 0.033 IU/mL to 6.831 IU/mL, achieving 100% seroprotection [78].
- Passive Immunization: For post-exposure prophylaxis in the elderly, recombinant monoclonal antibodies like Siltartoxatug (10 mg IM) are emerging as superior alternatives to traditional plasma-derived HTIG (250 IU), offering higher potency and a lower risk of pathogen transmission [6].
Immunocompromised Patients
Patients with impaired immune systems, particularly solid organ transplant recipients, exhibit significantly diminished responses to tetanus toxoid boosters.
Impact of Immunosuppressants Pharmacological agents such as Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to hamper antibody responses to a broad range of vaccines, including tetanus [74]. In kidney transplant recipients, those on MMF-containing regimens have lower seroconversion rates compared to those on tacrolimus monotherapy [74].
Clinical Recommendations
- Post-Exposure: Immunocompromised individuals should be considered "unprotected" regardless of their vaccination history. For any tetanus-prone wound, they must receive HTIG 250 IU in addition to a tetanus-containing vaccine.
- Vaccination Timing: If possible, vaccinate prior to the initiation of intensive immunosuppression or during periods of minimal immunosuppression to maximize the geometric mean concentration of antibodies.
| Age Group | Pre-vaccination Seroprotection (≥0.1 IU/mL) | Post-booster Seroprotection | GMC (Pre-vaccination) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16–18 years | 44.00% | 100% | 0.079 IU/mL |
| 19–49 years | 18.47% | 100% | 0.052 IU/mL |
| ≥50 years | 5.38% | 100% | 0.033 IU/mL |
| Agent | Type | Dose | Clinical Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTIG | Plasma-derived | 250 IU IM | Standard of care; limited global supply [6] |
| Siltartoxatug | Recombinant mAb | 10 mg IM | Superior to HTIG in phase 3 trials; no pathogen risk [6] |
| Equine Antitoxin | Horse-derived | Varies | Used in LMICs; high risk of serum sickness [6] |
Prevention and Screening
- ▸Tetanus is unique among vaccine-preventable diseases as it lacks herd immunity; individual protection via a primary series and decennial boosters is the only effective prevention strategy.
- ▸Maternal immunization with Tdap during the third trimester is essential for preventing neonatal tetanus through the passive transfer of IgG antibodies.
- ▸Clinical tetanus infection does not confer immunity; survivors must be vaccinated to prevent recurrence.
Tetanus is a vaccine-preventable disease that remains a significant global health threat, causing 30,000 to 50,000 deaths annually despite the availability of highly effective toxoid-based immunizations [87]D. Unlike many other infectious diseases, tetanus does not exhibit herd immunity because spores are ubiquitous in the environment and the disease is not transmitted person-to-person [15]D[90]D. Consequently, prevention relies entirely on maintaining individual immunity through primary vaccination series and regular booster doses throughout life [15]D.
Primary Immunization Strategies
The cornerstone of tetanus prevention is the tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccine, often administered in combination with (D) and (P) antigens. These "legacy" vaccines have reduced the incidence of tetanus in the United States to less than 1 case per 10 million person-years [15]D.
- Infants and Children: The primary series typically involves a pentavalent or hexavalent vaccine (e.g., DTaP-IPV-Hib-HBV) administered in early infancy [7][86]. Studies confirm that hexavalent boosters are safe and highly immunogenic in toddlers, even when switching between different vaccine brands [86].
- Adolescents and Adults: Immunity wanes over time, necessitating boosters. In adolescents (aged 6–17), a single dose of Tdap (tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) is recommended to maintain seroprotection and address the rising incidence of pertussis [5][88]. For adults, a booster dose of Td (tetanus and diphtheria) or Tdap is recommended every 10 years [15]D[90]D.
- Adjuvant Innovations: Recent phase I trials have evaluated investigational Tdap vaccines with CpG 1018 adjuvants, which may enhance immunogenicity in adolescents and adults compared to standard formulations [84].
Maternal and Neonatal Prevention
Maternal immunization is the primary strategy for eliminating maternal and neonatal tetanus (MNT). Vaccination during pregnancy induces high levels of maternal IgG, which is passively transferred across the placenta to the fetus [79][82]D.
- Timing and Mechanism: Tdap is ideally administered during the third trimester (weeks 27–36) to maximize the concentration of neutralizing antibodies in the neonate [79]. These antibodies also persist in human milk, providing additional mucosal protection during lactation [73].
- Safety and Interference: Concerns regarding "blunting"—where maternal antibodies interfere with the infant's subsequent response to other vaccines (such as pneumococcal conjugates)—have been investigated. Current evidence suggests that antenatal Tdap exposure does not significantly increase the risk of invasive pneumococcal disease in children [81].
- Global Coverage: Despite its efficacy, coverage remains suboptimal in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to factors such as limited access to antenatal care and lack of education [72][82]D. In some East African regions, pooled vaccination coverage among pregnant women remains below target levels, necessitating targeted public health interventions [72].
Screening and Serological Monitoring
Routine population screening for tetanus immunity is not standard clinical practice in most regions; however, serological assessment is critical for high-risk groups and epidemiological surveillance [13]D[78].
- Seroprotection Thresholds: A serum anti-tetanus IgG level of ≥0.1 IU/mL is generally considered the minimum threshold for protection [78][95]D. A level of ≥0.5 IU/mL is often defined as "robust" protection [95]D.
- Waning Immunity: Seroprotection rates decline significantly with age. In one study, SPR dropped from 44% in individuals aged 16–18 to only 5.38% in those aged ≥50 [78]. This highlights the necessity of adult boosters, as older adults often lack protective antibody levels [78][87]D.
- Screening in Migrants: Unaccompanied minor asylum seekers often lack documentation of prior vaccination. Screening and catch-up protocols, including a booster dose followed by serology testing one month later, are recommended to ensure adequate immunity [92]D.
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP)
of tetanus-prone wounds is a critical secondary prevention measure. The decision to administer a tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine (TTCV) and/or tetanus immunoglobulin (TIG) depends on the nature of the wound and the patient's vaccination history [80][90]D.
Step-by-Step PEP Protocol:
- Wound Assessment: Classify the wound as "clean/minor" or "all other wounds" (e.g., contaminated with dirt, feces, or saliva; puncture wounds; avulsions; or burns) [90]D.
- History Review: Determine if the patient has completed a primary 3-dose series and the date of their last booster [13]D.
- Immunization: Administer TTCV if the last dose was >10 years ago (for clean wounds) or >5 years ago (for high-risk wounds) [90]D.
- Passive Immunization: Administer TIG (250–500 units IM) only to patients with high-risk wounds who have an uncertain or incomplete (<3 doses) vaccination history [87]D[90]D.
Prevention in Special Populations
Certain patient groups require specialized immunization considerations due to altered immune responses or increased risk of exposure.
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT): Recipients lose their prior immunity and require a full 3-dose re-vaccination series starting 6 to 12 months post-transplantation, provided they are no longer on intensive immunosuppression [89][93]D.
- Chronic Disease: Patients with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and cirrhosis are at higher risk for fatal outcomes if they contract tetanus [2][91]D. Hemodialysis patients also show significantly lower rates of robust protection (16.7%) compared to the general population [95]D.
- Undernutrition: In LMICs, stunting and undernutrition in children may be associated with reduced antibody responses to the tetanus vaccine, potentially requiring modified schedules or nutritional support to ensure efficacy [85][94]D.
Secondary Prevention and Education
Clinical tetanus infection does not confer natural immunity because the lethal dose of tetanospasmin is lower than the dose required to stimulate an immune response [87]D. Therefore, all patients recovering from tetanus must receive a complete primary vaccination series or booster as part of their discharge plan [87]D.
Patient education should focus on:
- The necessity of life-long boosters every 10 years [15]D.
- Immediate medical evaluation and wound care for deep or contaminated injuries [90]D.
- The safety profile of modern vaccines, addressing common misconceptions to improve uptake in hesitant populations [90]D.
| Vaccination History | Clean, Minor Wounds: TTCV | Clean, Minor Wounds: TIG | All Other Wounds: TTCV | All Other Wounds: TIG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown or <3 doses | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| ≥3 doses | No (Yes if >10 yrs since last) | No | No (Yes if >5 yrs since last) | No |
| Antibody Level (IgG) | Interpretation | Clinical Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| <0.1 IU/mL | Non-protective | Immediate booster/primary series required [78][95]D |
| 0.1–0.5 IU/mL | Minimal protection | Booster recommended to ensure long-term safety [95]D |
| >0.5 IU/mL | Robust protection | Adequate immunity; follow standard 10-year schedule [95]D |
Guidelines and Resources
- ▸The WHO recommends replacing monovalent Tetanus Toxoid (TT) with Tetanus-Diphtheria (Td) vaccines to address waning diphtheria immunity across all age groups.
- ▸Maternal vaccination with Tdap/Tdap-IPV is essential for neonatal protection, despite a known 'blunting' effect on the infant's subsequent primary vaccine response.
- ▸Siltartoxatug (10 mg) is an emerging recombinant monoclonal antibody that has shown superiority to traditional HTIG (250 IU) for post-exposure prophylaxis.
Current clinical practice guidelines for tetanus focus on three primary pillars: universal primary immunization, maternal-neonatal protection through pregnancy-based vaccination, and rigorous post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). While tetanus is a vaccine-preventable disease, global research indicates that coverage gaps and waning immunity—particularly in older adults and low-resource settings—continue to drive sporadic outbreaks and high mortality rates [83][1]. Modern guidelines have shifted toward the use of combination vaccines, such as tetanus- (Td) or tetanus-diphtheria-acellular (Tdap), to address concurrent declines in diphtheria immunity [104].
Global Immunization Standards
The World Health Organization (WHO) and major health agencies now recommend that tetanus toxoid (TT) monovalent vaccines be replaced by Td vaccines [104]. This transition is driven by evidence of waning diphtheria immunity in populations that only receive TT boosters. Clinical trials, such as those evaluating the TeddyVac vaccine, have demonstrated that Td vaccines are non-inferior to existing brands in terms of immunogenicity and safety across age groups from 10 to 60 years [104]. Furthermore, the use of tetanus toxoid as a carrier protein in conjugate vaccines, such as the Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (TCV), has shown sustained protection against other diseases like typhoid for up to 5 years after a single dose, highlighting the versatility of the TT platform [100].
Maternal and Neonatal Prophylaxis
Vaccination during pregnancy is the cornerstone of preventing neonatal tetanus. Guidelines recommend administering Tdap or Tdap-IPV (inactivated poliovirus) during the second or third trimester [96][97]. This strategy induces high levels of maternally derived antibodies that are transplacentally transferred to the fetus, providing immediate protection after birth [99].
However, clinicians must be aware of the "blunting" effect: high levels of maternal antibodies can significantly reduce the infant's own serological response to their primary vaccination series [97][103]. Despite this reduction in antibody titers, the clinical consensus remains that the benefits of preventing severe neonatal disease far outweigh the risks of blunted primary responses [97]. In cases where maternal vaccination was missed, an acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine given in the first week after birth has been shown not to impair later childhood antibody responses, offering a viable alternative for early protection [98].
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) Protocol
of tetanus-prone wounds requires a rapid assessment of the patient's vaccination history and the severity of the injury. The standard of care for passive immunization has long been plasma-derived human tetanus immunoglobulin (HTIG) [6].
Step-by-Step PEP Protocol:
- Wound Assessment: Categorize the wound as clean/minor or tetanus-prone (e.g., contaminated with soil, feces, or saliva; puncture wounds; avulsions; or burns).
- Vaccination History Review: Determine if the patient has completed a primary series of 3 doses and the timing of their last booster.
- Active Immunization: Administer Td or Tdap if the last dose was >10 years ago (for clean wounds) or >5 years ago (for tetanus-prone wounds).
- Passive Immunization: For patients with unknown or incomplete (<3 doses) vaccination history presenting with a tetanus-prone wound, administer HTIG 250 IU intramuscularly [6].
Recent phase 3 trials have introduced siltartoxatug, a first-in-class recombinant monoclonal antibody, as a potential replacement for HTIG. At a dose of 10 mg, siltartoxatug demonstrated superiority to HTIG 250 IU in post-exposure prophylaxis, offering a solution to the global supply shortages and safety concerns associated with plasma-derived products [6].
Clinical Prediction and Risk Stratification
Mortality in hospitalized adult patients remains high, often exceeding 10-20% depending on the region and available intensive care resources [1]. Guidelines emphasize early identification of high-risk patients to guide aggressive management. Key risk factors for fatality identified in systematic reviews include [1][2]:
- Autonomic dysfunction: The strongest predictor of poor outcomes.
- Short incubation period: Typically <7 days from injury to symptom onset.
- Comorbidities: Diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases significantly increase the risk of death.
- Clinical signs: Presence of opisthotonus and generalized spasms.
Patient Resources and Tools
- CDC Pink Book: Comprehensive guide on vaccine-preventable diseases and immunization schedules.
- WHO Vaccine Position Papers: Detailed evidence-based recommendations on the use of Td and Tdap vaccines.
- Immunization Action Coalition (IAC): Provides patient education materials in multiple languages regarding the importance of the Tdap booster.
- Clinical Calculators: Tools for assessing the Phillips Score or Ablett Classification to grade tetanus severity.
| Organization | Year | Key Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| WHO | 2024 | Replace TT with Td vaccines; single-dose TCV for high-burden typhoid areas [100][104] |
| CDC/ACIP | 2024 | Universal Tdap/Td booster every 10 years; Tdap during every pregnancy (27-36 weeks) [97] |
| Global Consensus | 2025 | Adoption of recombinant monoclonal antibodies (e.g., siltartoxatug) for PEP to replace HTIG [6] |
| UK Health Agency | 2024 | Use of dTaP-IPV in pregnancy; monitoring for blunted polio responses in infants [103] |
| Risk Factor | Impact on Mortality | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomic Dysfunction | High Increase | 2a [1][2] |
| Incubation <7 Days | Moderate Increase | 2a [2] |
| Diabetes Mellitus | Moderate Increase | 2a [2] |
| Opisthotonus | Moderate Increase | 2a [2] |
| Age >60 Years | High Increase | 2a [1] |
References
- [1]
Chen Z, Lin Z, Zhang W et al.. “Mortality and risk factors in hospitalised adult patients with tetanus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” BMJ open (2025). PMID: 40721266 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes, Guidelines and Resources - [2]
Kolsuz S, Güllü D, Karahan KD et al.. “Risk factors and preventive role of vaccination in adult tetanus fatality: a systematic review of reported cases (1990-2024) and meta-analysis.” International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (2025). PMID: 39814168 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management, Prevention and Screening, Guidelines and Resources - [3]
Nicholson L, Adkins E, Karyanti MR et al.. “What is the true burden of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and poliovirus in children aged 3-18 years in Asia? A systematic literature review.” International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (2022). PMID: 35077880 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [4]
Nepal G, Coghlan MA, Yadav JK et al.. “Safety and efficacy of Magnesium Sulfate in the management of Tetanus: A systematic review.” Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH (2021). PMID: 34403179 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [5]
Liu X, Wei C, Huang H et al.. “Preliminarily evaluation the safety and immunogenicity of tetanus, reduced diphtheria and acellular pertussis (five components) combined vaccine, adsorbed (Tdcp) in participants aged 6 years and above: a blinded and randomised, and controlled phase I clinical trial.” Frontiers in immunology (2025). PMID: 40977696 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Special Populations, Prevention and Screening - [6]
Liang Z, Liu S, Guo W et al.. “Recombinant monoclonal antibody siltartoxatug versus plasma-derived human tetanus immunoglobulin for tetanus: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial.” Nature medicine (2025). PMID: 40628965 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Special Populations, Guidelines and Resources - [7]
Nakano T, Hasegawa M, Endo M et al.. “Immunogenicity and safety of adsorbed diphtheria-purified pertussis-tetanus-inactivated polio (Sabin strain)-Haemophilus type b conjugate combined vaccine (DPT-IPV-Hib) in healthy Japanese Infants ≥ 2 and < 43 months of Age: A phase III, multicenter, active controlled, assessor-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study.” Vaccine (2024). PMID: 38582691 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Prevention and Screening - [8]
Choi UY, Kim KH, Lee J et al.. “Immunogenicity and Safety of a Newly Developed Tetanus-Diphtheria Toxoid (Td) in Healthy Korean Adolescents: a Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Trial.” Journal of Korean medical science (2021). PMID: 34931494 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [9]
Lanuza PDT, Garcia JJB, Turalde CWR et al.. “Clinical profile and outcomes of tetanus patients in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines: a ten-year retrospective study.” BMC infectious diseases (2024). PMID: 38287272 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, History and Physical Examination - [10]
Grasselli Kmet N, Muzlovič I, Martinčič Ž et al.. “Adult patients with tetanus in Slovenia 2006-2021 : Results of a national cohort study.” Wiener klinische Wochenschrift (2023). PMID: 37278856 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [11]
Rao Y, Xu X, Chen L et al.. “Delirium in tetanus patients: a review of clinical features, pathophysiology, and integrated management strategies.” Annals of medicine (2025). PMID: 40770926 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [12]
Sharma HJ, Parekh S, Pujari P et al.. “Safety and immunogenicity of an indigenously developed tetanus toxoid, diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in adults, adolescents, and children in India.” Expert review of vaccines (2023). PMID: 36883291 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [13]
Hughes MM, Amin AB, Rubis AB. “Tetanus Surveillance - United States, 2009-2023.” Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) (2026). PMID: 41980046 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Prevention and Screening - [14]
Donaghy F, Karunakaran S. “Clinical progress note: Tetanus.” Journal of hospital medicine (2026). PMID: 40818092 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [15]
Slifka MK, Thomas A, Gao L et al.. “Lessons learned from successful implementation of tetanus and diphtheria vaccination programs.” Clinical microbiology reviews (2025). PMID: 40662744 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Prevention and Screening - [16]
He L, Liu C, Nie X et al.. “Global analysis of tetanus incidence and mortality in children under 5 years: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.” BMJ paediatrics open (2025). PMID: 40374285 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [17]
Shalaby M, Catenazzi A, Smith MF et al.. “An Assessment of the Presence of Clostridium tetani in the Soil and on Other Surfaces.” The western journal of emergency medicine (2024). PMID: 39625759 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [18]
Baroncelli S, Galluzzo CM, Orlando S et al.. “Seroprotection against tetanus in HIV-exposed and HIV-unexposed infants in Malawi in 2019-2020.” BMJ paediatrics open (2024). PMID: 39317654 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [19]
Lima CP, Barreiros GM, Oliveira ASA et al.. “A Dual Strategy-In Vitro and In Silico-To Evaluate Human Antitetanus mAbs Addressing Their Potential Protective Action on TeNT Endocytosis in Primary Rat Neuronal Cells.” International journal of molecular sciences (2024). PMID: 38891974 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [20]
Bagordo F, Grassi T, Rota MC et al.. “Seroprotection against tetanus in the Italian general population.” Vaccine (2024). PMID: 38762356 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [21]
Gaumer G, Crown WH, Kates J et al.. “Analysis of maternal and child health spillover effects in PEPFAR countries.” BMJ open (2023). PMID: 38135335 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [22]
Tamir TT, Kassie AT, Zegeye AF. “Prevalence and determinants of two or more doses of tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine immunization among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from recent demographic and health survey data.” Vaccine (2023). PMID: 37949753 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [23]
Bampoe VD, Brown N, Deng L et al.. “Serologic Immunity to Tetanus in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2016.” Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2024). PMID: 37787062 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [24]
Khan MAS, Hasan MJ, Hawlader MDH. “The road towards protection of all against tetanus.” PLoS neglected tropical diseases (2023). PMID: 37733677 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [25]
Zhang T, He Q, Richardson S et al.. “Does armed conflict lead to lower prevalence of maternal health-seeking behaviours: theoretical and empirical research based on 55 683 women in armed conflict settings.” BMJ global health (2023). PMID: 37612034 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Epidemiology and Risk Factors - [26]
Perrin L, Bisdorff M, Saxena S et al.. “Predicting personalised remifentanil effect site concentration for surgical incision using the nociception level index: A prospective calibration and validation study.” European journal of anaesthesiology (2022). PMID: 36125017 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: History and Physical Examination, Diagnosis and Workup - [27]
Nomura K, Sakawaki E, Sakawaki S et al.. “Non-surgical treatment of tetanus infection associated with breast cancer skin ulcer: a case report and literature review.” BMC infectious diseases (2021). PMID: 33413196 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [28]
A R, Chandran S, Ghatak AR et al.. “Novel Mutations in CRLF1: Case Reports with Crisponi Syndrome.” Indian journal of pediatrics (2022). PMID: 35984556 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination, Diagnosis and Workup - [29]
Adeleye AO, Azeez AL. “Fatal tetanus complicating an untreated mild open head injury: a case-illustrated review of cephalic tetanus.” Surgical infections (2012). PMID: 23039234 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [30]
Skuby SO, Rhee E, Thilo EH et al.. “Tetanus and Occam's Razor: Almost Forgotten but Not Gone: A Case Report.” Pediatrics (2016). PMID: 27940761 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [31]
Ganesh M, Sheikh NK, Shah P et al.. “Detection of Clostridium tetani in human clinical samples using tetX specific primers targeting the neurotoxin.” Journal of infection and public health (2016). PMID: 26220795 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [32]
Giordano M, Ciarambino T, Di Bella O et al.. “Acute dysphagia in an octogenarian: an unusual case of tetanus.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2014). PMID: 24468126 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [33]
Vollman KE, Acquisto NM, Bodkin RP. “A case of tetanus infection in an adult with a protective tetanus antibody level.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2014). PMID: 24211286 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: History and Physical Examination - [34]
Gadoth A, Mukadi Nkamba D, Arena PJ et al.. “Assessing the feasibility of passive surveillance for maternal immunization safety utilizing archival medical records in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.” Vaccine (2022). PMID: 35570074 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [35]
Merrick M, Scarrott I. “Tetanus presenting as painful muscle spasms, dysphagia and delirium in an older adult.” Age and ageing (2021). PMID: 34115833 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [36]
Bae S, Go M, Kim Y et al.. “Clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of inpatients with tetanus in Korea, 2011-2019.” BMC infectious diseases (2021). PMID: 33750329 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [37]
Tadesse GA, Javed H, Thanh NLN et al.. “Multi-Modal Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases in the Developing World.” IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics (2020). PMID: 31944967 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [38]
Trieu HT, Lubis IN, Qui PT et al.. “Neonatal Tetanus in Vietnam: Comprehensive Intensive Care Support Improves Mortality.” Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (2016). PMID: 26407289 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [39]
Narang M, Khurana A, Gomber S et al.. “Epidemiological trends of tetanus from East Delhi, India: a hospital-based study.” Journal of infection and public health (2014). PMID: 24284024 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: History and Physical Examination - [40]
De Vito M, Capannolo G, Alameddine S et al.. “Trauma in pregnancy clinical practice guidelines: systematic review.” The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians (2022). PMID: 35703623 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Diagnosis and Workup - [41]
Van Hao N, Loan HT, Yen LM et al.. “Human versus equine intramuscular antitoxin, with or without human intrathecal antitoxin, for the treatment of adults with tetanus: a 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled trial.” The Lancet. Global health (2022). PMID: 35561721 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Supportive Care and Complication Management, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [42]
Yamamoto T, Sada RM, Yamamoto S et al.. “Functional prognosis of older adults with tetanus in Japan: a single-center retrospective study.” BMC infectious diseases (2025). PMID: 41152751 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Supportive Care and Complication Management, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes, Special Populations - [43]
Shi C, Jing ZC, Yang DG et al.. “A rare case of type 1 leprosy reactions following tetanus infection in a borderline tuberculoid leprosy patient and a literature review.” Infectious diseases of poverty (2018). PMID: 29908564 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [44]
Sun C, Zhao H, Lu Y et al.. “Prognostic factors for generalized tetanus in adults: A retrospective study in a Chinese hospital.” The American journal of emergency medicine (2019). PMID: 29891121 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [45]
Deniz M, Erat T. “Generalized tetanus: a pediatric case report and literature review.” Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo (2023). PMID: 37377323 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [46]
Aiello M, Roy S, Chitty L et al.. “Prolonged administration of intrathecal baclofen in a patient with generalized grade 4 tetanus.” Regional anesthesia and pain medicine (2024). PMID: 38724273 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Supportive Care and Complication Management - [47]
Knipe M, Embersics C, Dickinson P. “Electroencephalography of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in a dog with generalized tetanus.” Journal of veterinary internal medicine (2023). PMID: 36457276 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup - [48]
Niederschweiberer J, Lauerer M, Schweyer K et al.. “Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis following Tdap vaccination and bacterial meningoencephalitis.” Multiple sclerosis and related disorders (2020). PMID: 32877821 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup - [49]
Gordon AA, Tran LT, Phelps PO. “Eyelid and orbital trauma for the primary care physician.” Disease-a-month : DM (2020). PMID: 32622682 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Diagnosis and Workup - [50]
Okike CO, Muoneke UV, Uwaezuoke SN et al.. “The Prevalence and Case-Fatality Rates of Post-Neonatal Tetanus in a Population of Hospitalized Nigerian Children: An 8-Year Retrospective Review.” Journal of tropical pediatrics (2020). PMID: 31397484 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Diagnosis and Workup - [51]
Cheng D, Liang L, Miaomiao H et al.. “Adult patients with tetanus in Anhui Province of China from 2013 to 2022: A retrospective study.” Medicine (2023). PMID: 37800818 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes, Special Populations - [52]
Guedra M, Cortellini S, Humm K. “Respiratory complications in dogs with tetanus: A retrospective study of 53 cases.” The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne (2021). PMID: 34728847 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Diagnosis and Workup, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [53]
Woldeamanuel YW, Andemeskel AT, Kyei K et al.. “Case fatality of adult tetanus in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2016). PMID: 27538652 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management, Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [54]
Rodrigo C, Samarakoon L, Fernando SD et al.. “A meta-analysis of magnesium for tetanus.” Anaesthesia (2012). PMID: 23033859 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [55]
Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Cordon SM et al.. “Effect of magnesium sulphate on urinary catecholamine excretion in severe tetanus.” Anaesthesia (2008). PMID: 18582257 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [56]
Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Loan HT et al.. “Magnesium sulphate for treatment of severe tetanus: a randomised controlled trial.” Lancet (London, England) (2006). PMID: 17055945 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [57]
Gibson K, Bonaventure Uwineza J, Kiviri W et al.. “Tetanus in developing countries: a case series and review.” Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie (2009). PMID: 19296192 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [58]
Mathew PJ, Samra T, Wig J. “Magnesium sulphate for treatment of tetanus in adults.” Anaesthesia and intensive care (2010). PMID: 20191795 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [59]
Ogundare EO, Ajite AB, Adeniyi AT et al.. “A ten-year review of neonatal tetanus cases managed at a tertiary health facility in a resource poor setting: The trend, management challenges and outcome.” PLoS neglected tropical diseases (2021). PMID: 34874950 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [60]
Yen LM, Thwaites CL. “Tetanus.” Lancet (London, England) (2019). PMID: 30935736 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [61]
Afshar M, Raju M, Ansell D et al.. “Narrative review: tetanus-a health threat after natural disasters in developing countries.” Annals of internal medicine (2011). PMID: 21357910 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [62]
Bandt C, Rozanski EA, Steinberg T et al.. “Retrospective study of tetanus in 20 dogs: 1988-2004.” Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association (2007). PMID: 17473020 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [63]
Firth PG, Solomon JB, Roberts LL et al.. “Airway management of tetanus after the Haitian earthquake: new aspects of old observations.” Anesthesia and analgesia (2011). PMID: 21778337 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [64]
Sykora M, Diedler J, Veltkamp R et al.. “Autonomic impairment in tetanus: delayed baroreflex involvement.” Journal of the neurological sciences (2008). PMID: 18358492 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [65]
Freshwater-Turner D, Udy A, Lipman J et al.. “Autonomic dysfunction in tetanus - what lessons can be learnt with specific reference to alpha-2 agonists?” Anaesthesia (2007). PMID: 17845661 ↗
L4CASE_REPORTCited in: Supportive Care and Complication Management - [66]
Yoshino Y, Ohtsuka M, Kawaguchi M et al.. “The wound/burn guidelines - 6: Guidelines for the management of burns.” The Journal of dermatology (2016). PMID: 26971391 ↗
L1cGUIDELINECited in: Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [67]
Higgins JP, Soares-Weiser K, López-López JA et al.. “Association of BCG, DTP, and measles containing vaccines with childhood mortality: systematic review.” BMJ (Clinical research ed.) (2016). PMID: 27737834 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [68]
Han SB, Rhim JW, Shin HJ et al.. “Immunogenicity and safety of the new reduced-dose tetanus-diphtheria vaccine in healthy Korean adolescents: A comparative active control, double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase III study.” Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi (2017). PMID: 26055693 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [69]
Roos N, Lambach P, Mantel C et al.. “Maternal Immunization and Antenatal Care Situation Analysis (MIACSA) study protocol: a multiregional, cross-sectional analysis of maternal immunization delivery strategies to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.” BMJ open (2019). PMID: 31167857 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [70]
Kovac M, Kostanyan L, Mesaros N et al.. “Immunogenicity and safety of a second booster dose of an acellular pertussis vaccine combined with reduced antigen content diphtheria-tetanus toxoids 10 years after a first booster in adolescence: An open, phase III, non-randomized, multi-center study.” Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics (2018). PMID: 29630439 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [71]
Salim AM, Liang Y, Kilgore PE. “Protecting Newborns Against Pertussis: Treatment and Prevention Strategies.” Paediatric drugs (2015). PMID: 26542059 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes - [72]
Taye BA, Weldearegay BY, Yirsaw BG et al.. “Tetanus toxoid vaccination coverage and associated factors among pregnant women in East Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.” BMC public health (2025). PMID: 41044529 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations, Prevention and Screening - [73]
Deese J, Schaible K, Massierer D et al.. “Systematic Literature Review of Maternal Antibodies in Human Milk Following Vaccination During Pregnancy or Lactation: Tetanus, Pertussis, Influenza and COVID-19.” The Pediatric infectious disease journal (2025). PMID: 39951072 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations, Prevention and Screening - [74]
Fatly ZA, Betjes MGH, Dik WA et al.. “Mycophenolate mofetil hampers antibody responses to a broad range of vaccinations in kidney transplant recipients: Results from a randomized controlled study.” The Journal of infection (2024). PMID: 38432583 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations - [75]
Aydin I, May M, Pisano F et al.. “Safety and immunogenicity of SIIPL Tdap, a new tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, in healthy subjects 4-65 years of age: A Phase II/III randomized, observer-blinded, active controlled, multicenter clinical study in Germany.” Vaccine (2023). PMID: 37827966 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations - [76]
Puthanakit T, Chokephaibulkit K, Chaithongwongwatthana S et al.. “A phase 2 randomized controlled dose-ranging trial of recombinant pertussis booster vaccines containing genetically inactivated pertussis toxin in pregnant women.” Vaccine (2023). PMID: 37330371 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations - [77]
Embacher S, Maertens K, Herzog SA. “Half-life Estimation of Pertussis-Specific Maternal Antibodies in (Pre)Term Infants After In-Pregnancy Tetanus, Diphtheria, Acellular Pertussis Vaccination.” The Journal of infectious diseases (2023). PMID: 37285482 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Special Populations - [78]
Guan Q, Liu J, Tang M et al.. “A single-center, randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, phase IV clinical trial to assess the immunogenicity and safety of adsorbed tetanus toxoid vaccine in individuals aged ≥16 years.” Human immunology (2025). PMID: 41240607 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Special Populations, Prevention and Screening - [79]
Ayouni I, Mbangiwa T, Amponsah-Dacosta E et al.. “Acceptance and uptake of vaccines against tetanus, influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 among pregnant and postpartum women in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.” Systematic reviews (2024). PMID: 39237969 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Special Populations, Prevention and Screening - [80]
Ono S, Nakajima M, Yamana H et al.. “Tetanus toxoid vaccination uptake by trauma patients in Japan: A retrospective cohort study using large administrative claims data.” Vaccine (2025). PMID: 39892109 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations, Prevention and Screening, Guidelines and Resources - [81]
Thibault M, Deceuninck G, Quach C et al.. “Antenatal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization and risk of serogroup 19 IPD in children: An indirect cohort study.” Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics (2024). PMID: 38330991 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Special Populations, Prevention and Screening - [82]
Zegeye AF, Tamir TT, Mekonen EG et al.. “Number of tetanus toxoid injections before birth and associated factors among pregnant women in low and middle income countries: Negative binomial poisson regression.” Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics (2024). PMID: 38772729 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Special Populations, Prevention and Screening - [83]
Zhou C, Zuo Y, Ma J et al.. “Two decades of global research on tetanus vaccines and tetanus immunoglobulins: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and integrative review (2000-2025).” Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology (2026). PMID: 41909843 ↗
L2aSR_OBSCited in: Prevention and Screening, Guidelines and Resources - [84]
Richmond P, Nolan T, McGirr A et al.. “Phase 1 trial of an investigational Tdap booster vaccine with CpG 1018 adjuvant compared with Boostrix in healthy adults and adolescents.” Vaccine (2024). PMID: 39226786 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Prevention and Screening - [85]
Eskenazi B, Rauch S, Elsiwi B et al.. “Undernutrition and antibody response to measles, tetanus and Haemophilus Influenzae type b (Hib) vaccination in pre-school south African children: The VHEMBE birth cohort study.” Vaccine (2025). PMID: 39665976 ↗
L2bCOHORTCited in: Prevention and Screening - [86]
Guerra A, Costantino C, Martinon-Torres F et al.. “A phase 4, open-label study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib in children previously vaccinated with DTaP2-HBV-IPV-Hib or DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib (V419-016).” Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics (2024). PMID: 38327239 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Prevention and Screening - [87]
Ergönül Ö, Kolsuz S, Figueroa JP. “Tetanus.” Lancet (London, England) (2026). PMID: 41544646 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Prevention and Screening - [88]
Tang X, Xiao Y, Chen J et al.. “Immunogenicity and safety of co-purified diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine in 6-year-old Chinese children.” Nature communications (2025). PMID: 41318685 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Prevention and Screening - [89]
Epaulard O, Carré M, Hermet E et al.. “Antibody response to tetanus, diphtheria, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B, and H. influenzae b vaccines in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant adult recipients: A multicenter trial.” PloS one (2025). PMID: 41144397 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Prevention and Screening - [90]
Stala O, Patel S, Donlon C et al.. “Tetanus Control in the United States and Global Disaster Settings: Public Health Disparities and Prevention Strategies.” Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2026). PMID: 41752737 ↗
L5REVIEW_NARRATIVECited in: Prevention and Screening - [91]
Haghnejad V, Lucas M, Chevrier L et al.. “Hepatitis B Virus, Pneumococcal, Diphtheria, and Tetanus Vaccination Responses in Compensated Cirrhosis.” Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver (2026). PMID: 41968440 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention and Screening - [92]
Mühlstein-Barasche J, Gualtieri R, Wagner N et al.. “Evaluation of vaccine immunity against tetanus, hepatitis B, measles, mumps, rubella and varicella, in migrant adolescents aged 13 to 18 years arriving in Geneva in 2023.” European journal of pediatrics (2026). PMID: 41817808 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention and Screening - [93]
Paternina-De La Ossa R, Oliveira MC, Achcar JA et al.. “Immunological responses to tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in Brazilian hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.” Vaccine (2026). PMID: 41544367 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention and Screening - [94]
Salloum M, Vandermosten L, Maseko T et al.. “Assessing vaccination coverage and antibody levels for measles, pertussis, and tetanus in Boende, DR Congo: Implications for maternal and child health.” Vaccine (2026). PMID: 41455185 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention and Screening - [95]
Özsoy M, Öztürk H, Tuna A et al.. “Evaluation of anti-tetanus IgG antibody levels and influencing factors in patients undergoing hemodialysis.” Frontiers in immunology (2025). PMID: 41415284 ↗
L5OTHERCited in: Prevention and Screening - [96]
Saso A, Fröberg J, Jobe H et al.. “Mucosal immune responses to Bordetella pertussis in Gambian infants after maternal and primary vaccination: an immunological substudy of a single-centre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 4 trial.” The Lancet. Microbe (2026). PMID: 41519134 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [97]
Saso A, Kanteh E, Jeffries D et al.. “The effect of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy on the immunogenicity of acellular or whole-cell pertussis vaccination in Gambian infants (GaPS): a single-centre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 4 trial.” The Lancet. Infectious diseases (2025). PMID: 40154521 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [98]
McAlister SM, van den Biggelaar AHJ, Cooper MN et al.. “Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Given in the Week After Birth Does Not Impair Antibody Responses to Later Childhood Doses.” The Pediatric infectious disease journal (2025). PMID: 40063739 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [99]
Nakabembe E, Greenland M, Amaral K et al.. “Safety and immunogenicity of an acellular pertussis vaccine containing genetically detoxified pertussis toxin administered to pregnant women living with and without HIV and their newborns (WoMANPOWER): a randomised controlled trial in Uganda.” The Lancet. Global health (2025). PMID: 39706666 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [100]
Qadri F, Khanam F, Zhang Y et al.. “5-year vaccine protection following a single dose of Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in Bangladeshi children (TyVOID): a cluster randomised trial.” Lancet (London, England) (2024). PMID: 39396349 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [101]
Pérez Chacón G, Estcourt MJ, Totterdell J et al.. “Immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and IgE-mediated immune responses of a mixed whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccine schedule in Australian infants: A randomised, double-blind, noninferiority trial.” PLoS medicine (2024). PMID: 38857311 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [102]
O'Neill S, Grieve R, Singh K et al.. “Persistence and heterogeneity of the effects of educating mothers to improve child immunisation uptake: Experimental evidence from Uttar Pradesh in India.” Journal of health economics (2024). PMID: 38805881 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [103]
Radia K, Sapuan S, Grassly N et al.. “An observational, cohort, multi-centre, open label phase IV extension study comparing IPV immune responses to preschool dTaP-IPV booster vaccines in children whose mothers received or did not receive an IPV-containing pertussis vaccine during pregnancy in England.” Vaccine (2026). PMID: 41690287 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [104]
Susarla SK, Narang M, Khandgave PN et al.. “A Phase II/III multicenter randomized single blind non-inferiority immunogenicity and safety study of TeddyVac™ vaccine of Human Biologicals Institute in healthy subjects of 10 years to 60 years of age.” Infectious diseases (London, England) (2025). PMID: 39378070 ↗
L2bTRIAL_NONRANDOMCited in: Guidelines and Resources - [105]
Robertson CA, Jacqmein J, Selmani A et al.. “Immune persistence and booster response of a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-TT) 5 years after primary vaccination of adults at ≥56 years of age.” Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics (2024). PMID: 39555800 ↗
L1bRCTCited in: Guidelines and Resources